Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2018, 54(6): 881-906 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2018.54.6.434

Rethinking the Continuum between Public and Private Actors in Electricity Policy in the Context of the UK Energy Transition

Lucie de Carvalho
Department of Anglophone Studies, Université de Lille

At the turn of the 1990s, a very large part of UK energy utilities was transferred from the public sector into private ownership. When analysing the era of privatisation, recent research on public policy has concluded that public authorities' ability to influence or shape national energy choices has been substantially weakened. Since the mid-2000s, however, tight cooperation between private investors and UK public regulators and policy-makers has emerged as a critical factor to meet the challenges posed by the energy transition. How have the British public authorities tried to get private actors on board and to involve them not only in the delivery and funding of energy services, as has been the case with public-private partnerships, but also in the decision-making process? This article identifies various schemes spearheaded by the UK government to breed or revive innovation in the privately-owned renewable and nuclear energy industries. This analysis explores the various strategies used to facilitate 'decompartmentalising' initiatives and ensure a smooth transition towards a neo-corporatist revival of the Triple Helix involving industry, academia, and government. It shows how these hybrid processes offer valuable insight for analysing and reconceptualising the boundary between the public and the private sectors. Based on this case study, this analysis ultimately demonstrates how the public/private dichotomy should be reassessed using the concepts of hybrid roles and responsibilities.

Keywords: private actors, multi-actor transition, energy transition, governance

Published: December 1, 2018Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
de Carvalho, L. (2018). Rethinking the Continuum between Public and Private Actors in Electricity Policy in the Context of the UK Energy Transition. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review54(6), 881-906. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2018.54.6.434.
Download citation

