Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2017, 53(2): 147-180 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2017.53.2.304

The Decline of the Party and the Rise of Party Leaders? The Personalisation of Voting Behaviour in the Czech Republic

Lukáš Linek, Marcela Voženílková
1 Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i., Praha
2 Fakulta sociálních studií, Masarykova univerzita, Brno

The aim of this article is to analyse the personalisation of Czech voters' behaviour during the last two decades. This study examines if the effect of party leaders on party choice has increased as the vote personalisation literature suggests. Alternative explanations of party choice emphasise the stable role of cleavages and left-right orientation, leaving limited space for leadership effects and their growth. In addition, this paper also tests party-specific hypotheses. These hypotheses are tested using four Czech post-election surveys (1996-2013). Vote choices are modelled using stacked data matrices (for each election) and a logistic regression estimator. An instrumental variable approach is used to deal with the endogeneity between vote choice and party identification. The results show that there has been no increase in party leadership effects in the Czech Republic. Party leader effects are largely stable across the four elections examined. The article reveals that party leaders play a greater role in the decision-making calculus of voters of new populist non-leftist parties; however, the effects are not large.

Keywords: leader effects, party identification, personalization of politics, elections, Czech Republic

Published: April 1, 2017Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Linek, L., & Voženílková, M. (2017). The Decline of the Party and the Rise of Party Leaders? The Personalisation of Voting Behaviour in the Czech Republic. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 53(2), 147-180. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2017.53.2.304.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aardal, B., T. Binder. 2011. "Leader Effects and Party Characteristics." Pp. 108-126 in A. Kees, A. Blais, H. Schmitt (eds.). Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    2. Arbour, B. 2014. Candidate-Centered Campaigns. Political Messages, Winning Personalities and Personal Appeals. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
    3. Balmas, M., G. Rahat, T. Sheafer, S. R. Shenhav. 2014. "Two Routes to Personalized Politics: Centralized and Decentralized Personalization." Party Politics 20 (1): 37-51, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436037. Go to original source...
    4. Bartels, L. M. 2002. "The Impact of Candidate Traits in American Presidential Elections." Pp. 44-69 in A. King (ed.). Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199253137.003.0002. Go to original source...
    5. Bartle, J., I. Crewe. 2002. "The Impact of Party Leaders in Britain: Strong Assumptions, Weak Evidence." Pp. 70-95 in A. King (ed.). Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199253137.003.0003. Go to original source...
    6. Bean, C., A. Mughan. 1989. "Leadership Effects in Parliamentary Elections in Australia and Britain." American Political Science Review 83 (4): 1165-1179, https://doi.org/10.2307/1961663. Go to original source...
    7. Beyme, K. von. 1985. Political Parties in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Gower.
    8. Biezen, I. van. 2003. Political Parties in New Democracies. Party Organization in Southern and East-Central Europe. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403937858. Go to original source...
    9. Brettschneider, F. 2002. Spitzenkanidaten und Wahlerfolg. Personalisierung-Kompetenz-Parteien. Ein internationaler Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Go to original source...
    10. Brettschneider, F., K. Neller, Ch. J. Anderson. 2006. "Candidate Images in the 2005 German National Elections." German Politics 15 (4): 481-499, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644000601062667. Go to original source...
    11. Brug, W. van der, C. van der Eijk, M. Franklin. 2007. The Economy and the Vote. Conomic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Caambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.12.010. Go to original source...
    12. Brug, W. van der, C. van der Eijk, M. Franklin. 2008. "One Electorate or Many? Differences in Party Preference Formation between New and Established European Democracies." Electoral Studies 27 (4): 589-600, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2007.12.010. Go to original source...
    13. Cabada, L., M. Tomšič. 2016. "The Rise of Person-Based Politics in the New Democracies: The Czech Republic and Slovenia." Politics in Central Europe 12 (2): 29-50, https://doi.org/10.1515/pce-2016-0011. Go to original source...
    14. Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, D. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.
    15. Caprara, G. V., P. G. Zimbardo. 2004. "Personalizing Politics: A Congruency Model of Political Preference." American Psychologist 59 (7): 581-594, https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.581. Go to original source...
    16. Caprara, G. V. 2007. "The Personalization of Modern Politics." European Review 15 (2): 151-164, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798707000178. Go to original source...
    17. Carey, J. M., M. S. Shugart. 1995. "Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas." Electoral Studies 14 (4): 417-439, https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)00035-2. Go to original source...
    18. Casal Bertoa, F. 2014. "Party Systems and Cleavage Structures Revisited: A Sociological Explanation of Party System Institutionalization in East Central Europe". Party Politics 20 (1): 16-36, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436042. Go to original source...
    19. Clarke, H. D., D. Sanders, M. C. Stewart, P. F. Whiteley. 2004. Political Choice in Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/019924488X.001.0001. Go to original source...
