Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2019, 55(5): 561-586 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2019.55.5.477

The 'Assemblages' of Disability: An Affirmative Conception in a Deleuze-Guattarian Perspective

Hana Porkertová
Provozně ekonomická fakulta Mendelovy univerzity v Brně

The article discusses the potential of Deleuze-Guattarian philosophy for studying disability. It draws on empirical research comprising interviews with and ethnographic observations regarding the visually impaired people, in which the concept of assemblage is used as a sociological tool to analyse the continuity and discontinuity of disability. An assemblage is made up of heterogenic, rhizomatic, and often unpredictable connections, both organic and inorganic and linguistic and material, that continuously transform each other. An assemblage is never finished but is always complete, which gives rise to the question of the relationship between a whole and its parts, thus challenging the perception of disability as a lack and making it possible to think of disability in an affirmative sense. Disability can thus be analysed as a dynamic phenomenon that acquires its concrete contours in specific situations and to consider its discursive and material character. Thus, the concept of assemblage captures both the stability and the fluidity of disability and focuses on connections that maintain and decompose it. On the one hand, disability represents hegemonic discourses about health and the body, while on the other hand, it is a breeding ground for subversive processes.

Keywords: disability, assemblage, Deleuze-Guattarian philosophy, dis/continuity, visual impairment

Published: October 1, 2019Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Porkertová, H. (2019). The 'Assemblages' of Disability: An Affirmative Conception in a Deleuze-Guattarian Perspective. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review55(5), 561-586. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2019.55.5.477.
Download citation

