Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2010, 46(2): 187-210 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2010.46.2.01

The Value-Added of Studying at Multi-year Gymnasia in the Light of Available Data Sources

Jana Straková
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i., Praha

The results of students at different basic and secondary schools vary largely in the Czech Republic compared to other countries, and there is a strong connection between the results of students and family background. The Czech education system is also highly stratified, and student tracking begins at a young age. In this respect the most controversial element in the system are the multi-year gymnasia, the existence of which is nonetheless strongly supported by the public. This support is based on the conviction that multi-year gymnasia provide the most talented students with a good education, enable more rapid cognitive development for these students, and thus help cultivate Czech elites. This article sets out to verify whether multi-year gymnasia genuinely fulfil the function associated with them. Hypotheses about the role of multi-year gymnasia are tested using data from the OECD PISA 2000 and OECD PISA 2006 surveys, the PISA-L longitudinal survey, and Higher Education Studies 2004 survey. The main analytic methods used are multi-level modelling and logistic regression.

Keywords: student achievement, socioeconomic status, tracking, multi-year gymnasia.

Published: April 1, 2010Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Straková, J. (2010). The Value-Added of Studying at Multi-year Gymnasia in the Light of Available Data Sources. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 46(2), 187-210. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2010.46.2.01.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Blossfeld, H.-P., T. Schneider, J. Doll. 2009. "Methodological Advantages of Panel Studies. Designing the New National Educational Panel Study (NEPS) in Germany." Journal for Educational Research Online 1 (1): 10-32.
    2. Gamoran, A. 1992. "Synthesis of Research/Is Ability Grouping Equitable?" Educational Leadership 50 (2): 11-17.
    3. Gamoran, A., R. D. Mare. 1989. "Secondary School Tracking and Educational Inequality: Compensation, Reinforcement, or Neutrality?" The American Journal of Sociology 94 (5): 1146-1183. Go to original source...
    4. Gamoran, A., M. Nystrand. 1991. "Background and Instructional Effects on Achievement in Eighth-Grade English and Social Studies." Journal of Research on Adolescence 1 (3): 277-300. Go to original source...
    5. Gröhlich, C., K. Scharenberg, W. Bos. 2009. "Wirkt sich Leistungsheterogenität in Schulklassen auf den individuellen Lernerfolg in der Sekundarstufe aus?" Journal for Educational Research Online 1 (1): 86-105.
    6. Hanushek, E. A., L. Woessman. 2005. "Does Educational Tracking Affect Performance and Inequality? Differences-in-Differences Evidence across Countries." CESifo Working Paper 1415. Munich: CESifo. Go to original source...
    7. Hoffer, T. B. 1992. "Middle School Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Science and Mathematics." Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 14 (3): 205-227. Go to original source...
    8. Ireson, J., H. Clark, S. Hallam. 2002. "Constructing Ability Groups in the Secondary School: Issues in Practice." School Leadership and Management 22 (2): 163-176. Go to original source...
    9. Kerckhoff, A. C. 1986. "Effect of Ability Grouping in British Secondary Schools." American Sociological Review 51 (6): 842-858. Go to original source...
    10. Kulik, J. A. 1992. "Student Self-Esteem." Pp. 43-45 in J. A. Kulik. An Analysis of the Research on Ability Grouping: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
    11. Kulik, C. C., J. A. Kulik. 1982. "Effect of Ability Grouping on Secondary School Students: A Meta-analysis of Evaluation Findings." American Educational Research Journal 19 (3): 415-428. Go to original source...
    12. Loveless, T. 1998. "The Tracking and Ability Grouping Debate." [online] Washington: The Thomas B. Fordham Institute [cit. 18. 3. 2010]. Dostupné z: <http://www.edexcellence.net/detail/news.cfm?news_id=127>.
    13. Lucas, S. R. 1999. Tracking Inequality. Stratification and Mobility in American High Schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
    14. Matějů, P., J. Straková. 2006. "Víceletá gymnázia a jejich role v reprodukci vzdělanostních nerovností." Pp. 194-219 in P. Matějů, J. Straková (eds.). (Ne)rovné šance na vzdělání, vzdělanostní nerovnosti v České republice. Praha: Academia.
    15. Oakes, J. 1990. Multiplying Inequalities: The Effects of Race, Social Class, and Tracking on Opportunities to Learn Mathematics and Science. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
    16. Scheerens, J., G. Cees, S. M. Thomas. 2003. Educational Evaluation, Assessment and Monitoring - a Systemic Approach. Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers.
    17. Slavin, R. E. 1987. "Ability Grouping and Student Achievement in Elementary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis." Review of Educational Research 57 (3): 293-336. Go to original source...
    18. Slavin, R. E. 1990. "Achievement Effects of Ability Grouping in Secondary Schools: A Best-Evidence Synthesis." Review of Educational Research 60 (3): 471-499. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content