Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2019, 55(6): 697-733 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2020.55.6.490

Social Stratification and Its Perception in Austria and Its Central-East European Neighbouring Countries from 1960 to 2015: Historical Legacies, Socialist Pasts and Recent Developments

Marcus Hadler, Max Haller
University of Graz

This article compares Austria with three of its former state-socialist neighbouring countries: the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary. The authors are guided by the assumption that it is necessary to analyse changes in both the structure and the perception of inequality and that the two are interconnected. They assume that some general differences exist as a result of the legacy of state socialism in the three post-communist countries, but also that significant differences exist between those three countries themselves that stem from their different paths of development in the 19th and early 20th centuries. In the first part of this article, differences in the societal-political aims of a Western country such as Austria and those of state-socialist countries are discussed. The authors argue that the state-socialist countries were able to contain income inequality but were less successful at limiting other aspects of inequality. Austria, on the other hand, was able to avoid the severe income inequalities of the capitalist system by introducing democratic-corporatist institutions and a strong welfare state. In the second part of the article the authors investigate the subjective perception of inequality based on the ISSP inequality surveys. The majority of the population in all four countries think that income differences are too large, but there are significant differences in how people perceive and evaluate the stratification structure: in Austria, individuals rank themselves significantly higher than do people in the other three countries and see their society as dominated by the middle classes. The opposite is true in Hungary, where most people think that they live in a society characterised by a small elite, and they see the mass of the people at the bottom.

Keywords: social stratification, inequality, Austria, state socialism, perception of inequality

Published: December 1, 2019Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hadler, M., & Haller, M. (2019). Social Stratification and Its Perception in Austria and Its Central-East European Neighbouring Countries from 1960 to 2015: Historical Legacies, Socialist Pasts and Recent Developments. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 55(6), 697-733. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2020.55.6.490.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abercrombie, N. and B. S. Turner. 1978. 'The Dominant Ideology Thesis.' British Journal of Sociology 29 (2): 149-170, https://doi.org/10.2307/589886. Go to original source...
    2. Altzinger, W., N. Lamei, B. Rumplmaier and A. Schneebaum. 2013. 'Intergenerationale soziale Mobilität in Österreich.' Statistische Nachrichten 68 (1): 48-62.
    3. Atoyan, R., L. Christiansen, A. Dizioli, C. Ebeke, N. Ilahi, A. Ilyina, G. Mehrez, H. Qu, F. Raei, A. Rhee and D. Zakharova. 2016. Emigration and Its Economic Impact in Eastern Europe. IMF Discussion Note. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475576368.006. Go to original source...
    4. Bahna, M. 2016. 'Ten Years after the Post-Accession Migration Wave from EU 8 to the UK: What Can We Learn from the Largest Intra-EU Migration Experiment?' Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41 (4): 373-389, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-016-0244-4. Go to original source...
    5. Baravalle, A. 2009. Systemwechsel und Transformationsprozess in Polen und Tschechien. Diploma thesis, University of Vienna, Department of Political Science.
    6. Breinerd, E. 2010. Human Development in Eastern Europe and the CIS since 1990. New York: United Nations Human Development Programme. Retrieved 23 November 2018 (http://hdr.undp.org./en/content/human-development-eastern-europe-and-cis-1990).
    7. Connor, W. D. 1979. Socialism, Politics, and Equality. Hierarchy and Change in Eastern Europe and the USSR. New York: Columbia UP, https://doi.org/10.7312/conn92866. Go to original source...
    8. Delhey, J. and U. Kohler. 2006. 'Europäisierung sozialer Ungleichheit.' Pp. 339-358 in Die Europäisierung sozialer Ungleichheit. Zur transnationalen Klassen- und Sozialstrukturanalyse, edited by M. Heidenreich. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.
    9. Dieke, S. and H. Lesch. 2017. Gewerkschaftliche Mitgliederstrukturen im europäischen Vergleich. Ergebnisse des European Social Survey (=IW-Trends 3/2017). Cologne: Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft.