References

  1. Areheart, B. A. 2011. "Disability Trouble." Yale Law & Policy Review 29 (2): 347-388.
  2. Braidotti, R. 2012. The Posthuman. Oxford: Polity Press.
  3. Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.
  4. Butler, J. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex". New York: Routledge.
  5. Campbell, F. K. 2009. Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245181. Go to original source...
  6. Casey, H., N. Brady, S. Guerin. 2013. "'Is Seeing Perceiving?' Exploring Issues Concerning Access to Public Transport for People with Sight Loss." British Journal of Visual Impairment 31 (3): 217-227, https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619613495023. Go to original source...
  7. Corker, M., S. French. 1999. Disability Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  8. Davies, Ch. A. 2002. Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. London: Routledge.
  9. Davis, L. J. 2006. The Disability Studies Reader. New York: Routledge.
  10. Deleuze, G. 1983. Nietzsche and Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
  11. Deleuze, G. 2004. Difference and Repetition. London: The Athlone Press.
  12. Deleuze, G., F. Guattari. 2010. Tisîc plošin. Praha: Herrmann & synové.
  13. Duff, C. 2010. "Towards a Developmental Ethology: Exploring Deleuze's Contribution to the Study of Health and Human Development." Health 14 (6): 619-634, https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459309360793. Go to original source...
  14. Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  15. Fourie, R. J. 2007. "A Qualitative Self-study of Retinitis Pigmentosa." The British Journal of Visual Impairment 25 (3): 217-232, https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619607079794. Go to original source...
  16. Fox, N. J. 2002. "Refracting 'Health': Deleuze, Guattari and Body-Self." Health 6 (3): 347-363, https://doi.org/10.1177/136345930200600306. Go to original source...
  17. Fox, N. J. 2011. "The Ill-health Assemblage: Beyond the Body-with-Organs." Health Sociology Review 20 (4): 359-371, https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2011.20.4.359. Go to original source...
  18. Fox, N. J. 2012. "Deleuze and Guattari." Pp. 150-166 in G. Scambler (ed.). Contemporary Theorists for Medical Sociology. London: Routledge.
  19. Gagnon, M., M. Stuart. 2009 "Manufacturing Disability: HIV, Women and the Construction of Difference." Nursing Philosophy 10 (1): 42-52, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2008.00380.x. Go to original source...
  20. Gibson, B. E., F. A. Carnevale, G. King. 2012. "'This is my way': Reimagining Disability, In/dependence and Interconnectedness of Persons and Assistive Technologies." Disability and Rehabilitation 34 (22): 1894-1899, https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2012.670040. Go to original source...
  21. Goodley, D. 2007. "Becoming Rhizomatic Parents: Deleuze, Guattari and Disabled Babies." Disability and Society 22 (2): 145-160, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590601141576. Go to original source...
  22. Goodley, D. 2013. "Dis/entangling Critical Disability Studies." Disability & Society 28 (5): 631-644, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.717884. Go to original source...
  23. Goodley, D., R. Lawthom, K. Runswick. 2014. "Posthuman Disability Studies." Subjectivity 7 (4): 342-361, https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2014.15. Go to original source...
  24. Goodley, D., G. Roets. 2008. "The (Be)comings and Goings of Developmental Disabilities: The Cultural Politics of 'Impairment'." Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 29 (2): 239-255, https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300801966971. Go to original source...
  25. Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile Bodies. Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.
  26. Howe, P. D. 2011. "Cyborg and Supercrip: The Paralympics Technology and the (Dis)empowerment of Disabled Athletes." Sociology 45 (5): 868-882, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038511413421. Go to original source...
  27. Jagose, A. 1996. Queer Theory: An Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
  28. Koch, T. 2001. "Equality and Disability Symposium: Disability and Difference: Balancing Social and Physical Constructions." Journal of Medical Ethics 27: 370-376, https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.27.6.370. Go to original source...
  29. Kolářová, K. 2012. "Disability studies: Jiný pohled na 'postižení'." Pp. 11-40 in K. Kolářová (ed.). Jinakost - postiženî - kritika: společenské konstrukty nezpůsobilosti a hendikepu: antologie textů z oboru disability studies. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelstvî (SLON).
  30. Kolářová, K. 2014. "(Ne)přizpůsobeni krizi, nezpůsobilí občanství? 'Postižení' a 'rasa' v diskurzech krize." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum 15 (2): 48-60, https://doi.org/10.13060/12130028.2014.15.2.130. Go to original source...
  31. Konopásek, Z. 2008. "Making Thinking Visible with Atlas.ti: Computer Assisted Qualitative Analysis as Textual Practices." Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung [online] 9 (2) [cit. 12. 3. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/28836.
  32. Kuppers, P., J. Overboe. 2009. "Introduction: Deleuze, Disability, and Difference." Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 3 (3): 217-220, https://doi.org/10.1353/jlc.0.0030. Go to original source...
