Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2011, 47(2): 325-360 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2011.47.2.05

Countermovements from the Perspective of the Sociology of Social Movements

Petr Vidomus
Praha

Countermovements and conservative activism have received relatively little attention in Czech and European sociology. This article summarises the discussions concerning the countermovement phenomenon in the last thirty years. The starting point of the interest in countermovements of different kinds in the Western context is generally considered to lie in the 1970s and the 1980s, when the opposition to the reform movements of the preceding period became more intense. In an attempt to define this phenomenon, sociology made use of its theoretical and methodological apparatus available at that time. Therefore, resource mobilization theory, the political opportunities/ political process model, and framing theory gradually looked at countermovements from different points of view and concentrated on different parts of their life cycle. This article first discusses various countermovement definitions and dilemmas which sociologists have faced in their analysis. It then focuses on the key dimensions of the countermovement life cycle: its genesis and mobilization, strategy and tactics, and its potential effects. Emphasis is placed on the comparison of different theoretical and methodological approaches and the dynamic movement-countermovement relationship. The topics are illustrated on examples from relevant case studies. The conclusion summarises the areas to which the social sciences, in analysing the problems of countermovements, pay very little attention.

Keywords: social movements, countermovements, conservative movements, countermovement mobilization, countermovement strategies, countermovement effects, political opportunity structure, resource mobilization, framing.

Published: April 1, 2011Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vidomus, P. (2011). Countermovements from the Perspective of the Sociology of Social Movements. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review47(2), 325-360. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2011.47.2.05.
Download citation