    10. Djilas, M. 1959. Die neue Klasse. Eine Analyse des kommunistischen Systems. Munich: Kindler.
    11. Dorling, D. 2018. Do We Need Economic Inequality? Cambridge and Medford, MA: Polity Press.
    12. Eddie, S. M. 1989. 'The Social Distribution of Landed Wealth in Hungary, ca. 1910.' Research in Economic History Suppl. 5: 219-249.
    13. Eder, A. 2017. Veränderung der Wahrnehmung sozialer Ungleichheit in den 1990er und 2000er Jahren: Ländervergleichende Analysen in Zeiten steigender Ungleichheit, zunehmender Globalisierung und osteuropäischer Transformation. Sociological Dissertation, University of Graz, https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2017.1335524. Go to original source...
    14. Eder, A., H. Volk and M. Haller. 2017. 'Patterns of Social Ties, Trust and Participation after the Fall of the Iron Curtain: New Findings from Central and Southeast European Countries.' International Journal of Sociology 47 (3): 147-161. Go to original source...
    15. Eder, A., M. Hadler and M. Schweighart. 2018. 'Über das scheinbare Paradoxon der Zugehörigkeit zur gesellschaftlichen Mitte. Eine quantitative und qualitative Analyse der subjektiven sozialen Position der ÖsterreicherInnen 1993-2016.' SWS-Rundschau 58 (2): 203-224.
    16. Fenger, M. 2007. 'Welfare Regimes in Central and Eastern Europe: Incorporating Post-communist Countries in a Welfare Regime Typology.' Contemporary Issues and Ideas in Social Sciences 3 (2): 1-30.
    17. Geissler, R. 1983. 'Bildungschancen und Statusvererbung in der DDR.' Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 38 (4): 913-940.
    18. Gijsberts, M. 2002. 'The Legitimation of Income Inequality in State-Socialist and Market Societies.' Acta Sociologica 45 (4): 269-285, https://doi.org/10.1177/000169930204500402. Go to original source...
    19. Good, D. F. 1984. The Economic Rise of the Habsburg Empire, 1750-1914. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    20. Hadler, M. 2005. 'Why Do People Accept Different Income Ratios? A Multi-level Comparison of Thirty Countries.' Acta Sociologica 48 (2): 131-154, https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699305053768. Go to original source...
    21. Hadler, M. and T. Klebel. 2019. 'Einkommensungleichheit, Lebensstandard und soziale Position im Zeitvergleich.' Pp. 115-130 in Sozialstruktur und Wertewandel in Österreich, edited by J. Bacher et al. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21081-6_6. Go to original source...
    22. Haller, M. 1982. Klassenbildung und soziale Schichtung in Österreich. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.
    23. Haller, M. 1990. 'The Challenge for Comparative Sociology in the Transformation of Europe.' International Sociology 5 (2): 183-204. Go to original source...
    24. Haller, M. 1996. Identität und Nationalstolz der Österreicher. Gesellschaftliche Ursachen und Funktionen - Herausbildung und Transformation seit 1945 - Internationaler Vergleich. Vienna, Cologne and Weimar: Böhlau, https://doi.org/10.7767/9783205123521. Go to original source...
    25. Haller, M. 2008. European Integration as an Elite Process. The Failure of a Dream? New York and London: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927304. Go to original source...
    26. Haller, M. 2011. 'Values and Interests in Processes of Macro-Regional Integration.' Pp. 25-44 in Global Trends and Regional Development, edited by N. Genov. New York, London: Routledge.
    27. Haller, M. and B. Mach. 1984. 'Structural Changes and Mobility in Capitalist and Socialist Society. A Comparison of Men in Austria and Poland.' Pp. 43-103 in International Comparative Research: Social Structure and Public Institutions in Eastern and Western Europe, edited by Niessen et al. Oxford: Pergamon Press, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-031334-4.50010-2. Go to original source...
