Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2019, 55(4): 473-502 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2019.55.4.474

Family Policy and Formal and Informal Care for Preschool-Age Children in Selected European Countries

Věra Kuchařová, Olga Nešporová
Výzkumný ústav práce a sociálních věcí, v. v. i., Praha

The article focuses on the use of childcare for preschool-age children in 13 European countries with different models of maternal employment. Employing a comparative approach it relates care arrangements to family policy measures. Childcare policies and practices in post-communist countries (the Czech Republic, Bulgaria, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia) are compared in a wider European context and specifically to various countries representing the principal types of welfare state and family policy strategies in Europe (the United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, Italy, France, Spain, and Sweden). The article focuses on parental leave schemes, parental employment, and formal childcare and takes into account informal childcare, which in many countries is crucial to achieving a work-life balance. The authors' findings reveal that the use of informal childcare is not directly related to either the length of paid parental leave or maternal employment. Informal childcare, which in most cases is provided by grandparents, is used on a weekly basis for at least thirty per cent of preschool-age children in all the post-communist countries studied except Bulgaria. However, similarly high levels of informal childcare were also found in the United Kingdom, Italy, and Austria. Gendered moral rationalities based on cultural norms play an important role in division of childcare in each European state.

Keywords: family policy, childcare, informal childcare, Czech Republic, Europe

Published: August 1, 2019Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kuchařová, V., & Nešporová, O. (2019). Family Policy and Formal and Informal Care for Preschool-Age Children in Selected European Countries. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 55(4), 473-502. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2019.55.4.474.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bartáková, H. 2008. Cesta zpátky. Návrat žen po rodičovské dovolené na trh práce v České republice. Disertační práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, Fakulta sociálních studií.
    2. Barvíková, J., S. Höhne, J. Paloncyová, K. Svobodová. 2018. Mikrojesle: nová služba předškolní péče v průzkumu veřejného mínění [online]. Praha: VÚPSV. Dostupné z: http://praha.vupsv.cz/Fulltext/vz_443.pdf
    3. Bouget, D., H. Frazer, E. Marlier, S. Sabato, B. Vanhercke. 2015. Social Investment in Europe. A Study of National Policies 2015. Brusel: European Commission.
    4. Brandth, B., E. Kvande. 2011. "Norway: the Making of the Father's quota." Pp. 191-206 in S. Kamerman, P. Moss (eds.). The Politics of Parental Leave Policies: Children, Parenting, Gender and the Labour Market. Bristol: Policy Press, https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781847420671.003.0012. Go to original source...
    5. Caracciolo di Torella, E., A. Masselot. 2010. Reconciling Work and Family Life in EU Law and Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246683. Go to original source...
    6. Carling, A., S. Duncan, R. Edwards (eds.). 2002. Analysing Families. Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice. London: Routledge.
    7. Castles, F. G. 2003. "The World Turned Upside Down: Below Replacement Fertility, Changing Preferences and Family-Friendly Public Policy in 21 OECD Countries." Journal of European Social Policy 13 (3): 209-227, https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287030133001. Go to original source...
    8. D'Addio, A. C., M. M. d'Ercole, 2005. Trends and Determinants of Fertility Rates in OECD Countries: The Role of Policies. Paříž: OECD.
    9. Dudová, R., H. Hašková. 2011. "Nastavení sociálních politik, odborný diskurs a 'správná' péče o děti - srovnání České republiky a Francie." Fórum sociální politiky 5 (5): 8-14.
    10. Duncan, S., R. Edwards, T. Reynolds, P. Alldred. 2003. "Motherhood, Paid Work and Partnering: Values and Theories." Work, Employment and Society 17 (2): 309-330, https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017003017002005. Go to original source...
    11. Duncan, S., R. Edwards, P. Alldred, T. Reynolds. 2004. "Mothers and Childcare: Policies, Values and Theories." Children and Society 18 (4): 245-265. Go to original source...
