Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2013, 49(3): 427-448 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2013.49.3.04

Revisiting Deterrence: Legal Knowledge, Use Context and Arrest Perception for Cannabis

Patricia G. Erickson1, Mark van der Maas1, Andrew D. Hathaway2
1 University of Toronto
2 University of Guelph

Deterrence research has evolved considerably since the 1970s when a favourite offence for study was the emerging phenomenon of widespread cannabis use among mainstream populations. The deterrent model of crime prevention has expanded far beyond the study of objective and subjective indicators of certainty and severity to encompass social support, moral evaluations, peer involvement and, most recently, risk sensitivity and situational factors. Most earlier research found no evidence of deterrence of cannabis use, a fi nding attributed to its low actual and perceived risk of arrest and changes in public attitudes. This interview study with adult experienced cannabis users drawn from a representative survey base in Toronto, Canada, where possession is still treated as a criminal offence, provides a more nuanced interpretation of deterrence. The authors found that users had generally inaccurate knowledge about the current law and penalties and believed they would avoid arrest in the future. However, they were not oblivious to the possibility of police intervention, and took precautions such as carrying small amounts and avoiding public use. Thus, users were not unaffected by the law, but rather these discreet practices illustrate the operation of restrictive deterrence, shaping their choices of when, where and how to commit the crime of cannabis use. Further research on deterrence should examine situated choices by risk-sensitive offenders, and should also include cross-national patterns of arrest and user risk perceptions. While cannabis continues to be prohibited by international treaties, the reality of widespread use presents opportunities for innovative deterrence studies into this normalised yet illegal crime. The variation in policies, penalty structures and enforcement across European nations, compared to those in other Western jurisdictions, can foster relevant research for a transatlantic discussion about global drug policy transformation.

Keywords: deterrence, cannabis, drug policy, drug arrests, public opinion, cross-national comparisons, Canada

Published: June 1, 2013Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Erickson, P.G., van der Maas, M., & Hathaway, A.D. (2013). Revisiting Deterrence: Legal Knowledge, Use Context and Arrest Perception for Cannabis. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review49(3), 427-448. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2013.49.3.04.
Download citation

References

  1. Adlaf, Edward M., Patricia Begin and Ed Sawka. 2005. Canadian Addiction Survey (CAS). A national survey of Canadians' use of alcohol and other drugs: Prevalence of use and related harms: Detailed report. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
  2. Aldridge, Judith, Fiona Measham and Lisa Williams. 2011. Illegal Leisure Revisited: Changing Patterns of Alcohol and Drug Use in Adolescents and Young Adults. London: Routledge.
  3. Andenaes, Johannes. 1974. Punishment and Deterrence. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  4. Anderson, Linda S., Ted G. Chiricos and Gordon P. Waldo. 1977. 'Formal and Informal Sanctions: A Comparison of Deterrent Effects.' Social Problems 25 (1): 103-114. Go to original source...
  5. Baker, Thomas and Alex R. Piquero. 2010. 'Assessing the Perceived Benefits-Criminal Offending Relationship.' Journal of Criminal Justice 38 (5): 981-987. Go to original source...
  6. Barratt, Monica J., Francoise Chanteloup, Simon Lenton and Ali Marsh. 2005. 'Cannabis Law Reform in Western Australia: An Opportunity to Test Theories of Marginal Deterrence and Legitimacy.' Drug and Alcohol Review 24 (4):321-330. Go to original source...
  7. Beccaria, Caesar. (1764) 1963. On Crimes and Punishments. Translated by H. Paolucci. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.
  8. Becker, Gary. 1968. 'Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach.' Journal of Political Economy 76 (2): 169-217. Go to original source...
  9. Böllinger, Lorenz. 2002. 'Recent Developments Regarding Drug Law and Policy in Germany and the European Community: The Evolution of Drug Control in Europe.' Journal of Drug Issues 32 (2): 363-378. Go to original source...
  10. Bouchard, Martin and Holly Nguyen. 2010. 'Is It Who You Know, or How Many That Counts? Criminal Networks and Cost Avoidance in a Sample of Young Offenders.' Justice Quarterly 27 (1): 130-158. Go to original source...
