Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2017, 53(4): 533-564 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2017.53.4.357

Between Tactics and Affect, Non-place and Place: A Visual Analysis of the Everyday Geography of Homeless People

Petr Vašát, Petr Gibas, Markéta Poláková
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i., Praha

The article uses photovoice to explore the everyday geography of homelessness and its affective dimension. We focus on two aspects of the everyday geography captured by photovoice: (1) movement in space and (2) the performativity of heterotopic places. The aim is to understand how the research partners as actors (re)present and (re)construct their everyday geography by visual means and how they relate to it affectively (or otherwise). Photovoice is a suitable method for this type of research as it has been used across the social sciences and especially in action research as a productive tool that allows people to document and reflect on their everyday life, their strengths, and their concerns, and to communicate all this effectively to the wider public. In this article, we critically discuss photovoice and argue that besides its action potential, it can also be used to generate rich visual research data. We present data collected from photovoice research on homeless people in Prague and Pilsen, two cities in the Czech Republic, and conduct formal analytical and hermeneutic analyses of the data. The photographs we obtained reveal the movement of our research partners - the homeless - in space and their relationship to different places and the people in them. In general, people were the most frequently photographed theme. The research revealed that social relations are the most important aspect in the creation and production of places in cities. Several factors, most importantly age, influence the extent to which social relations play this role.

Keywords: photovoice, visuality, affect, social relations, public space, place, everyday geography, heterotopia, homeless, Czech Republic

Published: August 1, 2017Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vašát, P., Gibas, P., & Poláková, M. (2017). Between Tactics and Affect, Non-place and Place: A Visual Analysis of the Everyday Geography of Homeless People. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review53(4), 533-564. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2017.53.4.357.
Download citation