    12. Esping-Andersen, G. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    13. European Commission. 2013. Barcelona Objectives. The Development of Childcare Facilities for Young Children in Europe with a View to Sustainable and Inclusive Growth [online]. Luxembourg: European Commission [cit. 23. 5. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/genderequality/files/documents/130531_barcelona_en.pdf.
    14. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice/Eurostat. 2014. Key Data on Early Childhood Education and Care in Europe. 2014 Edition. Eurydice and Eurostat Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, https://doi.org/10.2797/75270.
    15. Eurostat. 2009. Reconciliation between Work, Private and Family Life in the European Union [online]. Luxembourgh: Eurostat [cit. 20. 11. 2018]. Dostupné z: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/5705547/KS-78-09-908-EN.PDF/6180b5e6-e482-4d5f-a681-6a9bce05d733.
    16. European Commission. 2018. Changes in Child and Family Policies in the EU28 in 2017. European Platform for Investing in Children: Annual Thematic Report. Brussels: European Commission [cit. 30. 11. 2018], https://doi.org/10.2767/14467.
    17. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. 2003. Working-time preferences and work-life balance in the EU: some policy considerations for enhancing the quality of life. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions.
    18. Evropská komise. 2018. Zpráva komise evropskému parlamentu, radě, evropskému hospodářskému a sociálnímu výboru a výboru regionů [online]. Brusel: Evropská komise [cit. 30. 11. 2018]. Dostupné z: https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2018/CS/COM-2018-273-F1-CS-MAIN-PART-1.PDF.
    19. Eydal, G. B., T. Rostgaard. 2016. Fatherhood in the Nordic Welfare States: Comparing Care Policies and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press, https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447310471.001.0001. Go to original source...
    20. Förster, M., G. Verbist. 2012. "Money or Kindergarten? Distributive Effects of Cash Versus In-kind Family Transfers for Young Children." OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 135. Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/5k92vxbgpmnt-en. Go to original source...
    21. Gerbery, D. 2016. "Rodinná politika na Slovensku v komparatívnej perspektíve." Slovenská štatistika a demografia 26 (3): 48-68.
    22. Giddens, A. 2000. Třetí cesta: obnova sociální demokracie. Praha: Mladá Fronta.
    23. Gilligan, C. 2001. Jiným hlasem: o rozdílné psychologii žen a mužů. Praha: Portál.
    24. Glaser, K., D. Price, G. Di Gessa, E. Ribe, R. Stuchburg, A. Tinker. 2013. Grandparenting in Europe: Family Policy and Grandparent Role in Providing Childcare [online]. London: King's College [cit. 28. 5. 2017]. Dostupné z: https://www.grandparentsplus.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/Grandparenting-in-Europe-0613_Electronic.pdf.
    25. Gray, A. 2005. "The Changing Availibility of Grandparents as Carers and Its Implications for Childcare Policy in the UK." Journal of Social Policy 34 (4): 557-577, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279405009153. Go to original source...
    26. Grunow, D., M. Evertsson. 2016. Couples' Transitions to Parenthood. Analysing Gender and Work in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785366000. Go to original source...
    27. Grunow, D., M. Evertsson. 2019. New Parents in Europe. Work-Care Practices, Gender Norms and Family Policies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788972970. Go to original source...
    28. Hakim, C. 2000. Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century: Preference Theory. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
    29. Hakim, C. 2016. Key Issues in Women's Work: Female Diversity and the Polarisation of Women's Employment. Abingdon, New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843146148. Go to original source...
    30. Hamplová, D. 2014. "Hlídání vnoučat českými prarodiči v mezinárodním srovnání." Data a výzkum-SDA Info 8 (1): 25-40. Go to original source...
    31. Hamplová, D., P. Šalamounová. 2015. "Preferovaná délka rodičovské dovolené: Srovnání osmi evropských zemí." Fórum sociální politiky 9 (6): 2-9.
