Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2014, 50(3): 365-390 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2014.50.3.102

Rental Housing for Young Households in the Czech Republic: Perceptions, Priorities, and Possible Solutions

Jana Vobecká, Tomáš Kostelecký, Martin Lux
Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague

This paper describes changes in the housing market after the collapse of communism in Central Europe and analyses the current functions and perceptions of the private rental housing in the Czech Republic. It aims to understand why private rental housing is perceived as a sub-optimal housing solution for young adults, whether this affects their family plans, and which policy design could change that. The article uses qualitative research techniques to analyse mental frames, opinions, and attitudes of both potential tenants and landlords towards rental housing. The authors argue that the main problem of rental housing for young tenants is the short-term lease. Lack of mutual trust between tenants and landlords is a main cause of short-term contracts in the private rental segment. The insecurity it produces among young tenants contributes to delayed family formation. A policy tool aiming to overcome that distrust between tenants and private landlords through the involvement of an independent third party as a guarantor of the relationship is discussed.

Keywords: housing policy, rental housing, focus group, young households, family planning, Czech Republic

Published: June 1, 2014Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vobecká, J., Kostelecký, T., & Lux, M. (2014). Rental Housing for Young Households in the Czech Republic: Perceptions, Priorities, and Possible Solutions. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 50(3), 365-390. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2014.50.3.102.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Andersson, R. 2002. 'Some Reflection on Housing and Family Well-being.' Housing Studies 17 (1): 27-31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02673030120105866. Go to original source...
    2. Billari, F. C., D. Philipov and P. Baizan. 2001. 'Leaving Home in Europe: The Experience of Cohorts Born Around 1960.' MPIDR Working paper WP 2001-014. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. Go to original source...
    3. Boelhouwer, P. J. and H. M. H. van der Heijden. 1992. Housing Systems in Europe. Delft: Delft University Press.
    4. Butler, S. 1996. 'Child Protection or Professional Self-preservation by the Baby Nurses? Public Health Nurses and Child Protection in Ireland.' Social Science and Medicine 43 (3): 303-314, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00378-9. Go to original source...
    5. Český statistický úřad (Czech Statistical Office). 2011. 'Sčítání lidu, domů a bytů.' (Population and Housing Census) Retrieved 15 May 2014.
    6. Clark, W. A. V., M. C. Deurloo and F. M. Dieleman. 2003. 'Housing Careers in the United States, 1968-93: Modelling the Sequencing of Housing States.' Urban Studies 40 (1): 143-160, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00420980220080211. Go to original source...
    7. Donner, C. 2000. Housing Policies in the European Union. Vienna: Christian Donner.
    8. Ecotech Research and Consulting Limited. 2008. 'Young People's Housing Transitions.' Retrieved 15 May 2014 (http://www.jrf.org.uk/system/files/ECOTEC%202337.pdf).
    9. Felson, M. and M. Solaún. 1975. 'The Fertility-Inhibiting Effect of Crowded Apartment Living in a Tight Housing Market.' American Journal of Sociology 80 (6): 1410-1427, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/225997. Go to original source...
    10. Fukuyama, F. 1996. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press Paperbacks.
    11. Ghekière, L. 1992. Les politiques du logement dans l´Europe de demain. Paris: UNFOHLM.
    12. Giorgi, L., A. Kofler and D. Avramov. 2001. 'European Housing Policies Compared.' ICCR Working Papers 507. Vienna: ICCR.
    13. Glazer, N. 1967. 'Housing Policy and the Family.' Journal of Marriage and the Family 29 (1): 140-163, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/349671. Go to original source...
    14. Goldman, A. E. 1962. 'The Group Depth Interview.' Journal of Marketing 26 (3): 61-68, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1248305. Go to original source...
    15. Haurin, D. R., P. H. Hendershott and D. Kim. 1993. 'The Impact of Real Rents and Wages on Household Formation.' The Review of Economics and Statistics 75 (2): 284-293, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2109434. Go to original source...
    16. Heath, S. 1999. 'Young Adults and Household Formation in the 1990s.' British Journal of Sociology and Education 20 (4): 545-561, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425699995263. Go to original source...
    17. Housing Strategy in the CR until 2020. 2011. Prague: Ministry for Regional Development.
    18. Hughes, D. and S. Lowe (eds.). 2007. The Private Rented Housing Market. Aldershot: Ashgate.
    19. Hughes, M. E. 2003. 'Home Economics: Metropolitan Labor and Housing Markets and Domestic Arrangements in Young Adulthood.' Social Forces 81 (4): 1399-1429, http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0059. Go to original source...
    20. Kemp, P. 1997. A Comparative Study of Housing Allowances. London: Department of Social Security.
    21. Klasen, S. and A. Launov. 2006. 'Analysis of the Determinants of Fertility Decline in the Czech Republic.' Journal of Population Economics 19 (1): 25-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00148-005-0030-2. Go to original source...
