Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2011, 47(1): 89-114 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2011.47.1.05

The Civic Democratic Party and the Ascendancy of the Professional Party Organisation in Czech Democracy in the 1990s

Magdaléna Hadjiisky
Groupe de Sociologie Politique Européenne, Université de Strasbourg

This article focuses on the emergence of the Civic Democratic Party (ODS). It attempts to trace the party's origins in several possible, coinciding factors that in the Czech Republic led not just to the establishment of ODS, but also to the institutionalisation of professional party organisation as such. On the one hand, the article points to the significance of interactions between the various groups within Civic Forum (OF), where the group around Václav Klaus asserted the 'standard model' of party competition. On the other hand, it questions the simplifying theory of ODS as a party of 'economists' and on the contrary shows that its success depended not so much on its economic vision as on the existence of an important group of post-normalisation 'technocrats', who after 1989 provided an anchoring for this vision among Czech regional elites. Their crucial support for professional party organisation stemmed from the absence of any other method of self-legitimisation, something which, by contrast, former dissidents were able to rely on, as were defenders of the model of political organisation that did not envision the existence of other political parties.

Keywords: Civic Democratic Party, Civic Forum, political parties, Czech Republic.

Published: February 1, 2011Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hadjiisky, M. (2011). The Civic Democratic Party and the Ascendancy of the Professional Party Organisation in Czech Democracy in the 1990s. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review47(1), 89-114. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2011.47.1.05.
Download citation