    32. Hasmanová Marhánková, J. 2015. "The Changing Practices and Meanings of Grandparenthood. Reflections on Demographical Trends and Changing Representations of Ageing. Sociology Compass 9 (4): 309-319, https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12259. Go to original source...
    33. Hasmanová Marhánková, J., M. Štípková. 2014. "Typologie prarodičovství v české společnosti - faktory ovlivňující zapojení prarodičů do péče o vnoučata." Naše společnost 12 (1): 15-26.
    34. Hasmanová Marhánková, J., M. Štípková. 2018. Prarodičovství v současné české společnosti. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    35. Hašková, H., A. Křížková, R. Dudová. 2015. Ekonomické náklady mateřství: co znamená odpovědnost za péči o dítě/děti pro ženy z hlediska jejich pracovního uplatnění a ekonomického postavení? [online]. SOÚ AV ČR [cit. 30. 11. 2018]. Dostupné z: http://aa.ecn.cz/img_upload/8b47a03bf445e4c3031ce326c68558ae/sekundarni-analyza-zprava-final_format.pdf.
    36. Hašková, H., S. Saxonberg. 2016. "The Revenge of History - The Institutional Roots of Post-Communist Family Policy in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland." Social Policy Administration 50 (5): 559-579, https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12129. Go to original source...
    37. Hašková, H., J. Mudrák, S. Saxonberg. 2013. Péče o nejmenší. Boření mýtů. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    38. Höhne, S. 2017. "Změny v čerpání rodičovského příspěvku v demografických souvislostech." Demografie 59 (1): 5-22.
    39. Höhne, S., V. Kuchařová. 2016. "Změny finančních nástrojů rodinné politiky v letech 2006-2015 a jejich potenciál měnit natalitní chování." Politická ekonomie 64 (7): 867-890, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.1094. Go to original source...
    40. Hoskovcová, S. 2006. Psychická odolnost předškolního dítěte. Praha: Grada.
    41. Chesnais, J. C. 1996. "Fertility, Family, and Social Policy in Contemporary Western Europe." Population and Development Review 22 (4): 729-739, https://doi.org/10.2307/2137807. Go to original source...
    42. Kellehear, A. 2012. Compassionate Cities. Public Health and End of Life Care. London: Routledge. Go to original source...
    43. Koslowski, A., S. Blum, P. Moss (eds.). 2016. 12th International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2016 [online]. International Network On Leave Policies And Research [cit. 30. 5. 2017]. Dostupné z: http://www.leavenetwork.org/fileadmin/user_upload/k_leavenetwork/annual_reviews/2016_Full_draft_20_July.pdf.
    44. Křížková, A., R. Dudová, H. Hašková, H. Maříková, Z. Uhde (eds.). 2008. Práce a péče. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    45. Kuchařová, V., O. Nešporová. 2017. "Česká rodinná politika - podpora rodin s nezaopatřenými dětmi a autonomie rodiny." Fórum sociální politiky 11 (2): 2-13.
    46. Kuchařová, V., K. Peychlová. 2016.Výzkum zájmu rodičů o motivační otcovskou dovolenou. Praha: VÚPSV.
    47. Kuitto, K. 2016. Post-Communist Welfare States in European Context. Paterns of Welfare Policies in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham a Northampton: Edward Elgar, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784711986. Go to original source...
    48. Lakomý, M., M. Kreidl. 2015. "Full-time Versus Part-time Employment: Does It Influence Frequency of Grandparental Childcare?" European Journal of Ageing 12 (4): 321-331, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-015-0349-9. Go to original source...
    49. Leitner, S. 2003. "Varieties of Familialism. The Caring Function of the Family in Comparative perspective." European Societies 5 (4): 353-375, https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669032000127642. Go to original source...
    50. Lewis, J., M. Campbell, C. Huerta. 2008. "Patterns of Paid and Unpaid Work in Western Europe: Gender, Commodification, Preferences and the Implications for Policy." Journal of European Social Policy 18 (1): 21-37, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928707084450. Go to original source...
