Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2018, 19 (2): 102-134 | DOI: 10.13060/25706578.2018.19.2.428

Disability, Gender and Education in the Labour Market from an Intersectional Perspective

Alena Křížková, Hana Hašková, Kristýna Pospíšilová

The complex nature of the social position of people with disabilities in the Czech labour market is under-researched. Intersectionality is a useful perspective that stresses the socio-contextual, as opposed to the individualist, nature of disability. It explores the dynamics of the interactions between the systems of inequality that create diverse barriers and opportunities in access to employment and to good working conditions for people with disabilities. Using an intersectional perspective, binary logistic regression, and a thematic analysis of interviews with men and women with disabilities and interviews with people working in organisations that support people with disabilities, we set out to answer the following questions: (1) Are people who assess their health as worse more at risk of potentially precarious work than people who assess their health as better, and what other factors contribute to this? (2) How is the risk of precarious work perceived by people with disabilities and how is their experience shaped by various sources of disadvantage? Intergroup intersectional analysis shed light on the systems of inequality and the interactions between them that leave disabled persons more vulnerable to contractual precarity. Intragroup intersectional analysis helped provide a contextual understanding of how gender and education together structure the access of people with disabilities to decent and secure employment, focusing on access to paid work and contractual conditions and remuneration.

Keywords: intersectionality, precarious work, binary logistic regression, thematic analysis of interviews, gender, health status, disability, education

Published: June 1, 2018Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Křížková, Alena, Hana Hašková, and Kristýna Pospíšilová. 2018. "Disability, Gender and Education in the Labour Market from an Intersectional Perspective." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 19(2):102-134.
Download citation