References

  1. Ahlborg, H. 2017. 'Towards a Conceptualisation of Power in Energy Transition.' Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 25: 122-141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.004. Go to original source...
  2. Ankrah, S. and O. Al-Tabbaa. 2015. 'Universities-Industry Collaboration.' Scandinavian Journal of Management 31: 387-408, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003. Go to original source...
  3. Baker, K., J. Simpson and G. Stoker. 2012. ''The Nuclear Investors Conference.' A SPRing Working Report. Southampton: University of Southampton.
  4. BEIS. 2017. Digest of UK Energy Statistics. London: TSO.
  5. Bell, S. and A. Hindmoor. 2009. Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814617. Go to original source...
  6. Biau, V. and S. Weil. 2006. 'Comprendre les Pratiques Européennes: Evolution de la Politique PFI Concernant les Bâtiments Publics en Grande-Bretagne.' Rapport d'Enquête. Paris : Centre d'Expertise Français pour l'Observation des Partenariats Publics-Privés (CEF-O-PPP).
  7. Ćetković, S. and A. Buzogány. 2016. 'Varieties of Capitalism and Clean Energy Transitions in the European Union: When Renewable Energy Hits Different Economic Logics.' Climate Policy 16 (5): 642-657, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1135778. Go to original source...
  8. Ćetković, S., A. Buzogány and M. Schreurs. 2017. 'Varieties of Clean Energy Transitions in Europe: Political-Economic Foundations of Onshore and Offshore Wind Development.' Pp. 642-657 in The Political Economy of Clean Energy Transition, edited by D. Arent, C. Ardnt, M. Miller, F. Tarp and O. Zinaman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. 1993. Realising our Potential: A Strategy for Science, Technology and Engineering. London: HMSO.
  10. Chitty, A. 2011. 'Burying the Haldane Principle.' Storm Breaking upon the University. Retrieved 20 November 2018 (http://stormbreaking.blogspot.com/2011/04/burying-haldane-principle.html).
  11. Cogent. 2009. Power People: The Civil Nuclear Workforce, 2009-2025. Renaissance Nuclear Skills Series 1. Warrington, DC: Cogent.
  12. Cooper, T. 1985. 'The Public-Private Continuum: Interdependence in a Democratic Society.' Public Budgeting and Finance 5 (3): 99-115, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00693. Go to original source...
  13. de Carvalho, L. 2017. 'Austerity Policies, the UK State and the Energy Utilities: A Changing Paradigm or Business as Usual?' The Political Quarterly 8 (3): 425-433, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12377. Go to original source...
  14. DECC. 2013. Nuclear Energy Research and Development Roadmap: Future Pathways. London: TSO.
  15. DTI. 1988. The Department for Enterprise. London: HMSO.
  16. DTI. 2007. Meeting the Energy Challenge: A White Paper on Energy. London: HMSO.
  17. Edgerton, D. and K. Hughes. 1989. 'The Poverty of Science: Critical Analysis of Scientific and Industrial Policy under Mrs Thatcher.' Public Administration 67 (4): 419-433, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1989.tb00739.x. Go to original source...
  18. Etzkowitz, H. 2003. 'Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-IndustryGovernment Relations.' Social Science Information 42 (3): 293-338, https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002. Go to original source...
  19. Farla, J., J. Markard, R. Raven and L. Coenen. 2012. 'Sustainability Transitions in the Making: A Closer Look at Actors, Strategies and Resources.' Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (6): 991-998, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001. Go to original source...
  20. Favarel-Garrigues, G., T. Godefroy and P. Lascoumes. 2007. 'Sentinels in the Banking Industry: Private Actors and the Fight against Money Laundering.' Sociologie du Travail 49 (1): 10-27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soctra.2006.12.005. Go to original source...
  21. Fischer, L.-B. and J. Newig. 2016. 'Importance of Actors and Agency in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Exploration of the Literature.' Sustainability 8: 476-497, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050476. Go to original source...
  22. Geels, F. 2004. 'From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory.' Research Policy 33 (6-7): 897-920, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015. Go to original source...
  23. Geels, F. and J. Schot. 2007. 'Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways.' Research Policy 36 (3): 399-417, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003. Go to original source...
  24. Geels, F. 2010. 'Ontologies, Socio-Technical Transitions (to Sustainability), and the MultiLevel Perspective.' Research Policy 39: 495-510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022. Go to original source...
  25. Grin, J., J. Rotmans, J. Schot, D. Loorbach and F. Geels (eds). 2010. Transitions to Sustainable Development; New Directions in the Study of Long-Term Transformative Change. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856598. Go to original source...
  26. Habermas, J. (1962 translated 1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity.
  27. Hannesson, R. 2009. 'Energy and GDP Growth.' International Journal of Energy Sector Management 3 (2): 157-170, https://doi.org/10.1108/17506220910970560. Go to original source...
  28. Hedberg, D., S. Kullander and H. Frank. 2010. 'The World Needs a New Energy Paradigm.' Ambio 39 (1): 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0057-9. Go to original source...
  29. Helm, D. 2005. 'The Assessment: The New Energy Paradigm.' Oxford Review for Economic Policy 21 (1): 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gri001. Go to original source...
  30. Helm, D. 2007. The New Energy Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. HM Government. 2013. A Review of the Civil Nuclear R&D Landscape in the UK. London: HMSO.
  32. Horrocks, S. 2007. 'The Internationalisation of Science in a Commercial Context: Research and Development by Overseas Multinationals in Britain before the Mid-1970s.' British Society for the History of Science, 40 (2): 227-250, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087407009491. Go to original source...
  33. House of Commons. 1988. 'DTI-The Department for Enterprise.' Hansard 19 February, 493 (871).
  34. House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. 2011a. Call for Evidence: Nuclear Research and Development Capabilities. London: The Stationery Office.
  35. House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. 2011b. Nuclear Research and Development Capabilities. Third Report. London: The Stationery Office.
  36. Ilchong, N. and G. Rothwell (eds). 2014. New Nuclear Power Industry Procurement Markets: International Experiences. Seoul: Korea Development Institute.
  37. Kern, F., A. Smith, C. Shaw, R. Raven and B. Verhees. 2014. 'From Laggard to Leader: Explaining Offshore Wind Developments in the UK.' Energy Policy 69 (6): 635-646, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.031. Go to original source...
  38. Kuzemko, C. 2014. 'Depoliticisation, Institutions and Political Capacity: Explaining Sedate Energy Transition in the UK.' IGov EPG Working Paper 1405. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
  39. Lawton-Smith, H. 2006. Universities, Innovation and the Economy. Abingdon: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358054. Go to original source...
  40. Lee, S. 2011. 'Gordon Brown and the British Way of Risk-based Modernisation.' L'Observatoire de la Société Britannique 10: 45-58, https://doi.org/10.4000/osb.1115. Go to original source...
