Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2019, 55(5): 615-640 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2019.55.5.479

Experience, Expertise, and Users' Participation: The Case of the Czech Mental Health Care Reform

Petra A. Honová, Dino Numerato, Lucie Kondrátová
Fakulta sociálních věd, Univerzita Karlova, Praha
Národní ústav duševního zdraví, Klecany

This paper focuses on users' involvement in the reform of mental-health care in the Czech Republic, which, like in other countries, is connected with the destigmatisation of mental illness and the deinstitutionalisation of care. As part of the reform process, users' and caregivers' representatives were invited by the key stakeholders to participate in working groups, expert committees, and government bodies that associate users' and representatives of parents. At the same time, users and caregivers mobilised from below and participated in a number of bottom-up initiatives. Against this backdrop, this study set out to identify the main positions of patients and caregivers in the Czech process of reforming mental-health care. Moreover, the role of the different forms of knowledge that inspire civic engagement are examined. The study is based on an analysis of semi-structured interviews, primary and secondary sources, and field observations. First, the following four positions taken by users as part of their involvement in the reform of mental-health care are identified: guardians, negotiators, awakeners, and fighters. Second, this study discusses the complexity of relations between users' participation and knowledge, showing that the key source of users' involvement is personal experience, which is difficult to separate from expert knowledge. The paper concludes with a discussion of the implications of the complexity of relations between expertise and experience for users' involvement.

Keywords: mental health, expert knowledge, lay experience, patients' participation, mental health care reform, health social movement

Published: October 1, 2019Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Honová, P.A., Numerato, D., & Kondrátová, L. (2019). Experience, Expertise, and Users' Participation: The Case of the Czech Mental Health Care Reform. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review55(5), 615-640. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2019.55.5.479.
Download citation

