Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2009, 45(3): 487-518 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2009.45.3.01

The Inequality of Participation: Re-examining the Role of Social Stratification and Post-Communism on Political Participation in Europe

Michael L. Smith
Institute of Sociology AS CR, Prague

This article compares the determinants of political participation, from voting and signing petitions to boycotting, across 23 European countries, posing the question whether and to what degree social inequalities in political participation differ between post-communist and Western countries. The data for the analysis is from the second round of the ESS survey, conducted in 2004-2005. The analysis focuses on the role of education, occupation, and gender in shaping the chances of engaging in political action, while also controlling for a range of sociological, political, and demographic variables. Interaction effects between individual variables and a post-communist dummy variable are used to directly compare the statistical significance of the difference in coefficients between post-communist and Western countries. The article finds that the observed effects of the post-communist context are actually accounted for by the indirect effects of a number of individual-level variables. In particular, education, occupation, and gender have stronger effects in post-communist countries than Western countries on many forms of political participation; in other words, the post-communist countries exhibit somewhat larger inequalities in political participation than in the West.

Keywords: : political participation, political behaviour, social inequality, social stratification, post-communism

Published: June 1, 2009Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Smith, M.L. (2009). The Inequality of Participation: Re-examining the Role of Social Stratification and Post-Communism on Political Participation in Europe. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review45(3), 487-518. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2009.45.3.01.
Download citation

