Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2017, 53(2): 290-300

Giovanni Sartori: politický sociolog pluralismu

Miroslav Novák

Published: April 1, 2017Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Novák, M. (2017). Giovanni Sartori: politický sociolog pluralismu. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 53(2), 290-300.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Arendt, H. 1963. On Revolution. New York: Viking Press.
    2. Arendtová, H. 2011. O revoluci. Praha: OIKOYMENH.
    3. Collier, D., J. Gerring (eds.). 2009. Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. New York, London: Routledge.
    4. Daalder, H. (ed.). 1997. Comparative European Politics. The Story of a Profession. London and New York: Pinter.
    5. Duverger, M. 1951. Les partis politiques. Paris: Armand Colin.
    6. Duverger, M. 1960, "Sociologie des partis politiques." Pp. 22-45 in G. Gurvitch (ed.). Traité de sociologie, t. II. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
    7. Duverger, M. 1988. La nostalgie de l'impuissance. Paris: Albin Michel.
    8. Duverger, M. 2016. Politické strany. Praha: Karolinum.
    9. Hazan, R. Y. 1995. "Center Parties and Systemic Polarization: An Exploration of Recents Trends in Western Europe." Journal of Theoretical Politics 7 (4): 421-444. Go to original source...
    10. Kubát, M. 2016. "Antisystémová strana. Giovanni Sartori, jeho koncepce a diskuse o ní." Pp. 78-86 in M. Novák (ed.). 2016. Strany, volby a demokracie: Od Duvergera k Sartorimu a dále. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    11. Morlino, L. 2009. "Legitimacy and the Quality of Democracy." International Social Science Journal 60 (196): 211-222. Go to original source...
    12. Novák, M. 2003. "Popper versus Schumpeter: srovnání dvou neklasických teorií demokracie." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 39 (1): 11-36. Go to original source...
    13. Novák, M. 2004. "Les concepts utilisés dans le modèle consensuel de la démocratie: entre Sartori et Lijphart." Pp. 143-159 in C. Thiriot, M. Marty, E. Nadal (eds.). Penser la politique comparée. Un état de savoirs théoriques et méthodologiques. Paris: Editions Karthala.
    14. Novák, M. 2015. "Systèmes partisans compétitifs: quelle divergence entre Duverger et Sartori?" Revue française de science politique 65 (3): 447-467. Go to original source...
    15. Novák, M. (ed.). 2016. Strany, volby a demokracie: Od Duvergera k Sartorimu a dále. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    16. Pasquino, G. 2005a. "Political Science of Giovanni Sartori." European Political Science Review [online] 4: 33-41. Dostupné z: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/eps/journal/v4/n1/full/2210003a.html. Go to original source...
    17. Pasquino, G. (ed.). 2005b. La scienza politica di Giovanni Sartori. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    18. Sartori, G. 1957. Democrazia e definizioni. Bologna: Il Mulino.
    19. Sartori, G. 1962. Democratic Theory. Detroit: Wayne University Press.
    20. Sartori, G. 1968. "The Sociology of Parties: a Critical Review." Pp. 1-25 in O. Stammer (ed.). Party Systems, Party Organizations, and the Politics of New Mass. Berlin: Free University of Berlin.
    21. Sartori, G. 1970. "Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics." American Political Science Review 64 (4): 1033-1053. Go to original source...
    22. Sartori, G. 1971. "La Politica Comparata: Premesse e Problemi." Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 1 (1): 7-66. Go to original source...
    23. Sartori, G. 1976. Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    24. Sartori, G. 1979. La Politica. Logica e metodo nelle scienze sociali. Milano: Sugarco Edizioni.
    25. Sartori, G. 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. London: Chatham House Publishers.
    26. Sartori, G. 1991a. "Rethinking Democracy: Bad Polity and Bad Politics." International Social Science Journal 129 (August): 437-450.
    27. Sartori, G. 1991b. "Comparing and Miscomparing." Journal of Theoretical Politics 3 (3): 243-257. Go to original source...
    28. Sartori, G. 1993. Teória demokracie. Bratislava: Archa.
    29. Sartori, G. 1994. Comparative Constitutional Engineering. London: Mcmillan. Go to original source...
    30. Sartori, G. 1997. "Understanding Pluralism." Journal of Democracy 8 (4): 58-69. Go to original source...
    31. Sartori, G. 2001. Srovnávací ústavní inženýrství. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    32. Sartori, G. 2005a. Strany a stranické systémy. Schéma pro analýzu. Brno: CDK.
    33. Sartori, G. 2005b. Parties and Party Systems. A Framework for Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press.
    34. Sartori, G. 2005c. Pluralismus, multikulturalismus a přistěhovalci. Praha: Dokořán.
    35. Sartori, G. 2007. Democrazia. Cosa é. Nuova edizione aggiornata. Milano: Rizzoli.
    36. Sartori, G. (ed.). 1984. Social Science Concepts. A Systematic Analysis. London: Sage.
    37. Sartori, G., F. W. Riggs, H. Teune. 1975. Tower of Babel: On the Definition and Analysis of Concepts in the Social Sciences. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh.
    38. Schumpeter, J. A. 2004. Kapitalismus, socialismus a demokracie. Brno: CDK.
    39. Strmiska, M. 2016. "Sartoriho pojetí stranických systémů a případ polarizovaného pluralismu." Pp. 87-98 in M. Novák (ed.). 2016. Strany, volby a demokracie: Od Duvergera k Sartorimu a dále. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    40. Wolinetz, S. 2004. "Classifying Party Systems: Where Have All the Typologies Gone?" Příspěvek přednesený na Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association. Winnipeg, Manitoba, 3.-5. června 2004.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content