References

  1. Anspach, R. R. 1979. "From Stigma to Identity Politics: Political Activism among the Physically Disabled and Former Mental Patients." Social Science & Medicine 13A: 765-773, https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-7123(79)90123-8. Go to original source...
  2. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. "A Ladder of Citizen Participation." Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216-224, https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225. Go to original source...
  3. Baggott, R., R. Forster. 2008. "Health Consumer and Patients' Organizations in Europe: Towards a Comparative Analysis." Health Expectations 11 (1): 85-94, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00472.x. Go to original source...
  4. Barnes, M. 2015. "Survivors, Consumers, or Experts by Experience? Assigned, Chosen, and Contested Identities in the Mental Health Service User Movement." Pp. 131-149 in J. M. McGarry, A. Jasper (eds.). The Identity Dilemma: Social Movements and Collective Identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Go to original source...
  5. Bee, P., H. Brooks, C. Fraser, K. Lovell. 2015. "Professional Perspectives on Service User and Carer Involvement in Mental Health Care Planning: A Qualitative Study." International Journal of Nursing Studies 52 (12): 1834-1845, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.07.008. Go to original source...
  6. Beresford, P. 2005. "Social Approaches to Madness and Distress: User Perspectives and User Knowledges." Pp. 32-52 in J. Tew (ed.). Social Perspectives in Mental Health: Developing Social Models to Understand and Work with Mental Distress. London: Jessica Kingsley.
  7. Bingham, L. B., T. Nabatchi, R. O'Leary. 2013. "The New Governance: Practices Citizen and Processes for Work Stakeholder and of in the Participation Government." Public Administration Review 65 (5): 547-558, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x. Go to original source...
  8. Borkman, T. 1976. "Experiential Knowledge: A New Concept for the Analysis of Self-help Groups." Social Service Review 50 (3): 445-456, https://doi.org/10.1086/643401. Go to original source...
  9. Brown, P. 1981. "The Mental Patients' Rights Movement and Mental Health Institutional Change." International Journal of Health Services 11 (4): 523-540, https://doi.org/10.2190/CU8G-D0RJ-YY54-UC3F. Go to original source...
  10. Callon, M. 1999. "The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge." Science Technology & Society 4 (1): 81-94, https://doi.org/10.1177/097172189900400106. Go to original source...
  11. Castro, E. M., T. Van Regenmortel, W. Sermeus, K. Vanhaecht. 2018. "Patients' Experiential Knowledge and Expertise in Health Care: A Hybrid Concept Analysis." Social Theory & Health 17 (3): 1-24, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-018-0081-6. Go to original source...
  12. Císař, O., J. Navrátil, K. Vráblíková. 2011. "Staří, noví, radikální: politický aktivismus v České republice očima teorie sociálních hnutí." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 47 (1): 137-167.
  13. Collins, H. M., R. Evans. 2002. "The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience." Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 235-296, https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003. Go to original source...
  14. Council of Europe. 2017. "Guidelines for Civil Participation in Political Decision Making" [online]. Council of Europe [cit. 16. 11. 2017]. Dostupné z: https://rm.coe.int/guidelines-for-civil-participation-in-political-decision-making-en/16807626cf.
  15. Crawford, M. J., T. Aldridge, K. Bhui, D. Rutter, C. Manley, T. Weaver, P. Tyrer, N. Fulop. 2003. "User Involvement in the Planning and Delivery of Mental Health Services: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Service Users and Providers." Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 107 (6): 410-414, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00049.x. Go to original source...
  16. Crossley, M. L., N. Crossley. 2001. "'Patient' Voices, Social Movements and the Habitus: How Psychiatric Survivors 'Speak Out'." Social Science and Medicine 52 (10): 1477-1489. Go to original source...
  17. Crossley, N. 2006. Contesting Psychiatry: Social Movements in Mental Health. London, New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00257-4. Go to original source...
  18. CRPDZ. 2016. Výroční zpráva 2016 [online]. Praha: Centrum pro rozvoj péče o duševní zdraví [cit. 11. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.cmhcd.cz/CMHCD/media/Media/Ke%20stazeni/Centrum/CENTRUM_VZ_2016_web2.pdf.
  19. Curtis, T., D. Dellar, E. Leslie., B. Watson (eds.). 2000. Mad Pride: A Celebration of Mad Culture. London: Spare Change Books.
  20. Epstein, S. 1995. "The Construction of Lay Expertise." Science, Technology & Human Values 20 (4): 408-437, https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399502000402. Go to original source...
  21. Figueiredo Nascimento, S., E. Cuccillato, S. Schade, A. Guimarães Pereira. 2016. Citizen Engagement in Science and Policy-Making. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  22. Filipe, A., A. Renedo, C. Marston. 2017. "The Co-Production of What? Knowledge, Values, and Social Relations in Health Care." PLoS Biology 15 (5): 1-7, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001403. Go to original source...
  23. Fokus. 2015. Výroční zpráva 2015 [online]. Praha: Fokus, o. s. [cit. 11. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.fokus-cr.cz/index.php/knihovna/file/345-vyrocni-zprava-2015.
