Photosynthetica 2016, 54(4):508-516 | DOI: 10.1007/s11099-016-0207-9

Rearrangement of leaf traits with changing source-sink relationship in blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) leaves

E. Jorquera-Fontena1, M. Alberdi2,3, M. Reyes-Díaz2,3, N. Franck4,*
1 Programa de Doctorado y Magister en Ciencias de Recursos Naturales, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
2 Departamento de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
3 Center of Plant-Soil Interaction and Natural Resources, Biotechnology, Scientific, and Technological Bioresource Nucleus (BIOREN), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile
4 Centro de Estudios de Zonas Áridas, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Universidad de Chile, Coquimbo, Chile

The source-sink relationship is one of major determinants of plant performance. The influence of reproductive sink demand on light-saturated photosynthesis (P max), dark respiration (R D), stomatal conductance (g s), intrinsic water-use efficiency (WUEi), contents of soluble sugar (SSC), nitrogen, carbon, and photosynthetic pigments was examined in blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L. cv. 'Brigitta') during the final stage of rapid fruit growth. Measurements were performed three times per day on developed, sun-exposed leaves of girdled shoots with 0.1, 1, and 10 fruit per leaf (0.1F:L, 1F:L, and 10F:L, respectively) and nongirdled shoots bearing one fruit per leaf (NG). Girdling and lower fruit amount induced lower P max, g s, N, and total chlorophyll (Chl) and higher WUEi, SSC, R D, Chl a/b ratio and carotenoids-to-chlorophylls ratio (Car/Chl) for the 1F:L and 0.1F:L treatments. The impact of girdling was counterbalanced by 10F:L, with NG and 10F:L having similar values. Variables other than P max, R D, g s, WUEi, and SSC were unaffected throughout the course of the day. P max and g s decreased during the course of the day, but g s decreased more than P max in the afternoon, while WUEi was increasing in almost all treatments. SSC increased from the morning until afternoon, whereas R D peaked at noon regardless of the treatment. Generally, P max was closely and negatively correlated to SSC, indicating that sugar-sensing mechanisms played an important role in regulation of blueberry leaf photosynthesis. With respect to treatments, P max and N content were positively related, while R D was not associated to substrate availability. The enhanced Car/Chl ratio showed a higher photoprotection under the lower sink demand. Changes in the source-sink relationship in 'Brigitta' blueberry led to a rearrangement of physiological and structural leaf traits which allowed adjusting the daily balance between carbon assimilation and absorbed light energy.

Keywords: gas exchange; nitrogen; photosynthetic pigments; soluble sugars

Received: August 25, 2015; Accepted: January 26, 2016; Published: December 1, 2016Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jorquera-Fontena, E., Alberdi, M., Reyes-Díaz, M., & Franck, N. (2016). Rearrangement of leaf traits with changing source-sink relationship in blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) leaves. Photosynthetica54(4), 508-516. doi: 10.1007/s11099-016-0207-9.
Download citation

