Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2020, 56(2): 165-195 | DOI: 10.13060/csr.2020.006

‘It Depends Who You Meet’: The One-Child Family and Linked Life Paths’

Radka Dudová
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i., Praha

Single-child families are a phenomenon that, alongside childlessness, is contributing to the trend of declining fertility, especially in the countries of central and eastern Europe, including the Czech Republic. This article presents the results of a qualitative study based on problem-centred interviews with parents of a single child who had originally planned to have more children aimed at exploring their understanding of the main factors that led to them having one child, when two-child families are still the preferred normative model in Czech society. The analysis presents the main lines of argumentation that the respondents used to try to explain and justify their reproductive choices. In their narratives, a single-child family is constructed as the consequence of certain events and transitions in different areas of life and the timing of these events in the linked life paths of the two partners. In a situation where intensive parenting is the normative ideal and where it is also difficult to combine work and a family, and in view of the normative hierarchy of different paths to parenthood that exists (where the preferred path is to have a biological child in a two-parent family), being the parent of single child is becoming an accepted form of parenthood.

Keywords: single-child family, low fertility, parenthood, fertility plans, small families

Published: May 19, 2020Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dudová, R. (2020). ‘It Depends Who You Meet’: The One-Child Family and Linked Life Paths’. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review56(2), 165-195. doi: 10.13060/csr.2020.006.
Download citation