    51. Lohmann, H., H. Zagel. 2016. "Family Policy in Comparative Perspective: The Concepts and Measurement of Familization and Defamilization." Journal of European Social Policy 26 (1): 48-65, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928715621712. Go to original source...
    52. Lovász, A. 2016. "Childcare Expansion and Mothers' Employment in Post-Socialist Countries." IZA World of Labour 319: 1-11, https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.319. Go to original source...
    53. Maříková, H. (ed.). 2012. Živitelé a živitelky: reflexe (a) praxe. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    54. Meil, G., J. Rogero-García 2015. "Does Paternal Childcare Replace Grandparental Support in Dual-Earner Families?" Family Science 6 (1): 31-37, https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2015.1009934. Go to original source...
    55. Mitchell, E., D. Hamplová (eds.). 2012. Kdo se (po)stará? Dítě mezi rodinou, státem a trhem. Praha: SOÚ AV ČR.
    56. Mlčoch. L. 2014. Ekonomie rodiny v proměnách času, institucí a hodnot. Praha: Karolinum.
    57. Možný, I. 1990. Moderní rodina. Mýty a skutečnosti. Brno: Blok.
    58. Možný, I., M. Přidalová, L. Bánovcová. 2003. Mezigenerační solidarita: Předběžná zpráva z mezinárodního srovnávacího výzkumu Hodnota dětí a mezigenerační solidarita. Praha: VÚPSV.
    59. MPSV. 2008. Soubor prorodinných opatření - Prorodinný balíček [online]. MPSV [cit. 20. 11. 2018]. Dostupné z: https://www.mpsv.cz/files/clanky/5898/komplet_balik.pdf.
    60. Nešporová, O. 2015a. "Přechod k mateřství - Plány versus realita týkající se pracovních životů vysokoškolsky vzdělaných žen." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum 16 (2): 73-84, https://doi.org/10.13060/12130028.2015.16.2.222. Go to original source...
    61. Nešporová, O. 2015b. "Flexibilní režim čerpání rodičovského příspěvku a slaďování rodičovství s placenou prací." Fórum sociální politiky 9: 10-18. Dostupné z: http://praha.vupsv.cz/Fulltext/FSP_2015-06.pdf.
    62. Nilsen, A., J. Brannen, S. Lewis (eds.). 2013. Transitions to Parenthood in Europe. Bristol: Policy Press. Go to original source...
    63. OECD. 2007. Babies and Bosses: Reconciling Work and Family Life. A Synthesis of Findings for OECD Countries. Paris: OECD, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264032477-en. Go to original source...
    64. OECD. 2016. OECD Family Database [online]. Dostupné z: http://www.oecd.org/social/family/database.htm.
    65. OECD. 2018a. Typology of Cildcare and Early Education Services. Dostupné z: http://www.oecd.org/els/family/PF4-1-Typology-childcare-early-education-services.pdf.
    66. OECD. 2018b. Informal Childcare Arrangements [online]. Dostupné z: http://www.oecd.org/els/family/PF3-3-Informal-childcare-arrangements.pdf.
    67. Paloncyová, J., J. Barvíková, V. Kuchařová, K. Peychlová, K. Svobodová. 2014. Nové formy denní péče o děti v české republice. Praha: VÚPSV.
    68. Petrová Kafková, M. 2014. "Péče o vnoučata v současnosti: evidence na základě dat SHARE 2010." Fórum sociální politiky 8 (3): 9-14. Dostupné z: http://praha.vupsv.cz/Fulltext/FSP_2014-03.pdf.
    69. Saxonberg, S., T. Sirovátka. 2007. "Re-familisation of the Czech Family Policy and Its Causes." International Review of Sociology-Revue Internationale de Sociologie 17 (2): 319-341, https://doi.org/10.1080/03906700701357307. Go to original source...
    70. Saxonberg, S., D. Szelewa. 2007. "The Continuing Legacy of the Communist Legacy? The Development of Family Policies in Poland and the Czech Republic." Social Politics 14 (3): 351-379, https://doi.org/10.1093/sp/jxm014. Go to original source...
