Paper submission guidelines
Paper submission guidelines Formal requirements
A close adherence to this norm will help the organizer
to prepare the proceedings into print quickly and will save him a great
deal of work. Each paper must not
exceed 5000 words in length, or more precisely, 36 000 characters INCLUDING spaces and footnotes (see the word count function in Word). Submit no later than November 15th 2006
(within one month after the conference). Pictures are to be handed in separately. Remember to deduce the size of each picture from the maximum limit of words/characters (approximately).
Formal properties of the text: Please submit in
Word document, Times New Roman font, 12 pt main text and 10 pt
footnotes (use Word footnote function, Arabic numbering, i.e., 1, 2,
3...). Do not use page numbering.
Formal properties of footnotes: Follow closely the following style (examples): J. Caramuel, Metalogica Disputationes de Logicae Essentia, Proprietatibus, et Operationibus Continens (=Metalogica),
lib. VII De Propositionibus, disp. II De Propositionibus Futuri
Contingentis. An Habeant Determinatam Veritatem, aut Falsitatem?, art.
I – III, pp. 352-360.
Note: use "Juan Caramuel" rather than "John". Use abbreviations lib., disp. art. Further abbreviations: c., cc. – caput, capita disp. – disputatio d. – distinctio fund. – fundamentum med. – meditatio par. – paragraphus q., qq. – questio, questiones sect. – sectio not abbreviated: pars, principium When useful, reference to the marginal number is welcome. example of a direct quotation in a footnote: J. Caramuel, Metalogica, lib. I, disp. IV, p. 21: Habitum
dico, non vero qualitatem, non speciem, non unionem, non relationem;
quoniam dari in rerum natura habitus, certum est; an autem isti sint
qualitates a speciebus distinctae; an debita specierum collectio et
ordinatio: an vero aliquae uniones, relationes, aut radicationes,
incertum.
example of a direct quotation in the main text: ...and Caramuel says the following: Habitum dico, non vero qualitatem, non speciem, non unionem, non relationem; quoniam dari in rerum natura habitus, certum est; an autem isti sint qualitates a speciebus distinctae; an debita specierum collectio et ordinatio: an vero aliquae uniones, relationes, aut radicationes, incertum.3 How are we to understand this text?..... -------------- 3J. Caramuel, Metalogica, lib. I, disp. IV, p. 21. Reference to a monograph: W. L. Craig, The Problem of Divine Foreknowledge and Future Contingents from Aristotle to Suarez, Brill, Leiden 1988, p.108.
Immediate reference to the same work: Ibid., p. 109. Not immediate reference to the same work: Craig, op. cit., pp. 104-107. Reference to an article: J. Schmutz, "Juan Caramuel on the Year 2000: Time and Possible Worlds in Early Modern Scholasticism," in: The Medieval Concept of Time: The Scholastic Debate and its Receptions in early Modern Philosophy, ed. P. Porro,
Organizer web page: Dr. Petr Dvořák |
Vytvořila společnost BENETA.cz s.r.o. 2005 ©