Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2020, 56(1): 3-27 | DOI: 10.13060/csr.2020.001

Dealing with Parental Conflicts at the Child Protection Departments in the Czech Republic: Use of Defensive Practice and Its Factors

Kateřina Hejnová1, Johana Chylíková2
1 Filozofická fakulta, Univerzita Karlova, Praha
2 Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i., Praha

This study focuses on the approaches used by Czech social workers operating in the field of child protection to resolve parental conflicts and looks specifically at their inclination to employ defensive practice. Defensive practice involves prioritising regulations and prescribed rules over the interests of clients, i.e. parents and children. The aim of this study is to verify, with the help of a questionnaire, the theoretical connections between the use of defensive practice and several factors that represent working conditions and external pressures. The research indicates that the factors connected with the use of defensive practice to deal with parental conflicts have the opposite effect in the Czech Republic that that observed in international studies or have no influence whatsoever. Child protection social workers who emphasise compliance regard their working conditions as favourable and have somewhat conservative attitudes and beliefs. The authors' interpretation of the findings is that the emphasis on regulations in Czech child protection is not a defensive reaction to threatening working conditions, but an expression of loyalty to an organisation that offers them a pleasant work environment where they need not be afraid of any potential failures or consequences of their decisions. They also propose redefining Czech defensive practice by placing less emphasis on compliance as a reaction to unfavourable working conditions.

Keywords: parental conflict, guardianship, defensive practice, social work

Accepted: February 28, 2020; Published: March 1, 2020Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hejnová, K., & Chylíková, J. (2020). Dealing with Parental Conflicts at the Child Protection Departments in the Czech Republic: Use of Defensive Practice and Its Factors. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review56(1), 3-27. doi: 10.13060/csr.2020.001.
Download citation

