Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2015, 51(6): 1023-1046 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2015.51.6.227

Gender and Re-partnering after Divorce in Four Central European and Baltic Countries

Aušra Maslauskaitė, Marė Baublytė
Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas

This article analyses the demographic and social determinants of repartnering after divorce in four Baltic and Central European transition countries (Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, and Hungary), which, despite their common transition paths after the 1990s, developed distinct political economies and have different gender and family cultures. The article explores how the re-partnering chances of divorced women and men are shaped by the social divisions of gender, parenthood, age, and education within various transition- society contexts. In general, the findings support the argument about the relevance and mediating role of the societal context in the process of re-partnering. Although we found an overall gender disadvantage in re-partnering across all countries, in more traditional contexts, parenthood undermines the chances of re-partnering for women but not for men. The negative effect of older age for re-partnering after divorce is almost universal for men, but is context-sensitive for women. Education does not affect women's chances of re-partnering, but it does play a significant role in the attractiveness of men in more traditional settings. The analysis is based on the partnership and parenthood histories recorded in the Generations and Gender Survey.

Keywords: re-partnering, divorce, gender culture, Central European countries, Baltic countries

Published: December 1, 2015Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Maslauskaitė, A., & Baublytė, M. (2015). Gender and Re-partnering after Divorce in Four Central European and Baltic Countries. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review51(6), 1023-1046. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2015.51.6.227.
Download citation