  11. Brochu, Serge, Cameron Duff, Mark Asbridge and Patricia G. Erickson. 2011. '"There's What's on Paper and Then There's What Happens, Out on the Sidewalk"': Cannabis Users' Knowledge and Opinions of Canadian Drug Laws.' Journal of Drug Issues 41 (1): 95-115. Go to original source...
  12. Bushway, Shawn and Peter Reuter. 2008. 'Economists' Contribution to the Study of Crime and the Criminal Justice System.' Crime & Justice 37: 389-453. Go to original source...
  13. CADUMS. 2011. Canadian Alcohol and Drug Use Monitoring Survey. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
  14. Caulkins, Jonathan P. and Rosalie Pacula. 2006. 'Marijuana Markets: Inferences from Reports by the Household Population.' Journal of Drug Issues 36 (1): 173-200. Go to original source...
  15. Chambliss, William. 1966. 'The Deterrent Influence of Punishment.' Crime & Delinquency 12 (1): 70-75. Go to original source...
  16. Chanteloup, Francoise, Simon Lenton, James Fetherson and Monica J. Barratt. 2005. 'Expected Impacts of the Cannabis Infringement Notice Scheme in Western Australia on Regular Users and Their Involvement in the Cannabis Market.' Drug and Alcohol Review 24 (4): 311-319. Go to original source...
  17. Chiricos, Ted G. and Gordon P. Waldo. 1970. 'Punishment and Crime: An Examination of Some Empirical Evidence.' Social Problems 18 (2): 200-217. Go to original source...
  18. Cohen, Peter and Arjan Sas. 1996. Cannabis Use, a Stepping Stone to Other Drugs. The Case of Amsterdam. University of Amsterdam: CEDRO, Centre for Drug Research.
  19. Coomber, Ross and Paul Turnbull. 2007. 'Arenas of Drug Transactions: Adolescent Cannabis Transactions in England-Social Supply.' Journal of Drug Issues 37 (Fall): 845-865. Go to original source...
  20. Csete, Joanne. 2012. A Balancing Act: Policymaking on Illicit Drugs in the Czech Republic. New York: Open Society Foundation.
  21. Elliott, Luther, Andrew Golub and Eloise Dunlap. 2012. 'Off the Street and into "the Cut": Deterrence and Displacement in New York City's Quality of Life Marijuana Policing.' International Journal of Drug Policy 23 (3): 210-219. Go to original source...
  22. EMCDDA. 2006. A Gender Perspective on Drug Use and Responding to Drug Problems. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.
  23. EMCDDA. 2012. Annual Report 2012: The State of the Drugs Problem in Europe. Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.
  24. Erickson, Patricia G. 1976. 'Deterrence and Deviance: The Example of Cannabis Prohibition.' The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 67 (2): 222-232. Go to original source...
  25. Erickson, Patricia. G. 1980. Cannabis Criminals: The Social Effects of Punishment on Drug Users. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation.
  26. Erickson, Patricia G. 1982. 'Illicit Drug Use, Peer Attitudes, and Perceptions of Harmful Effects among Convicted Cannabis Offenders.' Substance Use & Misuse 17 (1): 141-154. [Formerly International Journal of the Addictions]. Go to original source...
  27. Erickson, Patricia G. 1989. 'Living with Prohibition: Regular Cannabis Users, Legal Sanctions, and Informal Controls.' Substance Use & Misuse 24 (3): 175-188. [Formerly International Journal of the Addictions]. Go to original source...
  28. Erickson, Patricia G. and Elaine Hyshka. 2010. 'Four Decades of Cannabis Criminals in Canada 1970-2010.' Amsterdam Law Forum 2 (4): 1-14. Go to original source...
  29. Erickson, Patricia G. and Glenn F. Murray. 1986. 'Cannabis Criminals Revisited.' British Journal of Addiction 81 (1): 81-85. Go to original source...
  30. Erickson, Patricia G., Diane M. Riley, Yuet W. Cheung and Patrick A. O'Hare (eds.). 2007. Harm Reduction: A New Direction for Drug Policies and Programs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  31. ESPAD. 2012. The 2011 ESPAD Report: Substance Use among Students in 36 European Countries. The European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Drug Use. Stockholm: The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs.