Attachments

Download file20-01-01_Hejnova-priloha.pdf

File size: 441.06 kB

References

  1. Acock, A. C. 2008. A gentle introduction to Stata. 5th ed. Texas: Stata press.
  2. Aldridge, M. 1994. Making Social Work News. London: Routledge.
  3. Altemeyer, B. 1988. Enemies of freedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  4. Arruabarrena, I., J. De Paúl. 2012. "Improving accuracy and consistency in child maltreatment severity assessment in child protection services in Spain: new set of criteria to help caseworkers in substantiation decisions." Children and Youth Services Review 34 (4): 666-674, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.011. Go to original source...
  5. Ayre, P. 2001. "Child protection and the media: Lessons from the last three decades." British Journal of Social Work 31 (6): 887-901, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/31.6.887. Go to original source...
  6. Banks, S. 2012. Ethics and Values in Social Work. London: Palgrave, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-37592-5. Go to original source...
  7. Barak, M. E. M., A. Levin, J. A. Nissly, J. C. Lane. 2006. "Why do they leave? Modeling child welfare workers' turnover intentions." Children and Youth Services Review 28 (5): 548-577, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.06.003. Go to original source...
  8. Barvíková, J., K. Svobodová, A. Šťastná. 2010. Podmínky výkonu sociálně-právní ochrany dětí na úrovni obecních úřadů obcí s rozšířenou působností. Praha: VÚPSV.
  9. Barvíková, J., A. Šťastná. 2014. Využívání opatření k zachování nebo obnově rodinných vztahů mezi rodiči a dětmi. Praha: VÚPSV.
  10. Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
  11. Bolton, A., C. Lennings. 2010. "Clinical opinions of structured risk assessments for forensic child protection: the development of a clinically relevant device." Children and Youth Services Review 32 (10): 1300-1310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.04.022. Go to original source...
  12. Boyas, J., L. H. Wind, S. Y. Kang. 2012. "Exploring the relationship between employment-based social capital, job stress, burnout, and intent to leave among child protection workers: an age-based path analysis model." Children and Youth Services Review 34 (1): 50-62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.08.033. Go to original source...
  13. Britner, P. A., D. G. Mossler. 2002. "Professionals' decision-making about out-of-home placements following instances of child abuse." Child Abuse & Neglect 26 (4): 317-332, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00311-3. Go to original source...
  14. Butler, I., M. Drakeford. 2005. Scandal, Social Policy and Social Welfare. Bristol: The Policy Press, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt9qgxh4. Go to original source...
  15. Cash, S. J. 2001. "Risk assessment in child welfare: the art and science." Children and Youth Services Review 23 (11): 811-830, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-7409(01)00162-1. Go to original source...
  16. Colton, M., R. Sanders, M. Williams. 2001. An introduction to working with children: A guide for social workers. Houndmills: Palgrave, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-91274-2. Go to original source...
  17. Cooper, A., R. Hetherington, I. Katz. 2003. The Risk Factor: Making the Child Protection System Work for Children. London: Demos.
  18. Cooper, A., A. Whittaker. 2014. "History as tragedy, never as farce: Tracing the long cultural narrative of child protection in England." Journal of Social Work Practice 28 (3): 251-266, https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2014.932276. Go to original source...
  19. Černá, P. 2001. Rozvod, otcové a děti. Praha: Eurolex Bohemia.
  20. Darlington, Y., K. Healy, J. A. Feeney. 2010. "Approaches to assessment and intervention across four types of child and family welfare services." Children and Youth Services Review 32 (3): 356-364, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2009.10.005. Go to original source...
  21. Davidson-Arad, B., E. Peled, R. Leichtentritt. 2008. "Representations of fathers and mothers in court petitions for dependent minor status for children at risk." Children and Youth Services Review 30 (8): 893-902, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.12.016. Go to original source...
  22. Ellett, A. J. 2009. "Intentions to remain employed in child welfare: the role of human caring, self-efficacy beliefs, and professional organizational culture." Children and Youth Services Review 31 (1): 78-88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.07.002. Go to original source...
  23. Farmer, L., M. Owen. 1998. "Gender and the Child Protection Process." The British Journal of Social Work 28 (4): 545-564, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a011366. Go to original source...
  24. Featherstone, B., C. A. Hooper, J. Scourfield, J. Taylor. 2010. Gender and Child Welfare in Society. Chichester: Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470684771. Go to original source...
  25. Ferguson, H. 2003. "Protecting children in new times: child protection and the risk society." Child&Family Social Work 2 (4): 221-234, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.1997.00064.x. Go to original source...
  26. Ferguson, H. 2005. "Working with violence, the emotions and the psycho-social dynamics of child protection: Reflections on the Victoria Climbié case." Social Work Education 24 (7): 781-95, https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470500238702. Go to original source...
  27. Fluke, J. D., M. Chabot, B. Fallon, B. MacLaurin, C. Blackstock. 2010. "Placement decisions and disparities among aboriginal groups: an application of the decision making ecology through multi-level analysis." Child Abuse & Neglect 34 (1): 57-69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2009.08.009. Go to original source...
  28. Franklin, B. 1999. Social policy, the media and misrepresentation. London: Routledge.
  29. Füredi, F. 2006. The Politics of Fear; Beyond Left and Right. London: Continuum Press.
  30. Giddens, A. 2010. Důsledky modernity. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  31. Grant, S., L. Sheridan, S. A. Webb. 2017. "Newly Qualified Social Workers' Readiness for Practice in Scotland." The British Journal of Social Work 47 (2): 487-506, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv146. Go to original source...
