Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2019, 55(6): 883-889

Big Steps and Blind Spots: Herbert Gintis's Take-Over of Sociology Is Economic Imperialism

Hartmut Esser
University of Mannheim

Published: December 1, 2019Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Esser, H. (2019). Big Steps and Blind Spots: Herbert Gintis's Take-Over of Sociology Is Economic Imperialism. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review55(6), 883-889.
Download citation

References

  1. Bicchieri, C. 2006. The Grammar of Society. The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  2. Fehr, E. and S. Gächter. 2000. 'Cooperation and Punishment in Public Good Experiments.' American Economic Review 90: 980-994. Go to original source...
  3. Fehr, E. and H. Gintis. 2007. 'Human Motivation and Social Cooperation: Experimental and Analytical Foundations.' Annual Review of Sociology 33: 43-64. Go to original source...
  4. Heiner, R. A. 1983. 'The Origin of Predictable Behavior.' American Economic Review 73: 560-595.
  5. Kroneberg, C., M. Yaish and V. Stocké. 2010. 'Norms and Rationality in Electoral Participation and in the Rescue of Jews in WWII: An Application of the Model of Frame Selection.' Rationality and Society 22: 3-36. Go to original source...
  6. Tutić, A. 2015. 'Revealed Norm Obedience.' Social Choice and Welfare 44: 301-318. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.