    20. Clarke, H. D., D. Sanders, M. C. Stewart, P. F. Whiteley. 2009. Performance Politics and The British Voter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
    21. Colton, T. J. 2000. Transitional Citizens: Voters and What Influences Them in the New Russia. Cambridge, London: Harvard University Press.
    22. Colton, T. J. 2002. "The Leadership Factor in the Russian Presidential Election of 1996." Pp. 184-209 in A. King (ed.). Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199253137.003.0007. Go to original source...
    23. Converse, P. E. 1969. "Of Time and Partisan Stability." Comparative Political Studies 2 (2): 139-171, https://doi.org/10.1177/001041406900200201. Go to original source...
    24. Costa Lobo, M. 2008. "Parties and Leader Effects. Impact of Leaders in the Vote for Different Types of Parties." Party Politics 14 (3): 281-298, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807088123. Go to original source...
    25. Costa Lobo, M. 2006. "Short-term Voting Determinants in a Young Democracy: Leader Effects in Portugal in the 2002 Legislative Elections." Electoral Studies 25 (2): 270-286, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.05.002. Go to original source...
    26. Curtice, J., S. Holmberg. 2005. "Party Leaders and Party Choice." Pp. 235-253 in J. Thomassen (ed.). The European Voter. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199273219.003.0010. Go to original source...
    27. Curtice, J., S. Hunjan. 2011. "Elections as Beauty Contests: Do the Rules Matter?" Pp. 91-170 in K. Aarts, A. Blais, H. Schmitt (eds.). Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    28. Curtice, J., M. Lisi. 2015. "The Impact of Leaders in Parliamentary and Presidential Regimes." Pp. 63-86 in M. Costa Lobo, J. Curtice (eds.). Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford Unviersity Press. Go to original source...
    29. Dinas, E. 2008. "Big Expectations, Small Outcomes: The Impact of Leaders' Personal Appeal in the 2004 Greek Election." Electoral Studies 27 (3): 505-517, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.01.009. Go to original source...
    30. Duverger, M. (1951) 1965. Political Parties. London: Methuen.
    31. Eijk, C. van der, W. van der Brug, M. Kroh, M. Franklin. 2006. "Rethinking the Dependent Variable in Voting Behavior: On the Measurement and Analyis of Electoral Utilities." Electoral Studies 25 (3): 424-447, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2005.06.012. Go to original source...
    32. Enyedi, Z., L. Linek. 2008. "Searching for the Right Organization: Ideology and Party Structure in East-Central Europe." Party Politics 14 (4): 455-477, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068808090255. Go to original source...
    33. Evans, G., S. Whitefield. 1993. "Identifying the Bases of Party Competition in Eastern Europe." British Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 521-548, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400006712. Go to original source...
    34. Evans, G., R. Anderson. 2005. "The Impact of Party Leaders: How Blair Lost Voters." Parliamentary Affairs 58 (4): 818-836, https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsi065. Go to original source...
    35. Fiorina, M. P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    36. Formichelli, S. 2015. "Personality Politics in Single-Party and Coalition Governments." Pp. 87-104 in M. Costa Lobo, J. Curtice (eds.). Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford Unviersity Press. Go to original source...
    37. Franklin, M. N. 2010. "Cleavage Research: A Critical Appraisal." West European Politics 33 (3): 648-658. Go to original source...
    38. Franklin, M. N., T. T. Mackie, H. Valen. 1992. Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Colchester: ECPR Press.
    39. Garzia, D. 2012. "Party and Leader Effects in Parliamentary Elections: Towards a Reassessment." Politics 32 (2): 175-185, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01443.x. Go to original source...
    40. Garzia, D. 2013a. "Can Candidates' Image Win Elections? A Counterfactual Assessment of Leader Effects in the Second Italian Republic." Journal of Political Marketing 12 (4): 348-361, https://doi.org/10.1080/15377857.2013.837303. Go to original source...
    41. Garzia, D. 2013b. "Changing Parties, Changing Partisans: The Personalization of Partisan Attachments in Western Europe." Political Psychology 34 (1): 67-89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00918.x. Go to original source...
    42. Garzia, D. 2014. Personalization of Politics and Electoral Change. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
    43. Garzia, D., A. De Angelis. 2016 (online first). "Partisanship, Leader Evaluations and the Vote: Disentangling the New Iron Triangle in Electoral Research." Comparative European Politics 14 (5): 604-625, http://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.36. Go to original source...
    44. Gheorghita, A. 2015a. "Determining the Components of Leader Effects in a Post-Communist Context." Pp. 191-214 in M. Costa Lobo, J. Curtice (eds.). Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford Unviersity Press. Go to original source...