References

  1. Ágh, Attila. 1998. "The End of the Beginning: the Partial Consolidation of East Central European Parties and Systems." Pp. 186-199 in Paul Pennings, Jan-Erik Lane (eds.). Comparing Party System Change. London, New York: Routledge.
  2. Aligica Dragos, Paul, Anthony J. Evans. 2009. The Neoliberal Revolution in Eastern Europe: Economic Ideas in the Transition from Communism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  3. Berger, Peter L., Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
  4. Best, Heinrich, Maurizio Cotta (eds.). 2000. Parliamentary Representatives in Europe 1848-2000. Legislative Recruitment and Careers in Eleven European Countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. van Biezen, Ingrid. 2005. "On the Theory and Practice of Party Formation and Adaptation in New Democracies." European Journal of Political Research 44 (1): 147-174. Go to original source...
  6. Blejer, Mario I., Fabrizio Coricelli. 1995. The Making of Economic Reform in Eastern Europe: Conversations with Leading Reformers in Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic. Aldershot, Brookfield: Edward Edgar.
  7. Bunce, Valerie. 1995. "Should Transitologists be Grounded?" Slavic Review 54 (1): 111-127. Go to original source...
  8. Briquet, Jean-Louis, Magdaléna Hadjiisky (eds.). 2008. Hommes d'affaires en politique. Politix 4 (84).
  9. Čermák, Miloš, Jan Sotona. 1997. Klaus je mrtev, ať žije Klaus! Praha: Duel.
  10. Clark, Ed, Anna Soulsby. 1996. "The Re-formation of the Managerial Élite in the Czech Republic." Europe-Asia Studies 48 (2): 285-303. Go to original source...
  11. Dangerfield, Martin. 1997. "Ideology and the Czech Transformation. Neoliberal Rhetoric or Neoliberal Reality?" East European Politics & Societies 11 (3): 436-469. Go to original source...
  12. De Waele, Jean-Michel. 1999. L'émergence des partis politiques en Europe centrale. Bruxelles: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles.
  13. Dobry, Michel. 2000. "Paths, Choices, Outcomes, and Uncertainty. Elements for a Critique of Transitological Reason." Pp. 49-70 in Michel Dobry (ed.). Democratic and Capitalist Transitions in Eastern Europe: Lessons for the Social Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publ. Go to original source...
  14. Dobry, Michel. 2009. Sociologie des crises politiques. Paris: Presses de la Fondation Nationale des Sciences Politiques.
  15. Duverger, Maurice. (1951) 1973. Les partis politiques. Paris: Armand Colin.
  16. Dvořáková, Vladimíra, Aleš Gerloch (eds.). Krystalizace struktury politických stran v České republice po roce 1989. Praha: Česká společnost pro politické vědy.
  17. Dvořáková, Vladimíra, Jiří Kunc. 1996. "Zrod českého stranického systému." Pp. 55-63 in Vladimíra Dvořáková, Aleš Gerloch (eds.). Krystalizace struktury politických stran v České republice po roce 1989. Praha: Česká společnost pro politické vědy.
  18. Enyedi, Zsolt, Gábor Tóka. 2007. "The Only Game in Town. Party Politics in Hungary." Pp. 147-177 in Paul Webb, Stephen White (eds.). Party Politics in New Democracies. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  19. Enyedi, Zsolt, Lukáš Linek. 2008. "Searching for the Right Organization." Party Politics 14 (4): 455-477. Go to original source...
  20. Fogel, Daniel S. (ed.). 1994. Managing in Emerging Market Economies. Cases from the Czech and Slovak Republics. Boulder, COL, Oxford: Westview Press.
  21. Fowler, Brigid. 2004. "Concentrated Orange: Fidesz and the Remaking of the Hungarian Centre-Right, 1994-2002." Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20 (3): 80-114. Go to original source...
  22. Hadjiisky, Magdaléna. 1999. "La démocratie par le marché. Le cas des pays tchèques (1989-1996)." Politix 12 (47): 63-88. Go to original source...
  23. Hadjiisky, Magdaléna. 2004. De la mobilisation citoyenne à la démocratie de partis. Participation et délégation politiques dans la nouvelle démocratie tchèque (1989-1996) (Od občanské mobilizace ke stranické demokracii: Politická participace a delegace v nové české demokracii, 1989-1996). Doktorská práce vedená profesorem J. Rupnikem. Paris: Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris.
  24. Hadjiisky, Magdaléna. 2005. "Des leaders, sans parti': engagement résistant et désengagement dirigeant. Les anciens dissidents en République tchèque." Pp. 293-323 in Lionel Arnaud, Christine Guionnet (eds.). Les frontières du politique. Enquête sur les processus de politisation et de dépolitisation. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes. Go to original source...
  25. Hadjiisky, Magdaléna. 2007. "Les économistes au pouvoir: l'usage d'une expertise professionnelle dans la construction des nouvelles démocraties centre-européennes." Pp. 146-172 in Wladimir Andreff (ed.). La transition vers le marché et la démocratie. Paris: La Découverte.
  26. Hadjiisky, Magdaléna. 2008. "Vznik Občanské demokratické strany: Pokus o sociologickou analýzu." Pp. 70-90 in Adéla Gjuričová, Michal Kopeček (eds.). Kapitoly z dějin české demokracie po roce 1989. Praha, Litomyšl: Paseka.
  27. Hanley, Seán. 1999. "The New Right in the New Europe? Unravelling the Ideology of 'Czech Thatcherism'." Journal of Political Ideologies 4 (2): 163-189. Go to original source...
  28. Hanley, Seán. 2004. "Blue Velvet: the Rise and Decline of the New Czech Right." Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20 (3): 28-54. Go to original source...
