Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2006, 42(6): 1171-1194 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2006.42.6.04

'The Son Has Ploughed', But a Foreign Son. Five Case Studies on Transformation Strategies in Czech Agriculture after 1989

Zdeněk R. Nešpor
Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague

Published: December 1, 2006Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Nešpor, Z.R. (2006). 'The Son Has Ploughed', But a Foreign Son. Five Case Studies on Transformation Strategies in Czech Agriculture after 1989. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review42(6), 1171-1194. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2006.42.6.04.
Download citation

References

  1. Abrahams, Ray. (ed.) 1996. After Socialism. Land Reform and Social Change in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Berghahn.
  2. Berend, I.T. 1985. 'Agriculture.' Pp. 148-209 in The Economic History of Eastern Europe, 1919-1979 I, edited by M.C. Kaser and E.A. Radice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  3. Bláha, I. Arnošt. 1925. Sociologie sedláka a dělníka. Příspěvek k sociologii společenských vrstev. (Sociology of Peasant and Worker. Contribution to Sociology of Social Classes) Prague: Orbis.
  4. Cartwright, A. 2003. 'Private Farming in Romania or What Are the Old People Going to Do with Their Land.' Pp. 171-188 in The Post-socialist Agrarian Question. Property Relations and the Rural Condition, edited by Chris Hann. Münster: Lit. Verlag.
  5. Creed, Gerald W. 1995. 'The Politics of Agriculture. Identity and Socialist Sentiment in Bulgaria.' Slavic Review 54 (4): 843-868. Go to original source...
  6. Creed, Gerald W. 1998. Domesticating Revolution. From Socialist Reform to Ambivalent Transition in a Bulgarian Village. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  7. Doucha, Tomáš. 2004. 'Czech Agriculture and the EU Accession. A Need for a New Strategy.' Agricultural Economics 50 (3): 94-99.
  8. Etzioni, Amitai. 1995. Morální dimenze ekonomiky. (Moral Dimension of Economics) Prague: Victoria Publishing.
  9. Gervais, Michel, Claude Servolin and Yves Tavernier. 1972. L'Univers politique des paysans dans la France contemporaire. Paris: A. Colin.
  10. Hann, Chris. 1993. 'From Production to Property. Decollectivization and the Family-Land Relationship in Contemporary Hungary.' Man 119 (3): 299-320. Go to original source...
  11. Hann, Chris. (ed.) 2003. The Postsocialist Agrarian Question. Property Relations and the Rural Condition. Münster: Lit Verlag.
  12. Haukanes, Haldis. 2004. Velká dramata - obyčejné životy. Postkomunistické zkušenosti českého venkova. (Great Dramas - Ordinary Lives. Post-communist Experiences in the Czech Countryside) Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství.
  13. Horská, Hana and Daniela Spěšná. 1994. Sociální souvislosti procesu transformace zemědělství. (Social Consequences of the Agricultural Transformation Process) Prague: VÚZE.
  14. Horská, Hana and Daniela Spěšná. 1996. Signály změn sociálního postavení zemědělců. (Signs of Change in the Social Position of Farmers) Prague: VÚZE.
  15. Hudečková, Helena. 2004. 'Dekolektivizace a rodinná tradice v zemědělském hospodaření.' (Decollectivisation and Family Tradition in Agriculture) Pp. 258-282 in Jihomoravský venkov po socialismu, edited by J. Kandert. Prague: Matfyzpress.
  16. Hudečková, Helena and Michal Lošťák. 2002. 'O rurální sociologii ve výuce a výzkumu na České zemědělské univerzitě.' (Rural Sociology in Education and Research at the Czech University of Agriculture) Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 38 (1-2): 89-99.
  17. Jech, Karel. 2001. Soumrak selského stavu 1945-1960. (Twilight of the Peasant State) Prague: ÚSD AV ČR.
  18. Jollivet, Marcel. 1986. 'Des sociologues en campagne.' Pp. 172-174 in L'Etat des sciences sociales en France, edited by Marc Guillaume. Paris: Ed. La Découverte.
  19. Kandert, Josef. (ed.) 2004. Jihomoravský venkov po socialismu. (The South Moravian Countryside after Socialism) Prague: Matfyzpress.
  20. Kaser, M.C. and E.A. Radice. (eds.) 1985. The Economic History of Eastern Europe, 1919-1979 I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  21. Keller, Jan. 1995. Dvanáct omylů sociologie. (Twelve Mistakes of Sociology) Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství.
  22. Lapka, Miloslav and Miroslav Gottlieb. 2000. Rolník a krajina. Kapitoly ze života soukromých rolníků. (Peasant and Landscape. Chapters from the Lives of Private Farmers) Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství.
  23. Le Bras, Gabriel. 1955. Études de sociologie religieuse I. Sociologie de la pratique religieuse dans les campagnes francaises. Paris: Presses universitaires.
  24. Leonard, Pamela and Deema Kaneff. (eds.) 2002. Post-Socialist Peasant? Rural and Urban Constructions of Identity in Eastern Europe, East Africa and the Former Soviet Union. Basingstoke - New York: Palgrave.
  25. Lošťák, M. 2004. 'Proměny soudobého zemědělství.' Pp. 177-198 in Jihomoravský venkov po socialismu, edited by J. Kandert. Prague: Matfyzpress.
