Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2020, 56(1): 85-107 | DOI: 10.13060/csr.2020.004

'Tied to a wheelchair': How the absence of civil inattention Serves as a Spatial barrier to electric wheelchair users

Robert Osman1, Hana Porkertová2
1 Přírodovědecká fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Brno
2 Provozně ekonomická fakulta, Mendelova univerzita, Brno

The article is based on disability geography and draws on the social-geographic conception of relational space, which is perceived as being constantly created, never finished, heterogeneous, and embodied, and not a space that is given and everywhere the same. It offers a specific way of linking the discursive and material dimensions of disability, which intersect in the concept of social space, and refers to Lefebvre's trialectics of production - spatial practices, the representation of space, and spaces of representations. To analyse the mutual production of social space and social bodies, we use Goffman's concept of civil inattention. We ask how such social practices as gazing, addressing, asking, or dodging that co-create the social space of electric wheelchair users influence their movement through material space, and through the spatial reactions of wheelchair users responding to unwanted attention we trace the homogenisation and differentiation of space. The text is based on a long-term study (2010-2018) of the temporal/spatial behaviour of five electric wheelchair users (four men and one woman) diagnosed with muscular dystrophy who live in the City of Brno.

Keywords: disability geography, social space, Henri Lefebvre, civil inattention, wheelchair users

Accepted: February 28, 2020; Published: March 1, 2020Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Osman, R., & Porkertová, H. (2020). 'Tied to a wheelchair': How the absence of civil inattention Serves as a Spatial barrier to electric wheelchair users. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review56(1), 85-107. doi: 10.13060/csr.2020.004.
Download citation