References

  1. Anderson, M. 1998. "Highly Restricted Fertility: Very Small Families in the British Fertility Decline." Population Studies 52 (2): 177-199, https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000150366. Go to original source...
  2. Bailey, A. J., M. K. Blake, T. J. Cooke. 2004. "Migration, Care, and the Linked Lives of Dual-earner Households." Environment and Planning 36 (9): 1617-1632, https://doi.org/10.1068/a36198. Go to original source...
  3. Beck, U. 2012. "Individualism." In G. Ritzer (ed.). The WileyBlackwell Encyclopedia of Globalization . Blackwell Publishing Ltd., https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog292. Go to original source...
  4. Blossfeld, H. P., E. Klijzing, M. Mills, K. Kurz. 2005. Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203003206. Go to original source...
  5. Boje, D. 1991. "The Storytelling Organization: A Study of Story Performance in an Office- Supply Firm." Administrative Science Quarterly 36 (1): 106-126, https://doi.org/10.2307/2393432. Go to original source...
  6. Breton, D., F. Prioux. 2009. "The One-child Family: France in the European Context." Demographic Research 20 (27): 657-692, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2009.20.27. Go to original source...
  7. Creswell, J. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions . Sage, Thousand Oaks, California.
  8. Čadová, N. 2016. "Postoje českých občanů k manželství a rodině - únor 2016." Tisková zpráva z výzkumu Naše společnost, v16-02. Praha: CVVM.
  9. Edley, N. 2001. "Analysing Masculinity: Interpretative Repertoirs, Ideological Dilemmas and Subject Positions." Pp. 189-228 in M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, S. J. Yates (eds.). Discourse and Data . A Guide for Analysis . London: Sage/Open University.
  10. Elder, G. H. 1985. "Perspectives on the Life Course." Pp. 23-49 in G. H. Elder (ed.). Life Course Dynamics: Trajectories and Transitions. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  11. Elder, G. H. 1994. "Time, Human Agency, and Social Change: Perspectives on the Life Course." Social Psychology Quarterly 57 (1): 4-15, https://doi.org/10.2307/2786971. Go to original source...
  12. Elder, G. H. 1998. "The Life Course as Developmental Theory." Child Development 69 (1): 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06128.x. Go to original source...
  13. Elder, G. H., R. Crosnoe, M. K. Johnson. 2003. "The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory." Pp. 3-19 in J. T. Mortimer, M. J. Shanahan (eds.). Handbook of the Life Course. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48247-2_1. Go to original source...
  14. Erel, U. 2007. "Constructing Meaningful Lives: Biographical Methods in Research on Migrant Women." Sociological Research Online 12 (4): 5, https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1573. Go to original source...
  15. Esping-Andersen, G., F. C. Billari. 2015. "Re-theorizing Family Demographics." Population and Development Review 41 (1): 1-31, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00024.x. Go to original source...
  16. Faircloth, C. 2014. "Intensive Parenting and the Expansion of Parenting." Pp. 25-50 in E. Lee, J. Bristow, C. Faircloth, J. Macvarish (eds.). Parenting Culture Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304612_2. Go to original source...
  17. Fialová, L., D. Hamplová, M. Kučera, S. Vymětalová. 2000. Představy mladých lidí o manželství a rodičovství. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  18. Fivush, R., C. A. Haden. 2003. Autobiographical Memory and the Construction of A Narrative Self: Developmental and Cultural Perspectives. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410607478. Go to original source...
  19. Foster, C. 2004. "The Limits to Low Fertility: A Biosocial Approach." Population and Development Review 26 (2): 209-234, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2000.00209.x. Go to original source...
  20. Frejka, T. 2008. "Overview Chapter 3: Birth regulation in Europe." Demographic Research 19 (5): 73-84, https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2008.19.5. Go to original source...
  21. Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
  22. Gillespie, R. 1999. Choosing Childlessness: Resisting Pronatalism and the Emergence of a Childless Femininity. Southampton: University of Southampton.
  23. Hašková, H. 2009. Fenomén bezdětnosti. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  24. Hašková, H. (ed.), M. Vohlídalová, H. Maříková, R. Dudová, Z. Uhde, A. Křížková, L. Formánková. 2014. Vlastní cestou? Životní dráhy v pozdně moderní společnosti. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  25. Hašková, H., L. Zamykalová. 2006. "Mít děti - co je to za normu? Čí je to norma?" Biograf [online] (40-41): 130 odst. Dostupné z: http://www.biograf.org/clanky/clanek.php?clanek=v4001.
  26. Hašková, H., R. Dudová. 2017. "Institutions and Discourses on Childcare for Children Under the Age of Three in a Comparative French-Czech Perspective." Sociological Research Online 22 (3): 120-142, https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780417725940. Go to original source...
  27. Hašková, H., R. Dudová, K. Pospíšilová. 2019. "Kde se berou jedináčci? Faktory související s jednodětností v ČR." Demografie 61 (2): 93-110.
  28. Hayford, S. R. 2009. "The Evolution of Fertility Expectations over the Life Course." Demography 46 (4): 765-783, https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.0.0073. Go to original source...
  29. Hays, S. 1996. The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. Yale: Yale University Press.
  30. Heinz, W. R., H. Krüger. 2001. "Life Course: Innovations and Challenges for Social Research." Current Sociology 49 (2): 29-45, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392101049002004. Go to original source...
  31. Chaloupková, J. 2008. "Ideální věk rodičovství v České republice a v evropském srovnání." Data a výzkum - SDA info 2 (2): 109-130.