References

  1. Andress, H.-J., B. Borgloh, M. Bröckel, M. Giesselmann and D. Hummelsheim. 2006. 'The Economic Consequences of Partnership Dissolution. A Comparative Analysis of Panel Studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden.' European Sociological Review 22: 533-560, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcl012. Go to original source...
  2. Beaujouan, É. 2012. 'Repartnering in France: The Role of Gender, Age and Past Fertility.' Advances in Life Course Research 17: 69-80, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2012.03.001. Go to original source...
  3. Becker, G. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Blossfeld, H.-P. and G. Rohwer. 2002. Techniques of Event History Modeling. New Approaches to Causal Analysis. Mahwah/NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Go to original source...
  5. Bohle, D. and B. Greskovits. 2007. 'Neoliberalism, Embedded Neoliberalism and Neocorporatism: Towards Transnational Capitalism in Central Eastern Europe.' Western European Politics 30 (3): 443-466, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402380701276287. Go to original source...
  6. de Graaf, P. M. and M. Kalmijn. 2003. 'Alternative Routes in the Remarriage Market: Competing-Risk Analyses of Union Formation after Divorce.' Social Forces 81 (4): 1459-1498, http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/sof.2003.0052. Go to original source...
  7. Dewilde, C. and W. Uunk. 2008. 'Remarriage as a Way to Overcome the Financial Consequences of Divorce-A Test of the Economic Need Hypothesis for European Women.' European Sociological Review 24 (3): 393-407, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn025. Go to original source...
  8. Esping-Andersen, G. 2009. The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women's New Roles. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
  9. Fodor, É. and A. Balogh. 2010. 'Back to the Kitchen? Gender Role Attitudes in 13 East European Countries.' Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 22 (3): 289-307.
  10. Fokkema, T. and P. Dykstra. 2002. 'Differences in Depression between Married and Divorced Women in the Netherlands: In Search for an Explanation.' The Netherlands Journal of Social Sciences 38 (1): 24-47.
  11. Földháyi, E. 2010. 'New Partnership after First Divorce-An Event History Analysis.' Demográfia 53 (5): 78-101.
  12. Gähler, M. and A. Garriga. 2013. 'Has the Association between Parental Divorce and Young Adults' Psychological Problems Changed over Time? Evidence from Sweden, 1968-2000.' Journal of Family Issues 34: 784-808, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12447177. Go to original source...
  13. Gähler, M. and E.-L. Palmtag. 2014. 'Parental Divorce, Psychological Well-Being and Educational Attainment: Changed Experience, Unchanged Effect Among Swedes Born 1892-1991.' Social Indicators Research 123: 601-623, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0768-6. Go to original source...
  14. Gender Equality Index Report. 2013. Brussels: European Institute for Gender Equality.
  15. Glass, C. and É. Fodor. 2007. 'From Public to Private Maternalism? Gender and Welfare in Poland and Hungary after 1989.' Social Politics 14: 323-350, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxm013. Go to original source...
  16. Goldscheider, F., E. Bernhardt and T. Lappegård. 2015. 'The Gender Revolution: A Framework for Understanding Changing Family and Demographic Behavior.' Population and Development Review 41 (2): 209-239, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00045.x. Go to original source...
  17. Goldscheider, F., G. Kaufman and S. Sassler. 2009. 'Navigating the "New" Marriage Market. How Attitudes Toward Partner Characteristics Shape Union Formation.' Journal of Family Issues 30: 719-737, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192513X09331570. Go to original source...
  18. Goldscheider, F. and S. Sassler. 2006. 'Creating Stepfamilies: Integrating Children into the Study of Union Formation.' Journal of Marriage and Family 68: 275-291, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00252.x. Go to original source...
  19. Goldscheider, F. and L. J. Waite. 1986. 'Sex Differences in the Entry into Marriage.' American Journal of Sociology 92: 395-421, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228464. Go to original source...
  20. Grey, E. 2015. 'Repartnering.' Pp.101-121 in Family Formation in 21st Century Australia, edited by G. Heard and D. Arunachalam. New York: Springer Science+Business Media, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9279-0_6. Go to original source...
  21. Inglehart, R. and P. Norris. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511550362. Go to original source...
  22. Ivanova, K., M. Kalmijn and W. Uunk. 2013. 'The Effect of Children on Men's and Women's Chances of Re-partnering in a European Context.' European Journal of Population 29: 417-444, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10680-013-9294-5. Go to original source...
  23. Jansen, M., D. Mortelmans and L. Snoeckx. 2009. 'Repartnering and (Re)employment: Strategies to Cope with the Economic Consequences of Partnership Dissolution.' Journal of Marriage and Family 71: 1271-1293, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00668.x. Go to original source...
  24. Jasilionis, D. and V. Stankūnienė. 2011. Suaugusiųjų Lietuvos gyventojų socioekonominiai skirtumai. (Socioeconomic differences in adult mortality in Lithuania) Vilnius: Lithuanian Social Research Center.
  25. Lampard, R. and K. Peggs. 1999. 'Repartnering: The Relevance of Parenthood and Gender to Cohabitation and Remarriage among the Formerly Married.' British Journal of Sociology 50 (3): 443-465, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.1999.00443.x. Go to original source...
  26. Matysiak, A. 2011. Interdependencies between Fertility and Women's Labour Supply. Dordrecht: Springer, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1284-3. Go to original source...
  27. Meggiolaro, S. and F. Ongaro. 2008. 'Repartnering after Marital Dissolution: Does Context Play a Role?' Demographic Research 19: 1913-1934, http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.57. Go to original source...
  28. Morgan, L. and S. Kunkel. 1998. Ageing: The Social Context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
  29. Mott, F. L. and S. F. Moore. 1983. 'The Tempo of Remarriage among Young American Women.' Journal of Marriage and the Family 45: 427-436, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/351521. Go to original source...
  30. Norkus, Z. 2011. 'Why Did Estonia Perform Best? The North-South Gap in the Postsocialist Economic Transition of the Baltic States.' Journal of Baltic Studies 38 (1): 21-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01629770701223502. Go to original source...
  31. Oppenheimer, V. 1988. 'A Theory of Marriage Timing: Assortative Mating under Varying Degrees of Uncertainty.' American Journal of Sociology 94: 563-591, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/229030. Go to original source...
  32. Philipov, D. 2008. 'The Three Dimensions: "Gender-role Ideology", "Consequences for the Family, and "Economic Consequences.' Pp.153-174 in People, Population Change and Policies; Vol.2: Demographic Knowledge-Gender-Ageing, edited C. Höhn, D. Avramov and I. E. Kotowska. New York: Springer Science+Business Media. Go to original source...
  33. Prskawetz, A., A. Vikat, D. Philipov and H. Engelhardt. 2003. 'Pathways to Stepfamily Formation in Europe: Results from the FFS.' Demographic Research 8: 107-149, http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2003.8.5. Go to original source...
  34. Report on Progress on Equality between Men and Women. 2014. Brussels: European Commission.
  35. Sipavičienė, A. 2009. 'Emigration.' Pp. 43-51 in The Baltic Countries. Population, Family and Family Policy, edited by V. Stankūnienė and D. Jasilionis. Vilnius: Social Research Center.
  36. Skew, A., A. Evans and E. Gray. 2009. 'Repartnering in the United Kingdom and Australia.' Journal of Comparative Family Studies 40 (4): 563-585. Go to original source...
  37. Stevenson, B. and J. Wolfers. 2007. 'Marriage and Divorce: Changes and Their Driving Forces.' NBER Working Paper No. 12944. Town: Publisher. Go to original source...
  38. Sweeney, M. M. 2010. 'Remarriage and Stepfamilies: Strategic Sites for Family Scholarship in the 21st Century.' Journal of Marriage and Family 72: 667-684, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00724.x. Go to original source...
  39. Sweeney, M. M. 1997. 'Remarriage of Women and Men after Divorce: The Role of Socioeconomic Prospects.' Journal of Family Issues 18: 479-502, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019251397018005002. Go to original source...
  40. Vanassche, S., M. Corijn, K. Matthijs and G. Swicegood. 2015. 'Repartnering and Childbearing after Divorce: Differences According to Parental Status and Custodial Arrangements.' Population Research Policy Review 34 (5): 761-784, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11113-015-9366-9. Go to original source...
  41. Vergauwen, J., J. Wood, D. De Wachter and K. Neels. 2015. 'Quality of Demographic Data in GGS Wave 1.' Demographic Research 32: 723-774, http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.24. Go to original source...
  42. Vikat, A., Z. Spéder, G. Beets, F. C. Billari, C. Bühler, A. Désesquelles, T. Fokkema, J. M. Hoem, A. McDonald, G. Neyer, A. Pailhé, A. Pinnelli and A. Solaz. 2007. 'Generations and Gender Survey (GGS): Towards a Better Understanding of Relationships and Processes in the Lifecourse.' Demographic Research 17: 389-440, http://dx.doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.17.14. Go to original source...
  43. Wu, Z. and C. M. Schimmele. 2005. 'Repartnering after First Union Disruption.' Journal of Marriage and Family 67 (1): 27-36, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00003.x. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.