Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2015, 51(2): 227-260 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2015.51.2.160

Why Does the Number of Voters and Invalid Ballots Decrease in the Second Rounds of Czech Senate Elections?

Karel Kouba
Filozofická fakulta, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci

The second rounds of elections to the Czech Senate consistently suffer from the lowest voter turnout among all types of elections in the Czech Republic. Moreover, voter turnout and the share of invalid votes decrease substantially between the first and the second rounds of the Senate elections. This article enquires into the causes of the decrease. It builds on theories that emphasise the salience of elections and the decisiveness of voting and using data from all Senate electoral races between 1996 and 2012 tests several theoretical predictions drawn from these theories. Two types of regression models are employed to test these hypotheses. Surprisingly, the findings show that neither the closeness of the electoral race nor the presence of an incumbent or a communist candidate has an influence on voter turnout. The decrease in turnout between rounds and between electoral cycles is best explained by the fact that first-round elections coincide with other types of elections, and by the lack of ideologically polarised electoral races in the second rounds and the fragmentation of the first round contest. The substantial number of invalid votes in the fi rst rounds can be attributed to voting error rather than deliberate electoral behaviour. The article closes with several suggestions regarding the electoral system used in the Czech Senate elections and with a discussion of the implications of the findings for current research.

Keywords: voter turnout, invalid ballots, Czech Republic, Senate elections, electoral systems