References

  1. Barnes, C. 2012. "Re-thinking Disability, Work and Welfare." Sociology Compass, Vol. 6, No. 6: 472-484, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2012.00464.x. Go to original source...
  2. Barnes, C., Mercer, G. 2005. "Disability, Work, and Welfare: Challenging the Social Exclusion of Disabled People." Work, Employment and Society, http://doi.org/10.1177/0950017005055669. Go to original source...
  3. Becker, G. 1957. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  4. Bem, S. L. 1993. The Lenses of Gender: Transforming the Debate on Sexual Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  5. Bielby, W. T., Baron, J. N. 1986. "Men and Women at Work: Sex Segregation and Statistical Discrimination." American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 91, No. 4: 759, http://doi.org/doi:10.1086/228350. Go to original source...
  6. Blažková, V. 2011. "Zaměstnávání osob se zdravotním postižením." Fórum sociální politiky, roč. 5, č. 2: 11-17.
  7. Bowleg, L. 2008. "When Black + Lesbian + Woman ≠ Black Lesbian Woman: The Methodological Challenges of Qualitative and Quantitative Intersectionality Research." Sex Roles, Vol. 59: 312-325, http://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9400-z. Go to original source...
  8. Braun, V., Clarke, V. 2006. "Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology." Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2: 77-101, http://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. Go to original source...
  9. Coleman-Fountain, E., Sainsbury, R., Trezzini, B., Káňová, Š. 2018. "Diversity and Change in the Labour Market Careers of Persons with Disabilities." Pp. 66-82 in Halvorsen, R., Hvinden, B., Beadle-Brown, J., Biggeri, M., Tossebro, J., Waldschmidt, A. (eds.). Understanding the Lived Experiences of Persons with Disabilities in Nine Countries. London, New York: Routledge.
  10. Davaki, K., Marzo, C., Narminio, E., Arvanitidou, M. 2013. Discrimination Generated by the Intersection of Gender and Disability. Brussels. Dostupné z: http://www.prois-nv.ro/docs/Discrimination Generated by the Intersection of Gender and Disability.pdf.
  11. Dubrow, J. K. 2008. "How Can We Account for Intersectionality in Quantitative Analysis of Survey Data? Empirical Illustration for Central and Eastern Europe."Ask: Research and Methods, No. 17: 85-100.
  12. Dudová, R., Hašková, H. 2014. "Prekérní práce pečujících žen v kontextu ekonomické krize." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 15, č. 2: 19-32, http://doi.org/10.13060/12130028.2014.15.2.128. Go to original source...
  13. Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S. 2016. "Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research: I. Theoretical and Epistemological Issues." Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 2: 155-170, http://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316629797. Go to original source...
  14. European Commission. 2016. Intersectional Discrimination in EU Gender Equality and Nondiscrimination Law. Brussels.
  15. Fevre, R., Robinson, A., Lewis, D., Jones, T. 2013. "The Ill-treatment of Employees with Disabilities in British Workplaces." Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 27, No. 2: 288- 307, http://doi.org/10.1177/0950017012460311. Go to original source...
  16. Formánková, L., Křížková, A. 2010. "Odraz nejistot, znevýhodnění a marginalizace na trhu práce v biografických výpovědích žen." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 12, č. 2: 23-35.
  17. Halvorsen, R., Hvinden, B., Beadle-Brown, J., Biggeri, M., Tossebro, J., Waldschmidt, A. (eds.). 2018. Understanding the Lived Experiences of Persons with Disabilities in Nine Countries. Active Citizenship and Disability in Europe. Vol. 2. London, New York: Routledge.
  18. Hašková, H., Dudová, R. 2017. "Precarious Work and Care Responsibilities in the Economic Crisis." European Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 23, No. 1: 47-63, http://doi.org/10.1177/0959680116672279. Go to original source...
  19. Hašková, H., Křížková, A., Pospíšilová, K. 2018. "Intersekcionální přístup ke zkoumání nezaměstnanosti." Czech Sociological Review,Vol. 54, No. 2: 171-197, http://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2018.54.2.398. Go to original source...
  20. Hesse-Biber, S. N., Johnson, R. B. 2014. Oxford Handbook of Multimethod and Mixed Methods Research Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  21. Hora, O. 2009. "Situace rodičů s dětmi do sedmi let na trhu práce podle výsledků Výběrového šetření pracovních sil." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 10, č. 2: 42-53.
  22. Choo, H. Y., Ferree, M. M. 2010. "Practicing Intersectionality in Sociological Research: A Critical Analysis of Inclusions, Interactions, and Institutions in the Study of Inequalities." Sociological Theory, Vol. 28, No. 2: 129-149, http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2010.01370.x Go to original source...
  23. Jarkovská, L., Lišková, K. 2008. "Genderové aspekty českého školství." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, roč. 44, č. 4: 683-701.
  24. Kalleberg, A. L. 2009. "Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations in Transition." American Sociological Review, Vol. 74, No. 1: 1-22. Go to original source...
  25. Kolářová, K. (ed.). 2012. Jinakost - postižení - kritika: Společenské konstrukty nezpůsobilosti a hendikepu. Praha: SLON.
  26. Křížková, A., Maříková, H., Hašková, H., Formánková, L. 2011. Pracovní dráhy žen v České republice. Praha: SLON.
  27. Křížková, A., Vohlídalová, M., Pospíšilová, K., Maříková, H. 2017. Aktuální rozdíly v odměňování žen a mužů v ČR. Hloubková analýza statistik a mezinárodní srovnání. Praha: Ministerstvo práce a sociálních věcí.
  28. Lister, R. 2003. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
  29. Maříková, H. (ed.), Křížková, A., Vohlídalová, M. 2012. Živitelé a živitelky: reflexe a praxe. Praha: SLON.
  30. McCall, L. 2005. "The Complexity of Intersectionality." Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, Vol. 30, No. 3: 1771-1800, http://doi.org/10.1086/426800. Go to original source...
  31. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., Moules, N. J. 2017. "Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria." International Journal of Qualitative Methods, Vol. 16, No. 1: 1-13, http://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847. Go to original source...
  32. Pančocha, K. 2013. Postižení jako axiologická kategorie sociální participace. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  33. Pančocha, K., Procházková, L., Sayoud Solárová, L. 2013. Edukativní, intervenční a terapeutické přístupy k dospělým osobám a seniorům se zdravotním postižením. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  34. Procházková, L. 2015. Možnosti pracovního uplatnění lidí s postižením-současné trendy v České republice a v zahraničí. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  35. Reskin, B. 1993. "Sex Segregation in the Workplace." Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 19: 241-270. Dostupné z: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083388. Go to original source...
  36. Romero, M. 2018. Introducing Intersectionality (Short Intr). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  37. Sépulchre, M., Schuller, V., Kline, J., Kittelsaa, A. M. 2018. Gendering Active Citizenship: experiences of women with disabilities. Pp. 156-173 in R. Halvorsen, B. Hvinden, J. Beadle-Brown, M. Biggeri, J. Tossebro, A. Waldschmidt (eds.). Understanding the Lived Experiences of People with Disabilities in Nine Countries. London, New York: Routledge.
  38. Shakespeare, T., Watson, N. 2002. "The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology?" Research in Social Science and Disability, Vol. 2: 9-28. Go to original source...
  39. Schiek, D. 2016. "Organising EU Equality Law Around the Nodes of ´Race´, Gender and Disability." Pp. 12-27 in Schiek, D., Lawson, A. (eds.). European Union NonDiscrimination Law and Intersectionality: Investigating the Triangle of Racial, Gender and Disability Discrimination. Milton Park: Routledge, Dostupné z: https://books.google.cz/books?id=-iu3DAAAQBAJ≺intsec=frontcover&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false.
  40. Smetáčková, I. 2009. "Politika genderové rovnosti ve vzdělávání." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 10, č. 2: 12-21.
  41. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Skaggs, S. 1999."An Establishment-Level Test of the Statistical Discrimination Hypothesis." Work and Occupations, Vol. 26, No. 4: 422-445, http://doi.org/10.1177/0730888499026004003. Go to original source...
  42. Vosko, L. F. 2006. "Precarious Employment: Towards an Improved Understanding of Labour Market Insecurity." Pp. 3-42 in Vosko, L. F. (ed.). Precarious Employment: Understanding Labour Market Insecurity in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
  43. Williams, C. L. 1992. "The Glass Escalator: Hidden Advantages for Men in the 'Female' Professions." Social Problems, Vol. 39, No. 3: 253-267. http://doi.org/10.2307/3096961. Go to original source...
  44. Williams, C. L. 2013. "The Glass Escalator, Revisited: Gender Inequality in Neoliberal Times, SWS Feminist Lecturer." Gender & Society, Vol. 27, No. 5: 609-629, http://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213490232. Go to original source...
  45. Wilson-Kovacs, D., Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Rabinovich, A. 2008. "Just because You Can Get a Wheelchair in the Building Doesn't Necessarily Mean that You Can Still Participate: Barriers to the Career Advancement of Disabled Professionals." Disability and Society, Vol. 23, No. 7: 705-717, http://doi.org/10.1080/09687590802469198. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.