Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2007, 8 (2): 43-51

Occupational Gender Segregation in the Context of Educational Segregation: Cross-national Comparison

Marie Valentová, Iva Šmídová a Tomáš Katrňák

This article focuses on the latter approach, in particular on the occupational gender segregation in relation to the gender segregation in education. The theory of human capital suggests that the increasing level of qualification, talents and productive skills of women acquired in the educational system, training and experience at work, should have a positive impact on quality of women's position in the labour market and enhance gender equality. Given the increasing educational attainment of women over the past decades, one would assume that their position in the labour market, including the gender segregation in occupational categories, has improved as well. However, the results of current research prove that despite all the changes and progress made with respect to the level of education of women, the level of occupational segregation tends to remain relatively stable over time. Thus, the increasing level of education does not seem to have a very strong impact on the overall level of gender segregation in occupations. One of the possible explanations may be the fact that women and men tend to choose different fields of study which predetermine their participation in particular categories of occupational structure to a larger extent than their level of education. Men are still overrepresented in different fields of education than women and this tendency seems to persist even in the countries where a campaign has been led for the promotion of democratic and non-discriminatory practices in the system of education. The main aims of this article are: 1) to conduct a cross-national comparison of levels of occupational gender segregation and 2) to examine the relation between the level of occupational gender segregation and gender segregation in education (both vertical and horizontal). The analyses include 18 European countries covered by the European Social Survey (ESS) conducted in 2004.

Keywords: FOccupational gender segregation, Educational gender segregation, ESS data

Published: June 1, 2007Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Valentová, Marie and Iva Šmídová a Tomáš Katrňák. 2007. "Occupational Gender Segregation in the Context of Educational Segregation: Cross-national Comparison." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 8(2):43-51.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bettio, F. 2002. "The Pros and Cons of Occupational Gender Segregation in Europe." Canadian Public Policy - Analyse de Politiques. Vol. XXVIII. Supplement/numero special No. 1: 65-84. Go to original source...
    2. Bradley, K. 2000. "The Incorporation of Women into Higher Education: Paradoxical Outcome?" Sociology of Education, Vol. 73, No. 1: 1-18. Go to original source...
    3. Coré, F. 1999. The Continuing Saga of Labour Market Segregation. OECD OBSERVER. Dostupné na: http://www.oecdobserver.org/news/fullstory.php?aid=88.
    4. Education Levels Rising in OECD Countries but Low Attainment Still Hampers Some. Dostupné na: http://www.oecd.org/document/31/0,2340,en_2649_37455_33710751_1_1_1_37455,00.html.
    5. Esping-Andersen, G. 2002. Why Do We Need A New Welfare State? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    6. Grusky, D. B., Charles, M. 1998. "The Past, Present, and Future of Sex Segregation Methodology." Demography, Vol. 35, No. 4: 497-504. Go to original source...
    7. Hakim, C. 1992. "Explaining Trends in Occupational Segregation: The Measurement, Causes, and Consequences of the Sexual Division of Labour." European Sociological Review, Vol. 8, No. 2: 127-152. Go to original source...
    8. Hakim, C. 2002. "Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women's differentiated labour market careers." Work and Occupations, Vol. 29, No. 4: 428-459. Go to original source...
    9. Harding, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. New York: Cornell University Press.
    10. Chang, M. L. 2000. "The Evolution of Sex Segregation Regimes." American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 105, No. 6: 1658-1701. Go to original source...
    11. Charles, M. 1992. "Cross National Variation in Occupational Sex Segregation." American Sociological Review, Vol. 57, No. 4: 483-502. Go to original source...
    12. Charles, M. 2002. "Equal but Separate? A cross-national study of sex segregation in higher education." American Sociological Review, Vol 67, No. 4: 573-599. Go to original source...
    13. Charles, M., Grusky, D. B. 1995. "Models for Describing the Underlying Structure of Sex Segregation." American Journaly of Sociology, Vol. 100, No. 4: 931-971. Go to original source...
    14. Chiplin, B., Sloane, P. J. 1976. "Personal Characteristics and Sex Differentials in Professional Employment." The Economic Journal, Vol. 86, No. 344: 729-745. Go to original source...
    15. Key Indicators of the Labour Market (KILM) Third edition. 2003 Geneva: ILO.
    16. International Standard Classification of Education ISCED 1997. Dostupné na: [online] http://www.uis.unesco.org/TEMPLATE/pdf/isced/ISCED_A.pdf
    17. Reskin, B. 1993. "Sex Segregation in the Workplace." Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 19: 241-270. Go to original source...
    18. Sirovátka, T. (ed.). 2004. Sociální exkluze a sociální inkluze menšin a marginalizovaných skupin. Brno: MU a Nakladatelství Georgetown.
    19. Šmausová, G. 2002. "Proti tvrdošíjné představě o ontické povaze gender a pohlaví." Sociální studia, č. 7: 15-27.
    20. Šmausová, G. 2004. "Normativní heterosexualita bez nátlaku k prokreaci." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 5, č. 2-3: 1-4.
    21. Valentová, M., Šmídová, I., Katrňák T. 2007. "Gender Segregation in the Labour Market Placed in the Context of Educational Segregation: Cross-National Comparison." Sociológia - Slovak Sociological Review, Vol. 39, No. 3: 214-244.
    22. West, C. a Zimmerman D. H. 1991. "Doing gender." Pp. 125-147 in Lorber, J., Farrell, S. A. (eds.). The social construction of gender. London: Sage Publications.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content