References

  1. Amenta, Edwin, Michael P. Young. 1999. "Making an Impact: Conceptual and Methodological Implications of the Collective Goods Criterion." Pp. 22-41 in Marco Giugni, Doug McAdam, Charles Tilly (eds.). How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  2. Andrews, Kenneth, T. 2002. "Movement-Countermovement Dynamics and the Emergence of New Institutions: The Case of 'White Flight' Schools in Mississippi." Social Forces 80 (3): 911-936. Go to original source...
  3. Beck, Ulrich. 2004. Riziková společnost: Na cestě k jiné moderně. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  4. Beck, Ulrich. 2007. Vynalézání politiky: K teorii reflexivní modernizace. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  5. Beder, Sharon. 2002. Global Spin: The Corporate Assault on Environmentalism. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.
  6. Benford, Robert D. 1987. Framing Activity, Meaning and Social Movement Participation: The Nuclear Disarmament Movement. Disertační práce. Austin: University of Texas.
  7. Benford, Robert D. 1993. "Frame Disputes within the Nuclear Disarmament Movement." Social Forces 71 (3): 677-701. Go to original source...
  8. Benford, Robert D., Scott A. Hunt. 2003. "Interactional Dynamics in Public Problems Marketplaces: Movements and the Counterframing and Reframing of Public Problems." Pp. 153-186 in James A. Holstein, Gale Miller (eds.). Challenges and Choices: Constructionist Perspectives on Social Problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  9. Benford, Robert D., David A. Snow. 2000. "Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment." Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611-639. Go to original source...
  10. Berbrier, Mitch. 1998. "'Half the Battle': Cultural Resonance, Framing Processes, and Ethnic Affectations in Contemporary White Separatist Rhetoric." Social Problems 45 (4): 431-450. Go to original source...
  11. Boykoff, Maxwell T., Jules M. Boykoff. 2004. "Balance as Bias: Global Warming and the US Prestige Press." Global Environmental Change 14 (2): 125-136. Go to original source...
  12. Císař, Ondřej. 2003. "Globální a lokální boje proti korupci: případová studie Transparency International." Politologický časopis 10 (3): 221-242.
  13. Císař, Ondřej. 2010. "Externally Sponsored Contention: the Channelling of Environmental Movement Organisations in the Czech Republic after the Fall of Communism." Environmental Politics 19 (5): 736-755. Go to original source...
  14. Císař, Ondřej, Petr Fiala (eds.). 2004. Obhajoba zájmů a transnacionální vztahy. Brno: Mezinárodní politologický ústav Masarykovy univerzity.
  15. Císař, Ondřej, Kateřina Vráblíková. 2010. "The Europeanization of Social Movements in the Czech Republic: The EU and Local Women's Groups." Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43 (2): 209-219. Go to original source...
  16. Crowley, Jocelyn E. 2009. "Fathers' Rights Groups, Domestic Violence and Political Countermobilization." Social Forces 88 (2): 723-756. Go to original source...
  17. Dryzek, John S. et al. 2003. Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
  18. Dugan, Kimberly B. 2004. "Strategy and 'Spin': Opposing Movement Frames in an Anti-Gay Voter Initiative." Sociological Focus 37 (3): 213-233. Go to original source...
  19. Esacove, Anne W. 2004. "Dialogic Framing: The Framing/Counterframing of 'PartialBirth' Abortion." Sociological Inquiry 74 (1): 70-101. Go to original source...
  20. Eskridge, William N. 2000. "No Promo Homo: The Sedimentation of Antigay Discourse and the Channeling Effect of Judicial Review." New York University Law Review 75 (5): 1327-1411.
  21. Fetner, Tina. 2001. "Working Anita Bryant: The Impact of Christian Anti-gay Activism on Lesbian and Gay Movement Claims." Social Problems 48 (3): 411-428. Go to original source...
  22. Gale, Richard P. 1986. "Social Movements and the State: The Environmental Movement, Countermovement, and Government Agencies." Sociological Perspectives 29 (2): 202-240. Go to original source...
  23. Gamson, William A. 1975. The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
  24. Gamson, William A. 2004. "Bystanders, Public Opinion, and the Media." Pp. 242-261 in David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, Hanspeter Kriesi (eds.). The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell. Go to original source...
  25. Gamson, William A., David S. Meyer. 1996. "Framing Political Opportunity." Pp. 275-290 in Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, Mayer N. Zald (eds.). Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  26. Gamson, William A., Gadi Wolfsfeld. 1993. "Movements and Media as Interacting Systems." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528 (1): 114-125. Go to original source...
  27. Giugni, Marco G. 1998. "Was it Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements." Annual Review of Sociology 24: 371-393. Go to original source...
  28. Giugni, Marco G. 1999. "How Social Movements Matter: Past Research, Present Problems, Future Developements." Pp. xiii-xxxiii in Marco Giugni, Doug McAdam, Charles Tilly (eds.). How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
  29. Gleeson, Brendan. 2000. "Reflexive Modernization: The Re-enlightenment of Planning?" International Planning Studies 5 (1): 117-135. Go to original source...
  30. Hašková, Hana. 2005. "Czech Women's Civic Organising under the State Socialist Regime, Socio-economic Transformation and the EU Accession Period." Czech Sociological Review 41 (6): 1077-1110.
  31. Hilgartner, Stephen, Charles L. Bosk. 1988. "The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model." American Journal of Sociology 94 (1): 53-78. Go to original source...
  32. Hirschman, Albert O. 1991. The Rhetoric of Reaction. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