  26. Lozoviuk, Petr. 2005. Evropská etnologie ve středoevropské perspektivě. (European Ethnology in the Central European Perspective) Pardubice: UPa.
  27. Majerová, Věra. 1992. 'Sociologický pohled na změny v československém zemědělství po roce 1989.' (A Sociological Outlook on Changes in Czechoslovak Agriculture after 1989) Sociologie venkova a zemědělství 28 (1): 31-41.
  28. Majerová, Věra. 2000a. Sociologie venkova a zemědělství. (A Sociology of the Countryside and Agriculture) Prague: ČZU.
  29. Majerová, Věra. 2000b. 'Four Milestones in the Societal and Economic Development of Czech Agriculture.' Czech Sociological Review 7 (2): 157-176.
  30. Majerová, Věra and Emerich Majer. 2003. Kvalitativní výzkum v sociologii venkova a zemědělství I. (Qualitative Research in the Sociology of the Countryside and Agriculture Vol. 1) Prague: ČZU.
  31. Majerová, Věra and Emerich Majer. 2005. Kvalitativní výzkum v sociologii venkova a zemědělství II. (Qualitative Research in the Sociology of the Countryside and Agriculture Vol. 2) Prague: ČZU.
  32. Meurs, Mieke. 2001. The Evolution of Agrarian Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Go to original source...
  33. Miller, L.G. and P. Heady. 2003. 'Cooperation, Power and Community. Economic and Ideology in the Russian Countryside.' Pp. 257-299 in The Post-socialist Agrarian Question. Property Relations and the Rural Condition, edited by Chris Hann. Münster: Lit. Verlag.
  34. Myant, Martin. 2003. The Rise and Fall of Czech Capitalism. Economic Development in the Czech Republic since 1989. Cheltenham - Northampton: E. Elgar.
  35. Necov, Neco Petkov. 2006. Dějiny Vojvodova. (The History of Vojvodovo) Edited by M. Jakoubek, Z. R. Nešpor and T. Hirt. Občanské sdružení Vojvodovo. (Vojvodovo Civic Association). Manuscript.
  36. Nešpor, Zdeněk R. 2005a. Sociokulturní kapitál a socioekonomické instituce v zemědělství. (Social Capital and Socio-economic Institutions in Agriculture) Prague: NHÚ J. Hlávky.
  37. Nešpor, Zdeněk R. 2005b. 'Reemigrace českých západních emigrantů v 90. letech 20. století z hlediska ekonomické sociologie.' (The Re-emigration of Czech Western Emigrants in the 1990s from the Perspective of Economic Sociology) Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 41 (1): 31-55.
  38. Perrota, L. 2002. 'Rural Identities in Transition: Particle Persons and Partial Peasants in Post-Socialist Russia.' Pp. 117-135 in Post-Socialist Peasant? Rural and Urban Constructions of Identity in Eastern Europe, East Africa and the Former Soviet Union, edited by Pamela Leonard and Deema Kaneff. Basingstoke - New York: Palgrave.
  39. Premusová, Jarmila. 1999. Sociologický a prostorový výzkum vybraných regionů na česko-polské hranici. (Sociological and Spatial Investigation of Selected Regions on the Czech-Polish Border) Ostrava: OU.
  40. Ritzer, George. 1996. Mcdonaldizace společnosti. Výzkum měnící se povahy soudobého společenského života. (The Mcdonaldisation of Society. An Investigation into the Changing Character of Contemporary Social Life) Prague: Academia.
  41. Salzmann, Zdeněk and Vladimír Scheufler. 1974. Komárov. A Czech Farming Village. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  42. Skalník, Petr. (ed.) 2004. Dolní Roveň. Poločas výzkumu. (Dolní Roveň. Research at Half-time) Pardubice: UPa.
  43. Skovajsa, Marek. 2006. 'Proměny a fúze kultur v procesech postkomunistické transformace a evropské integrace.' (Cultural Changes and Fusions in Processes of Post-communist Transformation and European Integration) Pp. 253-263 in Socioekonomické hodnoty, politiky a instituce v období vstupu České republiky do Evropské unie, edited by Zdeněk R. Nešpor and Jiří Večerník. Sociologické studie/Sociological Studies 06: 1. Prague: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
  44. Stone, D.G. and C.E. Downum. 1999. 'Neo-Boserupian Ecology and Agricultural Risk. Ethic Politics and Land Control in the Arid Southwest.' American Anthropologist 101: 113-128. Go to original source...
  45. Tauber, Jan. 1965. Kdo žije na vesnici. (Who Lives in the Villages) České Budějovice: Nakladatelství České Budějovice.
  46. Thelen, Tatjana. 2001. 'Post-socialist Entrepreneurs in Rural Hungary. Social Continuity and Legal Practice in Mesterszállás.' Acta Ethnographica Hungarica 46 (3-4): 315-342.
  47. Thelen, Tatjana. 2003. 'Are the Kuláks Back? Inherited Capital and Social Continuity in Mesterszállás (Hungary).' Pp. 329-346 in Distinct Inheritances. Property, Family and Community in a Changing Europe, edited by Cannes Grandits and Patrick Heady. Münster: Lit Verlag.
  48. Torsello, Davide. 2003. Trust, Property and Social Change in a Southern Slovakian Village. Münster: Lit Verlag.
  49. Verdery, Katherine. 1996. What Was Socialism, and What Comes Next? New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  50. Verdery, Katherine. 1998. 'Transnationalism, Nationalism, Citizenship, and Property: Eastern Europe since 1989.' American Ethnologist 25 (2): 291-306. Go to original source...
  51. Verdery, Katherine. 2003. The Vanishing Hectare. Property and Value in Postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.