  32. Chromková Manea, B. E., L.Vondráčková, J. Matula. 2014. "Jednodětnost v České společnosti." Pp. 125-142 in P. Fučík, B. E. Chromková Manea. Rodičovské dráhy. Dvacet let vývoje české porodnosti v sociologické perspektivě. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  33. Chromková-Manea, B. E., P. Fučík. 2007. "Teorie konfliktních preferencí a plodnost v České republice." Demografie 49 (4): 244-252.
  34. Jefferies, J. 2001. "A Reluctance to Embrace the One-Child Family in Britain?" [online]. Příspěvek přednesený na konferenci EURESCO The Second Demografic Transition in Europe. Bad Herrenalb, Německo, 23.-28. června 2001. Dostupné z: http://citeseerx. ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.560.7471&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
  35. Kyzlinková, R. 2013. Bezdětnost a rodiny s jedním dítětem . Analýza dat sociologického výběrového šetření "Životní a pracovní dráhy 2010" [online]. Dostupné z: https://www. soc.cas.cz/sites/default/files/soubory/kyzlnkova_2013_bezdetnost_jedinacci.pdf.
  36. Liefbroer, A. C., F. C. Billari. 2009. "Bringing Norms Back in: A Theoretical and Empirical Discussion of their Importance for Understanding Demographic Behaviour." Population, Space and Place 16 (4): 287-305, https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.552. Go to original source...
  37. McDonald, P. 2013. "Societal Foundations for Explaining Fertility: Gender Equity." Demographic Research S16 (34): 981-994, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.34. Go to original source...
  38. Oláh, L. Sz. 2003. "Gendering Fertility: Second Births in Sweden and Hungary." Population Research and Policy Review 22 (2): 171-200, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025089031871. Go to original source...
  39. Oppenheimer, V. K. 1994. "Women's Rising Employment and the Future of the Family in Industrial Societies." Population and Development Review 20 (2): 293-342, https://doi.org/10.2307/2137521. Go to original source...
  40. Pakosta, P. 2008. "Jedináček a rozvod - vliv rozvodu na reprodukční dráhu ženy." Sociální studia (5) 2: 55-68.
  41. Pavlicová, M. 2016. Náklady intenzivního mateřství [online] . Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i. Dostupné z: http://diverzita.cz/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ Náklady-intenzivního-mateřství-v-ČR-Martina-Pavlicová_edit-1.pdf.
  42. Rabušic, L., B. E. Chromková Manea. 2007. "Jednodětnost v českých rodinách. Kdo jsou ti, kdo mají nebo plánují pouze jedno dítě." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 43 (4): 699-719, https://www.jstor.org/stable/41132451.
  43. Rabušic, L., B. E. Chromková Manea. 2013. "Velikost rodiny - postoje, normy a realita." Demografie 55 (3): 208-219.
  44. Scott, J., D. Alwin. 1998. "Retrospective versus Prospective Measurement of Life Histories in Longitudinal Research." Pp. 98-127 in J. Z. Giele, G. H. Jr. Elder (eds.). Methods of Life Course Research. Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483348919.n5. Go to original source...
  45. Settersten, R. A., O. G. Hägestad. 1996. "What's the Latest? Cultural Age Deadlines for Family Transitions." The Gerontologist 36 (2): 178-188, https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/36.2.178. Go to original source...
  46. Settersten, R. A. Jr. 2003. "Normative Structuring of the Life Course." Pp. 81-98 in J. T. Mortimer, M. J. Shanahan (eds.). Handbook of the Life Course. New York: Kluwer Academic Press. Go to original source...
  47. Shirani, F., K. Henwood. 2011. "Taking One Day at a Time: Temporal Experiences in the Context of Unexpected Life Course Transitions." Time & Society 20 (1): 49-68, https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X10374906. Go to original source...
  48. Schoen, R., Young J. K., C. A. Nathanson, J. Fields, N. M.e Astone. 1997. "Why Do Americans Want Children?" Population and Development Review 23 (2): 333-358, https://doi.org/10.2307/2137548. Go to original source...
  49. Slepičková, L. 2015. "Dokdy je možné fertilizovat ženu? Parlamentní debata o zákonné úpravě asistované reprodukce." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum 16 (2): 60-72, https://doi.org/10.13060/12130028.2015.16.2.221. Go to original source...
  50. Sobotka, T., É. Beaujouan. 2014. "Two Is Best ? The Persistence of a Two-Child Family Ideal in Europe." Population and Development Review 40 (3): 391-419, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2014.00691.x. Go to original source...
  51. Surkyn, J., R. Lesthaeghe. 2004. "Value Orientations and the Second Demographic Transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An Update." Demographic Research S3: 45-86, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.3. Go to original source...
  52. Šprocha, B., L. Šídlo, G. Nováková, A. Šťastná. 2017. "Bezdetnosť - nový fenomén v životných drahách žien na Slovensku." Sociológia 49 (5): 561-587, https://doi.org/10.31577/sociologia.2018.50.5.21. Go to original source...
  53. Šťastná, A. 2007. "Druhé dítě v rodině - preference a hodnotové orientace českých žen." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 43 (4): 721-745.
  54. Šťastná, A. 2011. "Realisation of Childbearing Intentions in the Czech Republic." Demografie 53 (4): 321-332.
  55. Šťastná, A., J. Slabá, J. Koucourková. 2017. "Plánování, načasování a důvody odkladu narození prvního dítěte v České republice." Demografie 59 (3): 207-223.
  56. Torr, B. M., S. E. Short. 2004. "Second Births and the Second Shift: A Research Note on Gender Equity and Fertility." Population and Development Review 30 (1): 109-130, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.00005.x. Go to original source...
  57. Vidovićová, L., E. Gregorová. 2007. "Věkové normy v sociologické perspektivě." Sociální studia / Social Studies 4 (1-2): 201-217. Go to original source...
  58. Witzel, A., H. Reiter. 2012. The ProblemCentered Interview. London: Sage Publications.
  59. Zeman, K. 2018. "Cohort Fertility and Educational Expansion in the Czech Republic during the 20th Century." Demographic Research 38 (1): 1699-1732, https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.38.56. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.