  24. Fokus. 2016. Výroční zpráva 2016 [online]. Praha: Fokus, z. s. [cit. 11. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.fokus-cr.cz/index.php/knihovna/file/383-vyrocni-zprava-2016.
  25. Fox, N. J., K. J. Ward, A. J. O 'Rourke. 2005. "The 'Expert Patient': Empowerment or Medical Dominance? The Case of Weight Loss, Pharmaceutical Drugs and the Internet." Social Science & Medicine 60: 1299-1309, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.07.005. Go to original source...
  26. Fung, A., E. O. Wright. 2001. "Deepening Democracy: Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance." Politics and Society 29 (1): 5-41, https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329201029001002. Go to original source...
  27. Gooding, P. 2016. "From Deinstitutionalisation to Consumer Empowerment: Mental Health Policy, Neoliberal Restructuring and the Closure of the 'Big Bins' in Victoria." Health Sociology Review 25 (1): 33-47, https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2015.1134261. Go to original source...
  28. Hazelton, M., M. Clinton. 2004. "Mental Health Consumers or Citizens with Mental Health Problems?" Pp. 98-112 in S. Henderson A. Petersen (eds.). Consuming Health. London: Routledge.
  29. Howard, M. M. 2002. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511840012. Go to original source...
  30. Hrešanová, E. 2017. "The Natural Childbirth Movement in the Czech Republic." Pp. 277-307 in K. Fabian, E. Korolczuk. Rebellious Parents: Parental Movements in Central-Eastern Europe and Russia. Indiana: Indiana University Press, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt2005wgn.14. Go to original source...
  31. Janoušková, M., L. Kondrátová, D. Chrtková, M. Vítková, J. Jaroš, K. Šárková, B. Lacinová. 2017. "Zapojování lidí s duševním onemocněním do reformy psychiatrické péče." Psychiatrie 21 (3): 115-120.
  32. Jaroš, J. 2016. Stav realizace Strategie reformy psychiatrické péče pohledem uživatelů psychiatrické péče [online]. Občanské sdružení Kolumbus [cit. 11. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://docplayer.cz/35619857-Stav-realizace-strategie-reformy-psychiatricke-pecepohledem-uzivatelu-psychiatricke-pece-kveten-2016.html.
  33. Kolářová, K. 2012. "Disability studies: jiný pohled na 'postižení'." Pp. 11-40 in K. Kolářová (ed.). Jinakost, postižení, kritika: Společenské konstrukty nezpůsobilosti a hendikepu. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  34. Kolumbus. 2015. Výroční zpráva 2015 [online]. Ústí nad Labem: Kolumbus [cit. 11. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.spolekkolumbus.cz/kolumbus/dokumenty-ke-stazeni/category/2-vyrocni-zpravy?download=24:vyrocnizprava-2015.
  35. Kolumbus. 2016. Výroční zpráva za rok 2016 [online]. Ústí nad Labem: Kolumbus [cit. 11. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.spolekkolumbus.cz/kolumbus/dokumenty-ke-stazeni/category/2-vyrocni-zpravy?download=30:vyrocnizprava-2016.
  36. Law, H., A. P. Morrison. 2014. "Recovery in Psychosis: A Delphi Study with Experts by Experience." Schizophrenia Bulletin 40 (6): 1347-1355, https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbu047. Go to original source...
  37. Lewis, B. 2006. "A Mad Fight: Psychiatry and Disability Activism." Pp. 339-352 in L. Davis (ed.). The Disability Studies Reader. New York, Oxon: Routledge.
  38. Marhánková, J. H. 2014. "Postoje rodičů odmítajících povinná očkování svých dětí: případová studie krize důvěry v biomedicínské vědění." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 50 (2): 163-188.
  39. Martin, G. P. 2008. "'Ordinary People Only': Knowledge, Representativeness, and the Publics of Public Participation in Healthcare." Sociology of Health and Illness 30 (1): 35-54, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x. Go to original source...
  40. May, J. 2006. "Ladders, Stars and Triangles Old and New Theory for the Practice of Public Participation." International Journal of Market Research 48 (3): 305-320, https://doi.org/10.1177/147078530604800305. Go to original source...
  41. McLaughlin, H. 2009. "What's in a Name: 'Client', 'Patient', 'Customer', 'Consumer','Expert by Experience', 'Service User'-What's Next?" The British Journal of Social Work 39 (6): 1101-1117, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcm155. Go to original source...
  42. McLean, A. 1995. "Empowerment and the Psychiatric Consumer/ex-Patient Movement in the United States: Contradictions, Crisis and Change." Social Science and Medicine 40 (8): 1053-1071, https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)00179-W. Go to original source...
  43. Miraftab, F. 2006. "Feminist Praxis, Citizenship and Informal Politics." International Feminist Journal of Politics 8 (2): 194-218, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740600612830. Go to original source...
  44. Moynihan, D. P. 2003. "Normative and Instrumental Perspectives on Public Participation: Citizen Summits in Washington, D.C." American Review of Public Administration 33 (2): 164-188, https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074003251379. Go to original source...
  45. Müller, K. 2003. Češi a občanská společnost. Praha: Triton.
  46. MZ ČR. 2013. Strategie reformy psychiatrické péče [online]. Praha: Ministerstvo zdravotnictví ČR [cit. 13. 5. 2018]. Dostupné z: http://www.reformapsychiatrie.cz/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/SRPP_publikace_web_9-10-2013.pdf.
