Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2018, 54(6): 881-906 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2018.54.6.434

Rethinking the Continuum between Public and Private Actors in Electricity Policy in the Context of the UK Energy Transition

Lucie de Carvalho
Department of Anglophone Studies, Université de Lille

At the turn of the 1990s, a very large part of UK energy utilities was transferred from the public sector into private ownership. When analysing the era of privatisation, recent research on public policy has concluded that public authorities' ability to influence or shape national energy choices has been substantially weakened. Since the mid-2000s, however, tight cooperation between private investors and UK public regulators and policy-makers has emerged as a critical factor to meet the challenges posed by the energy transition. How have the British public authorities tried to get private actors on board and to involve them not only in the delivery and funding of energy services, as has been the case with public-private partnerships, but also in the decision-making process? This article identifies various schemes spearheaded by the UK government to breed or revive innovation in the privately-owned renewable and nuclear energy industries. This analysis explores the various strategies used to facilitate 'decompartmentalising' initiatives and ensure a smooth transition towards a neo-corporatist revival of the Triple Helix involving industry, academia, and government. It shows how these hybrid processes offer valuable insight for analysing and reconceptualising the boundary between the public and the private sectors. Based on this case study, this analysis ultimately demonstrates how the public/private dichotomy should be reassessed using the concepts of hybrid roles and responsibilities.

Klíčová slova: private actors, multi-actor transition, energy transition, governance