  32. Fergusson, David M., Nicola R. Swain-Campbell and L. John Horwood. 2003. 'Arrests and Convictions for Cannabis Related Offences in a New Zealand Birth Cohort.' Drug and Alcohol Dependence 70 (1): 53-63. Go to original source...
  33. Fielding, Amanda, Robin Room, Benedikt Fischer, Wayne Hall, Simon Lenton and Peter Reuter. 2008. The Global Cannabis Commission Report. Oxford: The Beckley Foundation Drug Policy Program.
  34. Gallupe, Owen, Martin Bouchard and Jonathan P. Caulkins. 2011. 'No Change Is a Good Change? Restrictive Deterrence in Illegal Drug Markets.' Journal of Criminal Justice 39 (1): 81-89. Go to original source...
  35. Gibbs, John P. 1975. Crime, Punishment, and Deterrence. New York: Elsevier.
  36. Giffen, P. James, Shirley Endicott and Sylvia Lambert. 1991. Panic and Indifference: The Politics of Canada's Drug Laws: A Study in the Sociology of Law. Ottawa: Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.
  37. Harrison, Lana. 1997. 'The Validity of Self-reported Drug Use in Survey Research: An Overview and Critique of Research Methods.' Pp. 17-37 in NIDA Research Monograph 167, edited by Lana Harrison and Arthur Hughes. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
  38. Hathaway, Andrew D. 1997. 'Marijuana and Lifestyle: Exploring Tolerable Deviance.' Deviant Behavior 18 (3): 213-232. Go to original source...
  39. Hathaway, Andrew D. 2001. 'Charter Rights of Canadian Drug Users: A Constitutional Assessment of the Clay Trial and Ruling.' Canadian Journal of Law and Society 16 (1): 29-43. Go to original source...
  40. Hathaway, Andrew D. 2004. 'Cannabis Careers Reconsidered: Transitions and Trajectories of Committed Long-Term Users.' Contemporary Drug Problems 31 (3): 401-423. Go to original source...
  41. Hathaway, Andrew D. and Patricia G. Erickson. 2003. 'Drug Reform Principles and Policy Debates: Harm Reduction Prospects for Cannabis in Canada.' Journal of Drug Issues 33 (2): 465-495. Go to original source...
  42. Hathaway, Andrew D., Patricia G. Erickson and Phillipe Lucas. 2007. 'Canadian Public Opinion on Cannabis: How Far Out of Step with It Is the Existing Law?' Canadian Review of Social Policy 59: 44-55.
  43. Hathaway, Andrew D., Elaine Hyshka, Patricia G. Erickson, Mark Asbridge, Serge Brochu, Marie-Marthe Cousineau and David Marsh. 2010. 'Whither RDS? An Investigation of Respondent Driven Sampling as a Method of Recruiting Mainstream Marijuana Users.' Harm Reduction Journal 7 (15): 1-11. Go to original source...
  44. Hathaway, Andrew D., Maritt Kirst and Patricia G. Erickson. 2013. 'Marijuana Motives and Associated Outcomes: Relaxation and Enhancement versus Coping Outcomes.' Pp. 119-134 in Drug Use and Abuse: Signs/Symptoms, Physical and Psychological Effects and Intervention Approaches, edited by Marie Claire Van Hout. Hauppauge, NY: NOVA Science.
  45. Hathaway, Andrew D. and Kirk I. Tousaw. 2008. 'Harm Reduction Headway and Continuing Resistance: Insights from Safe Injection in the City of Vancouver.' International Journal of Drug Policy 19 (1): 11-16. Go to original source...
  46. Hyshka, Elaine. 2009a. 'The Saga Continues: Canadian Legislative Attempts to Reform Cannabis Law in the Twenty-First Century.' Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue Canadienne de Criminologie et de Justice Pénale 51 (1): 73-91. Go to original source...
  47. Hyshka, Elaine. 2009b. 'Turning Failure into Success: What Does the Case of Western Australia Tell Us about Canadian Cannabis Policy-Making?' Policy Studies 30 (5): 513-531. Go to original source...
  48. Hyshka, Elaine, Patricia G. Erickson and Andrew D. Hathaway. 2011. 'The Time for Decriminalization Has Come Again … and Again.' Criminal Law Bulletin 47 (2): 258-275.