    45. Gheorghita, A. 2015b. "Voter Characteristics and Leader Effects in a Post-Communist Context: The Case of the 2012 Legislative Elections in Romania." Romanian Journal of Political Science 15 (1): 52-79.
    46. Gilljam, M. 1997. "The Directional Theory under the Magnifying Glass: A Reappraisal." Journal of Theoretical Politics 9 (1): 5-12, https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692897009001001. Go to original source...
    47. Gunther, R. 2005. "Parties and Electoral Behaviour in Southern Europe". Comparative Politics 37 (3): 253-275, https://doi.org/10.2307/20072889. Go to original source...
    48. Havlík, V. 2015. "The Economic Crisis in the Shadow of Political Crisis: The Rise of Party Populism in the Czech Republic." Pp. 199-215 in H. Kriesi, T. S. Pappas (eds.). European Populism in the Shadow of the Great Recession. Colchester: ECPR Press.
    49. Hayes, B. C., I. McAllister. 1997. "Gender, Party Leaders, and Election Outcomes in Australia, Britain, and the United States." Comparative Political Studies 30 (1): 3-26, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414097030001001. Go to original source...
    50. Hazan, R. 1996. "Presidential Parliamentarism: Direct Popular Election of the Prime Minister, Israel's New Electoral and Political System." Electoral Studies 15 (1): 21-37, https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-3794(94)00003-4. Go to original source...
    51. Hloušek, V. 2005. "Česko." Pp. 438-452 in M. Strmiska et al.: Politické strany moderní Evropy analýza stranicko-politických systémů. Praha: Portál.
    52. Hloušek, V., L. Kopeček. 2010. Politické strany: původ, ideologie a transformace politických stran v západní a střední Evropě. Praha: Grada.
    53. Hloušek, V. 2015. "Two Types of Presidentialization in the Party Politics of Central Eastern Europe." Italian Political Science Review 45 (3): 277-299, https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2015.17 Go to original source...
    54. Holmberg, S., H. Oscarsson, 2011. "Party Leader Effects on the Vote." Pp. 35-51 in K. Aarts, A. Blais, H. Schmitt (eds.). Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    55. Holsteyn, J. J. M. van, R. B. Andeweg. 2010. "Demoted Leaders and Exiled Candidates: Disentangling Party and Person in the Voter's Mind." Electoral Studies 29 (4): 628-635, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.06.003. Go to original source...
    56. Janda, K., D. S. King. 1985. "Formalizing and Testing Duverger's Theories on Political Parties". Comparative Political Studies 18 (2): 139-169, https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414085018002001. Go to original source...
    57. Johnston, R. 2002. "Prime Ministerial Contenders in Canada." Pp. 158-183 in A. King (ed.). Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199253137.003.0006. Go to original source...
    58. Karvonen, L. 2010. The Personalisation of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. Colchester: ECPR Press.
    59. Kepplinger, H. M., H.-B. Brosius, S. Dahlem. 1994. Wie das Fernsehen die Wahlen beeinflußt. Theoretische Modelle und empirische Analysen. München: Verlag Reinhard Fischer.
    60. King, A. 2002. Leaders' Personalities and the Outcomes of Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199253137.001.0001. Go to original source...
    61. Kmenta, J. 1997. Elements of Econometrics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.15701. Go to original source...
    62. Kunštát, D. et al. 2014. 25 let české demokracie očima veřejnosti. Praha: Academia, Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i.
    63. Lachat, R. 2015. "Leader Effects and Party Polarization." Pp. 105-123 in M. Costa Lobo, J. Curtice (eds.). Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford Unviersity Press. Go to original source...
    64. Leary, M. R., R. M. Kowalski. 1990. "Impression Management: A Literature Review and Two-Component Model." Psychological Bulletin 107 (1): 34-47, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.1.34. Go to original source...
    65. Lewis-Beck, M. S., R. Nadeau, A. Elias. 2008. "Economics, Party, and the Vote: Causality Issues and Panel Data." American Journal of Political Science 52 (1): 84-95, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00300.x. Go to original source...
    66. Linek, L. 2009. "Jak měřit stranickou identifikaci." Data a výzkum - SDA Info 3 (2): 187-210.
    67. Linek, L. 2010. Zrazení snu? Struktura a dynamika postojů k politickému režimu a jeho institucím a jejich důsledky. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    68. Linek, L. 2012a. "Volba strany: vliv tematického hlasování a lídrů stran" Pp. 189-208 in L. Linek (ed.): Voliči a volby 2010. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON), Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i.
    69. Linek, L. 2012b. "Úvod: Volební výsledky, účast a vzorce podpory politických stran" Pp. 12-29 in L. Linek (ed.): Voliči a volby 2010. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON), Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i.