Zveřejněno: 1. prosinec 2018Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
de Carvalho, L. (2018). Rethinking the Continuum between Public and Private Actors in Electricity Policy in the Context of the UK Energy Transition. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review54(6), 881-906. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2018.54.6.434.
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Ahlborg, H. 2017. 'Towards a Conceptualisation of Power in Energy Transition.' Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 25: 122-141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.004. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  2. Ankrah, S. and O. Al-Tabbaa. 2015. 'Universities-Industry Collaboration.' Scandinavian Journal of Management 31: 387-408, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  3. Baker, K., J. Simpson and G. Stoker. 2012. ''The Nuclear Investors Conference.' A SPRing Working Report. Southampton: University of Southampton.
  4. BEIS. 2017. Digest of UK Energy Statistics. London: TSO.
  5. Bell, S. and A. Hindmoor. 2009. Rethinking Governance: The Centrality of the State in Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814617. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. Biau, V. and S. Weil. 2006. 'Comprendre les Pratiques Européennes: Evolution de la Politique PFI Concernant les Bâtiments Publics en Grande-Bretagne.' Rapport d'Enquête. Paris : Centre d'Expertise Français pour l'Observation des Partenariats Publics-Privés (CEF-O-PPP).
  7. Ćetković, S. and A. Buzogány. 2016. 'Varieties of Capitalism and Clean Energy Transitions in the European Union: When Renewable Energy Hits Different Economic Logics.' Climate Policy 16 (5): 642-657, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1135778. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  8. Ćetković, S., A. Buzogány and M. Schreurs. 2017. 'Varieties of Clean Energy Transitions in Europe: Political-Economic Foundations of Onshore and Offshore Wind Development.' Pp. 642-657 in The Political Economy of Clean Energy Transition, edited by D. Arent, C. Ardnt, M. Miller, F. Tarp and O. Zinaman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster. 1993. Realising our Potential: A Strategy for Science, Technology and Engineering. London: HMSO.
  10. Chitty, A. 2011. 'Burying the Haldane Principle.' Storm Breaking upon the University. Retrieved 20 November 2018 (http://stormbreaking.blogspot.com/2011/04/burying-haldane-principle.html).
  11. Cogent. 2009. Power People: The Civil Nuclear Workforce, 2009-2025. Renaissance Nuclear Skills Series 1. Warrington, DC: Cogent.
  12. Cooper, T. 1985. 'The Public-Private Continuum: Interdependence in a Democratic Society.' Public Budgeting and Finance 5 (3): 99-115, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00693. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  13. de Carvalho, L. 2017. 'Austerity Policies, the UK State and the Energy Utilities: A Changing Paradigm or Business as Usual?' The Political Quarterly 8 (3): 425-433, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12377. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  14. DECC. 2013. Nuclear Energy Research and Development Roadmap: Future Pathways. London: TSO.
  15. DTI. 1988. The Department for Enterprise. London: HMSO.
  16. DTI. 2007. Meeting the Energy Challenge: A White Paper on Energy. London: HMSO.
  17. Edgerton, D. and K. Hughes. 1989. 'The Poverty of Science: Critical Analysis of Scientific and Industrial Policy under Mrs Thatcher.' Public Administration 67 (4): 419-433, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1989.tb00739.x. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  18. Etzkowitz, H. 2003. 'Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-IndustryGovernment Relations.' Social Science Information 42 (3): 293-338, https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184030423002. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  19. Farla, J., J. Markard, R. Raven and L. Coenen. 2012. 'Sustainability Transitions in the Making: A Closer Look at Actors, Strategies and Resources.' Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (6): 991-998, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  20. Favarel-Garrigues, G., T. Godefroy and P. Lascoumes. 2007. 'Sentinels in the Banking Industry: Private Actors and the Fight against Money Laundering.' Sociologie du Travail 49 (1): 10-27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soctra.2006.12.005. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  21. Fischer, L.-B. and J. Newig. 2016. 'Importance of Actors and Agency in Sustainability Transitions: A Systematic Exploration of the Literature.' Sustainability 8: 476-497, https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050476. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  22. Geels, F. 2004. 'From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory.' Research Policy 33 (6-7): 897-920, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  23. Geels, F. and J. Schot. 2007. 'Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways.' Research Policy 36 (3): 399-417, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  24. Geels, F. 2010. 'Ontologies, Socio-Technical Transitions (to Sustainability), and the MultiLevel Perspective.' Research Policy 39: 495-510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  25. Grin, J., J. Rotmans, J. Schot, D. Loorbach and F. Geels (eds). 2010. Transitions to Sustainable Development; New Directions in the Study of Long-Term Transformative Change. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856598. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  26. Habermas, J. (1962 translated 1989). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge: Polity.
  27. Hannesson, R. 2009. 'Energy and GDP Growth.' International Journal of Energy Sector Management 3 (2): 157-170, https://doi.org/10.1108/17506220910970560. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  28. Hedberg, D., S. Kullander and H. Frank. 2010. 'The World Needs a New Energy Paradigm.' Ambio 39 (1): 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0057-9. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  29. Helm, D. 2005. 'The Assessment: The New Energy Paradigm.' Oxford Review for Economic Policy 21 (1): 1-18, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gri001. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  30. Helm, D. 2007. The New Energy Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  31. HM Government. 2013. A Review of the Civil Nuclear R&D Landscape in the UK. London: HMSO.
  32. Horrocks, S. 2007. 'The Internationalisation of Science in a Commercial Context: Research and Development by Overseas Multinationals in Britain before the Mid-1970s.' British Society for the History of Science, 40 (2): 227-250, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007087407009491. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  33. House of Commons. 1988. 'DTI-The Department for Enterprise.' Hansard 19 February, 493 (871).
  34. House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. 2011a. Call for Evidence: Nuclear Research and Development Capabilities. London: The Stationery Office.
  35. House of Lords Science and Technology Committee. 2011b. Nuclear Research and Development Capabilities. Third Report. London: The Stationery Office.
  36. Ilchong, N. and G. Rothwell (eds). 2014. New Nuclear Power Industry Procurement Markets: International Experiences. Seoul: Korea Development Institute.
  37. Kern, F., A. Smith, C. Shaw, R. Raven and B. Verhees. 2014. 'From Laggard to Leader: Explaining Offshore Wind Developments in the UK.' Energy Policy 69 (6): 635-646, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.031. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  38. Kuzemko, C. 2014. 'Depoliticisation, Institutions and Political Capacity: Explaining Sedate Energy Transition in the UK.' IGov EPG Working Paper 1405. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.