    22. Kostelecký, T. 2005. 'Postoje obyvatel k situaci na trhu s bydlením a bytové politice: existují v České republice "housing classes"?' (The Population's Views on the Situation in the Housing Market and Housing Policy: Are There 'Housing Classes' in the Czech Republic) Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 41 (2): 253-270.
    23. Kostelecký, T. and J. Vobecká. 2009. 'Housing Affordability in Czech Regions and Demographic Behaviour-Does Housing Affordability Impact Fertility?' Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 45 (6): 1191-1213.
    24. Kulhavý, V. and H. Bartáková. 2007. 'Rodina a zaměstnání II. Mladé rodiny.' (Family and Employment II: Young Families) Research report. Prague: The Research Institute of Labour and Social Affairs.
    25. Lauster, N. T. 2006. 'A Room of One's Own or Room Enough for Two? Access to Housing and New Household Formation in Sweden, 1968-1992.' Population Research and Policy Review 25 (4): 329-351, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11113-006-9000-y. Go to original source...
    26. Lauster, N. T. 2008. 'Better Homes and Families: Housing Markets and Young Couple Stability in Sweden.' Journal of Marriage and Family 70 (4): 891-903, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00534.x. Go to original source...
    27. Lux, M. (ed.) 2003. Housing Policy: An End or a New Beginning? Budapest: LGI/OSI.
    28. Lux, M. 2009. Housing Policy and Housing Finance in the Czech Republic during Transition. Amsterdam: Delft University Press.
    29. Lux, M. and P. Sunega. 2010a. 'The Future of Housing Systems after the Transition: The Case of the Czech Republic.' Communist and Post-communist Studies 43 (2): 221-231, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2010.04.001. Go to original source...
    30. Lux, M. and P. Sunega. 2010b. 'Private Rental Housing in the Czech Republic: Growth and …?' Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 46 (3): 349-373.
    31. Lux, M. and A. Puzanov 2013. 'Rent Regulation and Housing Allowances.' Pp. 65-80 in Social Housing in Transition Countries, edited by J. Hegedüs, M. Lux and N. Teller. New York: Routledge.
    32. Mikeszová, M. and M. Lux. 2013. 'Faktory úspěšné reintegrace bezdomovců a nástroje bytové politiky pro řešení bezdomovství v ČR.' (Factors of the Successful Integration of the Homeless and Housing Policy Instruments for Addressing Homelessness in the Czech Republic) Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 49 (1): 29-52.
    33. Morgan, D. L. 1988. Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
    34. Neuendorf, K. A. 2002. The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
    35. Oxley, M. and J. Smith. 1996. Housing Policy and Rented Housing in Europe. London: Chapman and Hall.
    36. Peters, D. A. 1993. 'Improving Quality Requires Consumer Input: Using Focus Groups.' Journal of Nursing Care Quality 7 (2): 34-41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001786-199301000-00006. Go to original source...
    37. Pop, L. and P. Vanhuysse. 2004. 'Review Section: Varieties of Capitalism, Varieties of Theory? Conceptualizing Paths of Change and Patterns of Economic Interaction across Models of Market Democracy.' Journal of European Public Policy 11 (1): 167-177, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000164352. Go to original source...
    38. Rex, J. and R. Moore. 1967. Race, Community and Conflict. London and New York: Oxford University Press.
    39. Rindfuss, R. R. and S. R. Brauner-Otto. 2008. 'Institutions and the Transitions to Adulthood: Implications for Fertility Tempo in Low-fertility Settings.' Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2008: 57-87, http://dx.doi.org/10.1553/populationyearbook2008s57. Go to original source...
    40. Sim, J. 1998. 'Collecting and Analysing Qualitative Data: Issues Raised by the Focus Group.' Journal of Advanced Nursing 28 (2): 345-352, http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00692.x. Go to original source...
    41. Sim, J. and J. Snell. 1996. 'Focus Groups in Physiotherapy Evaluation and Research.' Physiotherapy 82 (3): 189-198, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)66923-4. Go to original source...
    42. Vajdová, Z. 2000. 'Dráhy bydlení realizované prostřednictvím trhu.' (Housing Paths Realised through the Market) Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 36 (1): 57-66.
    43. Vanhuysse, P. 2006. 'Czech Exceptionalism? A Comparative Political Economy Interpretation of Post-Communist Policy Pathways, 1989-2004.' Sociologický časopis/ Czech Sociological Review 42 (6): 1115-1136.
    44. Vanhuysse, P. 2009. 'Power, Order and the Politics of Social Policy in Central and Eastern Europe'. Pp. 53-70 in Post-communist Welfare Pathways: Theorizing Social Policy Transformations in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by A. Cerami and P. Vanhuysse. New York: Palgrave McMillan. Go to original source...
    45. Vobecká, J. and V. Piguet. 2012. 'Fertility, Natural Growth and Migration in the Czech Republic: An Urban-Suburban-Rural Gradient Analysis of Long-term Trends and Recent Reversals.' Population, Space and Place 18 (3): 225-240. Go to original source...
    46. Wilkinson, S. 2004. 'Focus Group Research.' Pp. 177-199 in Qualitative Research: Theory, Method and Practice, edited by D. Silverman. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    47. Williamson, H. 2002. Supporting Young People in Europe. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content