Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2015, 51(2): 261-278 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2015.51.2.161

Cohabitation - Joint Living without a Joint Purse?

Dana Hamplová
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i, Praha

The article uses ISSP 2012 data to investigate money allocation practices in Czech households. It examines the extent to which married and cohabiting couples differ with respect to money pooling and whether the observed differences can be attributed to the socio-demographic composition of married and unmarried couples or different value orientations. The empirical part uses a sequential logistic analysis. First, the odds of pooling (versus non-pooling) are explored; second, the odds of using fully independent money management (versus partial pooling) are estimated. The results show that cohabiting couples are more likely not to pool money and are more likely to keep their money completely separate. Although the socio-demographic composition of the couples explains some of the differences, it does not account fully for all the differences observed. Even if the socio-demographic and value differences are controlled cohabiting couples are still more than twice as likely not to pool their money.

Keywords: income management, pooling, marriage, cohabitation, ISSP 2012

Published: April 1, 2015Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hamplová, D. (2015). Cohabitation - Joint Living without a Joint Purse? Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review51(2), 261-278. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2015.51.2.161.
Download citation

References

  1. Addo, F. R., S. Sassler. 2010. "Financial Arrangements and Relationship Quality in Low-income Couples." Family Relations 59: 408-423, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00612.x. Go to original source...
  2. Baatrup, S., K. Waaldijk. 2005. "Major Legal Consequences of Marriage, Cohabitation and Registered Partnerships for Different-sex and Same-sex Partners in Denmark." Pp. 67-78 in K. Waaldijk (ed.). More or Less Together. Paris: INED.
  3. Barlow, A. 2004. "Regulation of Cohabitation, Changing Family Policies and Social Attitudes: A Discussion of Britain within Europe." Law and Policy 26: 57-86, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0265-8240.2004.00163.x. Go to original source...
  4. Becker, G. S. 1996. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge (MA, USA), London: Harvard University Press.
  5. Bonke, J., M. Browning. 2009. "The Allocation of Expenditures within the Household: A New Survey." Fiscal Studies 30: 461-481, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.2009.00104.x. Go to original source...
  6. Brines, J., K. Joyner. 1999. "The Ties that Bind: Principles of Cohesion in Cohabitation and Marriage." American Sociological Review 64: 333-355, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2657490. Go to original source...
  7. Buis, M. L. 2011. "The Consequences of Unobserved Heterogeneity in a Sequential Logit Model." Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 29: 247-262. Go to original source...
  8. Burgoyne, C. B., V. Morison. 1997. "Money in Remarriage: Keeping Things Simple-and separate." The Sociological Review 45: 363-395, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2010.12.006. Go to original source...
  9. ČSÚ. 2011. Metodické vysvětlivky k šetření Životní podmínky 2011 [online]. ČSÚ [cit. 18. 3. 2015]. Dostupné z: http://www.czso.cz/csu/2010edicniplan.nsf/t/BB00497314/$File/301210mc.pdf.
  10. Elizabeth, V. 2001. "Managing Money, Managing Coupledom: A Critical Examination of Cohabitants' Money Management Practices." The Sociological Review 49: 389-411, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00338. Go to original source...
  11. Gray, E., A. Evans. 2008. "Do Couples Share Income?" Australian Journal of Social Issues 43: 441-457. Go to original source...
  12. Hamplová, D. 2002. "Marriage and Cohabitation: Qualitative Differences in Partnership Arrangements." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 38: 771-788.
  13. Hamplová, D., C. Le Bourdais. 2009. "One Pot or Two Pot Strategies? Income Pooling in Married and Unmarried Households in Comparative Perspective." Journal of Comparative Family Studies 40 (3): 355-385, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12138. Go to original source...
  14. Hamplová, D., C. Le Bourdais, E. Lapierre-Adamcyk. 2014. "Is the Cohabitation-marriage Gap in Money Pooling Universal?" Journal of Marriage and Family 76: 983-997. Go to original source...
  15. Heimdal, K. R., S. K. Houseknecht. 2003. "Cohabiting and Married Couples' Income Organization: Approaches in Sweden and the United States." Journal of Marriage and Family 65: 525-538, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00525.x. Go to original source...
  16. Hiekel, N., A. C. Liefbroer, A.-R. Poortman. 2014. "Income Pooling Strategies among Cohabiting and Married couples: A Comparative Perspective." Demographic Research 30: 1527-1560, http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.55. Go to original source...
  17. Chaloupková, J. 2006. "Dohromady, nebo každý zvlášť? Hospodaření s příjmy manželských a nesezdaných párů." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 42: 971-986.