  39. Lawton-Smith, H. 2006. Universities, Innovation and the Economy. Abingdon: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358054. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  40. Lee, S. 2011. 'Gordon Brown and the British Way of Risk-based Modernisation.' L'Observatoire de la Société Britannique 10: 45-58, https://doi.org/10.4000/osb.1115. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  41. Lehmbruch, G. 1979. 'Liberal Corporatism and Party Government.' Pp. 91-126 in Trends Towards Corporatism Intermediation, edited by P. Schmitter and G. Lehmbruch. London: Sage. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  42. Lehmbruch, G. 1984. 'Concertation and the Structure of Corporatist Networks.' Pp. 60-80 in Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism, edited by J. Goldthorpe. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  43. Lockwood, M., C. Kuzemko, C. Mitchell and R. Hoggett. 2013. 'Theorising Governance and Innovation in Sustainable Energy Transitions.' IGov Working Paper 1304. Exeter: Exeter University Press.
  44. Markard, J., R. Roven and B. Truffer. 2012. 'Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects.' Research Policy 41: 955-967, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  45. Moran, M. 2003. The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, https://doi.org/10.1093/0199247579.001.0001. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  46. Mosley, L. 2009. 'Private Governance for the Public Good? Exploring Private Sector Participation in Global Financial Regulation.' Pp. 126-146 in Power, Interdependence, and Nonstate Actors in World Politics, edited by A. Moravcsik and H. Milner. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830787.126. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  47. National Audit Office. 2012. Managing Risk Reduction at Sellafield. London: The Stationery Office.
  48. NIA. 2008. The UK Capability to Deliver a New Nuclear Build Programme 2008 Update. Nuclear Industry Association Report.
  49. Nuttall, William. 2005. Nuclear Renaissance: Technologies and Policies for the Future of Nuclear Power. Oxon: Taylor & Francis Group.
  50. ONS. 2014. UK Gross Domestic Expenditure on Research and Development. Statistical Bulletin. London: TSO.
  51. Perkmann, M., A. Neely and K. Walsh. 2011. 'How Should Firms Evaluate Success in University-Industry Alliances? A Performance Measurement System.' R&D Management 41: 202-216, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2011.00637.x. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  52. Perry, J. and H. Rainey. 1988. 'The Public-Private Distinction in Organization Theory: A Critique and Research Strategy.' Academy of Management Review 13 (2): 182-201, https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1988.4306858. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  53. Pollitt, C. 2003. 'Joined-Up Government: A Survey.' Political Studies Review 1 (1): 34-49, https://doi.org/10.1111/1478-9299.00004. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  54. Ragwitz, M. and A. Miola. 2005. 'Evidence from R&D Spending for Renewable Energy Sources in the EU.' Renewable Energy 30 (11): 1635-1647, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.12.001. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  55. Ranga, M. and H. Etzkowitz. 2013. 'Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society.' Industry and Higher Education 27: 237-262, https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  56. Rhodes, R. A. W. 1996. 'The New Governance: Governing without Government.' Political Studies 44 (4): 652-667, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  57. Richmond, A. and R. Kaufmann. 2006. 'Is There a Turning Point in the Relationship between Income and Energy Use and/or Carbon Emissions?' Ecological Economics 56 (2): 176-189, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.011. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  58. Riess, B. 2012. Government as Partner? CSR Policy in Europe. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
  59. Rip, A. and R. Kemp. 1998. 'Technological Change." Pp. 327-399 in Human Choice and Climate Change, vol. 2, edited by S. Rayner, S. and E. Malone. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
  60. Rotmans, J., R. Kemp and M. Van Asselt. 2001. 'More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy.' Foresight 3 (1): 15-31, https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680110803003. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  61. Royal Society. 2011. Fuel Cycle Stewardship in a Nuclear Renaissance. London: The Royal Society.
  62. Ruffles, P. 2003. An Essential Programme to Underpin Government Policy on Nuclear Power. Nuclear Task Force. Retrieved 20 November 2018 (http://130.88.20.21/uknuclear/pdfs/Nuclear_Task_Force_July_2003.pdf).
  63. Rutledge, I. and P. Wright (eds). 2010. UK Energy Policy and the End of Market Fundamentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  64. Santoro, M. and S. Gopalakrishnan. 2000. 'The Institutionalization of Knowledge Transfer Activities within Industry-University Collaborative Ventures.' Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 17: 299-319, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00027-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  65. Schmitter, P. 1979. 'Still the Century of Corporatism?' Pp. 7-52 in Trends towards Corporatism Intermediation, edited by P. Schmitter and G. Lehmbruch. London: Sage.
  66. Siaroff, A. 1999. 'Corporatism in 24 Industrial Democracies: Meaning and Measurement.' European Journal of Political Research 36: 175-205, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00467. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  67. Simmie, J., R. Sternberg and J. Carpenter. 2014. 'New Technological Path Creation: Evidence from the British and German Wind Energy Industries.' Journal of Evolutionary Economics 24 (4): 875-904, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-014-0354-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  68. Sherry, A. et al. 2010. A Review of the UK's Nuclear R&D Capability. Swindon: Technology Strategy Board.
  69. Stark, A. 2010. Drawing the Line: Public and Private in America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  70. Steward, T. 2013. 'Demand and Decarbonisation in 2050: Themes from Scenarios.' IGov Working Paper. Energy Policy Group, University of Exeter.
  71. Stone, D. 2013. Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. London: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137022912. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  72. Thomas, S. 2004. 'The British Model in Britain: Failing Slowly.' Paper presented at the International Workshop on: 'Thirty Years of World Energy Policy - cum - Editorial Board Meeting of Energy Policy.' Hong Kong Energy Studies Centre. Retrieved 20 November 2018 (http://gala.gre.ac.uk/3757/1/PSIRU_8908_-_2004-04-E-UK-HongKong.pdf).
  73. Van de Donk, W. (eds). 2008. Infrastructures: Time to Invest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  74. Vaughan, A. 2017. 'Foreign Companies Flock to Build Nuclear Plants in the UK.'' The Guardian, 25 March 2017.
  75. Verbong, G. and D. Loorbach (eds). 2012. Governing the Energy Transition: Reality, Illusion or Necessity? Oxon: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203126523. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  76. Verbruggen, P. and T. Havinga. 2015. 'Introduction to the Special Issue on the Patterns of Interplay between Public and Private Regulation.' European Journal of Risk Regulation 6 (4): 482-487, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00005043. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  77. Weintraub, J. and K. Kumar (eds). 1997. Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  78. Wieczorek, A. J., S. O. Negro, R. Harmsen, G. J. Heimeriks, L. Luo and M. P. Hekkert 2013. 'A Review of the European Offshore Wind Innovation System.' Renewable and Sustainable Energy Review 26 (2): 294-306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.045. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  79. Wittmayer, J., F. Avelino, F. van Steenbergen and D. Loorbach. 2017. 'Actor Roles in Transition: Insights from Sociological Perspectives.' Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 24: 45-56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  80. WNN. 2009. 'UK Government Boosts Nuclear Support.' World Nuclear News, 3 December 2009.

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.