  29. Hanley, Seán. 2008. The New Right in the New Europe. Czech Transformation and the Right-Wing Politics, 1989-2006. London, New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  30. Hanley, Seán, Aleks Szczerbiak, Tim Haughton, Brigit Fowler. 2008. "Sticking Together: Explaining Comparative Centre-Right Party Success in Post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe." Party Politics 14 (4): 407-434. Go to original source...
  31. Jasiewicz, Krzysztof. 2007. "Party System by Default." Pp. 85-117 in Paul Webb, Stephen White (eds.). Party Politics in New Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  32. Kalberg, Stephen. 1994. Max Weber's Comparative-Historical Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  33. Kalberg, Stephen. 2007. "A Cross-National Consensus on a Unified Sociological Theory? Some Inter-cultural Obstacles." European Journal of Social Theory 10 (2): 206-19. Go to original source...
  34. Kopecký, Petr. 1995. "Developing Party Organization in East-Central Europe. What Type of Party is Likely to Emerge?" Party Politics 1 (4): 515-534. Go to original source...
  35. Kopecký, Petr. 2006. "Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe: The Nature of Symbiosis." Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22 (3): 251-273. Go to original source...
  36. Kopecký, Petr, Cas Mudde. 2000. "What Has Eastern Europe Taught Us about the Democratization Literature (and vice versa)?" European Journal of Political Research 37 (4): 517-539. Go to original source...
  37. Kostelecký, Tomáš. 2002. Political Parties after Communism. Developments in East-Central Europe. Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.
  38. Kostelecký, Tomáš, Aleš Kroupa. 1996. "Party Organization and Structure at National and Local Level in the Czech Republic Since 1989." Pp. 89-119 in Paul G. Lewis (ed.). Party Structure and Organization in East-Central Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  39. Kyloušek, Jakub. 2007. "České parlamentní volby 2006: analýza kandidátních listin." Politologický časopis / Czech Journal of Political Science 14 (1): 79-92.
  40. Lagroye, Jacques. 1989. "Permanence and Change in Political Parties." Political Studies 37 (3): 362-375. Go to original source...
  41. Linek, Lukáš, Štěpán Pecháček. 2007. "Low Membership in Czech Political Parties: Party Strategy or Structural Determinants?" Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 23 (2): 259-275. Go to original source...
  42. Linz, Juan J., Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  43. Mair, Peter. 1996. What Is Different about Post-Communist Party Systems? Glasgow: Center for the Study of Public Policy, University of Strathclyde.
  44. Měchýř, Jan. 1999. Velký převrat či snad revoluce sametová? Praha: Český spisovatel.
  45. Montecinos, Verónica, John Markoff. 1993. "Democrats and Technocrats: Professional Economists and Regime Transition in Latin America." Canadian Journal of Development Studies 14 (1): 7-22.
  46. Offerlé, Michel (ed.). 1999. La Profession Politique, XIXè-XXè siècle. Paris: Belin.
  47. OECD. 1993. Regards sur l'éducation. Paris.
  48. Pšeja, Pavel. 2004. "Občanské fórum jako katalysátor vývoje stranického systému ČR." Politologický časopis / Czech Journal of Political Science 11 (3): 316-327.
  49. Pšeja, Pavel. 2005. Stranický systém České republiky. Politické strany a jejich vývoj 1989-1998. Brno: Centrum pro studium demokracie a kultury.
  50. Schöpflin, George. 1993. Politics in Eastern Europe, 1945-1992. Oxford, Cambridge: Blackwell.
  51. Suk, Jiří. 2003. Labyrintem revoluce. Praha: Prostor.
  52. Suk, Jiří. 2008. "Od nemožnosti politiky k politice jako umění možného: Paradoxní život občana Václava Havla v letech 1969-1992." Pp. 16-51 in Adéla Gjuričová, Michal Kopeček (eds.). Kapitoly z dějin české demokracie po roce 1989. Praha, Litomyšl: Paseka.
  53. Stark, David, László Bruszt. 1998. Post-Socialist Pathways, Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
  54. Waterbury, Myra. 2006. "Internal Exclusion, External Inclusion: Diaspora Politics and Party-Building in Post-Communist Hungary." East European Politics and Societies 20 (3): 483-515. Go to original source...
  55. Weber, Max. (1956) 1995. Economie et Société. Paris: Plon.
  56. Archiv KC OF (ÚSD). Vnitřní organizace OF (Praha, 28. 11. 1989); zápis schůzky KC OF s místními občanskými fóry, 27. 6. 1990; zápis ze sněmu OF, 30. 6. 1990.
  57. Archiv ODS, Hlavní kancelář, Praha. Projev V. Klause na první schůzi Výkonné rady ODS, 30. 4. 1991; úvodní projev Klause na ustavujícím kongresu strany 20. 4. 1991; tajný dokument o počtu bývalých členů a kandidátů KSČ v ODS (červen 1992); Stanovy Občanské demokratické strany (ODS se představuje", 1995); volební dokumentace ODS, 1996; volební časopis ODS Dokázali jsme, že to dokážeme!, 1996.
  58. Husák, Petr. 1997. Budování kapitalismu v Čechách. Rozhovory s Tomášem Ježkem. Praha: Volvox Globator.
  59. Inforum 44/90, 17. 10. 1990; 45/90, 25. 10. 1990; 46/90, 1. 11. 1990; 52/90, 13. 12. 1990.
  60. Klaus, Václav. 1991. O tvář zítřka (rok devadesátý). Praha: Pražská imaginace.
  61. Klaus, Václav. 1993. Rok málo či mnoho v dějinách země. Praha: Repro-Media.
  62. Klaus, Václav. 1998. "Místo autobiografie: určující momenty a vlivy." Pp. 119-141 in P. Jüngling, T. Koudelka, P. Žantovský. Tak pravil Václav Klaus. Praha: Votobia.
  63. Klaus, Václav. 2009. "Václav Klaus proti 'svým'." Syntéza rozhovoru, který V. Klaus poskytl Lidovým novinám, Radio Praha, 18. 5. 2009. Rozhovor vedla Alena Gebertová.
  64. Rozhovory autorky s Petrem Pithartem, 1995, Lubomírem Zaorálkem, 31. ledna 1997, s Mirkem Topolánkem, Ostrava, 21. 2. 1997, Petrem Havlíkem, Soňou Tarhoviskou a Lubomírem Zaorálkem, 1997.
  65. Vávra, Jan. 1990. "Kolik je kandidátů na předsedu OF?" Fórum, 10.-16. října.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.