    70. Linek, L. 2014. "Čistá a celková volební volatilita v Česku v letech 1990-2013: stejný koncept, odlišná měření a podobné závěry?" Acta Politologica 6 (1): 24-38.
    71. Linek, L., P. Lyons. 2013. Dočasná stabilita? Volební podpora politických stran v České republice v letech 1990-2010. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON), Sociologický ústav AV ČR. v.v.i.
    72. Lyons, P., L. Linek. 2007. "Povaha a zdroje stranické identifikace." Pp. 147-175 in T. Lebeda, L. Linek, P. Lyons, K. Vlachová a kol.: Voliči a volby 2006. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v.v.i.
    73. Maddens, B., S. Fiers. 2004. "The Direct PM Election and the Institutional Presidentialisation of Parliamentary Systems." Electoral Studies 23 (4): 769-793, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2003.10.006. Go to original source...
    74. Malcová, K. 2012. "Lokální aspekt volební podpory kandidátů do Senátu Parlamentu ČR." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 48 (2): 283-313.
    75. Marks, G. 1993. "Partisanship and the Vote in Australia: Changes over Time 1967-1990." Political Behavior 15 (2): 137-166, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993851. Go to original source...
    76. Marsh, M. 2007. "Candidates or Parties? Objects of Electoral Choice in Ireland." Party Politics 13 (4): 500-527, https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807075944. Go to original source...
    77. Matějů, P., B. Řeháková. 1997. "Turning Left or Class Realignment? Analysis of the Changing Relationship between Class and Party in the Czech Republic, 1992-96." East European Politics and Societies 11 (3): 501-541, https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325497011003004. Go to original source...
    78. Matějů, P., K. Vlachová et al. 2000. Nerovnost, spravedlnost, politika. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    79. McAllister, I. 2007. "The Personalisation of Politics." Pp. 571-588 in R. J. Dalton, H.-D. Klingemann (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    80. Miller, A. H., M. P. Wattenberg, O. Malanchuk. 1984. "Cognitive Representations of Candidate Assessments." Pp. 183-210 in L. Kaid, D. Nimmo (eds.). Political Communication Yearbook. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press.
    81. Miller, W. E., J. M. Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    82. Mudde, C. 2007. Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037. Go to original source...
    83. Mughan, A. 2000. Media and the Presidentialization of Parliamentary Elections. New York: Palgrave, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403920126. Go to original source...
    84. Mughan, A. 1993. "Party Leaders and Presidentialism in the 1992 British Election: A Postwar Perspective." Pp. 193-204 in D. Denver (eds.). British Elections and Parties Yearbook. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Go to original source...
    85. Page, B. I., C. C. Jones. 1979. "Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote." American Political Science Review 73 (4): 1071-1089, https://doi.org/10.2307/1953990. Go to original source...
    86. Pecháček, Š. 2013. "Personalizace politiky v ČR." Revue politika 11 (2): 93-109.
    87. Poguntke, T., P. Webb. (eds.). 2005. The Presidentialization of Politics in Democratic Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    88. Rahat, G., T. Sheafer. 2007. "The Personalization(s) of Politics: Israel 1949-2003." Political Communication 24 (1): 65-80, https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600601128739. Go to original source...
    89. Rudi, T. 2015. "Emotions towards Leaders and Voting Behavior." Pp. 215-240 in M. Costa Lobo, J. Curtice (eds.). Personality Politics? The Role of Leader Evaluations in Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford Unviersity Press. Go to original source...
    90. Schmitt, H., S. Holmberg. 1995. "Political Parties in Decline?" Pp. 95-133 in H.-D. Klingemann, D. Fuchs (eds.). Citizens and the State. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    91. Smith, M. L., P. Matějů. 2011. "Restratifikace české politiky. Vývoj třídně podmíněného volebního chování v České republice v letech 1992-2010." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 47 (1): 33-59. Go to original source...
    92. Spiller, L., J. Bergner. 2011. Branding the Candidate: Marketing Strategies to Win Your Vote. Santa Barbara: Praeger.
    93. Ștefuriuc, I. 2003. "Campaign Personalization and Personal Voting in Romania: A Longitudinal Analysis, 1995-2002." The Romanian Journal of Society and Politics 3 (2): 61-96.
    94. Thomassen, J. (ed.). The European Voter. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    95. Voženílková, M., J. Šedo. 2016. "Personalizace volebních systémů v České republice. Možnosti a limity metody J. Careyho a M. Shugarta." Politické vedy 19 (1): 138-166.
    96. Voženílková, M. 2017. Personalizace politiky: Případ České republiky. Disertační práce. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
    97. Woolridge, J. M. 2006. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.
    98. Žižlavský, M. 2012. "Strana jako značka." Pp. 230-253 in R. Chytilek, O. Eibl, A. Matušková (eds.). Teorie a metody politického marketingu. Brno: CDK.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content