References

  1. Abramson, Paul R., Brian D. Silver and Barbara A. Anderson. 1987. 'The Effects of Question Order in Attitudes Surveys: The Case of the SRC/CPS Citizen Duty Items.' American Journal of Political Science 31 (4): 900-908. Go to original source...
  2. Aldrich, John H. 1993. 'Rational Choice and Turnout.' American Journal of Political Science 37 (1): 246-278. Go to original source...
  3. Almond, Gabriel and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
  4. Anderson, Barbara and Brian D. Silver. 1986. 'Measurement and Mismeasurement of the Validity of the Self-reported Vote.' American Journal of Political Science 30 (4): 771-785. Go to original source...
  5. Ansolabehere, Stephen and Eitan Hersh. 2008. 'Vote Validation in the 2006 CCES.' Working paper. Cambridge: Harvard University.
  6. Bădescu, Gabriel, Paul Sum and Eric M. Uslaner. 2004. 'Civil Society Development and Democratic Values in Romania and Moldova.' East European Politics and Societies 18 (2): 316-341. Go to original source...
  7. Bean, Clive. 1991. 'Participation and Political Protest: A Causal Model with Australian Evidence.' Political Behavior 13 (3): 253-283. Go to original source...
  8. Bernstein, Robert, Anita Chadha and Robert Montjoy. 2001. 'Overreporting Voting: Why It Happens and Why It Matters.' Public Opinion Quarterly 65 (1): 22-44. Go to original source...
  9. Bishop, George F., Robert W. Oldendick and Alfred J. Tuchfarber. 1984. 'Interest in Political Campaigns: The Influence of Question Order and Electoral Context.' Political Behavior 6 (2): 159-169. Go to original source...
  10. Caínzos, Miguel, Monica Ferrin and Carmen Voces. 2007. 'Class Inequalities in Political Participation: Spain and Europe.' Paper presented at the RC28 Spring Meeting, Brno, 24-27 May 2007.
  11. Dalton, Russell J. 2002. Citizen Politics: Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. (3rd ed.). New York: Chatham House.
  12. Ekiert, Grzegorz and Jan Kubik. 2001. Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland, 1989-1993. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  13. Fischer, Frank. 2000. Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge. Durham: Duke University Press. Go to original source...
  14. Fraser, Nancy. 2003. Redistribution or Recognition? A Political-Philosophical Exchange. (with Axel Honneth) New York: Verso.
  15. Fraser, Nancy. 2008. Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World. New York: Polity Press.
  16. Frič, Pavol. 2004. 'Political Developments after 1989 and Their Impact on the Nonprofit Sector.' Pp. 217-243 in Future of Civil Society: Making Central European Non-profit Organizations Work, edited by Annette Zimmer and Eckhard Priller. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Go to original source...
  17. Gallego, Aina. 2007. 'Inequality in Political Participation: Contemporary Patterns in European Countries.' Working paper. Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California, Irvine.
  18. Glenn, Norval D. and Michael Grimes. 1968. 'Aging, Voting, and Political Interest.' American Sociological Review 33 (4): 563-575. Go to original source...
  19. Greskovits, Bela. 1998. The Political Economy of Protest and Patience. East European and Latin American Transformations Compared. Budapest: Central European University Press.
  20. Havelková, Hana. 1997. 'Abstract Citizenship? Women and Power in the Czech Republic.' Pp. 115-137 in Crossing Boarders: Gender and Citizenship in Transition, edited by Barbara Hobson, Anne Marie Berggren and Nancy Fraser. Stockholm: Swedish Council for Planning and Coordination of Research.
  21. Havelková, Hana. 1999. 'Women In and After a "Classless" Society.' Pp. 69-84 in Women and Social Class: International Feminist Perspectives, edited by Christine Zmroczek and Pat Mahony. London: Taylor and Francis.
  22. Howard, Marc Morjé. 2002. 'The Weakness of Postcommunist Civil Society.' Journal of Democracy 13 (1): 157-169. Go to original source...
  23. Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  24. Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
  25. Innes, Judith and David Booher. 2004. 'Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century.' Planning Theory and Practice 5 (4): 419-436. Go to original source...
  26. Jaccard, James J. 2001. Interaction Effects in Logistic Regression. (Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  27. Matějů, Petr, Michael L. Smith, Petr Soukup and Josef Basl. 2007. 'The Determination of College Expectations in OECD Countries: The Role of Individual and Structural Factors.' Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 43 (6): 1121-1148.
  28. Matějů, Petr and Michael L. Smith. 2008. 'The Perceived Value of Education and Educational Aspirations in the Czech Republic: Changes in the Determination of Educational Aspirations between 1989 and 2003.' Comparative Education Review 53 (1): 13-39. Go to original source...
  29. Matsusaka, John G. and Filip Palda. 1999. 'Voter Turnout: How Much Can We Explain?' Public Choice 98 (3-4): 431-446. Go to original source...
  30. McAdam, Doug, John D. McCarthy and Mayer N. Zald. 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. New York: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  31. Mihaylova, Dimitrina. 2004. Social Capital in Central and Eastern Europe: A Critical Assessment and Literature Review. Budapest: Center for Policy Studies, Central European University.
  32. Mutz, Diana. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  33. Norris, Pippa, Stefaan Walgrave and Peter Van Aelst. 2005. 'Who Demonstrates? Antistate Rebels, Conventional Participants, or Everyone?' Comparative Politics 37 (2): 189-206. Go to original source...
  34. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  35. Parry, Geraint, Georgie Moyser and Neil Day. 1992. Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. New York: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  36. Rakušanová, Petra. 2005. 'Civil Society and Civic Participation in the Czech Republic.' Sociologické studie/Sociological Studies 05:05. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic..
  37. Rakušanová, Petra. 2008. Povaha občanské společnosti v České republice v kontextu střední Evropy. (The Nature of Civil Society in the Czech Republic within a Central European Context) Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
  38. Rosenstone, Steven J. and John M. Hansen. 2003. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. London: Longman Classics.
  39. Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Sidney Verba and Henry Brady. 1995. 'Participation's Not a Paradox: The View from American Activists.' British Journal of Political Science 25 (1): 1-36. Go to original source...
  40. Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Sidney Verba and Henry Brady. 1999. 'Civic Participation and the Equality Problem.' Pp. 427-459 in Civic Engagement in American Democracy, edited by Theda Skocpol and Morris Fiorina. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.
  41. Shapiro, Ian. 2001. Democratic Justice. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  42. Sigelman, Lee. 1982. 'The Nonvoting Voter in Voting Research.' American Journal of Political Science 26 (1): 47-56. Go to original source...
  43. Smith, Michael L. 2009. Občané v politice: Studie k participativní a přímé demokracii ve střední Evropě. (Citizens in Politics: Studies on Participatory and Direct Democracy in Central Europe) Prague: Institute for Social and Economic Analysis (ISEA).
  44. Smolar, Aleksander. 1996. 'Civil society after Communism: From Opposition to Atomization.' Journal of Democracy 7 (1): 24-38. Go to original source...
  45. Sokolová, Věra. 2006. 'Koncepční pohled na "sexuální menšiny" aneb vše je jen otázka správné orientace....' (A Conceptual Look at Sexual Minorities, or Everything Is Only a Question of the Right Orientation) Pp. 253-266 in Mnohohlasem: Vyjednávání ženských prostorů po roce 1989, edited by Hana Hašková, Alena Křížková and Marcela Linková. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.
  46. Sokolová, Věra. 2009. 'Otec, otec a dítě: Gay muži a rodičovství.' (Father, Father, and Child: Gay Men and Parenthood in the Czech Republic) Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 45 (1): 115-145.
  47. Teixeira, Ruy A. 1992. The Disappearing American Voter. Washington DC: Brookings Institution.
  48. Urban, Jan and Iva Zvěřinová. 2009. 'What are the Determinants of Environmentally Significant Behavior in the Czech Republic? A Secondary Analysis of Two ISSP Data-sets.' Working Paper WP 2009/01. Prague: Charles University Environment Center.
  49. Vajdová, Tereza. 2005. Česká občanská společnost 2004: po patnácti letech rozvoje. (Czech Civil Society 2004: After 15 Years of Development) Prague: NROS.
  50. Veselý, Arnošt and Michael L. Smith. 2008. 'Macro-Micro Linkages and the Role of Mechanisms in Social Stratification Research.' Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review 44 (3): 491-510.
  51. Verba, Sidney and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper Row.
  52. Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Steven J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.
  53. Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.