    28. Haller, M., T. Kolosi and P. Robert. 1990. 'Social Mobility in Austria, Czechoslovakia, and Hungary. An Investigation of the Effects of Industrialization, Socialist Revolution, and National Uniqueness.' Pp. 153-197 in Class Structure in Europe, edited by M. Haller. New York and London: Armonk, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315489698-6. Go to original source...
    29. Haller, M., B. Mach and H. Zwicky. 1995. 'Egalitarismus und Antiegalitarismus zwischen gesellschaftlichen Interessen und kulturellen Leitbildern. Ergebnisse eines internationalen Vergleichs.' Pp. 221-264 in Soziale Ungleichheit und soziale Gerechtigkeit, edited by H.-P. Müller and B. Wegener. Opladen: Leske + Budrich, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11419-2_9. Go to original source...
    30. Haller, M. and R. Ressler. 2005. 'Schlechte Arbeitsmarktchancen von Jugendlichen verringern die Geburtenrate.' Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft 31 (4): 583-590.
    31. Haller, M., R. Jowell and T. W. Smith. (eds) 2009. The International Social Survey Programme, 1984-2009. Charting the Globe. London and New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880050. Go to original source...
    32. Haller, M., M. Hadler and G. Kaup. 2013. 'Leisure Time in Modern Societies: A New Source of Boredom and Stress?' Social Indicators Research 111 (2): 403-434, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0023-y. Go to original source...
    33. Haller, M. and A. Eder. 2015. Ethnic Stratification and Socioeconomic Inequality around the World. The End of Exclusion and Exploitation? London and New York: Routledge.
    34. Haller, M., A. Eder and B. Müller. 2015. 'Drei Wege zur Zähmung des Kapitalismus. Die Wahrnehmung und Bewertung sozialer Ungleichheit in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz.' Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 40: 1-31, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-015-0153-y. Go to original source...
    35. Haller, M. and R. Verwiebe. 2016. 'Central Europe as a Space of Transnational Migration.' Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41 (4): 361-371, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-016-0250-6. Go to original source...
    36. Hegedüs, A. 1977. The Structure of Socialist Society. London: Constable.
    37. Heidenreich, M. 2006. Die Europäisierung sozialer Ungleichheit. Zur transnationalen Klassen- und Sozialstrukturanalyse. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.
    38. Ivanova, M. 2007. 'Inequality and Government Policies in Central and Eastern Europe.' East European Quarterly 41 (2): 167-204.
    39. Kaser, M. C. and E. A. Radice. 1985. The Economic History of Eastern Europe 1919-1975. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    40. Konrad, G. and I. Szelenyi. 1979. The Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.
    41. Kopsidis, M. 2006. Agricultural Development and Impeded Growth: The Case of Hungary 1870-1970. IEHC Helsinki: Session.
    42. Korpi, W. 1978. The Working Class in Welfare Capitalism. Work, Unions and Politics in Sweden. London, UK, and Boston, MA: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    43. Laki, M. 2007. 'Attitudes and Actions of the Members of the Hungarian Business Elites towards Foreign Owned Companies.' Pp. 199-210 in Restructuring of the Economic Elites after State Socialism, edited by D. Lane, G. Lengyel and J. Tholen. Stuttgart: ibidem Verlag.
    44. Lane, D. 1971. The End of Inequality? Stratification under State Socialism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    45. Lane, D. 2011. Elites and Classes in the Transformation of State Socialism. New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Transaction Publishers.
    46. Lehmbruch, G. (ed.) 1982. Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. London: Sage.
    47. Leitner, A. and A. Wroblewski. 2019. 'Soziale Mobilität von Frauen und Männern. Einflussfaktoren und Grenzen der Aufstiegschancen.' Pp. 159-173 in Sozialstruktur und Wertewandel in Österreich, edited by J. Bacher et al. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21081-6_8. Go to original source...
    48. Lengyel, G. 2007. 'Hungarian Economic Policy Makers and Businessmen in the 1990s: Similarities and Differences.' Pp. 97-114 in Restructuring of the Economic Elites after State Socialism, edited by D. Lane, G. Lengyel and J. Tholen. Stuttgart: ibidem Verlag.
