Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2012, 48(4): 757-784 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2012.48.4.10

The Institutionalisation of Non-responsibility - Efficiency or Conformity? Organisational Reform of Public Services Based on Accountability Theory

Arnošt Veselý
Fakulta sociálních věd Univerzity Karlovy v Praze

The article examines several aspects of the organisational reform of public services in EU-10 countries based on accountability theory. First, it briefly summarises what reforms have been introduced and describes their internal contradictions. The author argues that these internal tensions stem not just from the introduction of 'new public management' ideas into a completely different context, but also from the fact that the conceptual bases of one of the key objectives of these reforms - greater accountability - are internally contradictory. To understand these inconsistencies, the author analyses the various meanings of 'accountability' and shows how the term differs from 'responsibility'. He then examines the understanding of accountability as a type of social relation. The author also distinguishes the different forms that accountability can assume and defines the incompatible objectives and expectations that tie them together. In the second part of the article the author analyses reforms in the EU-10 and formulates three theoretical propositions on the nature of accountability and its potential consequences: (1) too much accountability operating in too many directions can lead to professional disorientation; (2) too much emphasis on the assessment of outcomes at the expense of an assessment of processes, which can result in a phenomenon that the author calls 'the institutionalisation of conformity'; (3) the asymmetry of accountability, i.e. the uneven distribution among different actors of the responsibility to account for actions, which can generate a reduced sense of fairness and legitimacy.

Keywords: sociology of organisations, public sector, accountability, responsibility, new public management, EU-10

Published: August 1, 2012Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Veselý, A. (2012). The Institutionalisation of Non-responsibility - Efficiency or Conformity? Organisational Reform of Public Services Based on Accountability Theory. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review48(4), 757-784. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2012.48.4.10.
Download citation