  41. Lehmbruch, G. 1979. 'Liberal Corporatism and Party Government.' Pp. 91-126 in Trends Towards Corporatism Intermediation, edited by P. Schmitter and G. Lehmbruch. London: Sage. Go to original source...
  42. Lehmbruch, G. 1984. 'Concertation and the Structure of Corporatist Networks.' Pp. 60-80 in Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by J. Goldthorpe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  43. Lockwood, M., C. Kuzemko, C. Mitchell and R. Hoggett. 2013. 'Theorising Governance and Innovation in Sustainable Energy Transitions.' IGov Working Paper 1304. Exeter: Exeter University Press.
  44. Markard, J., R. Roven and B. Truffer. 2012. 'Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects.' Research Policy 41: 955-967, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013. Go to original source...
  45. Moran, M. 2003. The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247579.001.0001. Go to original source...
  46. Mosley, L. 2009. 'Private Governance for the Public Good? Exploring Private Sector Participation in Global Financial Regulation.' Pp. 126-146 in Power, Interdependence, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics, edited by A. Moravcsik and H. Milner. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830787.126. Go to original source...
  47. National Audit Office. 2012. Managing Risk Reduction at Sellafield. London: The Stationery Office.
  48. NIA. 2008. The UK Capability to Deliver a New Nuclear Build Programme 2008 Update. Nuclear Industry Association Report.
  49. Nuttall, William. 2005. Nuclear Renaissance: Technologies and Policies for the Future of Nuclear Power. Oxon: Taylor & Francis Group.
  50. ONS. 2014. UK Gross Domestic Expenditure on Research and Development. Statistical Bulletin. London: TSO.
  51. Perkmann, M., A. Neely and K. Walsh. 2011. 'How Should Firms Evaluate Success in University-Industry Alliances? A Performance Measurement System.' R&D Management 41: 202-216, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00637.x. Go to original source...
  52. Perry, J. and H. Rainey. 1988. 'The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy.' Academy of Management Review 13 (2): 182-201, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306858. Go to original source...
  53. Pollitt, C. 2003. 'Joined-Up Government: A Survey.' Political Studies Review 1 (1): 34-49, https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9299.00004. Go to original source...
  54. Ragwitz, M. and A. Miola. 2005. 'Evidence from R&D Spending for Renewable Energy Sources in the EU.' Renewable Energy 30 (11): 1635-1647, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.12.001. Go to original source...
  55. Ranga, M. and H. Etzkowitz. 2013. 'Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society.' Industry and Higher Education 27: 237-262, https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165. Go to original source...
  56. Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. 'The New Governance: Governing without Government.' Political Studies 44 (4): 652-667, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x. Go to original source...
  57. Richmond, A. and R. Kaufmann. 2006. 'Is There a Turning Point in the Relationship between Income and Energy Use and/or Carbon Emissions?' Ecological Economics 56 (2): 176-189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.011. Go to original source...
  58. Riess, B. 2012. Government as Partner? CSR Policy in Europe. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
  59. Rip, A. and R. Kemp. 1998. 'Technological Change." Pp. 327-399 in Human Choice and Climate Change, vol. 2, edited by S. Rayner, S. and E. Malone. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
  60. Rotmans, J., R. Kemp and M. Van Asselt. 2001. 'More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy.' Foresight 3 (1): 15-31, https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680110803003. Go to original source...
  61. Royal Society. 2011. Fuel Cycle Stewardship in a Nuclear Renaissance. London: The Royal Society.
  62. Ruffles, P. 2003. An Essential Programme to Underpin Government Policy on Nuclear Power. Nuclear Task Force. Retrieved 20 November 2018 (http://130.88.20.21/uknuclear/pdfs/Nuclear_Task_Force_July_2003.pdf).
  63. Rutledge, I. and P. Wright (eds). 2010. UK Energy Policy and the End of Market Fundamentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  64. Santoro, M. and S. Gopalakrishnan. 2000. 'The Institutionalization of Knowledge Transfer Activities within Industry-University Collaborative Ventures.' Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 17: 299-319, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00027-8. Go to original source...
  65. Schmitter, P. 1979. 'Still the Century of Corporatism?' Pp. 7-52 in Trends towards Corporatism Intermediation, edited by P. Schmitter and G. Lehmbruch. London: Sage.
  66. Siaroff, A. 1999. 'Corporatism in 24 Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement.' European Journal of Political Research 36: 175-205, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00467. Go to original source...
  67. Simmie, J., R. Sternberg and J. Carpenter. 2014. 'New Technological Path Creation: Evidence from the British and German Wind Energy Industries.' Journal of Evolutionary Economics 24 (4): 875-904, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-014-0354-8. Go to original source...
  68. Sherry, A. et al. 2010. A Review of the UK's Nuclear R&D Capability. Swindon: Technology Strategy Board.
  69. Stark, A. 2010. Drawing the Line: Public and Private in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  70. Steward, T. 2013. 'Demand and Decarbonisation in 2050: Themes from Scenarios.' IGov Working Paper. Energy Policy Group, University of Exeter.
  71. Stone, D. 2013. Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. London: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137022912. Go to original source...
  72. Thomas, S. 2004. 'The British Model in Britain: Failing Slowly.' Paper presented at the International Workshop on: 'Thirty Years of World Energy Policy - cum - Editorial Board Meeting of Energy Policy.' Hong Kong Energy Studies Centre. Retrieved 20 November 2018 (http://gala.gre.ac.uk/3757/1/PSIRU_8908_-_2004-04-E-UK-HongKong.pdf).
  73. Van de Donk, W. (eds). 2008. Infrastructures: Time to Invest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  74. Vaughan, A. 2017. 'Foreign Companies Flock to Build Nuclear Plants in the UK.'' The Guardian, 25 March 2017.
  75. Verbong, G. and D. Loorbach (eds). 2012. Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or Necessity? Oxon: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203126523. Go to original source...
  76. Verbruggen, P. and T. Havinga. 2015. 'Introduction to the Special Issue on the Patterns of Interplay between Public and Private Regulation.' European Journal of Risk Regulation 6 (4): 482-487, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00005043. Go to original source...
  77. Weintraub, J. and K. Kumar (eds). 1997. Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  78. Wieczorek, A. J., S. O. Negro, R. Harmsen, G. J. Heimeriks, L. Luo and M. P. Hekkert 2013. 'A Review of the European Offshore Wind Innovation System.' Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 26 (2): 294-306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.045. Go to original source...
  79. Wittmayer, J., F. Avelino, F. van Steenbergen and D. Loorbach. 2017. 'Actor Roles in Transition: Insights from Sociological Perspectives.' Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 24: 45-56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003. Go to original source...
  80. WNN. 2009. 'UK Government Boosts Nuclear Support.' World Nuclear News, 3 December 2009.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.