Photosynthetica, 2008 (vol. 46), issue 2

Photosynthetica 2008, 46(2):291-293 | DOI: 10.1007/s11099-008-0051-7

Leaf area prediction model for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars

J. T. Tsialtas2,1,*, N. Maslaris3,1
1 Hellenic Sugar Industry SA, Greece
2 Department of Experimentation, Larissa factory, Larissa, Hellas
3 Agronomic Research Service, Sindos, Hellas

In two successive years (2003 and 2004), a set of 16 commercial sugar beet cultivars was established in Randomized Complete Block experiments at two sites in central Greece. Cultivar combination was different between years, but not between sites. Leaf sampling took place once during the growing season and leaf area, LA [cm2], leaf midvein length, L [cm] and maximum leaf width, W [cm] were determined using an image analysis system. Leaf parameters were mainly affected by cultivars. Leaf dimensions and their squares (L2, W2) did not provide an accurate model for LA predictions. Using L×W as an independent variable, a quadratic model (y = 0.003 x2 - 1.3027 x + 296.84, r 2 = 0.970, p<0.001, n = 32) provided the most accurate estimation of LA. With compromises in accuracy, the linear relationship between L×W and LA (y = 0.5083 x + 31.928, r 2 = 0.948, p<0.001, n = 32) could be used as a prediction model thanks to its simplicity.

Keywords: leaf length; leaf width; morphology; non-destructive methods

Received: May 17, 2007; Accepted: October 8, 2007; Published: June 1, 2008Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Tsialtas, J.T., & Maslaris, N. (2008). Leaf area prediction model for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) cultivars. Photosynthetica46(2), 291-293. doi: 10.1007/s11099-008-0051-7.
Download citation

References

  1. Bhatt, M., Chanda, S.V.: Prediction of leaf area in Phaseolus vulgaris by non-destructive method.-Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 29: 96-100, 2003.
  2. Bosemark, N.O.: Genetics and breeding.-In: Cooke, D.A., Scott, R.K. (ed.): The Sugar Beet Crop: Science into Practice. Pp. 67-119. Chapman & Hall, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993. Go to original source...
  3. Camargo Neto, J., Meyer, G.E., Jones, D.D., Samal, A.K.: Plant species identification using Elliptic Fourier leaf shape analysis.-Comp. electron. Agr. 50: 121-134, 2006. Go to original source...
  4. Cristofori, V., Rouphael, Y., Mendoza-de Gyves, E., Bignami, C.: A simple model for estimating leaf area of hazelnut from linear measurements.-Sci. Hort. 113: 221-225, 2007. Go to original source...
  5. Du, J.X., Wang, X.F., Zhang, G.J.: Leaf shape based plant species recognition.-Appl. Math. Comput. 185: 883-893, 2007.
  6. Gamper, H.: Nondestructive estimates of leaf area in white clover using predictive formulae: The contribution of genotype identity to trifoliate leaf area.-Crop Sci. 45: 2552-2556, 2005. Go to original source...
  7. Goudriaan, J., van Laar, H.H.: Modelling Potential Crop Growth Processes.-Kluwer Academic Publ., Dordrecht 1994. Go to original source...
  8. Iwata, H., Nesumi, H., Ninomiya, S., Takano, Y., Ukai, Y.: Diallel analysis of leaf shape variations of citrus varieties based on Elliptic Fourier descriptors.-Breed. Sci. 52: 89-94, 2002a. Go to original source...
  9. Iwata, H., Nesumi, H., Ninomiya, S., Takano, Y., Ukai, Y.: The evaluation of genotype × environment interactions of citrus leaf morphology using image analysis and Elliptic Fourier descriptors.-Breed. Sci. 52: 243-251, 2002b. Go to original source...
  10. Iwata, H., Ukai, Y.: SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on Elliptic Fourier descriptors.-J. Heredity 93: 384-385, 2002. Go to original source...
  11. Kessler, S., Sinha, N.: Shaping up: the genetic control of leaf shape.-Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7: 65-72, 2004.
  12. Květ, J., Marshall, J.K.: Assessment of leaf area and other assimilating plant surfaces.-In: Šesták, Z., Čatský, J., Jarvis, P.G. (ed.): Plant Photosynthetic Production. Manual of Methods. Pp. 517-555. Dr W. Junk Publ., The Hague 1971.
  13. Lu, H.-Y., Lu, C.-T., Wei, M.-L., Chan, L.-F.: Comparison of different models for nondestructive leaf area estimation in taro.-Agron. J. 96: 448-453, 2004. Go to original source...
  14. Mendoza-de Gyves, E., Rouphael, Y., Cristofori, V., Mira, F.R.: A non-destructive, simple and accurate model for estimation of the individual leaf area of kiwi (Actinidia deliciosa).-Fruits 62: 1-7, 2007. Go to original source...
  15. Ober, E.S., Le Bloa, M., Clark, C.J.A., Royal, A., Jaggard, K.W., Pidgeon, J.D.: Evaluation of physiological traits as indirect selection criteria for drought tolerance in sugar beet.-Field Crops Res. 91: 231-249, 2005. Go to original source...
  16. Ober, E.S., Luterbacher, M.C.: Genotypic variation for drought tolerance in Beta vulgaris.-Ann. Bot. 89: 917-924, 2002. Go to original source...
  17. Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Fanasca, S., Karam, F.: Leaf area estimation of sunflower leaves from simple linear measurements.-Photosynthetica 45: 306-308, 2007. Go to original source...
  18. Rouphael, Y., Rivera, C.M., Cardarelli, M., Fanasca, S., Colla, G.: Leaf area estimation from linear measurements in zucchini plants of different ages.-J. hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 81: 238-241, 2006. Go to original source...
  19. Salerno, A., Rivera, C.M., Rouphael, Y., Colla, G., Cardarelli, M., Pierandrei, F., Rea, E., Saccardo, F.: Leaf area estimation of radish from simple linear measurements.-Adv. hortic. Sci. 19: 213-215, 2005.
  20. Scott, R.K., Jaggard, K.W.: Crop physiology and agronomy.-In: Cooke, D.A., Scott, R.K. (ed.): The Sugar Beet Crop: Science into Practice. Pp. 179-237. Chapman & Hall, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1993. Go to original source...
  21. Serdar, Ü., Demirsoy, H.: Non-destructive leaf area estimation in chestnut.-Sci. Hort. 108: 227-230, 2006. Go to original source...
  22. Stewart, D.W., Dwyer, L.M.: Mathematical characterization of leaf shape and area of maize hybrids.-Crop Sci. 39: 422-427, 1999. Go to original source...
  23. Tsialtas, J.T., Maslaris, N.: Leaf area estimation in a sugar beet cultivar by linear models.-Photosynthetica 43: 477-479, 2005. Go to original source...