References

  1. Amin, A., N. Thrift. 2017. Seeing Like a City. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  2. Anderson, B. 2017. "Affect." Pp. 19-29 in M. Jayne, K. Ward (eds.). Urban Theory: New Critical Perspectives. New York: Routlegde, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0763. Go to original source...
  3. Augé, M. 1995. Non-Places: Introduction to an Anthropology of Supermodernity. London: Verso.
  4. Bahr, H. M. 1973. Skid Row: Introduction to Disaffiliation. New York: Oxford University Press.
  5. Bandit, R. 2016. Naděje je na druhém břehu: životy pražských žen bez domova. Olomouc: Broken Books.
  6. Banks, M., D. Zeitlyn. 2015. Visual Methods in Social Research. London: Sage.
  7. Blunt, A., R. Dowling 2006. Home. London/New York: Routledge.
  8. Bredesen, J. A., M. S. Stevens. 2013. "Using Photovoice Methodology to Give Voice to the Health Care Needs of Homeless Families." American International Journal of Contemporary Research 3 (3): 1-12.
  9. Bolger, R. M. 1996. "Doubling-up: A Strategy of Urban Reciprocity to Avoid Homelessness in Detroit." Pp. 35-50 in A. L. Dahavenon (ed.). There's No Place Like Home: Anthropological Perspectives on Housing and Homelessness in the United States. Westport, Connecticut: Bergin and Harvey.
  10. Bukowski, K., S. Buetow. 2011. "Making the Invisible Visible: A Photovoice Exploration of Homeless Women's Health and Lives in Central Auckland." Social Science & Medicine 72 (5): 739-746, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.11.029. Go to original source...
  11. Burzová, P., T. Hirt, L. Lupták. 2015. Vizuální antropologie: Klíčové studie a texty. Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita v Plzni.
  12. Butchinski, C. 2007. "Identities of Rough Sleepers in Oxford." Pp. 10-26 in M. Seal (ed.). Understanding and Responding to Homeless Experiences, Identities and Cultures. Plymouth: Russell House Publishing.
  13. Cabassa, L. J., A. Nicasio, R. Whitley. 2013. "Picturing Recovery: A Photovoice Exploration of Recovery Dimensions among People with Serious Mental Illness." Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.) 64 (9): 837-842, https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.201200503. Go to original source...
  14. Carlson, E. D., J. Engebretson, R. M. Chamberlain. 2006. "Photovoice as a Social Process of Critical Consciousness." Qualitative Health Research 16 (6): 836-852, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287525. Go to original source...
  15. Casey, R., R. Goudie, K. Reeve. 2008. "Homeless Women in Public Spaces: Strategies of Resistance." Housing Studies 23 (6): 899-916, https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030802416627. Go to original source...
  16. Castleden, H., T. Garvin. 2008. "Modifying Photovoice for Community-Based Participatory Indigenous Research." Social Science & Medicine 66 (6): 1393-1405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.030. Go to original source...
  17. Catalani, C., M. Minkler. 2010. "Photovoice: A Review of the Literature in Health and Public Health." Health Education & Behavior 37 (3): 424-451, https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198109342084. Go to original source...
  18. Certeau, M. de. 1988. The Practice of Evereyday Life. London: University of California Press.
  19. Clocke, P., J. May, S. Johnsen. 2008. "Performativity and Affect in the Homeless City." Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 26: 241-263, https://doi.org/10.1068/d84j. Go to original source...
  20. Daya, S., N. Wilkins. 2012. "The Body, the Shelter, and the Shebben: An Affective Geography of Homelessness in South Africa." Cultural Geographies (20): 357-378.
  21. Del Casino, V., C. L. Jocoy. 2008. "Neoliberal Subjectivities, the 'New' Homelessness, and Struggles of/in the City." Antipode 40 (2):192-199, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00583.x. Go to original source...
  22. Cresswell, T. 2004. Place: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  23. Čeněk, D., T. Porybná (eds.). 2011. Vizuální antropologie: Kultura žitá a viděná. Červený Kostelec: Pavel Mervart.
  24. DeVerteuil, G., J. May, J. von Mahs. 2009. "Complexity Not Collapse: Recasting the Geographies of Homelessness in a 'Punitive' Age." Progress in Human Geography 33 (5): 646-666, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132508104995. Go to original source...
  25. "Digitales Forum Mittel- und Osteuropa." 2015. Pilsna Digitalis [online]. Die Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Kultur und Medien [cit. 22. 12. 2015]. Dostupné z: http://www.pilsna-digitalis.eu/?lang=cs%C2%A0je.
  26. Gibas, P. 2010. "Globalised Aestheticisation of Urban Decay." Pp. 155-161 in P. Mácha, V. Kopeček (eds.). Beyond Globalisation: Exploring the Limits of Globalisation in the Regional Context. Ostrava: University of Ostrava.
  27. Gibas, P. 2013. "Lidé ve městě uhlí a oceli: Vizuální analýza příkladného socialistického města." Český lid 100 (3): 341-360.
  28. Gibas, P. 2017. "Domov jako konceptuální rámec, téma i výzkumný terén: vývoj i současná podoba studií domova." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 53 (2): 241-268, https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2017.53.2.315. Go to original source...
  29. Goffman, E. 1999. Všichni hrajeme divadlo. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  30. Harper, D. 2002. "Talking about Pictures: A Case for Photo Elicitation." Visual Studies 17 (1): 13-26, https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345. Go to original source...