  49. Jacobs, Bruce A. 2010. 'Deterrence and Deterrability.' Criminology 48 (2): 417-441. Go to original source...
  50. Johnston, Lloyd. 1980. 'Marijuana Use and the Effects of Marijuana Decriminalization.' Testimony delivered at the hearings on the effects of marijuana held by the Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Judiciary Committee, US Senate, 16 January, Washington, DC.
  51. Kilmer, Beau. 2003. Do Cannabis Possession Laws Influence Cannabis Use? Brussels: Ministry of Public Health.
  52. Le Dain Commission. 1972. Cannabis. Final Report. Report of the commission of inquiry into the non-medical use of drugs. Ottawa: Information Canada.
  53. Le Dain Commission. 1973. Cannabis. Final Report. Report of the commission of inquiry into the non-medical use of drugs. Ottawa: Information Canada.
  54. Lenton, Simon. 2009. 'Cannabis Policy and the Burden of Proof: Is It Now beyond Reasonable Doubt That Cannabis Prohibition Is Not Working?' Drug and Alcohol Review 19 (1): 95-100. Go to original source...
  55. Lenton, Simon and Penny Heale. 2000. 'Arrest, Court and Social Impacts of Conviction for a Minor Cannabis Offense under Strict Prohibition.' Contemporary Drug Problems 27 (4): 805-833. Go to original source...
  56. Loughran, Thomas A., Raymond Paternoster, Alex R. Piquero and Greg Pogarsky. 2011. 'On Ambiguity in Perceptions of Risk: Implications for Criminal Decision Making and Deterrence.' Criminology 49 (4): 1029-1061. Go to original source...
  57. Lundman, Richard J. 1986. 'One-Wave Perceptual Deterrence Research: Some Grounds for the Renewed Examination of Cross-sectional Methods.' Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 23 (4): 370-388. Go to original source...
  58. MacCoun, Robert, Rosalie L. Pacula, Jamie Chriqui, Katherine Harris and Peter Reuter. 2009. 'Do Citizens Know Whether Their State Has Decriminalized Marijuana? Assessing the Perceptual Component of Deterrence Theory.' Review of Law & Economics 5 (1): 340-364. Go to original source...
  59. MacCoun, Robert and Peter Reuter. 2001. 'Evaluating Alternative Cannabis Regimes.' The British Journal of Psychiatry 178 (2): 123-128. Go to original source...
  60. Meier, Robert F. and Weldon T. Johnson. 1977. 'Deterrence as Social Control: The Legal and Extralegal Production of Conformity.' American Sociological Review 42 (4): 292-304. Go to original source...
  61. Murray, Glenn F. and Patricia G. Erickson. 1987. 'Cross-sectional versus Longitudinal Research: An Empirical Comparison of Projected and Subsequent Criminality.' Social Science Research 16 (2): 107-118. Go to original source...
  62. Parker, Howard. 2005. 'Normalization as a Barometer: Recreational Drug Use and the Consumption of Leisure by Younger Britons.' Addiction Research & Theory 13 (3): 205-215. Go to original source...
  63. Pauwels, Lieven, Frank Weerman, Gerben Bruinsma and Wim Bernasco. 2011. 'Perceived Sanction Risk, Individual Propensity and Adolescent Offending: Assessing Key Findings from the Deterrence Literature in a Dutch Sample.' European Journal of Criminology 8 (5): 386-400. Go to original source...
  64. Peretti-Watel, Patrick. 2003. 'Neutralization Theory and the Denial of Risk: Some Evidence from Cannabis Use among French Adolescents.' The British Journal of Sociology 54 (1): 21-42. Go to original source...
  65. Piquero, Alex R., Raymond Paternoster, Greg, Pogarsky and Thomas Loughran. 2011. 'Elaborating the Individual Difference Component in Deterrence Theory.' Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7: 335-360. Go to original source...
  66. Pogarsky, Greg. 2002. 'Identifying 'Deterrable' Offenders: Implications for Research on Deterrence.' Justice Quarterly 19 (3): 431-452. Go to original source...