    49. Lengyel, G. and Z. Rsotovány. (eds) 2011. The Small Transformation. Society, Economy and Politics and the New European Architecture. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
    50. Lenski, G. 1978. 'Marxist Experiments in Destratification: An Appraisal.' Social Forces 57 (2): 364-383, https://doi.org/10.2307/2577674. Go to original source...
    51. Letwin, W. (ed.) 1983. Against Equality. Readings on Economic and Social Policy. London and Basingstoke: Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17175-0. Go to original source...
    52. Lupri, E. 1983. The Changing Position of Women in Family and Society. A Cross-national Comparison. Leiden: Brill.
    53. Magyar, B. 2016. Post-Communist Mafia State. The Case of Hungary. Budapest: CEU Press.
    54. Mannheim, K. 1951. Ideology and Utopia. An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
    55. Matějů, P. and N. Lim. 1995. 'Who Has Gotten Ahead after the Fall of Communism?' Czech Sociological Review 3 (2): 117-136. Go to original source...
    56. Mathis, F. 2007. Reiches Österreich. Fleiß oder Glück-warum geht es uns so gut? Innsbruck, Vienna and Bozen: Studienverlag.
    57. Mau, S. 1997. 'Ideologischer Konsens und Dissens im Wohlfahrtsstaat. Zur Binnenvariation von Einstellungen zur sozialen Ungleichheit in Schweden, Großbritannien und der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.' Soziale Welt 48 (1): 17-37.
    58. Mejstrik, M. (ed.) 1997. The Privatization Process in East-Central Europe. Evolutionary Process of Czech Privatizations. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publications. Go to original source...
    59. Milanovic, B. 2005. Worlds Apart. Measuring International and Global Inequality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    60. Ministry of Education and Culture. 2008. Education in Hungary. Past, Present, Future- An Overview. Budapest: Department for EU Relations, Ministry of Education.
    61. Möller, J. P. H. 1974. Wandel der Berufsstruktur in Österreich zwischen 1869 und 1961. Vienna: Verband der Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaften Österreichs.
    62. Moore, B. 1979. Injustice. The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. London: MacMillan. Go to original source...
    63. Münch, R. 2001. The Ethics of Modernity. Formation and Transformation in Britain, France, Germany and the USA. Langham: Rowman & Littlefield.
    64. Nee, V. 1989. 'A Theory of Market Transition: From Redistribution to Markets in State Socialism.' American Sociological Review 54 (5): 663-681, https://doi.org/10.2307/2117747. Go to original source...
    65. Nolan B., W. Salverda, D. Checchi, I. Marx, A. McKnight, I. G. Tóth and H. G. van de Werfhorst. (eds) 2014. Changing Inequalities and Societal Impacts in Rich Countries Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687428.001.0001. Go to original source...
    66. OECD. 2010. 'A Family Affair: Intergenerational Social Mobility across OECD Countries.' Pp. 183-200 in Economic Policy Reforms. Going for Growth. Paris: OECD.
    67. Offe, C. 1994. Der Tunnel am Ende des Lichts. Erkundungen der politischen Transformation im Nahen Osten. Frankfurt and New York: Campus.
    68. Ossowski, S. 1963. Class Structure in the Social Consciousness. New York: Free Press.
    69. Parkin, F. 1972. Class Inequality and Political Order. Social Stratification in Capitalist and Communist Societies. London: Paladin.
    70. Pelinka, A. 1981. Modellfall Österreich? Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Sozialpartnerschaft? Vienna: Braumüller.
    71. Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Go to original source...
    72. Podkaminer, L. 2013. Development Patterns of Central and East European Countries (in the Course of EU Accession), Research Report 288. Vienna: Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
    73. Prisching, M. 1996. Die Sozialpartnerschaft. Modell der Vergangenheit oder Modell für Europa? Vienna: Manz.
    74. Riedl, F. and M. Haller. 2014. 'From Socialist Equality to Capitalist Stratification: How People See It.' Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 5: 3-34, https://doi.org/10.14267/cjssp.2014.01.01. Go to original source...