References

  1. Brune, A., D. J. Wilson. 2013. Disability and Passing: Blurring the Lines of Identity. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  2. Butler, C. 2003. Law and the Social Production of Space. Disertační práce. Brisbane: Griffith university.
  3. Butler, R., S. Bowlby. 1997. "Bodies and Spaces: an Exploration of Disabled People's Experiences of Public Space." Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 15 (4): 411-433, https://doi.org/10.1068/d150411. Go to original source...
  4. Butler, R., H. Parr. 1999. Mind and Body Spaces: Geographies of Illness, Impairment and Disability. London: Routledge.
  5. Campbell, F. K. 2009. Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245181. Go to original source...
  6. Dale, K. 2005. "Building a Social Materiality: Spatial and Embodied Politics in Organizational Control." Organization 12 (5): 649-678, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508405055940. Go to original source...
  7. Davidson, J. 2003. "Putting on a Face: Sartre, Goffman, and Agoraphobic Anxiety in Social Space." Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 21 (1): 107-122, https://doi.org/10.1068/d45j. Go to original source...
  8. Devine, M. A. 2017. "Being a 'Doer' Instead of a 'Viewer': The Role of Inclusive Leisure Contexts in Determining Social Acceptance for People with Disabilities." Journal of Leisure Research 36 (2): 137-159, https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2004.11950017. Go to original source...
  9. Elden, S. 2009a. "Production of Space." Pp. 590-592 in D. Gregory, R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts, S. Whatmore (eds.). The Dictionary of Human Geography. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
  10. Elden, S. 2009b. "Space I." Pp. 262-267 in R. Kitchin, N. Thrift (eds.). International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Amsterdam: Elsevier, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00320-5. Go to original source...
  11. Gleeson, B. 1996. "A Geography for Disabled People?" Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 21 (2): 387-396, https://doi.org/10.2307/622488. Go to original source...
  12. Gleeson, B. 1999. Geographies of Disability. London: Routledge.
  13. Goffman, E. 1963. Behavior in Public Places. Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: The Free Pess.
  14. Goffman, E. (1963) 2003. Stigma: poznámky k problému zvládání narušené identity. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  15. Goodley, D. 2013. "Dis/entangling Critical Disability Studies." Disability & Society 28 (5): 631-644, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.717884. Go to original source...
  16. Gottdiener, M. 1994. The Social Production of Urban Space. Austin: University of Texas Press.
  17. Gregory, D. 1994. Geographical Imaginations. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.
  18. Grosz, E. A. 1992. "Bodies-Cities." Pp. 241-254 in B. Colomina, J. Bloomer (eds.). Sexuality & Space. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
  19. Hall, E. 2000. "Blood, Brain and Bones: Taking the Body Seriously in the Geography of Health and Impairment." Area 32 (1): 21-29, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2000.tb00111.x. Go to original source...
  20. Hall, E., R. Wilton. 2017. "Towards a Relational Geography of Disability." Progress in Human Geography 41 (6): 727-744, https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516659705. Go to original source...
  21. Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
  22. Imrie, R. 1996. "Ableist Geographies, Disablist Spaces: Towards a Reconstruction of Golledge's Geography and the Disabled." Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 21 (2): 397-403, https://doi.org/10.2307/622489. Go to original source...
  23. Imrie, R., C. Edwards. 2007. "The Geographies of Disability: Reflections on the Development of a Sub-discipline." Geography Compass 1 (3): 623-640, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00032.x. Go to original source...
  24. Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  25. Low, J. 1996. "Negotiating Identities, Negotiating Environments: An interpretation of the Experiences of Students with Disabilities." Disability & Society 11 (2): 235-248, https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599650023254. Go to original source...
  26. Mallett, R., K. Runswick-Cole. 2014. Approaching disability: critical issues and perspectives. London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315765464. Go to original source...
  27. Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: Sage. Go to original source...
  28. Marrifield, A. 2000. "Henri Lefebvre: a Socialist in Space." Pp. 167-182 in M. Crang, N. Thrift (eds.). Thinking Space. London: Routledge.
  29. Martins, M. R. 1982. "The Theory of Social Space in the Work of Henri Lefebvre." Pp. 160-185 in R. Forrest, J. Henderson, P. Williams (eds.). Urban Political Economy and Social Theory. Aldershot: Gower.
  30. Moser, I. 2006. "Disability and the Promises of Technology: Technology, Subjectivity and Embodiment Within an Order of the Normal." Information, Communication and Society 9 (3): 373-395, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600751348. Go to original source...
  31. Moser, I., J. Law. 1998. "Přechody snadné, přechody nesnadné." Biograf [online] (15-16): 70 odst. Dostupné z: http://www.biograf.org/clanek.php?clanek=1502.
  32. Mulíček, O., R. Osman, D. Seidenglanz. 2013. "Imaginace a reprezentace prostoru v každodenní zkušenosti." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 49 (5): 781-810.
  33. Osman, R. 2014. "Sociální prostor." Pp. 33-58 in R. Matoušek, R. Osman (eds.). Prostor(y) geografie. Praha: Karolinum.
  34. Osman, R. 2019. "Jet pěšky / Geografie vozíčkářů a vozíčkářek." Pp. 29-67 in R. Osman, L. Pospíšilová (eds.). Geografie "okrajem": každodenní časoprostorové zkušenosti. Praha: Karolinum.
  35. Osman, R., L. Pospíšilová. 2016. "Zkušenost bez zraku: příležitost pro reflexi prostorového normativu." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum 17 (1): 63-76, http://dx.doi.org/10.13060/12130028.2016.17.1.256. Go to original source...
  36. Overboe, J. 2007. "Disability and Genetics: Affirming the Bare Life (the State of Exception)." Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue Canadienne De Sociologie 44 (2): 219-235, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-618X.2007.tb01135.x. Go to original source...
  37. Pitoňák, M. 2019. "V sexuálním closetu/Geografie 'ne-heterosexuálních lidí'." Pp. 147-181 in R. Osman, L. Pospíšilová (eds.). Geografie "okrajem": každodenní časoprostorové zkušenosti. Praha: Karolinum.
  38. Porkertová, H. 2017. Nevidomá zkušenost: disabilita jako asambláž a vztah mezi tělem, diskurzem a zkušeností. Disertační práce. Brno: Masarykova Univerzita.
  39. Porkertová, H. 2019. "Materialita pohybu: vztah mezi nevidomostí a městským prostorem." Sociální studia 16 (1): 13-32, https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2019-1-13. Go to original source...
  40. Shakespeare, T. 1993. "Re-presenting Disabled People." Disability, Handicap & Society 8 (1): 95-101, https://doi.org/10.1080/02674649366780081. Go to original source...
  41. Shakespeare, T. 1995. "Re-defining the Disability Problem." Critical Public Health 6 (2): 4-9, https://doi.org/10.1080/09581599508409047. Go to original source...
  42. Shakespeare, T. 1998. Disability Reader: Social Science Perspectives. London: Continuum.
  43. Shakespeare, T. 2014. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  44. Shildrick, M. 2009. Dangerous Discourses of Disability, Subjectivity and Sexuality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230244641. Go to original source...
  45. Simonsen, K. 2003. "The Embodied City: From Bodily practice to Urban Life." Pp. 157-173 in J. Öhman, K. Simonsen (eds.). Voices From the North: New Trends in Nordic Human Geography. London: Ashgate, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315234939-10. Go to original source...
  46. Simonsen, K. 2004. "Spatiality, Temporality and the Construction of the City." Pp. 43-61 in J. O. Bærenholdt, K. Simonsen (eds.). Space Odysseys. Spatiality and Social Relations in the 21st Century. Aldershot: Ashgate, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315242705-4. Go to original source...
  47. Simonsen, K. 2005. "Bodies, Sensations, Space and Time: The Contribution from Henri Lefebvre." Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 87 (1): 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.2005.00174.x. Go to original source...
  48. Simonsen, K. 2007. "Practice, Spatiality and Embodied Emotions: an Outline of a Geography of Practice." Human Affairs 17 (2): 168-181, https://doi.org/10.2478/v10023-007-0015-8. Go to original source...
  49. Soja, E. W. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: the Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.
  50. Soja, E. W. 1996. Thirdspace: Journeys to Los Angeles and Other Real-and-imagined Places. Malden: Blackwell.
  51. Urry, J. 1985. "Social Relations, Space and Time." Pp. 20-48 in D. Gregory, J. Urry (eds.). Social Relations and Spatial Structures. London: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27935-7_3. Go to original source...
  52. Wilkerson, A. 2002. "Disability, Sex Radicalism, and Political Agency." NWSA Journal 14 (3): 33-57, https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2002.14.3.33. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.