Logic Seminar
The seminar is usually on Mondays, from 11.30 to 13.00. The location is the Institute of Mathematics, Žitná 25, in the lecture hall on the ground floor of the rear building. The programme is announced via the mailing list.
Monday 3rd May, 11:30 - Emil Jeřábek, "Proofs with monotone cuts"The monotone sequent calculus (MLK) is the subsystem of the usual propositional sequent calculus (LK) obtained by restricting all formulas in the proof to be monotone. Atserias, Galesi and Pudlak showed that MLK quasipolynomially simulates LK-proofs of monotone sequents. We consider a conservative extension of MLK, called MCLK (LK with monotone cuts) which allows arbitrary formulas to appear in the proof, but requires all cut formulas to be monotone. We show that MCLK quasipolynomially simulates LK (even for nonmonotone sequents). We will also mention some connections to monotone decision trees.
The logic seminar is intended for people doing research in mathematical logic, including doctoral students. Talks are given by regular participants and guests on their own work as well as on interesting recent developments in the field. The prevailing themes in recent years are proof complexity, bounded arithmetic and logical aspects of computational complexity theory in general. Regular participants include members of the logic group, including a number of postdoctoral visitors and Ph.D. students. The seminars are conducted in English unless all participants speak Czech (which seems to never happen).
There is also a student logic seminar at Charles University, intended for undergraduate students.
The seminar has been organized continuously since the early 1970s, first by Petr Hájek for more than twenty years, from the early 90s until the summer of 2008 mostly by Jan Krajíček, and since fall 2008 by Neil Thapen.
Kod predmetu (MFF UK): AIL056 (zimni semestr) a AIL080 (letni semestr)
Past programme
- 12th October 2009 - Lou van den Dries, "Model theory of reals and o-minimality"
- 19th October - Lou van den Dries, "Logarithmic - exponential series"
- 2nd November - Stefan Dantchev, "Proof Complexity lowerbounds via reductions to the Pigeon-Hole Principle" - I will show how a number of known lowerbounds in Proof Complexity plus a few new ones can be obtained in a uniform way, by a kind of reduction to proving a lower bound for the Pigeon-Hole Principle (PHP). This approach makes somewhat stronger cases for studying the so-called Structured PHP (introduced by Krajicek) and for trying to find the precise connection between proof systems and pebble games studied in Finite Model Theory. I will keep all this very informal and, in particular, I will discuss many open questions and possible conjectures.
- 9th November - Sebastian Müller, "Heuristic Proof Systems" - Heuristic Proof Systems are randomized proof systems that may prove false statements, but only with a negligibly small probability. Hirsch and Itsykson recently introduced a class of randomized proof systems that can be shown to be optimal (in a certain sense) for such heuristic proof systems. We will discuss their approach and talk about the relevant proofs and assumptions.
- 23rd November - Pavel Pudlák, "Alternating minima and maxima, Nash equilibria and Bounded Arithmetic" - We show that the least number principle for strict \Sigma_k^b formulas can be characterized by the existence of alternating minima and maxima of length k. We show simple prenex forms of these formulas whose herbrandizations (by polynomial time functions) are \forall\Sigma_1^b formulas that characterize \forall\Sigma_1^b theorems of the levels T_2^k of the Bounded Arithmetic Hierarchy, and we derive from this another characterization, in terms of a search problem about finding pure Nash equilibria in k-turn games.
- 30th November - Pavel Pudlák, "Alternating minima and maxima, Nash equilibria and Bounded Arithmetic", Part 2
- 7th December - Neil Thapen, "A uniform no-gap theorem" - I will talk about some work in progress on the low-complexity consequences of bounded arithmetic theories. If the \forall \Sigma^b_1 consequences of T^{k+1}_2 are already provable in T^k_2, then the \forall \Sigma^b_1 consequences of T^j_2 are already provable in T^k_2, for any j>k. I will show that this can be done in a uniform way, and will describe a CNF formula F with the property that a bounded depth Frege lower bound for F would imply that CNFs exist separating depth k+1 from depth k Frege for all k.
- 14th December - Pavel Pudlák, "Truth, soundness and what we actually mean when we accept some axioms" - I will present some thoughts from the book I am writing which concern the concepts mentioned above. I will also explain mistakes in the attempts to apply Godel's Incompleteness Theorem to human mind.
