Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2004, 40(4): 469-488 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2004.40.4.05

The Influence of Territorially Specific Factors on the Formation of the Political Attitudes of Voters

Tomáš Kostelecký, Daniel Čermák
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, Praha

Published: August 1, 2004Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kostelecký, T., & Čermák, D. (2004). The Influence of Territorially Specific Factors on the Formation of the Political Attitudes of Voters. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 40(4), 469-488. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2004.40.4.05.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Agnew, J. 1987. Place and Politics. Winchester: Unwin Hyman.
    2. Archer, J. C. a F. M. Shelley 1986. American Electoral Mosaics. Washington, The Association of American Geographers.
    3. Berglund, S. a U. Lindstrom 1982. Regional Centers and Beyond: Geographic, Economic and Political Impacts. Umea, International Political Science Association.
    4. Butler, D. a D. Stokes 1969. Political Change in Britain: Forces Shaping Electoral Choice. London: Macmillan.
    5. Capecchi, V. a G. Galli 1969. "Determinants of Voting Behaviour in Italy: a Linear Causal Model of Analysis". Pp. 235-284 in M. Dogan a S. Rokkan (eds.), Quantitative Ecological Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, The MIT Press.
    6. Godstein, H. 2003. Multilevel Statistical Models. 3rd edition. London, Hodder Arnold.
    7. Illner, M. a M. Foret 1980. Sociální ukazatele. Praha, Nakladatelství Svoboda.
    8. Johnston, R. J., F. M. Shelley a P. J. Taylor (eds.) 1990. Development in Electoral Geography. London: Routledge.
    9. Key, V. O. 1955. "A Theory of Critical Elections". Journal of Politics 17: 3-18. Go to original source...
    10. Kostelecký, T., P. Jehlička a L. Sýkora 1993. "Czechoslovak Parliamentary Elections 1990: Old Patterns, New Trends and a Lots of Surprises". Pp. 235-254 in J. O'Loughlin a H. van der Wusten (eds.), The New Political Geography of Eastern Europe. London: Belhaven Press.
    11. Kostelecký, T. 1994. "Economic, Social and Historical Determinants of Voting Patterns: 1990 and 1992 Parliamentary Elections in the Czech Republic". Czech Sociological Review, 2: 209-228. Go to original source...
    12. Kostelecký, T. 1995a. "Politické, ekonomické a sociální chování během post-komunistické transformace - regionální pohled". Working Papers 95:5. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
    13. Kostelecký, T. 1995b. "Changing Party Allegiances in a Changing Party System: the 1990 and 1992 Parliamentary Elections in the Czech Republic". Pp. 79-107 in G. Wightman (ed.), Party formation in East-Central Europe. Post-Communist Politics in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland and Bulgaria. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
    14. Kostelecký, T. 1996. "The Results of the 1990 Parliamentary Elections in Regional Perspective". In H. D. Klingemann (ed.), Election Handbook 1990 - Czechoslovakia, Poland, Hungary, Slovenia. Berlin: WZB.
    15. Kostelecký, T. 2001. "Vzestup nebo pád politického regionalismu?" Sociologické texty 01:9. Praha, Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
    16. Kostelecký, T. 2002. Political Parties after Communism: Developments in East-Central Europe. Washington, D.C., Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
    17. Krivý, V., V. Feglová a D. Balko 1996. Slovensko a jeho regiony. Bratislava: Nadácia Média.
    18. Lipset, S. M. a S. Rokkan (eds.) 1967. Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: The Free Press, 554 s.
    19. Miller, W. L. 1982. "Variations in Electoral Behaviour in the United Kingdom". Pp. 224-250 in Madgwick and Rose (eds.). The Territorial Dimension in U.K. Politics. London: Macmillan. Go to original source...
    20. Nairn, T. 1977. The break-up of Britain. London: New Left Books.
    21. Nielsen, F. 1980. "The Flemish Movement in Belgium after World War II: a Dynamic Analysis". American Sociologic Review 45: 76-94. Go to original source...
    22. Oliver E. J. 2001. Democracy in Suburbia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    23. Patterson, L., a H. Goldstein 1991. New Statistical Methods for Analysis Social Structures: an Introduction to Multilevel Models. Multilvel Modelling Newsletter 3 (1): 4-6.
    24. Putnam, R. D. 1993. Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
    25. Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster. Go to original source...
    26. Rantala, O. 1967. "The Political Regions of Finland". Scandinavian Political Studies 2: 117-42. Go to original source...
    27. Rokkan, S. a D. W. Urwin 1983. Economy, Territory, Identity: Politics of West European Peripheries. Beverly Hills: Sage.
    28. Sellers, J. M. 2002. Governing from Below. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    29. Siegfried, A. 1913. Tableau politique de la France de l'Ouest sous la Troisieme Republique. Paris: A. Colin.
    30. Stachová, J. 2002. "Občanská společnost a neziskový sektor v regionálním kontextu". Pp. 50-74 in Kostelecký, Stachová, Čermák, Sociologické texty 02:7: Region a politika, Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
    31. Vajdová, Z. 1997. Politická kultura lokálních politických elit: srovnání českého a východoněmeckého města. Working Papers 97:3. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
    32. Vajdová, Z. a T. Kostelecký 1997. "Politická kultura lokálních společenství. Příklad tří měst". Sociologický časopis 33: 445-465. Go to original source...
    33. Zarycki, T. 2002. Region jako kontekst zachowan politycznych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe "Scholar".

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content