    75. Runciman, W. G. 1967. Relative Deprivation and Social Justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
    76. Sauer, C., P. Valet and S. Liebig. 2016. 'Welche Lohngleichheiten sind gerecht?' Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 68: 619-645, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-016-0385-2. Go to original source...
    77. Smith, T. W. 2009. 'The ISSP: History, Organization and Members, Working Principles and Outcomes: An Historical-Sociological Account'. Pp. 24-49 in The International Social Survey Programme 1984-2009, edited by M. Haller, R. Jowell and T. Smith. London and New York: Routledge.
    78. Solga, H. 1995. Auf dem Weg in die klassenlose Gesellschaft? Klassenlagen und Mobilität zwischen Generationen in der DDR. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783050071534. Go to original source...
    79. Solt, F. 2016. 'The Standardized World Income Inequality Data Base.' Social Science Quarterly 97 (5): 1267-1281. Retrieved 12 July 2019 (https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12295), https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12295. Go to original source...
    80. Stiglitz, J. E. 2013. The Price of Inequality. New York: Norton. Go to original source...
    81. Stolarik, M. M. (ed.) 2016. The Czech and Slovak Republics. Twenty Years of Independence 1993-1013. Budapest and New York: Central European University Press.
    82. Svallfors, S. 2003. 'Welfare Regimes and Welfare Opinions: A Comparison of Eight Western Countries.' Pp. 171-196 in European Welfare Production, edited by J. Vogel. Netherlands: Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0977-5_7. Go to original source...
    83. Szelenyi, S. 1998. Equality by Design. The Grand Experiment in Destratification in Socialist Hungary. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP.
    84. Szikra, D. 2014. 'Democracy and Welfare in Hard Times. The Social Policy of the Orbán Government in Hungary between 2010 and 2014.' Journal of European Social Policy 24 (5): 486-500, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714545446. Go to original source...
    85. Therborn, G. 1995. European Modernity and Beyond. The Trajectory of European Societies 1945-2000. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446222317. Go to original source...
    86. Toth, I. G. 2014. 'Revisiting Grand Narratives of Growing Income Inequality: Lessons from 30 Country Studies.' Pp. 11-47 in Changing Inequalities and Societal Impacts in Rich Countries: Thirty Countries Experiences, edited by B. Nolan et al. Oxford: Oxford UP, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687428.003.0002. Go to original source...
    87. Toth, I. G. 2016. 'Keeping Inequality on a Short Leash: Whose Task?' The World Financial Review, December 5.
    88. Uhlova, S. 2018. 'If the Czech Economy Is Thriving, Why Are We so Poor?' The Guardian, 19 September. Retrieved 16 October 2018 (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/sep/19/czech-republic-transition-state-socialism-capitalism).
    89. UNDP. 2015. Human Development Report 2015. New York: United Nations Human Development Programme.
    90. Večerník, J. 1995. 'Economic and Political Man. Hardship and Attitudes in the Czech Republic and Central Europe.' Czech Sociological Review 3 (2): 157-177.
    91. Večerník, J. 2009. Czech Society in the 2000s: A Report on Socio-economic Policies and Structures. Prague: Academia.
    92. Večerník, J. and P. Matějů. (eds) 1999. Ten Years of Rebuilding Capitalism: Czech Society after 1989. Prague: Academia.
    93. Verwiebe, R. and B. Wegener. 2000. 'Social Inequality and the Perceived Income Justice Gap.' Social Justice Research 13 (2): 123-149, https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007545823040. Go to original source...
    94. von Beyme, K. 1975. Ökonomie und Politik im Sozialismus. Ein Vergleich der Entwicklung in den sozialistischen Ländern. Munich: Piper.
    95. von Beyme, K. 1994. Systemwechsel in Osteuropa. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
    96. Voslensky, M. 1984. Nomenklatura: The Soviet Ruling Class. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
    97. Willi, V. 1966. Grundlagen einer empirischen Soziologie der Werte und Wertsysteme. Zürich: Orell Füssli.
    98. World Bank. 2005. Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content