  33. Hunt, Scott A., Robert D. Benford, David A. Snow. 1994. "Identity Fields: Framing Processes and the Social Construction of Movement Identities." Pp. 185-208 in Enrique Larana, Hank Johnston, Joseph R. Gusfield (eds.). New Social Movements: From Ideology to Identity. Philadelphia: Temple Press.
  34. Hunt, Stephen. 2002. "The Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement in Britain: Mobilization and Opposition." Journal of Religion & Society 4: 1-18.
  35. Chafetz, Janet S., Anthony G. Dworkin. 1987. "In the Face of Threat: Organized Antifeminism in Comparative Perspective." Gender & Society 1 (1): 33-60. Go to original source...
  36. Ibarra, Peter R., John I. Kitsuse. 1993. "Vernacular constituents of moral discourse: An interactionist proposal for the study of social problems." Pp. 25-58 in Gale Miller, James A. Holstein (eds.). Constructionist Controversies: Issues in Social Problems Theory. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
  37. Jacques, Peter J. 2009. Environmental Skepticism: Ecology, Power and Public Life. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.
  38. Jasper, James M. 1990. Nuclear Politics: Energy and the State in the United States, Sweden, and France. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
  39. Jasper, James M., Jane Poulsen. 1993. "Fighting Back: Vulnerabilities, Blunders, and Countermobilization by the Targets in Three Animal Rights Campaigns." Sociological Forum 8 (4): 639-657. Go to original source...
  40. Jenkins, Craig J. 1983. "Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements." Annual Review of Sociology 9: 527-553. Go to original source...
  41. June, Raymond. 2007. "Paradoxy profesionalizace protikorupčních aktivistů v České republice." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 43 (1): 111-132. Go to original source...
  42. Kent, Stephen A. 1990. "Deviance Labelling and Normative Strategies in the Canadian 'New Religions/Countercult' Debate." Canadian Journal of Sociology 15 (4): 393-416. Go to original source...
  43. Kitschelt, Herbert P. 1986. "Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: AntiNuclear Movements in Four Democracies." British Journal of Political Science 16 (1): 57-85. Go to original source...
  44. Klandermans, Bert. 1984. "Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansisons of Resource Mobilization Theory." American Sociological Review 49 (5): 583-600. Go to original source...
  45. Klandermans, Bert. 1988. "The Formation and Mobilization of Consensus." Pp. 173-196 Bert Klandermans, Hanspeter Kriesi, Sidney Tarrow (eds.). From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research Across Cultures. International Social Movement Research I. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  46. Kolářová, Marta. 2009. Protest proti globalizaci: gender a feministická kritika. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  47. Kriesi, Hanspeter, Ruud Koopmans, Jan Willem Duyvendak, Marco G. Giugni. 1995. New Social Movements in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. London: UCL Press.
  48. Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Go to original source...
  49. Lio, Shoon, Scott Melzer, Ellen Reese. 2008. "Constructing Threat and Appropriating 'Civil Rights': Rhetorical Strategies of Gun Rights and English Only Leaders." Symbolic Interaction 31 (1): 5-31. Go to original source...
  50. Lo, Clarence Y. H. 1982. "Countermovements and Conservative Movements in the Contemporary U.S." Annual Review of Sociology 8: 107-134. Go to original source...
  51. Lomborg, Bjørn. 2008. Zchlaďte hlavy! Skeptický ekolog o globálním oteplování. Praha: Dokořán.
  52. Marshall, Susan, E. 1985. "Ladies against Women: Mobilization Dilemmas of Antifeminist Movements." Social Problems 32 (4): 348-362. Go to original source...
  53. McAdam, Doug. 1983. "Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency." American Sociological Review 48 (6): 735-754. Go to original source...
  54. McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy, Mayer N. Zald. 1996. "Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes - Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements." Pp. 1-20 in Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, Mayer N. Zald (eds.). Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  55. McCaffrey, Dawn, Jennifer Keys. 2000. "Competitive Framing Processes in the Abortion Debate: Polarization-vilification, Frame Saving, and Frame Debunking." The Sociological Quarterly 41 (1): 41-61. Go to original source...
  56. McCarthy, John D., Mark Wolfson. 1992. "Consensus Movements, Conflict Movements, and the Cooptation of Civic and State Infrastructures." Pp. 273-97 in Aldon D. Morris, Carol M. Mueller (eds.). Frontiers in Social Movement Theory. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
  57. McCarthy, John D., Mayer N. Zald. 1977. "Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A Partial Theory." American Journal of Sociology 82 (6): 1212-1241. Go to original source...
  58. McCright, Aaron M., Riley E. Dunlap. 2000. "Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement's Counter-Claims." Social Problems 47 (4): 499-522. Go to original source...
  59. McCright, Aaron M., Riley E. Dunlap. 2010. "Anti-reflexivity: The American Conservative Movement's Success in Undermining Climate Science and Policy." Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2-3): 100-133. Go to original source...
  60. Meyer, David S. 2004. "Protest and Political Opportunities." Annual Review of Sociology 30: 125-145. Go to original source...
  61. Meyer, David S., Suzanne Staggenborg. 1996. "Movements, Countermovements, and the Structure of Political Opportunity." American Journal of Sociology 101 (6): 1628-1660. Go to original source...
  62. Meyer, David S., Suzanne Staggenborg. 2008. "Opposing Movement Strategies in U.S. Abortion Politics." Pp. 207-238 in Patrick G. Coy (ed.). Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 28. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. Go to original source...