References

  1. Avery D.J., Priestley C.A., Treharne K.J.: Integration of assimilation and carbohydrate utilization of apple-In: Marcelle R., Clijsters H., van Pouke W. (ed.): Photosynthesis and Plant Development. Pp. 221-231. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague 1979. Go to original source...
  2. Azcon-Bieto J., Lambers H., Day D.A.: Respiratory properties of developing bean and pea leaves.-Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 10: 237-245, 1983.
  3. Bartoli C.G., Gomez F., Gergoff G. et al.: Up-regulation of the mitochondrial alternative oxidase pathway enhances photosynthetic electron transport under drought conditions.-J. Exp. Bot. 56: 1269-1276, 2005. Go to original source...
  4. Demmig-Adams B.: Carotenoids and photoprotection in plants. A role for the xanthophyll zeaxanthin.-BBA-Bioenergetics 1020: 1-24, 1990. Go to original source...
  5. Duan W., Fan P.G., Wang L.J. et al.: Photosynthetic response to low sink demand after fruit removal in relation to photoinhibition and photoprotection in peach trees.-Tree Physiol. 28: 123-132, 2008. Go to original source...
  6. Eberhard S., Finazzi G., Wollman F.A.: The dynamics of photosynthesis.-Annu. Rev. Genet. 42: 463-515, 2008. Go to original source...
  7. Famiani F., Antognozzi E., Boco M. et al.: Effects of altered source-sink relationships on fruit development and quality in Actinidia deliciosa.-Acta Hortic. 444: 355-360, 1997. Go to original source...
  8. Fondy B.F., Geiger D.R.: Diurnal pattern of translocation and carbohydrate metabolism in source leaves of Beta vulgaris L.-Plant Physiol. 70: 671-676, 1982. Go to original source...
  9. Franck N., Vaast P., Génard M. et al.: Soluble sugars mediate sink feedback down-regulation of leaf photosynthesis in fieldgrown Coffea arabica.-Tree Physiol. 26: 517-525, 2006. Go to original source...
  10. Geiger D.R., Servaites J.C.: Diurnal regulation of photosynthetic carbon assimilation.-Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 45: 235-256, 1994.
  11. Gilbert M.E., Zwieniecki M.A., Holbrook N.M.: Independent variation in photosynthetic capacity and stomatal conductance leads to differences in intrinsic water use efficiency in 11 soybean genotypes before and during mild drought.-J. Exp. Bot. 62: 2875-2887, 2011. Go to original source...
  12. Gonçalves J.F.C., Barreto D.C.S., Santos Junior U.M. et al.: Growth, photosynthesis and stress indicators in young rosewood plants (Aniba rosaeodora Ducke) under different light intensities.-Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 17: 325-334, 2005.
  13. Hallik L., Niinemets Ü., Kull O.: Photosynthetic acclimation to light in woody and herbaceous species: a comparison of leaf structure, pigment content and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics measured in the field.-Plant Biol. 14: 88-99, 2012.
  14. Hendrix D.L., Huber S.C.: Diurnal fluctuations in cotton leaf carbon export, carbohydrate content and sucrose synthesizing enzymes.-Plant Physiol. 81: 584-586, 1986. Go to original source...
  15. Iglesias D.J., Lliso I., Tadeo F.R. et al.: Regulation of photosynthesis through source: sink imbalance in citrus is mediated by carbohydrate content in leaves.-Physiol. Plantarum 116: 563-572, 2002. Go to original source...
  16. Jang J.C., Sheen J.: Sugar sensing in higher plants.-Plant Cell 6: 1665-1679, 1994. Go to original source...
  17. Jorquera-Fontena E., Alberi M., Franck N.: Pruning severity affects yield, fruit load and fruit and leaf traits of 'Brigitta' blueberry.-J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 14: 855-868, 2014. Go to original source...
  18. Koch K.E., Nolte K.D., Duke E.R. et al.: Sugar levels modulate differential expression of maize sucrose synthase genes.-Plant Cell 4: 59-69, 1992. Go to original source...
  19. Layne D.R., Flore J.A.: End-product inhibition of photosynthesis in Prunus cerasus L. in response to whole-plant source-sink manipulation.-J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 120: 583-599, 1995. Go to original source...