    71. Sevenhuijsen, S. 2002. "A Third Way? Moralities, ethics and Families: An Approach through the Ethic of Care." Pp. 129-144 in A. Carling, S. Duncan, R. Edwards (eds.). Analysing Families. Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practices. London / New York: Routledge.
    72. Sirovátka, T. 2004. "Family Policy in the Czech Republic after 1989: From Gendered and Enforced De-familialism to Gendered and Implicit Familialism." Pp. 97-117 in P. Mareš (ed.). Society, Reproduction and Contemporary Challenges. Brno: Barrister and Principal.
    73. Sirovátka, T., J. Válková (eds.). 2017. Understanding Care Policies in Changing Times: Experiences and Lessons from the Czech Republic and Norway. Brno: CDK.
    74. Sirovátka, T., H. Tomešová Bartáková 2011. "Reconciliation Policy in the Czech Republic and the EU: From Neglect to Rejection." European Journal of Social Security 13 (1): 161-177, https://doi.org/10.1177/138826271101300109. Go to original source...
    75. Sleebos, J. 2003. "Low Fertility Rates in OECD Countries: Facts and Policy Responses." OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers 15. Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/568477207883. Go to original source...
    76. Svobodová, K., A. Šťastná. 2010. "Rozdělení genderových rolí mezi rodiči malých dětí v České republice a na Slovensku." Fórum sociální politiky 4 (4): 2-9.
    77. Szelewa, D. 2017. "From Implicit to Explicit Familialism: Post-1989 Family Policy Reforms in Poland." Pp. 129-151 in D. Auth, J. Hergenhan, B. Holland-Cunz (eds.). Gender and Family in European Economic Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41513-0_7. Go to original source...
    78. Szelewa, D., M. P. Polakowski. 2008. "Who Cares? Changing Patterns of Childcare in Central and Eastern Europe." Journal of European Social Policy 18 (2): 115-131, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928707087589. Go to original source...
    79. Šatava, J. 2016. Daňový systém snižuje motivaci matek s menšími dětmi k práci: Doporučení a jeho vyhodnocení. Praha: Národohospodářský ústav AV ČR.
    80. Šulová, L. 2013. "Předškolní dítě a jeho svět." Pp. 64-69 in I. Gillernová, J. Šípek. Vybrané kapitoly z psychologie pro každého. Praha: Univerzita Karlova, Filozofická fakulta, katedra psychologie, https://doi.org/10.29364/epsy.331. Go to original source...
    81. Thévenon, O. 2011. "Family Policies in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis." Population and Development Review 37 (1): 57-87, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17284457.2011.00390.x. Go to original source...
    82. Thomson, R. 2007. "The Qualitative Longitudinal Case History: Practical, Methodological and Ethical Reflections." Social Policy and Society 6 (4): 571-582, https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746407003909. Go to original source...
    83. Vidovićová, L., L. Galčanová, M. Petrová Kafková. 2015. "Význam a obsah prarodičovské role u mladých českých seniorů a seniorek." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 51 (5): 761-782, https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2015.51.5.213. Go to original source...
    84. Vohlídalová, M. 2007. "Participace mužů na domácích pracích a péči o děti na základě kvantitativních výzkumů." Pp. 32-51 in H. Maříková (ed.), M. Vohlídalová. Trvalá, nebo dočasná změna? Sociologické studie / Sociological Studies 07:11. Praha: SOÚ AV ČR.
    85. Wheelock, J., K. Jones. 2002. "'Grandparents are the Next Best Thing': Informal Childcare for Working Parents in Urban Britain." Journal of Social Policy 31 (3): 441-463, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279402006657. Go to original source...
    86. Wildebank, J. 1996. "To What Extend Can Social Policy Challenge the Dominant Ideology of Mothering? A Cross-National Comparision of Sweden, France and Britain." Journal of European Social Policy 6 (2): 147-161, https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879600600204. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content