Czech Sociological Review 1995, 3(2):117-136 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.1995.31.12.02

Who Has Gotten Ahead After the Fall of Communism? The Case of the Czech Republic

Petr Matějů, Nelson Lim
Institute of Sociology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague

Published: September 1, 1995Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Matějů, P., & Lim, N. (1995). Who Has Gotten Ahead After the Fall of Communism? The Case of the Czech Republic. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review31(2), 117-136. doi: 10.13060/00380288.1995.31.12.02.
Download citation

References

  1. Boudon, R. 1986. Theories of Social Change. A Critical Appraisal. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
  2. Bourdieu, P. 1986. "The Forms of Capital." Pp. 241-258 in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, ed. by J. G. Richardson. New York, Greenwood Press.
  3. Domañski, H. and B. Heyns 1993. "Toward a revised Theory of Market Transition: From Bargain to Market Control in State Socialism." (Working paper). Warsaw: Institute of Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences.
  4. Granovetter, M. 1973. "The Strength of Weak Ties." American Journal of Sociology 78: 13601380. Go to original source...
  5. Granovetter, M. 1974. Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  6. Hauser, R. M. 1980. "On Stratification in a Dual Economy." American Sociological Review 45: 702-712. Go to original source...
  7. Janáèek, K. 1992. "K vybraným sociálním efektùm transformace èeskoslovenské ekonomiky." (Social effects of the transformation of the Czechoslovak economy). Sociologický èasopis 28: 386-393.
  8. Kolósi, T. and A. Róna-Tas 1992a. "Poslední bude první? Sociální dùsledky pøechodu od socialismu k demokracii a trhu v Maïarsku." (The last shall be first? The social consequences of the transition from socialism in Hungary). Sociologický èasopis 28: 579-598.
  9. Kolósi, T. and A. Róna-Tas 1992b. "The last shall be first? The social consequences of the transition from socialism in Hungary." Paper presented at the meeting of the ISA Research Committee on Social Stratification, Trento.
  10. Kornai, J. 1990. Vision and Reality, Market and the State. New York: Routledge.
  11. Lenski, G. 1976. "History and Social Change." American Journal of Sociology 82: 548-64. Go to original source...
  12. Lieberson, S. 1985. Making it Count. The Improvement of Social Research and Theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  13. Long, J. S. and T. D. Miethe 1988. "The Statistical Comparison of Groups." In Common Problems/Proper Solutions: Avoiding Error in Quantitative Research, ed. by J. Scott Long. Newbury Park: SAGE Publications Ltd.
  14. Matìjù, P., B. Øeháková 1993. "Revolution for Whom? Analysis of selected patterns of intragenerational mobility in the Czech Republic, 1989-1992." Czech Sociological Review 1: 73-90.
  15. Matìjù, P., M. Tuèek and L. Rezler 1991. "Rodina 1989. Úvodní studie a hlavní výsledky z první vlny šetøení." (The introductory study and principal results from the first wave of the survey). Working papers 91: 2+3. Prague: Institute of Sociology, Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences.
  16. Matìjù, P. 1992. "Beyond educational inequality in Czechoslovakia." Czechoslovak Sociological Review, Special Issue: 37-60.
  17. Nee, V. 1989. "A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Market in State Socialism." American Sociological Review 54: 663-681. Go to original source...
  18. Nee, V. 1991. "Social Inequalities in Reforming State Socialism: Between Redistribution and Market in China." American Sociological Review 56: 267-282. Go to original source...
  19. Offe, C. 1991. "Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facing the Triple Transition in East Central Europe." Social Research 58: 865-892.
  20. Petersen, T. 1989. "The Earnings Function in Sociological Studies of Earnings Inequality: Functional Form and Hours Worked." Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 8: 221-250.
  21. Staniszkis, J. 1991. The Dynamics of the Breakthrough in Eastern Europe. The Polish Experience. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  22. Stark, D. 1992a. "Path Dependence and Privatization Strategies in East Central Europe." East European Politics and Societies 6: 17-51. Go to original source...
  23. Stark, D. 1992b. "From System Identity to Organizational Diversity: Analyzing Social Change in Eastern Europe." Contemporary Sociology 21: 299-304. Go to original source...
  24. Szelényi I. and D. J. Treiman 1991. "Vývoj sociální stratifikace a rekrutace elit ve východní Evropì po roce 1989." (The development of social stratification in Eastern Europe after 1989.) Sociologický èasopis 27: 276-298.
  25. Szelényi, I. and R. Manchin 1987. "Social Policy under State Socialism: Market, Redistribution and Social Inequalities in East European Socialist Societies". Pp. 103-139 in Stagnation and Routine in Social Policy, ed. by Esping-Andersen. Armong, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
  26. Szelényi, I. 1988. Socialist Entrepreneurs. Embourgeoisement in Rural Hungary. Madison, WI: Wisconsin University Press.
  27. Szelényi, I. 1991. "Strategie a dùsledky pøechodu od redistributivní ke smíšené hospodáøské soustavì" (Strategies and consequences of the transition from the redistributive to a mixed economic model). Sociologický èasopis 26: 331-341.
  28. Sztompka, P. 1992. "Dilemmas of the Great Transition." Sisyphus 2, No. VIII.: 9-27.
  29. Treiman, D. J. and I. Szelényi 1993. "Social Stratification in Eastern Europe after 1989." Proceedings Workshop Transformation Processes in Eastern Europe. The Hague: NWO-SSCW.
  30. Veèerník, J. 1995. "Changing Earnings Distribution in the Czech Republic. Survey Evidence from 1988-1994." Economies of Transition. (forthcoming). Go to original source...
  31. Wnuk-Lipiñski, E. 1992. "Freedom or Equality: An Old Dilemma in a New Context." Pp. 179-190 in Social Policy, Social Justice and Citizenship in Eastern Europe, ed. by Bob Deacon. New York: Sage.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.