  63. Mottl, Tahi L. 1980. "The Analysis of Countermovements." Social Problems 27 (5): 620-635. Go to original source...
  64. Peckham, Michael. 1998. "New Dimensions of Social Movement/Countermovement Interaction: The Case of Scientology and Its Internet Critics." Canadian Journal of Sociology 23 (4): 317-347. Go to original source...
  65. Peleg, Samuel. 2000. "Peace Now or Later?: Movement-Countermovement Dynamics and the Israeli Political Cleavage." Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 23 (4): 235-254. Go to original source...
  66. Pichardo, Nelson A. 1997. "New Social Movements: A Critical Review." Annual Review of Sociology 23: 411-430. Go to original source...
  67. Piven, Frances F., Richard A. Cloward. 1977. Poor People's Movements: Why They Succeed, How They Fail. New York: Vintage.
  68. Roberts, Jessica L. 2009. "To Have and to Uphold: The Common Language of StatusPreserving Countermovements." National Black Law Journal 21 (2): 122-136.
  69. Rohlinger, Deana A. 2002. "Framing the Abortion Debate: Organizational Resources, Media Strategies, and Movement-Countermovement Dynamics." The Sociological Quarterly 43 (4): 479-507. Go to original source...
  70. Rucht, Dieter. 2004. "The Quadruple 'A'. Media Strategies of Protest Movements since the 1960s." Pp. 29-56 in Wim Van de Donk, Brian D. Loader, Paul G. Nixon, Dieter Rucht (eds.). Cyberprotest. New Media, Citizens and Social Movements. London, New York: Routledge.
  71. Shupe, Anson D., David G. Bromley. 1979. "The Moonies and the Anti-Cultists: Movement and Countermovement in Conflict." Sociological Analysis 40 (4): 325-334. Go to original source...
  72. Siegel, Reva B. 1997. "Why Equal Protection No Longer Protects: The Evolving Forms of Status-Enforcing State Action." Stanford Law Review 49 (5): 1111-1148. Go to original source...
  73. Snow, David A., Robert D. Benford. 1988. "Ideology, Frame Resonance and Participant Mobilization." International Social Movement Research 1: 197-219.
  74. Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Steven K. Worden, Robert D. Benford. 1986. "Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization and Movement Participation." American Sociological Review 51 (4): 464-481. Go to original source...
  75. Sokačová, Linda. 2005. Komu patří embryo? Pohledy hnutí pro život a pro svobodnou volbu na problematiku interrupcí. Diplomová práce. Praha: FSV UK.
  76. Staggenborg, Suzanne. 1991. The Pro-Choice Movement. Organization and Activism in the Abortion Conflict. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  77. Steuter, Erin. 1992. "Women against Feminism: an Examination of Feminist Social Movements and Anti-feminist Countermovements." Canadian Review of Sociology 29 (3): 288-306. Go to original source...
  78. Switzer, Jacqueline V. 1997. Green Backlash: the History and Politics of the Environmental Opposition in the U.S. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  79. Taylor, Kristie. A. 2003. "Consequences of Countermovement Collapse: GermanAmerican Anti-Prohibition Activism Against U.S. Alcohol Prohibition, 1904-1919." [online] Příspěvek přednesený na konferenci Americké sociologické společnosti. Atlanta, 14. 1. 2003 [cit. 11. 9. 2010]. Dostupné z: <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p107524_index.html>.
  80. Tilly, Charles. 1978. From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  81. Tuchman, Gaye. 1972. "Objectivity as Strategic Ritual: An Examination of Newsmen's Notions of Objectivity." American Journal of Sociology 77 (4): 660-679. Go to original source...
  82. Useem, Bert, Mayer N. Zald. 1982. "From Pressure Group to Social Movement: Organizational Dilemmas of the Effort to Promote Nuclear Power." Social Problems 30 (2): 144-156. Go to original source...
  83. Voss, Kim. 1996. "The Collapse of a Social Movement: The Interplay of Mobilizing Structures, Framing, and Political Opportunities in the Knights of Labor." Pp. 227-261 in Doug McAdam, John D. McCarthy, Mayer N. Zald (eds.). Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framing. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  84. Walker, Edward T. 2009. "Privatizing Participation: Civic Change and the Organizational Dynamics of Grassroots Lobbying Firms." American Sociological Review 74 (1): 83-105. Go to original source...
  85. Walker, Edward T. 2010. "Industry-Driven Activism." Contexts 9 (2): 44-49. Go to original source...
  86. Walker, Edward T., Andrew W. Martin, John D. McCarthy. 2008. "Confronting the State, the Corporation, and the Academy: The Influence of Institutional Targets on Social Movement Repertoires." American Journal of Sociology 114 (1): 35-76. Go to original source...
  87. Walsh, Edward J. 1986. "The Role of Target Vulnerabilities in High-Technology Protest Movements: The Nuclear Establishment at Three Mile Island." Sociological Forum 1 (2): 199-218. Go to original source...
  88. Werum, Regina, Bill Winders. 2001. "Who's 'In' and Who's 'Out': State Fragmentation and the Struggle over Gay Rights, 1974-1999." Social Problems 48 (3): 386-410. Go to original source...
  89. Wilson, John. 1973. Introduction to Social Movements. New York: Basic Books.
  90. Yearley, Steven. 1992. "Green Ambivalence about Science: Legal-Rational Authority and the Scientific Legitimation of a Social Movement." The British Journal of Sociology 43 (4): 511-532. Go to original source...
  91. Zald, Mayer N., Bert Useem. 1987. "Movement and Countermovement Interaction: Mobilization, Tactics, and State Involvement." Pp. 247-271 in Mayer N. Zald, John D. McCarthy (eds.). Social Movements in an Organizational Society. New Brunswick, N. J.: Transaction. Go to original source...
  92. Zehr, Stephen C. 2000. "Public Representations of Scientific Uncertainty about Global Climate Change." Public Understanding of Science 9 (2): 85-103. Go to original source...
  93. Znebejánek, František. 1997. Sociální hnutí. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.