Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2005, 41(3): 375-400 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2005.41.3.03

Role Perceptions, Party Cohesion and Political Attitudes of East and West German Parliamentarians. Findings from the Jena Parliamentary Survey (2003-4)

Michael Edinger, Lars Vogel
Jena University

Published: June 1, 2005Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Edinger, M., & Vogel, L. (2005). Role Perceptions, Party Cohesion and Political Attitudes of East and West German Parliamentarians. Findings from the Jena Parliamentary Survey (2003-4). Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 41(3), 375-400. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2005.41.3.03.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bowler, S., D. M. Farrell, and R. S. Katz (eds.) 1999. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus OH: Ohio State University Press.
    2. Derlien, H.-U. 1997. "Elitezirkulation zwischen Implosion und Integration: Abgang, Rekrutierung und Zusammensetzung ostdeutscher Funktionseliten 1989-1994." Pp. 329-415 in Transformation der politisch-administrativen Strukturen in Ostdeutschland, edited by Hellmut Wollmann et al. Opladen: Leske and Budrich. Go to original source...
    3. Edinger, M. 2004. "Alte Eliten in einer jungen Demokratie? Elitenzirkulation und Elitenreproduktion unter ostdeutschen Parlamentariern." Pp. 61-92 in Alte Eliten in jungen Demokratien? Wechsel, Wandel und Kontinuität in Mittel- und Osteuropa, edited by H.-J. Veen. Cologne, Weimar and Vienna: Böhlau.
    4. Hazan, R. Y. (ed.) 2003. Cohesion and Discipline in Legislatures. Political Parties, Party Leadership, Parliamentary Committees and Governance (Special Issue of The Journal of Legislative Studies): 9 (4).
    5. Hazan, R. Y. 2003a: "Does Cohesion Equal Discipline? Towards a Conceptual Delineation." Cohesion and Discipline in Legislatures. Political Parties, Party Leadership, Parliamentary Committees and Governance (Special Issue of The Journal of Legislative Studies) 9 (4): 1-11. Go to original source...
    6. Herzog, D. 1990. Abgeordnete und Bürger. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Go to original source...
    7. Higley, J. and G. Lengyel. 2000. "Introduction: Elite Configurations after State Socialism." Pp. 1-21 in Elites after State Socialism, edited by J. Higley and G. Lengyel. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield
    8. Hoffmann-Lange, U. 2001. "Elite Research in Germany." International Review of Sociology 11 (2): 201-216. Go to original source...
    9. Jahr, S. and M. Edinger. 2005. "Telefoninterviews mit Repräsentationseliten. Methodologische Aspekte am Beispiel der Jenaer Abgeordnetenstudie." ZUMA-Nachrichten: forthcoming.
    10. Katz, R. S. and B. Wessels. (eds.) 1999. The European Parliament, National Parliaments, and European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    11. Klecka, W. R. 1980. Discriminant Analyses. Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-019. Beverly Hills and London: Sage.
    12. Linek, L. and P. Rakušanová. 2002. Parties in the Parliament. Why, When and How Do Parties Act in Unity? Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences in the Czech Republic.
    13. Lock, S. 1998. Ostdeutsche Landtagsabgeordnete 1990-1994. Berlin: VWF.
    14. Patzelt, W. J. 1993. Abgeordnete und Repräsentation. Amtsverständnis und Wahlkreisarbeit. Passau: Wissenschaftsverlag Rothe.
    15. Patzelt, W. J. 1994. "Legislators of New Parliaments: The Case of East Germany." Pp. 270-288 in The Emergence of East Central European Parliaments: The First Steps, edited by A. Ágh. Budapest: Hungarian Centre for Democratic Studies.
    16. Patzelt, W. J. 2001. "Professionalisierung und Bürgernähe - Entwicklungstrends im Amtsverständnis und in der Amtsführung ostdeutscher Parlamentarier." Pp. 56-76 in Aufbau und Leistung des Parlamentarismus in den neuen Bundesländern, edited by C. Lieberknecht and H. Oberreuter. Rheinbreitbach: NDV.
    17. Patzelt, W. J. 2003. "Party Cohesion and Party Discipline in German Parliaments." Cohesion and Discipline in Legislatures. Political Parties, Party Leadership, Parliamentary Committees and Governance (Special Issue of The Journal of Legislative Studies) 9 (4): 102-115. Go to original source...
    18. Pitkin, H. F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    19. Schindler, P. 1999. Datenhandbuch zur Geschichte des Deutschen Bundestages 1949 bis 1999, Vol. I-III. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
    20. Wahlke, J. C. et al. 1962. The Legislative System. Explorations in Legislative Behaviour. New York, London: John Wiley and Sons.
    21. Wessels, B. 2005. "Members of the German Bundestag in Perspective: Recruitment, Representation, and European Integration across Time and Countries." Pp. 10-26 in Central European Parliaments: First Decade of Democratic Experience and the Future Prospective, edited by Z. Mansfeldová, D. M. Olson and P. Rakušanová. Prague: Institute of Sociology of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content