  20. Lichtenthaler H.K., Wellburn A.R.: Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents.-Biochem. Soc. T. 11: 591-592, 1983. Go to original source...
  21. Ludewig F., Sonnewald U.: High CO2-mediated down-regulation of photosynthetic gene transcripts is caused by accelerated leaf senescence rather than sugar accumulation.-FEBS Lett. 479: 19-24, 2000. Go to original source...
  22. Maust B.E., Williamson J.G., Darnell R.L.: Effects of flower bud density on vegetative and reproductive development and carbohydrate relations in southern highbush blueberry.-J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 124: 532-538, 1999. Go to original source...
  23. Nebauer S.G., Renau-Morata B., Guardiola J.L.: Photosynthesis down-regulation precedes carbohydrate accumulation under sink limitation in Citrus.-Tree Physiol. 31: 169-177, 2011. Go to original source...
  24. Nii N.: Changes of starch and sorbitol in leaves before and after removal of fruits from peach trees.-Ann. Bot.-London 79: 139-144, 1997. Go to original source...
  25. Niinemets Ü.: Photosynthesis and resource distribution through plant canopies.-Plant Cell Environ. 30: 1052-1071, 2007. Go to original source...
  26. Noguchi K., Terashima I.: Different regulation of leaf respiration between Spinacia oleracea, a sun species, and Alocasia odora, a shade species.-Physiol. Plantarum 101: 1-7, 1997. Go to original source...
  27. Noguchi K.: Effects of light intensity and carbohydrate status on leaf and root respiration-In: Labert H., Ribas-Carbo M. (ed.): Plant Respiration. Pp. 63-83. Springer, Dordrecht 2005. Go to original source...
  28. Nozue K., Maloof J.N.: Diurnal regulation of plant growth.-Plant Cell Environ. 29: 396-408, 2006. Go to original source...
  29. Paul M.J., Driscoll S.P.: Sugar repression of photosynthesis: the role of carbohydrates in signalling nitrogen deficiency through source:sink imbalance.-Plant Cell Environ. 20: 110-116, 1997. Go to original source...
  30. Paul M.J., Foyer C.H.: Sink regulation of photosynthesis.-J. Exp. Bot. 52: 1383-1400, 2001. Go to original source...
  31. Proeitti P.: Effect of fruiting on leaf gas exchange in olive (Olea europaea L.).-Photosynthetica 38: 397-402, 2000.
  32. Raven J.A.: The cost of photoinhibition.-Physiol. Plantarum 142: 87-104, 2011. Go to original source...
  33. Roe J.H.: A colorimetric method for the determination of fructose in blood and urine.-J. Biol. Chem. 107: 15-22, 1934.
  34. Roitsch T.: Source-sink regulation by sugar and stress.-Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2: 198-206, 1999. Go to original source...
  35. Strik B., Buller G., Hellman E.: Pruning severity affects yield, berry weight, and hand harvest efficiency of highbush blueberry.-HortScience 38: 196-199, 2003. Go to original source...
  36. Swain P.A., Darnell R.L.: Production systems influence source limitations to growth in 'Sharpblue' southern highbush blueberry.-J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 127: 409-414, 2002. Go to original source...
  37. Thiebus-Kaesberg P., Lenz F.: Effect of fruit load on growth, carbohydrate and mineral concentrations of leaves of 'Golden Delicious' apple trees.-Erwerbsobstbau 36: 130-133, 1994.
  38. Urban L., Léchaudel M., Lu P.: Effect of fruit load and girdling on leaf photosynthesis in Mangifera indica L.-J. Exp. Bot. 44: 2075-2085, 2004. Go to original source...
  39. Walter A., Schurr U.: Dynamics of leaf and root growth: endogenous control versus environmental impact.-Ann. Bot.- London 95: 891-900, 2005. Go to original source...
  40. Wingler A., Marès M., Pourtau N.: Spatial patterns and metabolic regulation of photosynthetic parameters during leaf senescence.-New Phytol. 161: 781-789, 2004. Go to original source...
  41. Wünsche J.N., Greer D.H., Laing W.A. et al.: Physiological and biochemical leaf and tree responses to crop load in apple.-Tree Physiol. 25: 1253-1263, 2005. Go to original source...
  42. Yong J.W.H., Wong S.C., Farquhar G.D.: Stomatal responses to changes in vapour pressure difference between leaf and air.-Plant Cell Environ. 20: 1213-1216, 1997. Go to original source...