Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2007, 43(3): 589-610 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2007.43.3.04

The Impact of the Structure of the Education System on the Development of Educational Inequalities in the Czech Republic

Jana Straková
Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague

Published: June 1, 2007Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Straková, J. (2007). The Impact of the Structure of the Education System on the Development of Educational Inequalities in the Czech Republic. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 43(3), 589-610. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2007.43.3.04.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Beaton, A., I. V. S. Mullis, M. O. Martin, E. J. Gonzalez, D. Kelly, T. Smith. 1997a. Mathematics Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
    2. Beaton, A., M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, E. J. Gonzalez, T. Smith, D. Kelly. 1997b. Science Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
    3. EGREES. 2006. Equity in European Educational Systems (A set of indicators). Liège: Service de Pédagogie théorique et expérimentale.
    4. Erikson, R. and J. Jonsson. 1996. 'Explaining Class Inequality in Education. The Swedish Test Case.' Pp. 1-64 in Can Education be Equalized? The Swedish case, edited by R. Erikson and J. Jonsson. Boulder, USA: Westview Press.
    5. Hambleton, R. K., H. Swaminathan and H. J. Rogers. 1991. Fundaments of Item Response Theory. London: Sage Publications.
    6. Harlen, W. and H. Malcolm. 1999. Setting and Streaming. Edinburgh: The Scottish Council for Research in Education.
    7. Hutchmaker, W., D. Cochrane and N. Bottani. (eds.) 2001. In Pursuit of Equity in Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    8. Key Data on Education in the European Union 2004. 2004. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    9. Martin, M. O., I. V. S. Mullis, A. Beaton, E. J. Gonzalez, T. Smith and D. Kelly. 1997. Science Achievement in the Primary School Years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
    10. Matějů, P. and J. Straková. (eds.) 2003. Vyšší vzdělání jen pro elitu? (Higher Education for Elites Only). Prague: ISEA.
    11. Matějů, P., B. Řeháková and N. Simonová. 2003. 'Transition to University under Communism and after Its Demise. The Role of Socio-economic Background in the Transition between Secondary and Tertiary education in the Czech Republic 1948-1998.' Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 39 (3): 310-324.
    12. Mullis, I. V. S., M. O. Martin, A. Beaton, E. J. Gonzalez, D. Kelly and T. Smith. 1997. Mathematics Achievement in the Primary School Years: IEA's Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
    13. Mullis, I. V. S., M. O. Martin, E. J. Gonzales, K. D. Gregory, T. A. Smith, S. J.Chrostowski, R. A Garden and K. M. O'Connor. 2000a. TIMSS 1999 International Science Report. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
    14. Mullis, I. V. S., M. O. Martin, E. J. Gonzales, K. D. Gregory, R.A Garden, K.M. O'Connor, S. J. Chrostowski and T. A. Smith. 2000b. TIMSS 1999 International Mathematics Report. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
    15. Mullis, I. V. S., M. O. Martin, E. J. Gonzales and A. M. Kennedy. 2003. PIRLS 2001 International Report. Chestnut Hill: Boston College.
    16. Nováčková, J. 2001. Mýty ve vzdělávání.(Myths in Education) Kroměříž: Spirála.
    17. OECD. 1997. Education and Equity in the OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.
    18. OECD. 2001. Knowledge and Skills for Life: First Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
    19. OECD. 2004a. Learning for Tomorrow's World. First Results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.
    20. OECD. 2004b. What Makes School Systems Perform? Paris: OECD.
    21. OECD. 2005a. Education at a Glance 2005. Paris: OECD.
    22. OECD. 2005b. School Factors Related to Quality and Equity. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: OECD.
    23. OECD. 2006. Education at a Glance 2006. Paris: OECD.
    24. Pekkarinen, T., R. Uusitalo and S. Pekkala. 2006. 'Educational Policy and Intergenerational Income Mobility: Evidence from Finnish School Reform.' IZA Discussion Paper No. 2204.
    25. Slavin, R. E. 1990. 'Achievement Effects on Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Secondary Schools: A Best Evidence Synthesis.' Review of Educational Research 60 (3): 471-499. Go to original source...
    26. Wildt-Persson, A. and P. G. Rosengren. 2001. 'Equity and Equivalence in the Swedish School System.' Pp. 299-322 in In Pursuit of Equity in Education, edited by W. Hutchmaker, D. Cochrane and N. Bottani. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Go to original source...
    27. Wilms, J. D. 1999. 'Basic Concepts in Hierarchical Linear Modelling with Applications for Policy Analysis.' Pp. 473-493 in Handbook of Educational Policy, edited by G. J. Cizek. New York: Academic Press. Go to original source...
    28. Wilms, J. D. 2003. Ten Hypotheses about Socioeconomic Gradients and Community Differences in Children's Developmental Outcomes. Ottawa, Canada: Applied Research Branch of Human Resources Development Canada.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content