  33. Latour, B. 1999. "On recalling ANT." The Sociological Review 47 (S1): 15-25, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03480.x. Go to original source...
  34. Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. 2013. "'Hip to be Crip?' About Crip Theory, Sexuality and People with Intellectual Disabilities." Sexuality and Disability: A Journal Devoted to the Psychological and Medical Aspects of Sexuality in Rehabilitation and Community Settings 31 (4): 413-424, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-013-9287-7. Go to original source...
  35. Mallett, R., K. Runswick-Cole. 2014. Approaching Disability: Critical Issues and Perspectives. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315765464. Go to original source...
  36. Malins, P. 2004. Machinic Assemblages: Deleuze, Guattari and an Ethico-Aesthetics of Drug Use. New York: Trivium Publications.
  37. McRuer, R. 2006. Crip theory: cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press.
  38. Michalko, R. 1999. The Two-in-One Walking with Smokie, Walking with Blindness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  39. Osman, R., P. Doboš. 2019. "Vizuální nevědomí: vizuální organizace nevizuálního města." Sociální studia 16 (1): 33-55. Go to original source...
  40. Overboe, J. 2007. "Disability and Genetics: Affirming the Bare Life (the State of Exception)." Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne De Sociologie 44 (2): 219-235, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2007.tb01135.x. Go to original source...
  41. Overboe, J. 2009. "Affirming an Impersonal Life: a Different Register for Disability Studies." Journal of Literary & Cultural Disability Studies 3 (3): 241-256, https://doi.org/10.1353/jlc.0.0025. Go to original source...
  42. Overboe, J. 2012. "Theory, Impairment and Impersonal Singularities: Deleuze, Guattari and Agamben." Pp. 112-126 in D. Goodley, B. Hughes, L. J. Davis (eds.). Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023001_7. Go to original source...
  43. Porkertová, H. 2013. "Potíže s hmotou. Judith Butler a/nebo nový materialismus?" Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum 14 (2): 41-51.
  44. Riddle, Ch., A. 2013. "The Ontology of Impairment: Rethinking How We Define Disability." Pp. 23-40 in M. Wappett, K. Arndt (eds.). Emerging Perspectives on Disability Studies. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371973_2. Go to original source...
  45. Rieser, R., M. Mason. 1990. Disability Equality in the Classroom: A Human Rights Issue. London: Inner London Education Authority.
  46. Roets, G., R. Braidotti. 2012. "Nomadology and Subjectivity: Deleuze, Guattari and Critical Disability Studies." Pp. 161-178 in D. Goodley, B. Hughes, L. J. Davis. (eds.). Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137023001_10. Go to original source...
  47. Smith, R. G. 2007. "Poststructuralism, Power and the Global City." Pp. 249-260 in P. J. Taylor. Cities in globalization: practices, policies and theories. London: Routledge.
  48. Schillmeier, M. 2010. Rethinking Disability: Bodies, Senses, and Things. New York: Routledge.
  49. Shakespeare, T. 2006. Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203640098. Go to original source...
  50. Shakespeare, T. 2014. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  51. Shildrick, M. 2009. Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244641. Go to original source...
  52. Shildrick, M. 2012. "Critical Disability Studies: Rethinking the Conventions for the Age of Postmodernity." Pp. 30-41 in N. Watson, A. Roulstone, C. Thomas (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. London: Routledge.
  53. Southwell, P. 2012. "The Psycho-Social Challenge of Adapting to Visual Impairment." The British Journal of Visual Impairment 30 (2): 108-114, https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619612441766. Go to original source...
  54. Šumníková, P., L. Květoňová. 2011. Základní pojmy a informace související s tematikou postižení zraku (zrakové vady, důsledky postižení zraku, rehabilitace zrakově postižených osob, další formy podpory) [online]. Okamžik, z. ú. [cit. 7. 3. 2015]. Dostupné z: http://www.okamzik.cz/view/okamzik/Kurzy_zp/Studijni_materialy_osvetovy_pracovnik/P.Sumnikova_Zakladni_pojmy_k_zrakovemu_postizeni.pdf.
  55. Tremain, S. 2005. Foucault and the Government of Disability. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12678. Go to original source...
  56. Tremain, S. 2006. "Reproductive Freedom, Self-Regulation, and the Government of Impairment in Utero." Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 21 (1): 35-53, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb00963.x. Go to original source...
  57. Tremain, S. 2015. "This is What a Historicist and Relativist Feminist Philosophy of Disability Looks Like." Foucault Studies (19): 7-42, https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i19.4822. Go to original source...
  58. Wedgwood, N., N. J. Wilson, R. Shuttleworth. 2012. "The Dilemma of Disabled Masculinity." Men and Masculinities 15 (2): 174-194, https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X12439879. Go to original source...
  59. Vehmas, S., P. Mäkelä 2009. "The Ontology of Disability and Impairment: A Discussion of the Natural and Social Features." Pp. 42-56 in K. Kristiansen, S. Vehmas, T. Shakespeare. 2009. Arguing about Disability: Philosophical Perspectives. London: Routledge.
  60. Wilkerson, A. 2002. "Disability, Sex Radicalism, and Political Agency." NWSA Journal 14 (3): 33-57, https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2002.14.3.33. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.