  18. Cheal, D. 1993. "Changing Household Financial Strategies: Canadian Couples Today." Human Ecology 21: 197-213, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00889359. Go to original source...
  19. Cheal, D. 1997. "Sociology and Social Reform." Canadian Journal of Sociology 22: 113-122, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3341566. Go to original source...
  20. ISSP 2012 - International Social Survey Programme: Family and Changing Gender Roles IV.
  21. Jenkins, S. 1991. "Poverty Measurement and the within-household Distribution." Journal of Social Policy 20: 457-483, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047279400019760. Go to original source...
  22. Kenney, C. 2004. "Cohabiting Couple, Filing Jointly? Resource Pooling and U.S. Poverty Policies." Family Relations 53: 237-247.
  23. Kenney, C. 2006. "The Power of the Purse. Allocative Systems and Inequality in Couple Households." Gender and Society 20: 354-381, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243206286742. Go to original source...
  24. Kreidl, M. 2010. "Dochází v ČR ke konvergenci hodnotového profilu lidí žijících v manželství a nesezdaných soužití?" Sociální studia 7: 85-100.
  25. Lauer, S. R., C. Yodanis. 2011. "Individualized Marriage and the Integration of Resources." Journal of Marriage and Family 73: 669-683, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00836.x. Go to original source...
  26. Ludwig-Mayerhofer, W., J. Allmendinger, A. Hirseland, W. Schneider. 2011. "The Power of Money in Dual-earner Couples: A Comparative Study." Acta Sociologica 54: 367-383, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001699311422091. Go to original source...
  27. Ludwig-Mayerhofer, W., H. Gartner, J. Allmendinger. 2006. "The Allocation of Money in Couples: The End of Inequality?" Zeitschrift für Soziologie 35: 212-226. Go to original source...
  28. Lyngstad, T. H., T. Noack, P. A. Tufte. 2011. "Pooling of Economic Resources: A Comparison of Norwegian Married and Cohabiting Couples." European Sociological Review 27: 624-635, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcq028. Go to original source...
  29. Nyman, C. 1999. "Gender Equality in 'the Most Equal Country in the World'? Money and Marriage in Sweden." Sociological Review 47: 643-857, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00195. Go to original source...
  30. Oropesa, R. S., N. S. Landale, T. Kenkre. 2003. "Income Allocation in Marital and Cohabiting Unions: The Case of Mainland Puerto Ricans." Journal of Marriage and Family 65: 910-926, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00910.x. Go to original source...
  31. Pahl, J. 1989. Money and Marriage. London: Macmillan. Go to original source...
  32. Pahl, J. 1995. "His Money, Her Money: Recent Research on Financial Organisation in Marriage." Journal of Economic Psychology 16: 361-376, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-4870(95)00015-G. Go to original source...
  33. Perelli-Harris, B., N. S. Gassen. 2012. "How Similar are Cohabitation and Marriage? Legal Approaches to Cohabitation across Western Europe." Population and Development Review 38: 435-467, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00511.x. Go to original source...
  34. Poortman, A.-R., M. Mills. 2012. "Investments in Marriage and Cohabitation: The Role of Legal and Interpersonal Commitment." Journal of Marriage and Family 74: 357-376, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2011.00954.x. Go to original source...
  35. Raijas, A. 2011. "Money Management in Blended and Nuclear Families." Journal of Economic Psychology 32: 556-563, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.02.006. Go to original source...
  36. Singh, S., J. Lindsay. 1996. "Money in Heterosexual Relationships." The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Sociology 32: 57-69, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/144078339603200304. Go to original source...
  37. Stanley, S. M., G. K. Rhoades, H. J. Markman. 2006. "Sliding versus Deciding: Inertia and the Premarital Cohabitation Effect." Family Relations 55: 499-509, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00418.x. Go to original source...
  38. Treas, J. 1993. "Money in the Bank: Transaction Costs and the Economic Organization of Marriage." American Sociological Review 58: 1723-1734, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096283. Go to original source...
  39. Vogler, C. 2005. "Cohabiting Couples: Rethinking Money in the Household at the Beginning of the Twenty First Century." The Sociological Review 53: 1-29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00501.x. Go to original source...
  40. Vogler, C., M. Brockmann, R. D. Wiggins. 2006. "Intimate Relationships and Changing Patterns of Money Management at the Beginning of the Twenty-first Century." The British Journal of Sociology 57: 455-482, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00120.x. Go to original source...
  41. Yodanis, C., S. Lauer. 2007. "Managing Money in Marriage: Multilevel and Cross-national Effects of the Breadwinner Role." Journal of Marriage and Family 69: 1307-1325, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00449.x. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.