References

  1. Ágh, A. 2003. "Public Administration in Central and Eastern Europe." Pp. 536-548 in B. G. Peters, J. Pierre (eds.). Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage. Go to original source...
  2. Arendtová, H. 1995. Eichmann v Jeruzalémě. Praha: Mladá fronta.
  3. Aucoin, P., R. Heintzman. 2000. "The Dialectics of Accountability for Performance in Public Management Reform." International Review of Administrative Sciences 66 (1): 45-55. Go to original source...
  4. Barzanò, G. 2009. "Reflecting on English Educational Accountability." Italian Journal of Sociology of Education 3 (3): 189-209.
  5. Barzelay, M. 1992. Breaking Through Bureaucracy. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  6. Blagescu, M., R. Lloyd. 2006. 2006 Global Accountability Report: Holding Power to Account. London: One World Trust.
  7. Bouckaert, G. 2009. "Public Sector Reform in Central and Eastern Europe." Halduskultuur-Administrative Culture 10: 94-104.
  8. Bouckaert, G., V. Nakrošis, J. Nemec. 2011. "Public Administration and Management Reforms in CEE: Main Trajectories and Results." NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 4 (1): 9-29. Go to original source...
  9. Bovens, M. 2005. "Public Accountability." Pp.182-208 in E. Ferlie, L. Lynne, C. Pollitt (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  10. Bovens, M. 2006. "Analysing and Assessing Public Accountability. A Conceptual Framework." European Governance Papers (EUROGOV) No. C-06-01 (January 16, 2006).
  11. Bovens, M. 2007. "Analysing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework." European Law Journal 13 (4): 447-468. Go to original source...
  12. Bovens, M. 2010. "Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism." West European Politics 33 (5): 946-967. Go to original source...
  13. Bovens, M., T. Schillemans, P. T. Hart. 2008. "Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool." Public Administration 86 (1): 225-242. Go to original source...
  14. Brokl, L., Z. Mansfeldová, A. Seidlová. 2001. "Vztah poslanců českého parlamentu k voličům jako problém vertikální odpovědnosti." Sociologický časopis 37 (3): 297-311.
  15. CEEP. 2010. Public Services within the European Union and the 27 Member States: Statistics, Organizations and Regulations. Paris: CEEP. deLeon, L. 2003. "On Acting Responsibly in a Disorderly World: Individual Ethics and Administrative Accountability." Pp. 569-580 in B. G. Peters, J. Pierre (eds.). Handbook of Public Administration. London: SAGE.
  16. Drechsler, W. 2005. "The Re-Emergence of 'Weberian' Public Administration after the Fall of New Public Management: The Central and Eastern European Perspective." Halduskultuur Journal 6: 94-108.
  17. Dubnick, M. J. 2002. "Seeking Salvation for Accountability." Příspěvek přednesený na konferenci Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Boston, 29. 8.-1. 9. 2002.
  18. Dunleavy, P., H. Margetts, S. Bastow, J. Tinkler. 2006. "New Public Management Is Dead - Long Live Digital-era Governance." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16 (3): 467-494. Go to original source...
  19. Dunn, W. N., D. Y. Miller. 2007. "A Critique of the New Public Management and the Neo-Weberian State: Advancing a Critical Theory of Administrative Reform." Public Organization Review 7 (4): 345-358. Go to original source...
  20. Frankel, Ch. 1962. The Democratic Prospect. New York: Harper and Row.
  21. Frič, P. 2011. "Czech Elites and Citizens as Part of a Public Accountability System." Pp. 79-89 in A. Ball, S. P. Osborne (eds.). Social Accounting and Public Management: Accountability for the Public Good. New York: Routledge.
  22. Goodin, R. E. 2003. "Democratic Accountability: The Distinctiveness of the Third Sector." European Journal of Sociology 44 (3): 359-396. Go to original source...
  23. Gregory, R. 1995. "Accountability. Responsibility and Corruption: Managing the 'Public Production Process'." Pp. 56-78 in J. Boston (eds.). The State under Contract. Wellington, NZ: Bridget Williams Books.
  24. Gregory, R. 2003. "Accountability in Modern Government." Pp. 557-568 in B. G. Peters, J. Pierre (eds.). Handbook of Public Administration. London: SAGE. Go to original source...
  25. Handel, M. J. (eds.). 2003. The Sociology of Organizations: Classic, Contemporary, and Critical Readings. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  26. Kabele, J. 2001. "Rizika institucionalizace neodpovědnosti." Pp. 63-70 in J. Kabele, L. Mlčoch (eds.). Institucionalizace (ne)odpovědnosti: Globální svět, evropská integrace a české zájmy. Praha: Karolinum.
  27. Kabele, J., L. Mlčoch (eds.). 2001. Institucionalizace (ne)odpovědnosti: Globální svět, evropská integrace a české zájmy. Praha: Karolinum.
  28. Keller, J. 2010. Sociologie organizace a byrokracie. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
  29. Lane, J.-E. 1997. "Public Sector Reform: Only Deregulation, Privatization and Marketization?" Pp. 1-16 in J.-E. Lane (ed.). Public Sector Reform. London: SAGE. Go to original source...
  30. Lucas, J. R. 1976. Democracy and Participation. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  31. March, J. G., J. P. Olsen. 1995. Democratic Governance. New York: The Free Press.
  32. Mathiasen, D. G. 1999. "The New Public Management and Its Critics." International Public Management Journal 2 (1): 90-111. Go to original source...
  33. Mattei, P. 2009. Restructuring Welfare Organisations in Europe: From Democracy to Good Management? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  34. Mikáč, J. 2010. "Případy odvolání ředitelů škol a školských zařízení v letech 2010 a 2011." Řízení školy 8 (10): 8-11.
  35. Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to Authority; An Experimental View. New York: Harper and Row.
  36. Ministerstvo vnitra. 2002. Metodický návod MV pro analýzu veřejných služeb. Praha: Ministerstvo vnitra.
  37. Mosher, F. C. 1968. Democracy and the Public Service. New York: Oxford University Press.
  38. MŠMT. 1994. Kvalita a odpovědnost. Praha: MŠMT.
  39. Mulgan, R. 2000. "'Accountability': An Ever-Expanding Concept?" Public Administration 78 (3): 555-573. Go to original source...
  40. Mulgan, R. 2003. Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  41. Mulgan, R. 2008. "Public Sector Reform in New Zealand - Issues of Public Accountability." Public Administration Quarterly 32 (1): 1-32.
  42. Osborne, D., T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Penguin.
  43. Osborne, D., P. Plastrik. 1999. Banishing Bureaucracy: The Five Strategies for Reinventing Government. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
  44. Peters, B. G. 2001. The Future of Governing. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
  45. Peters, B. G. 2009. "The Two Futures of Governing: Decentering and Recentering Processes in Governing." The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 2 (1): 7-24. Go to original source...
  46. Pollitt, Ch. 2003. The Essential Public Manager. London: Open University Press.
  47. Pollitt, Ch., G. Bouckaert. 2004. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  48. Pollitt, Ch, S. Dan. 2011. "The Impact of the New Public Management in Europe: A Meta-analysis." COCOPS Working Paper 3. Leuven: COCOPS.
  49. Pospíšilová, T. 2006. "Odpovědnost pod tlakem: veřejná vykazatelnost během přistupování České republiky k Evropské unii v letech 1998-2000." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 42 (2): 307-327.
  50. Průcha, J. 1997. Moderní pedagogika. Praha: Portál.
  51. Randma-Liiv, T. 2008. "New Public Management versus the Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe." The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 1 (2): 49-71.
  52. Roberts, A. 2008. "Hyperaccountability: Economic Voting in Central and Eastern Europe." Electoral Studies 27 (3): 533-546. Go to original source...
  53. Scruton, R. 1999. Slovník politického myšlení. Brno: Atlantis.
  54. Schmitter, P. C. 2004. "The Ambiguous Virtues of Accountability." Journal of Democracy 15 (4): 47-60. Go to original source...
  55. Sinclair, A. 1995. "The Chameleon of Accountability: Forms and Discourses." Accounting, Organizations and Society 20 (2-3): 219-237. Go to original source...
  56. Strom, K. 2000. "Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies." European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 261-289. Go to original source...
  57. Sztompka, P. 1996. "Looking Back: The Year 1989 as a Cultural and Civilizational Break." Communist and Post-Communist Studies 29 (2): 115-129. Go to original source...
  58. Švec, Š. 1995. Základné pojmy v pedagogike a andragogike. Bratislava: IRIS.
  59. Thompson, D. F. 1980. "Moral Responsibility of Public Officials: The Problem of Many Hands." The American Political Science Review 74 (4): 905-916. Go to original source...
  60. Valor, C. 2005. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Citizenship: Towards Corporate Accountability." Business and Society Review 110 (2): 191-212. Go to original source...
  61. Van Thiel, S., F. L. Leeuw. 2002. "The Performance Paradox in the Public Sector." Public Performance & Management Review 25 (3): 267-281. Go to original source...
  62. Verheijen, A.J. G. 2003. "Public Administration in Post-Communist States." Pp. 489-499 in G. B. Peters, J. Pierre (eds.). Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage. Go to original source...
  63. Vibert, F. 2007. The Rise of the Unelected. Democracy and the New Separation of Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  64. Wright, G., J. Nemec. 2003. Management veřejné správy. Teorie a praxe. Praha: Ekopress.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.