Published: April 1, 2015Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kouba, K. (2015). Why Does the Number of Voters and Invalid Ballots Decrease in the Second Rounds of Czech Senate Elections? Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 51(2), 227-260. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2015.51.2.160.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aldashev, G., G. Mastrobuoni. 2010. "Invalid Ballots and Electoral Competition." Carlo Alberto Notebooks 153: 1-40.
    2. Aldrich, J. H. 1993. "Rational Choice and Turnout." American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 246-278, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111531. Go to original source...
    3. Blais, A., R. K. Carty. 1990. "Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout." European Journal of Political Research 18: 167-181, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1990.tb00227.x. Go to original source...
    4. Carter, J. R. 1984. "Early Projections and Voter Turnout in the 1980 Presidential Election." Public Choice 43: 195-202, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00140833. Go to original source...
    5. Cisneros, G. 2013. "Movilización, escolaridad y voto nulo. La elección federal de 2009 en México." Política y gobierno 20 (1): 39-78.
    6. Colomer, J. 2007. "Non-Median and Condorcet-loser Presidents in Latin America: A Factor of Instability." Paper prepared for the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association Chicago, August 30th - September 2nd.
    7. Cox, G. W. 1988. "Closeness and Turnout: A Methodological Note." The Journal of Politics 50 (3): 768-775, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131467. Go to original source...
    8. Dettrey, B., L. Schwindt-Bayer. 2009. "Voter Turnout in Presidential Democracies." Comparative Political Studies 42 (10): 1317-1338, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414009332125. Go to original source...
    9. Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
    10. Dalton, R. J. 2008. "The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences." Comparative Political Studies 41 (7): 899-920, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414008315860. Go to original source...
    11. Fauvelle-Aymar, C., A. Francois. 2006. "The Impact of Closeness on Turnout: An Empirical Relation Based on a Study of a Two-round Ballot." Public Choice 127: 469-491, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-9004-x. Go to original source...
    12. Fornos, C. A., T. J. Power, J. C. Garand. 2004. "Explaining Voter Turnout in Latin America, 1980 to 2000." Comparative Political Studies 37 (8): 909-940, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414004267981. Go to original source...
    13. Franklin, M. N. 2004. Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616884. Go to original source...
    14. Geys, B. 2006. "Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-level Research." Electoral Studies 25: 637-663, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.09.002. Go to original source...
    15. Gregor, K., M. Pink. 2011. "Senátní volby 2010 a voličské přesuny mezi prvním a druhým kolem." Středoevropské politické studie 13 (2-3): 220-245.
    16. Hair, J. F., R. E. Anderson, R. L. Tatham, W. C. Black. 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Macmillan.
    17. Hill, L., S. Young. 2007. "Protest or Error? Informal Voting and Compulsory Voting." Australian Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 515-521, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10361140701513646. Go to original source...
    18. Hirczy, W. 1994, "The Impact of Mandatory Voting Laws on Turnout: A Quasi-experimental Approach." Electoral Studies 13 (1): 64-76, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)90009-4. Go to original source...
    19. Chytilek, R. 2005. "Volby 2004 a strategické účinky volebních systémů." Středoevropské politické studie 6 (1): 13-25.
    20. Indridason, I. H. 2008. "Competition & Turnout: The Majority Run-off as a Natural Experiment." Electoral Studies 27: 699-710, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.05.006. Go to original source...
    21. Jacobson, G. C. 1997. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 4th ed. New York: Longman.
    22. Jones, M. 1999. "Electoral Laws and the Effective Number of Candidates in Presidential Elections." Journal of Politics 61 (1): 171-184, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2647780. Go to original source...
    23. Jones, M. 2004. "Electoral Institutions, Social Cleavages, and Candidate Competition in Presidential Elections." Electoral Studies 23 (1): 73-106, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00056-2. Go to original source...
    24. Kouba, K. 2014. "Důsledky prezidentských volebních systémů v Latinské Americe." Politologická revue 20 (1): 27-48.
    25. Lebeda, T. 2011. "Dopady dvoukolového většinového systému na reprezentaci stran v českém Senátu." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 47 (2): 243-271.
    26. Linek, L. 2013. Kam se ztratili voliči? Vysvětlení vývoje volební účasti v České republice v letech 1990-2010. Brno: CDK.
    27. Malcová, K. 2012. "Lokální aspekt volební podpory kandidátů do Senátu Parlamentu ČR." Sociologicky časopis / Czech Sociological Review 48 (2): 283-313.
    28. Mainwaring, S., M. Shugart. 1997. "Conclusion: Presidentialism and the Party System." Pp. 394-439 in S. Mainwaring, M. S. Shugart (eds.). Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174800. Go to original source...
    29. McAllister, I., T. Makkai. 1993. "Institutions, Society, or Protest? Explaining Invalid Votes in Australian Elections." Electoral Studies 12: 23-40, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(93)90004-4. Go to original source...
    30. Neter, J., W. Wasserman, M. H. Kutner. 1989. Applied Linear Regression Models. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
    31. Nový, M. 2013. "Mobilizace proti levici? Stranické konsekvence volební účasti v kontextu postkomunismu." Středoevropské politické studie 15 (1): 25-39, http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/CEPSR.2012.1.25. Go to original source...
    32. Power, T. J., J. C. Garand. 2007. "Determinants of Invalid Voting in Latin America." Electoral Studies 26: 432-444, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.11.001. Go to original source...
    33. Riker, W., P. C. Ordeshook. 1968. "A Theory of the Calculus of Voting." American Political Science Review 62 (1): 25-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1953324.
    34. Roberts, A., J. Seawright, J. Cyr. 2013. "Do Electoral Laws Affect Women's Representation?" Comparative Political Studies 46 (12): 1555-1581, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463906. Go to original source...
    35. Rosenthal, H., S. Sen. 1973. "Electoral Participation in the French Fifth Republic." American Political Science Review 67 (1): 29-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1958526. Go to original source...
    36. Shugart, M., J. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies. Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173988. Go to original source...
    37. Simonovits, G. 2012. "Competition and Turnout Revisited: The Importance of Measuring Expected Closeness Accurately." Electoral Studies 31: 364-371, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.01.009. Go to original source...
    38. Smets, K., C. van Ham. 2013. "The Embarrassment of Riches? A Meta-analysis of Individual-Level Research on Voter Turnout." Electoral Studies 32 (2): 344-359, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2012.12.006. Go to original source...
    39. Uggla, F. 2008. "Incompetence, Alienation, or Calculation? Explaining Levels of Invalid Ballots and Extra-Parliamentary Votes." Comparative Political Studies 41 (8): 1141-1164, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0010414007301702. Go to original source...
    40. Volby do orgánov samosprávnych krajov 2013 [online]. 2013. Štatistický úrav Slovenskej republiky [cit. 13. 10. 2014]. Dostupné z: http://volby.statistics.sk/osk/osk2013/VUC/download_sk.html.
    41. Zulfikarpasic, A. 2001. "Le vote blanc: Abstention civique ou expression politique?" Revue Française de Science Politique 51: 247-268, http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.2001.403618. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content