  32. Harris, N. 1987. "Defensive social work." British Journal of Social Work 17 (1): 61-69, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bjsw.a055315. Go to original source...
  33. Chylíková, J. 2011. "Úvod do problematiky výzkumu citlivých témat ve výběrových šetřeních." Data a výzkum - SDA Info 5 (2): 185-203.
  34. Chylíková, J. 2018. "Velká data jako alternativa výběrových šetření v kvantitativním sociálněvědním výzkumu." Naše společnost (Our Society) 16 (1): 57-79, https://doi.org/10.13060/1214438X.2018.1.16.416. Go to original source...
  35. Keddell, E. 2011. "Reasoning processes in child protection decision making: negotiating moral minefields and risky relationships." British Journal of Social Work 41 (7): 1251-1270, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr012. Go to original source...
  36. Kemshall, H., J. Pritchard. 2005. Good Practice in Risk Assessment and Risk Management. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
  37. Križ, K., M. Skivenes. 2014. "Street-level policy aims of child welfare workers in England, Norway and the United States: An exploratory study." Children and Youth Services Review 40 (1): 71-78, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.02.014. Go to original source...
  38. Kuchařová, V. et al. 2010. Zhodnocení a optimalizace řízení systému sociálně-právní ochrany (ohrožených) dětí a rodin ve vybraných regionech. Praha: VÚPSV.
  39. Laan, G. van der. 1998. Otázky legitimace sociální práce. Ostrava: Albert, Ostravská univerzita.
  40. LeBlanc, V. R., C. Regehr, A. Shlonsky, M. Bogo. 2012. "Stress responses and decision making in child protection workers faced with high conflict situations." Child Abuse & Neglect 36 (5): 404-412, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.01.003. Go to original source...
  41. Lipsky, M. 2010. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  42. Marinetto, M. 2011. "A Lipskian analysis of child protection failures from Victoria Climbié to 'Baby P': a street-level re-evaluation of joined-up governance." Public Administration 89 (3): 1164-1181, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01939.x. Go to original source...
  43. Matoušek, O. a kol. 2015. Děti a rodiče v rozvodu. Praha: Portál.
  44. Matoušek, O., H. Pazlarová. 2015. Státní orgány sociálně-právní ochrany dětí: Dobrá praxe z pohledu rodin a pracovníků. Praha: Karolinum.
  45. McPherson, L., M. Barnett. 2006. "Beginning Practice in Child Protection: A Blended Learning Approach." Social Work Education 25 (2): 192-198, https://doi.org/10.1080/02615470500487838. Go to original source...
  46. MPSV. 2012. Sociálně-právní ochrana dětí v případech rozvodových a rozchodových konfliktů. Praha: Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí.
  47. MPSV. 2018. Roční výkaz o výkonu sociálně právní ochrany dětí za rok 2017. Praha: Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí.
  48. Munro, E. 2010. The Munro Review of Child Protection: Part One: A Systems Analysis. London: The Stationery Office.
  49. Munro, E. 2011. The Munro Review of child protection. Final report: A child-centered system. London: Department for Education.
  50. Musil, L. 2004. Ráda bych Vám pomohla, ale… Brno: Nakladatelství Marek Zeman.
  51. Navrátil, P., R. Janebová a kol. 2010. Reflexivita v posuzování životní situace klientek a klientů sociální práce. Hradec Králové: Gaudeamus.
  52. O'Sullivan, T. 2011. Decision-making in social work. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  53. Pinkney, S. 2018. New Directions in Children's Welfare: Professionals, Policy and Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54539-8_1. Go to original source...
  54. Rose, G. 1997. "Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics." Progress in Human Geography 21 (3): 305-320, https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122. Go to original source...
  55. Rzepnicki, T. L., P. R. Johnson. 2005. "Examining decision errors in child protection: a new application of root cause analysis." Children and Youth Services Review 27 (4): 393-407, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.11.015. Go to original source...
  56. Shdaimah, C. 2010. "The law cannot terminate bloodlines: families and child welfare decisions." Children and Youth Services Review 32 (5): 704-710, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.01.007. Go to original source...
  57. Soukup, P. 2013. "Věcná významnost výsledků a její možnosti měření." Data a výzkum - SDA Info 7 (2): 125-148, https://doi.org/10.13060/23362391.2013.127.2.41. Go to original source...
  58. Soukup, P., L. Rabušic. 2007. "Několik poznámek K jedné obsesi českých sociálních věd-statistické významnosti." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 43 (2): 379-395.
  59. Stahmer, A. C., M. Hurlburt, S. McCue Horwitz, J. Landswerk, J. Zhang, L. K. Leslie. 2009. "Associations between intensity of child welfare involvement and childdevelopment among young children in child welfare." Child Abuse & Neglect 33 (9): 598-611, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.07.008. Go to original source...
  60. Stalker, K. 2003. "Managing risk and uncertainty in social work: A literature review." Journal of Social Work 32 (1): 211-233, https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173030032006. Go to original source...
  61. Stanford, S. 2010. "'Speaking back' to fear: Responding to the moral dilemmas of risk in social work practice." British Journal of Social Work 40 (4): 1065-1080, https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp156. Go to original source...
  62. Webb, S. A. 2006. Social Work in a Risk Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21442-2. Go to original source...
  63. Weber, M. 1997. Autorita, etika a společnost. Praha: Mladá fronta.
  64. Whittaker, A. 2011. "Social defences and organisational culture in a local authority child protection setting: Challenges for the Munro Review?" Journal of Social Work Practice 25 (4): 481-495, https://doi.org/10.1080/02650533.2011.626654. Go to original source...
  65. Wonnacot, J. 2012. Mastering Social Work Supervision. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishing.
  66. Zákon č. 359/1999 Sb., o sociálně-právní ochraně dětí, ve znění pozdějších předpisů.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.