  31. Hasmandová, K. 2008. "Metoda photovoice a možnosti jejího využití." Bakalářská práce. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci, Pedagogická fakulta.
  32. Hejnal, O. 2013a. "Hilton jako, fekální dvůr': Socioprostorové aspekty bezdomovectví." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 49 (2): 241-267.
  33. Hejnal, O. 2013b. "Anachorický bezdomovec: Purikace a transgrese veřejného prostoru." Český lid 100 (4): 449-467.
  34. Hejnal, O. 2014. "'Naše ruiny jsou našim domovem': Bezdomovci, domov a sociální organizace." Sociální studia 11 (4): 33-49. Go to original source...
  35. Hergenrather, K. C., S. D. Rhodes, C. A. Cowan, G. Bardhoshi, S. Pula. 2009. "Photovoice as Community-Based Participatory Research: A Qualitative Review." American Journal of Health Behavior 33 (6): 686-698, https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.33.6.6. Go to original source...
  36. Heywood, I., B. Sandywell (eds.). 1999. Interpreting Visual Culture: Explorations in the Hermeneutics of Vision. London: Routledge.
  37. Hradecký, I. a kol. 2007. Definice a typologie bezdomovství. Zpráva o realizaci aktivity č. 1 projektu Strategie inkluze bezdomovců v ČR. Praha: Naděje o.s.
  38. Jackson, E. 2012. "Fixed in Mobility: Young Homeless People and the City." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 6 (4): 725-741, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01124.x. Go to original source...
  39. Jenks, C. (ed.). 1995. Visual Culture. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426449.
  40. Johnsen, S., J. May, P. Cloke. 2008. Imag(in)ing 'Homeless Places': Using A-tophotography to (Re)examine the Geographies of Homelessness." Area (40) 2: 194-207, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2008.00801.x. Go to original source...
  41. Kawash, S. 1998. "The Homeless Body." Public Culture 10 (2): 319-339, http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/08992363-10-2-319. Go to original source...
  42. Kubalová, K. 2014. "Vliv sociálního prostředí dítěte na jeho přechod z prvního stupně základní školy na stupeň druhý - případová studie." Diplomová práce. České Budějovice: Jihočeská univerzita v Českých Budějovicích, Pedagogická fakulta.
  43. Lancione, M. 2013. "Homeless People and the City of Abstract Machines: Assemblage Thinking and the Performative Approach to Homelessness." Area 45 (3): 358-364, https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12045. Go to original source...
  44. Lefebvre, H. 2002. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  45. Lombard, M. 2013. "Using Auto-photography to Understand Place: Reflection from Research in Urban Informal Settlements in Mexico." Area 45 (1): 23-32, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01115.x. Go to original source...
  46. May, J. 2000. "Of Nomads and Vagrants: Single Homelessness and Narratives of Home as Place." Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18: 737-759. Go to original source...
  47. McIntyre, A. 2003. "Through the Eyes of Women: Photovoice and Participatory Research as Tools for Reimagining Place." Gender, Place and Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography 10 (1): 47-66, https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369032000052658. Go to original source...
  48. Myers, J. 2010. Moving Methods: Constructig Emotionally Poignant Geographies of HIV in Aucklad, New Zeland." Area 42 (3): 328-338, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2009.00927.x. "MyLondon: A Different Perspective." 2015. Café art [online]. [cit 30. 12. 2015]. Dostupné z: http://cafeart.org.uk/cafe-art-calendar/my-london-a-different-perspective-on-thecity/. Go to original source...
  49. Patterson, M. E., D. R. Williams. 2002. Collecting and Analysing Qualitative Data: Hermeneutic Principles, Methods and Case Examples (Advances in Tourism Applications Series). Champaign, IL: Sagamore Publishing.
  50. Oh, S. 2012. "Photofriend: Creating Visual Ethnography with Refugee Children." Area 44 (3): 282-288, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2012.01111.x. Go to original source...
  51. Petráň, T. 2011. Ecce Homo: Esej O Vizuální Antropologii. Pardubice: Univerzita Pardubice.
  52. Pink, S. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. London: Sage, https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857025029. Go to original source...
  53. Pink, S. 2009. Doing Sensory Ethnography. London: Sage, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249383. Go to original source...
  54. Pink, S., A. I. Afonso, L. Kürti (eds.). 2004. Working Images: Visual Research and Representation in Ethnography. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
  55. Pospěch, P. 2015. Od veřejného prostoru k nákupním centrům: Svět cizinců a jeho regulace. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  56. Princ, T. 2011. "Žitý prostor dětí z cikánské osady Pod Letanovským mlýnem." Bakalářská práce. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Fakulta humanitních studií.
  57. Rodman, M. C. 1992. "Empowering Place: Multilocality and Multivocality." American Anthropologist 94 (3): 640-656, https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1992.94.3.02a00060. Go to original source...
  58. Rose, G. 2001. Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to the Interpretation of Visual Materials. London, California, New Delhi: SAGE.
  59. Rossi, P. H. 1989. Down and Out in America. The Origins of Homelessness. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
