Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2010, 46(1): 43-72 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2010.46.1.02

Alternative Models of Entrance Exams and Access to Tertiary Education: A Simulation Study

Tomáš Konečný, Josef Basl, Jan Mysliveček
1 CERGE-EI, Praha
2 Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i., Praha 3 CERGE-EI, Praha

The study evaluates the potential impact of alternative models of university entrance exams - a model based on field-specific knowledge and a model relying on general aptitude tests - in the context of the Czech education system since 1998, a system that can be described as highly stratified and suffering from a notable excess of demand for higher education over supply. Using the dataset Sonda Maturant 1998, the authors show that entrance exams based on general aptitude tests may outperform the field-specific knowledge model in terms of providing access to talented students from a lower socioeconomic background. The simulations show that under the general aptitude regime the relative chances of an applicant with a university-educated father are only one-quarter higher than the relative chances of a student with a less educated father, compared to more than a one-third difference in the case of the regime emphasising field-specific knowledge. For mother's education, the respective odds ratios differ by the even larger margin of 28 percentage points.

Keywords: higher education, entrance exams, educational equity, Czech Republic.

Published: February 1, 2010Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Konečný, T., Basl, J., & Mysliveček, J. (2010). Alternative Models of Entrance Exams and Access to Tertiary Education: A Simulation Study. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review46(1), 43-72. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2010.46.1.02.
Download citation

References

  1. Abdulkadiroglu, A., T. Sonmez. 2003. "School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach." The American Economic Review 93 (3): 729-747. Go to original source...
  2. Barr, N., I. Crawford. 1998. "Funding Higher Education in an Age of Expansion." Education Economics 6 (1): 45-70. Go to original source...
  3. Bateman, M., D. Spruill. 1996. "Student Decision-making: Insights from the College Choice Process." College Student Journal 30 (2): 152-164.
  4. Buchmann, C., B. Dalton. 2002. "Interpersonal Influences and Educational Aspirations in 12 Countries: The Importance of Institutional Context." Sociology of Education 75 (2): 99-122. Go to original source...
  5. Buchamann, C., H. Park. 2005. "The Institutional Embeddedness of Educational and Occupational Expectations: A Comparative Study of 12 Countries." Příspěvek přednesený na konferenci Research Commitee on Stratification (RC 28) of the International Sociological Association. Los Angeles, CA, 19. 8. 2005.
  6. Cameron, A. C., P. K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  7. Dearden, L., E. Fitzsimons, A. Goodman, G. Kaplan. 2008. "Higher Education Funding Reforms in England: The Distributional Effects and the Shifting Balance of Costs." The Economic Journal 118 (526): F100-F125. Go to original source...
  8. EURYDICE. 2008. "Struktury systému vzdělávání, odborné přípravy, a vzdělávání dospělých v Evropě: Česká republika 2008." [online]. Praha: Ústav pro informace ve vzdělávání - ÚIV, Národní oddělení EURYDICE, Evropská komise [cit. 10. 7. 2009]. Dostupné z: <http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/ressources/eurydice/pdf/041DN/041_CZ_CS.pdf>.
  9. Griffith, S. 2008. "Exams That Failed." The Sunday Times [online] 19. 10. 2008 [cit. 10. 7. 2009]. Dostupné z: <http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/article4968871.ece>.
  10. Hansen, M. N. 1997. "Social and Economic Inequality in the Educational Career: Do the Effects of Social Background Characteristics Decline?" European Sociological Review 13 (3): 305-321. Go to original source...
  11. Jacobs, B. 2002. "An Investigation of Education Finance Reform: Graduate Taxes and Income Contingent Loans in the Netherlands." CPB Discussion Paper 9. The Hague: CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
  12. Kerckhoff, A. C. 1976. "The Status Attainment Process: Socialization or Allocation." Social Forces 55 (2): 152-174. Go to original source...
  13. Kobrin, J. L. B. F. Patterson, E. J. Shaw, K. D. Mattern, S. M. Barbuti. 2008. "Validity of the SAT for Predicting First-Year College Grade Point Average." College Board Research Report No. 2008-5. New York: The College Board.
  14. Lucas, S. R. 1999. Tracking Inequality: Stratification and Mobility in American High Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
  15. Lucas, S. R. 2001. "Effectively Maintained Inequality: Education Transitions, Track Mobility, and Social Background Effects." American Journal of Sociology 106 (6): 1642-1690. Go to original source...
  16. Manski, C. F., D. A. Wise. 1983. College Choice in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Go to original source...
  17. Matějů, P., I. Procházková, P. Burdová. 2006. "Přechod mezi střední a vysokou školou ve světle Sondy Maturant a Uchazeč 1998-1999." Pp. 313-341 in P. Matějů, J. Straková (eds.). (Ne)rovné šance na vzdělání: vzdělanostní nerovnosti v České republice. Praha: Academia.
  18. Matějů, P., M. L. Smith, P. Soukup, J. Basl. 2007. "Determination of College Expectations in OECD Countries: The Role of Individual and Structural Factors." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 43 (6): 1121-1148.
  19. Matějů, P., J. Straková. 2003. "Role rodiny a školy v reprodukci vzdělanostních nerovností: sociologický pohled na úlohu víceletých gymnázií ve světle výzkumu PISA 2000." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 39 (5): 625-652.
  20. Mattern, K. D., B. F. Patterson, E. J. Shaw, J. L. Kobrin, S. M. Barbuti. 2008. "Differential Validity and Prediction of the SAT." College Board Research Report No. 2008-4. New York: College Board.
  21. NACAC. 2008. Report of the Commission on the Use of Standardized Tests in Undergraduate Admission. Arlington, VA: National Association for College Admission Counseling.
  22. Rothstein, J. M. 2004. "College performance predictions and the SAT." Journal of Econometrics 121 (1-2): 297-317. Go to original source...
  23. SCIO. 2009. "Přehled fakult s NSZ." [online]. Praha: SCIO [cit. 9. 7. 2009]. Dostupné z: <http://www.scio.cz/in/2vs/nsz/fakulty/info.asp>.
  24. Simonová, N., T. Katrňák. 2008. "Empirické přístupy v sociálně stratifikačním výzkumu vzdělanostních nerovností." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 44 (4): 725-743.
  25. Stannek, A., F. Ziegele. 2005. "Private Higher Education in Europe: A National Report on Germany." Centrum für Hochschulenentwicklung Arbeitspapier [online] Nr. 71. Gütersloh: Centrum für Hochschulenentwicklung [cit. 9. 7. 2009]. Dostupné z: <http://www.che.de/downloads/Studie_Privathochschulen_AP71.pdf>.
  26. ÚIV. 2008. Vývojová ročenka školství v ČR: 2002/03-2007/08. Praha: Ústav pro informace ve vzdělávání.
  27. ÚIV. 2009. Statistická ročenka školství 2008/2009: výkonové ukazatele. Praha: Ústav pro informace ve vzdělávání.
  28. Vodopivec, M. 2009. "A Simulation of an Income Contingent Tuition Scheme in a Transition Economy." Higher Education 57 (4): 429-448. Go to original source...
  29. Zwick, R. 2007. College Admission Testing. Arlington, VA: National Association of College Admission Counseling.
  30. Zwick, R., J. C. Sklar. 2005. "Predicting College Grades and Degree Completion Using High School Grades and SAT Scores: The Role of Student Ethnicity and First Language." American Educational Research Journal 42 (3): 439-464. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.