Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2018, 54(6): 859-880 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2018.54.6.433

Lobbying and Advocacy: Brussels' Competition Lawyers as Brokers in European Public Policies

Lola Avril
Université Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne

Studying the role of lawyers specialising in competition law, this paper shows that they are essential intermediaries between the European administrative field and the private sector. Using both qualitative (interviews and archives) and quantitative (database) methods, it demonstrates that intermediation activities developed in the late 1980s with the arrival of American law firms, which exported their working methods to Europe. This led to a fierce competition between law firms, which tried to recruit from inside the European Commission. Circulation between the European institutions started to be common and slowly became regulated, a process that gave it legitimacy. While new activities developed for a part of the legal profession, most notably lobbying and intermediation activities, lawyers contributed to blurring the border between the public and the private sphere at the European level. The importance of circulation between the administrative sphere and law firms and the embeddedness between the public and the private sector are thus incentives for overcoming institutional frontiers when studying the European field of power. Because circulation facilitates the development of social networks, common practices, and shared representations, it is essential to maintaining coherence within this 'weak field'.

Keywords: EU studies; sociology of professions, lobbying, revolving doors, political sociology of the EU, legal professions

Published: December 1, 2018Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Avril, L. (2018). Lobbying and Advocacy: Brussels' Competition Lawyers as Brokers in European Public Policies. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review54(6), 859-880. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2018.54.6.433.
Download citation

References

  1. 1989a. 'Brussels Breakthrough.' International Financial Law Review, May, p. 2. 1989b. 'Brussels Still Filling Up.' International Financial Law Review, August, p. 8.
  2. Abbott, A. 1988. The System of Profession. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Alter, K. 2001. Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Bourdieu, P. 1980. 'Le Capital social.' Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 31 (1): 2-3.
  5. Brown, C. 1984. 'Europe's Law Firms: The Next 10 Years.' International Financial Law Review: 5.
  6. Bourdieu, P. 1987. 'The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field.' Hastings Law Journal 38 (5): 805-813.
  7. Cini, M. 2008. 'European Commission Reform and the Origins of the European Transparency Initiative.' Journal of European Public Policy 15 (5): 743-760, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802133245. Go to original source...
  8. Cini, M. and L. McGowan. 1998. Competition Policy in the European Union. Basingstoke: Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26710-1. Go to original source...
  9. Council. 1968. Council Regulation 459/68 on Protection against Dumping or the Granting of Bounties or Subsidies by Countries Which Are Not Members of the European Economic Community, 5 April 1968, OJ L 93/1.
  10. Council. 1979. Council Regulation 3017/79 on Protection against Dumped or Subsidised Imports from Countries Not Members of the European Economic Community, 20 December 1979, OJ L 339/1.
  11. Council. 1984. Council Regulation 2176/84 on Protection against Dumped or Subsidized Imports from Countries Not Members of the European Economic Community, 23 July 1984, OJ L 201/1.
  12. Council. 1987. Council Regulation 1761/87 amending Council Regulation 2176/84 on Protection against Dumped or Subsidized Imports from Countries Not Members of the European Economic Community, 22 June 1987, OJ L 167/09.
  13. Council. 1988. Council Regulation 2423/88 on Protection against Dumped or Subsidized Imports from Countries Not Members of the EEC, 11 July 1988, OJ L 209/1.
  14. Delaunay, O. 2010. 'Les Counsels à l'honneur au sein des cabinets d'avocats.' Option droit et affaires, 29 September.
  15. Denord, F. and A. Schwartz. 2010. 'L'Economie (très) politique du traité de Rome.' Politix 89: 35-56, https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.089.0035. Go to original source...
  16. Dezalay, Y. 1992. Marchands de Droit : la Restructuration de l'Ordre International par les Multinationales du Droit. Paris: Fayard.
  17. Dobry, M. 2009. Sociologie des crises politiques. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
  18. Garnerie, L. 2008. 'Lobbying: les avocats face à la réglementation européenne.' Patrimoine (July) 172: 1.
  19. Georgakakis, D. 2013. Mapping the EU Staff and Professionals. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  20. Greenhouse, S. 1991. 'US Lawyers Flock to Brussels.' New York Times, 13 May, p. 00001.
  21. Havemann, J. 1990. 'Doing Business: U.S. Law Firms Chasing New Clients in Brussels. They Hope to Cash in on the European Community's Quiet Revolution in the Way Businesses on the Continent do Business.' Los Angeles Times, 4 December.
  22. Jensen, D. 2010. 'A quoi servent les statuts alternatifs à l'association?' La lettre des juristes d'affaires, 10 January: 1004-1005.
  23. Karpik, L. 1995. Les Avocats, entre l'Etat, le Public et le Marché, XIIIe-XXe Siècles. Paris: Gallimard.
  24. Kelemen, D. 2011. Eurolegalism. The Transformaton of Law and Regulation in the European Union. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674061057. Go to original source...
  25. Kirch, P. and G. Le Breton. 2004. 'L'avocat et le lobbying à Bruxelles.' Gazette du Palais (27 March) 87: 2.
  26. Lahusen, C. 2008. 'Law and Lawyers in Brussels' World of Commercial Consultants.' EUI WORKING PAPERS RSCAS 2008/36. FI: European University Institute.
  27. Moore, A. 1980. 'The Brussels Connection.' Financial Times, 11 September: 16.
  28. Pollock, E. 1989. 'US Law Firms Catching 1992 Fever, Bet They'll Gain Edge in United Europe.' Wall Street Journal, 26 September.
  29. Ramírez Pérez, S. and S. van de Scheur. 2013. 'The Evolution of the Law on Articles 85 and 86 EEC [Articles 101 and 102 TFEU]: Ordoliberalism and Its Keynesian Challenge.' Pp. 19-52 in The Historical Foundations of EU Competition Law, edited by K. Patel and H. Schweitzer. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  30. Seidel, K. 2010. The Process of Politics in Europe. The Rise of European Elites and Supranational Institutions. London: Tauris Publishers.
  31. Slaughter, A.-M., A. Stone Sweet and J. H. H. Weiler. 1998. The Europe Court and National Courts-Doctrine and Jurisprudence. Legal Change in Its Social Context. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
  32. Stoakes, C. 1984. 'Brussels' Supranational Law Firms.' International Financial Law Review, July: 9-17.
  33. Trubek, D. and Y. Dezalay. 1994. 'Global Restructuring and the Law: Studies of the Internationalization of Legal Fields and the Creation of Transnational Arenas.' Case Western Reserve Law Review 44 (2): 407.
  34. van Bael, I. 1990. 'EEC Antidumping Enforcement: an Overview of Current Problems.' European Journal of International Law 1 (1): 118-147, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejil.a035759. Go to original source...
  35. van Criekingen, M. and J-M. Decroly. 2005. 'Local Geographies of Global Players: International Law Firms in Brussels.' Journal of Contemporary European Studies 13 (2): 173-187, https://doi.org/10.1080/14782800500212418. Go to original source...
  36. Vauchez, A. 2008. 'The Force of a Weak Field : Law and Lawyers on the Government of the European Union (for a Renewed Research Agenda).' International Political Sociology 5: 128-144, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2008.00040.x. Go to original source...
  37. Warlouzet, L. 2010. The Rise of European Competition Policy: A Cross-Disciplinary Survey of a Contested Policy Sphere. Florence: RSCAS Working paper.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.