  67. Pratt, Travis C., Francis T. Cullen, Kristie R. Blevins, Leah E. Daigle and Tamara D. Madensen. 2006. 'The Empirical Status of Deterrence Theory: A Meta-analysis.' Pp. 367-395 in Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory, Vol.15, edited by Francis Cullen, John P. Wright and Kristie R. Blevins. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Go to original source...
  68. Ream, Geoffrey L., Bruce D. Johnson, Eloise Dunlap and Ellen Benoit. 2010. 'The Role of Marijuana Use Etiquette in Avoiding Targeted Police Enforcement.' Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy 17 (6): 689-706. Go to original source...
  69. Reinarman, Craig. 2009. 'Cannabis Policies and User Practices: Market Separation, Price, Potency, and Accessibility in Amsterdam and San Francisco.' International Journal of Drug Policy 20 (1): 28-37. Go to original source...
  70. Reinarman, Craig, Peter D. Cohen and Hendrien L. Kaal. 2004. 'The Limited Relevance of Drug Policy: Cannabis in Amsterdam and in San Francisco.' American Journal of Public Health 94 (5): 836-842. Go to original source...
  71. Ritson, Bruce. 2003. 'The 1999 ESPAD Report. The European School Survey Project on Alcohol and Other Drug Use among Students in 30 European Countries.' Alcohol and Alcoholism 38 (1): 99-99. Go to original source...
  72. Sandberg, Sveinung. 2012. 'Cannabis Culture: A Stable Subculture in a Changing World.' Criminology and Criminal Justice. Retrieved 28 May 2012 (http://crj.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/05/24/1748895812445620).ly/2012/05/24/1748895812445620).
  73. Sarkany, Peter. 2012. 'The Strict Swedish vs the Loose Dutch System for Regulations on Prostitution and Drug Use.' Journal of Mathematics and System Science 2 (1): 26-35.
  74. Sherman, Lawrence W. 1993. 'Defiance, Deterrence, and Irrelevance: A Theory of the Criminal Sanction.' Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30 (4): 445-473. Go to original source...
  75. Shiner, Michael and Tim Newburn. 1997. 'Definitely, Maybe Not? The Normalisation of Recreational Drug Use amongst Young People.' Sociology 31 (3): 511-529. Go to original source...
  76. Silberman, Matthew. 1976. 'Toward a Theory of Criminal Deterrence.' American Sociological Review 41 (3): 442-461. Go to original source...
  77. Single, Eric W. 1989. 'The Impact of Marijuana Decriminalization: An Update.' Journal of Public Health Policy 10 (Winter): 456-466. Go to original source...
  78. Stafford, Mark C. and Mark Warr. 1993. 'A Reconceptualization of General and Specific Deterrence.' Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30 (2): 123-135. Go to original source...
  79. Statistics Canada. 2010. 'Police-Reported Crime for Selected Offences, Canada, 2010.' Retrieved 4 January 2012 (http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/110721/t110721b1-eng.htm).
  80. Teevan, James J. 1976. 'Subjective Perception of Deterrence (Continued).' Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 13 (2): 155-164. Go to original source...
  81. The Economist. 2013. 'Towards a Ceasefire: Winding Down the War on Drugs.' 23 February-1 March, pp. 57-59.
  82. Tittle, Charles. 1980. Sanctions and Social Deviance: The Question of Deterrence. New York: Praeger.
  83. UNODC. 2012. World Drug Report. New York: United Nations Office on Drug and Crime.
  84. van Vliet, Henk J. 1990. 'Separation of Drug Markets and the Normalization of Drug Problems in the Netherlands: An Example for Other Nations?' Journal of Drug Issues 20 (3): 463-471. Go to original source...
  85. Waldo, Gordon P. and Ted G. Chiricos. 1972. 'Perceived Penal Sanction and Self-reported Criminality: A Neglected Approach to Deterrence Research.' Social Problems 19 (4): 522-540. Go to original source...
  86. Yacoubian, Jr., George S. 2008. 'Assessing the Relationship between Marijuana Availability and Marijuana Use: A Legal and Sociological Comparison between the United States and the Netherlands.' Journal of Alcohol & Drug Education 51 (4): 17-34.
  87. Zimring, Franklin E. and Gordon Hawkins. 1973. Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.