  60. Rowe, S., J. Wolch. 1990. "Social Network in Time and Space: Homeless Woman in Skid Row, Los Angeles." Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80 (2): 184-204, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1990.tb00287.x. Go to original source...
  61. Ruddick, S. M. 1996. Young and Homeless in Hollywood. Mapping Social Identities. New York: Routledge.
  62. Shari, D., N. Wilkins. 2012. "The Body, the Shelter, and the Shebeen: An Affective Geography of Homelessness in South Africa." Area 20 (3): 357-378, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474474012469886. Go to original source...
  63. Sheehan, R. 2010. "I'm Protective of this Yard': Long-term Homeless Persons' Construction of Home Place and Workplace in a Historical Public Space." Social & Cultural Geography 11 (6): 539-558, https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2010.497912. Go to original source...
  64. Sheller, M., J. Urry. 2003. "Mobile Transformations of 'Public' and 'Private' Life." Theory, Culture & Society 20 (3): 107-125, https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764030203007. Go to original source...
  65. Shlay A. B., P. H. Rossi. 1992. "Social Science Research and Contemporary Studies of Homelessness." Annual Review of Sociology 18: 129-160, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001021. Go to original source...
  66. Snow, D. A., L. Anderson. 1993. Down on Thein Luck. A Study of Homeless Street People. Berkley: University of California Press.
  67. Snow, D. A., M. Mulcahy. 2001. "Space, Politics, and the Survival Strategies of the Homeless." The American Behavioral Scientist 45 (1): 149-169, https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121956962. Go to original source...
  68. Strack, R. W., C. Magill, K. McDonagh. 2004. "Engaging Youth through Photovoice." Health Promotion Practice 5 (1): 49-58, https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839903258015. Go to original source...
  69. Strong, M., L. Wilder (eds.). 2009. Viewpoints: Visual Anthropologists at Work. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  70. Světlík, R. 2013. "Výzkum percepce krajiny za použití vizuálních metod." Bakalářská práce. Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita v Plzni, Filozofická fakulta.
  71. Světlík, R., K. Pauknerová. 2013. "Dětský svět v zapadlé vesnici na konci Čech." Pp. 155-164 in B. Soukupová, H. Nosková, P. Bednařík (eds.). Paměť - národ - menšiny - marginalizace - identity I, Urbánní studie, sv. 6. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Fakulta humanitních studií.
  72. Šlesingerová, E., B. N. Jaworsky (eds.). 2015 "Monotematické číslo Visual Studies/ Encounter Imagination." Sociální studia 12 (1).
  73. Tonnelat, S. 2010. "The Sociology of Urban Public Spaces." Pp. 1-10 in Hongyang Wang (ed.). Territorial Evolution and Planning Solution: Experiences from China and France. Paris: Atlantis Press.
  74. Toušek, L. 2013. "Prostor, transgrese a bezdomovectví." Disertační práce. Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita, Fakulta filosofická.
  75. Urbánní a regionální laboratoř. 2015. "Zpřístupnění historických prostorových a statistických dat v prostředí GIS." Historická data v GIS [online]. Urbánní a regionální laboratoř [cit. 22. 12. 2015]. Dostupné z: http://www.historickygis.cz/cs/uvod-historicky-gis.
  76. Vašát, P. 2012. "Mezi resistencí a adaptací: Každodenní praxe třídy nejchudších." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 48 (2): 247-282.
  77. Vašát, P. 2013. "'Sme na jedný lodi': Morálka a ekonomika v prostředí třídy nejchudších." Český lid 100 (4): 427-448.
  78. Vašát, P. 2014. ",Předevčírem, nebo kdy to bylo?': Temporalita třídy nejchudších." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 50 (1): 83-105, https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2014.50.1.34. Go to original source...
  79. Wagner, D. 1993. Checkeboard Square. Culture and Resistence in a Homeless Community. Boulder: Westview Press.
  80. Wang, C. C. 1999. "Photovoice: A Participatory Action Research Strategy Applied to Women's Health." Journal of Women's Health 8 (2): 185-192, https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.1999.8.185. Go to original source...
  81. Wang, C. C. 2003. "Using Photovoice as a Participatory Assessment and Issue Selection Tool." Pp. 179-196 in M. Minkler, N. Wallerstein (eds.). Community-based Participatory Research for Health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  82. Wang, C. C., J. L. Cash, L. S. Powers. 2000. "Who Knows the Streets as Well as the Homeless? Promoting Personal and Community Action through Photovoice." Health Promotion Practice 1 (1): 81-89, https://doi.org/10.1177/152483990000100113. Go to original source...
  83. Wang, C. C., M. A. Burris. 1997. "Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment." Health Education & Behavior 24 (3): 369-387, https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309. Go to original source...
  84. Wang, C. C., S. Morrel-Samuels, P. M. Hutchison, L. Bell, R. M. Pestronk. 2004. "Flint Photovoice: Community Building among Youths, Adults, and Policymakers." American Journal of Public Health 94 (6): 911-913, https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.6.911. Go to original source...
  85. Wang, C. C., Wu Kun Yi, Zhan Wen Tao, K. Carovano. 1998. "Photovoice as a Participatory Health Promotion Strategy." Health Promotion International 13 (1): 75-86, https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/13.1.75. Go to original source...
  86. Wright, T. 1997. Out of Place. Homeless Mobilizations, Subcities, and Contested Landscapes. New York: State University of New York.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.