- 4th January 2010 - Petr Hájek, "Mathematical fuzzy logic and axiomatic arithmetic" - Basic notions of mathematical fuzzy predicate logic (t-norm based) will be briefly surveyed; then various results on properties of Peano- or Robinson-like arithmetic over fuzzy predicate logic will be explained, among them classical Peano arithmetic with a fuzzy truth predicate and essential undecidability of some extremely weak variants of Robinson arithmetic over fuzzy logic.
- 11th January - Pavel Pudlák, "How to find new axioms?" and "Worlds with different arithmetic" - I will continue with more thoughts about the philosophy and foundations of mathematics that will appear in the book I am writing. As the title says, I will discuss the problem of finding new axioms. But rather than just looking for new set-theoretical axioms as is done in set theory, I am interested in looking for axioms of an essentially different nature. The second topic will be speculations about the possibility that the arithmetical truth that we have in our world is not the only possible one.
- 15th March - Stefan Hetzl, "On the non-confluence of cut-elimination" - This talk is about cut-elimination in classical first-order logic. I will show how to construct a sequence of polynomial-length proofs having a non- elementary number of different cut-free normal forms. These normal forms are different in a strong sense: they not only represent different Herbrand- disjunctions but also have different proof skeletons. This result illustrates that the constructive content of a proof in classical logic can strongly depend on the chosen method for extracting it. Joint work with M. Baaz.
- 22nd March - Pavel Pudlák, "Visions of future foundations" - This will be a continuation of my talks about the philosophy of mathematics. I will present the last section of my book in which I propose new directions in which one can develop the foundations of mathematics. In particular I will talk about: 1. worlds with different arithmetic than ours and how we can model this by nonstandard models; 2. the relation of the foundations of mathematics to the foundations of physics; I will argue that one should look for a unified foundation of both sciences.
- 29th March - Pavel Pudlák, "Visions of future foundations", Part 2
- 12th April - Nicola Galesi, "Hardness of Parameterized Resolution" - Parameterized Resolution and, moreover, a general framework for parameterized proof complexity was introduced by Dantchev, Martin, and Szeider (FOCS'07). In that paper, Dantchev et al. show a complexity gap in tree-like Parameterized Resolution for propositional formulas arising from translations of first-order principles. We broadly investigate Parameterized Resolution obtaining the following main results: 1) We introduce a purely combinatorial approach to obtain lower bounds to the proof size in tree-like Parameterized Resolution. For this we devise a new asymmetric Prover-Delayer game which characterizes proofs in (parameterized) tree-like Resolution. By exhibiting good Delayer strategies we then show lower bounds for the pigeonhole principle as well as the order principle. 2) Interpreting a well-known FPT algorithm for vertex cover as a DPLL procedure for Parameterized Resolution, we devise a proof search algorithm for Parameterized Resolution and show that tree-like Parameterized Resolution allows short refutations of all parameterized contradictions given as bounded-width CNF's. 3) We answer a question posed by Dantchev, Martin, and Szeider showing that dag-like Parameterized Resolution is not fpt-bounded. We obtain this result by proving that the pigeonhole principle requires proofs of size $n^{\Omega(k)}$ in dag-like Parameterized Resolution. For this lower bound we use a different Prover-Delayer game which was developed for Resolution by Pudlak. Joint work with O. Beyersdorff and M Lauria.
- 19th April - Radek Honzík, "Failures of GCH and SCH with large cardinals" -We will study the implications large cardinals have on the behaviour of the function \alpha \to 2^\alpha for regular and singular \alpha's. The talk will be in essence introductory, no expertise in set theory is assumed. We will start by motivating the notion of large cardinals and explain the effects they have on the basic cardinal arithmetics (in terms of implications, and in terms of consistency results). In the course of the talk, some original results in this area will be stated.
- 26th April - Radek Honzík, "Failures of GCH and SCH with large cardinals", Part 2
Programme archive for 2008 / 2009
Programme archive for 1995 - Summer 2008
Auxiliary Links
Jech's library of preprints/reprints in set theory is available to students in our department
10/03/10 Neil Thapen