  47. Noorani, T. 2013. "Service User Involvement, Authority and the 'Expert-by-experience' in Mental Health." Journal of Political Power 6 (1): 49-68, https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2013.774979. Go to original source...
  48. OECD. 2005. Evaluating Public Participation in Policy Making. OECD Publishing.
  49. Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. London: Macmillan. Go to original source...
  50. Peck, E., P. Gulliver, D. Towel. 2002. "Information, Consultation or Control: User Involvement in Mental Health Services in England at the Turn of the Century." Journal of Mental Health 11 (4): 441-451.
  51. Peter, F. 2013. "The Human Right to Political Participation." Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 7 (2): 1-16, https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v7i2.71. Go to original source...
  52. Platforma pro transformaci. 2015. "Stanovisko Platformy pro transformaci systému péče o lidi s duševním onemocněním v ČR k aktuálnímu stavu Reformy psychiatrické péče v ČR" [online]. [cit. 11. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.pdz.cz/uploaded/data/files/Dokumenty/Transformace/Stanovisko%20Platformy%20pro%20transformaci%20syst%C3%A9mu%20p%C3%A9%C4%8De%20o%20lidi%20s.pdf.
  53. Prior, L. 2003. "Belief, Knowledge and Expertise: The Emergence of the Lay Expert in Medical Sociology." Sociology of Health & Illness 25 (3): 41-57, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00339. Go to original source...
  54. Rabeharisoa, V., T. Moreira, M. Akrich. 2014. "Evidence-based Activism: Patients', Users' and Activists' Groups in Knowledge Society." BioSocieties 9 (2): 111-128, https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.2. Go to original source...
  55. Renedo, A., A. Komporozos-Athanasiou, C. Marston. 2018. "Experience as Evidence: The Dialogic Construction of Health Professional Knowledge through Patient Involvement." Sociology 52 (4): 778-795, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038516682457. Go to original source...
  56. Restall, G. 2013. "Conceptualizing the Outcomes of Involving People Who Use Mental Health Services in Policy Development." Health Expectations 18: 1167-1179, https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.12091. Go to original source...
  57. Rowe, R., M. Shepherd. 2002. "Public Participation in the New NHS: No Closer to Citizen Control?" Social Policy and Administration 36 (3): 275-290, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9515.00251. Go to original source...
  58. Speed, E. 2006. "Patients, Consumers and Survivors: A Case Study of Mental Health Service User Discourses." Social Science & Medicine 62 (1): 28-38, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.05.025. Go to original source...
  59. Sympathea. 2017. Sympathea [online]. Sympathea, o. p. s. [cit. 11. 10. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.sympathea.cz/.
  60. Tattersall, R. L. 2002. "The Expert Patient: A New Approach to Chronic Disease Management for the Twenty-First Century." Clinical medicine (London, England) 2 (3): 227-229, https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.2-3-227. Go to original source...
  61. Thomas, C. 2004. "How is Disability Understood? An Examination of Sociological Approaches." Disability & Society 19 (6): 569-583, https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759042000252506. Go to original source...
  62. Tomes, N. 2006. "The Patient as a Policy Factor: A Historical Case Study of the Consumer/Survivor Movement in Mental Health." Health Affairs 25 (3): 720-729, https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.25.3.720. Go to original source...
  63. Tritter, J. Q., A. McCallum. 2006. "The Snakes and Ladders of User Involvement: Moving Beyond Arnstein." Health Policy 76 (2): 156-168, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2005.05.008. Go to original source...
  64. Trnka, S., C. Trundle. 2014. "Competing Responsibilities: Moving beyond Neoliberal Responsibilisation." Anthropological Forum 24 (2): 136-153, https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2013.879051. Go to original source...
  65. Trnka, S. 2017. One Blue Child: Asthma, Responsibility, and the Politics of Global Health. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  66. Vigoda, E. 2002. "From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration." Public Administration Review 62 (5): 527-540, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00235. Go to original source...
  67. Whiteford, H., B. Buckingham, R. Manderscheid. 2002. "Australia's National Mental Health Strategy." British Journal of Psychiatry 180: 210-215, https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.180.3.210. Go to original source...
  68. Wilcox, D. 1994. The Guide to Effective Participation. London: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  69. Winkler, P., D. Krupchanka, T. Roberts, L. Kondrátová, V. Machů, C. Höschl, G. Thornicroft. 2017. "A blind spot on the global mental health map: a scoping review of 25 years' development of mental health care for people with severe mental illnesses in central and eastern Europe." Lancet Psychiatry 4 (8): 634-642, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(17)30135-9. Go to original source...
  70. WHO. 2005. Mental Health Action Plan for Europe: Facing the Challenges, Building Solutions.
  71. Zakrzewska, M., M. Ahn, J. Biglieri, J. Zascerinska, N. Gruenwald. 2018. "The Role of Social Participation in the Concept of Good Governance: A Theoretical Approach." Public Policy and Administration 16 (4): 529-537.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.