Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2015, 16 (2): 60-72 | DOI: 10.13060/12130028.2015.16.2.221

Until What Age Can a Woman Be Fertilized? A Debate on the Legislative Regulation of Assisted Reproduction in the Czech Parliament

Lenka Slepičková

Until What Age Can a Woman Be Fertilized? A Debate on the Legislative Regulation of Assisted Reproduction in the Czech Parliament
Assisted reproduction has shifted from being an experimental technique to becoming a part of mainstream reproduction medicine. It has become a common and increasingly prevalent method of procreation in the 21st century. The boundaries of what is and is not normal in reproduction (and therefore desired, in the foucauldian sense) are not determined by what is medically possible; rather, they are bound by the legislation, public demand, and ethical and religious norms. Effort to redefine the boundaries determined by the legislation governing assisted reproduction occurred in the Czech Republic between 2008 and 2011. This effort was part of the so-called reformation package, which also included the Act on specific medical services. The Act regulates the conditions under which assisted reproduction is available. One issue that turned out to be controversial was the age barriers for women receiving assisted reproduction. Age barriers together with the issue of availability of assisted reproduction for women without a partner had not been previously clearly defined in the legislation. The main purpose of the paper is to analyse the discussions that occurred in the Parliament when the Act was debated. The paper will focus particularly on the three following issues: how was nature and normality discussed in the context of assisted reproduction; how were these topics related to nature and to society; and how does the adopted Act reflect on the position of a woman as an actor of reproduction.

Keywords: assisted reproduction, legislative gatekeeping in assisted reproduction, age norms for assisted reproduction, parliamentary debate analysis

Published: June 1, 2015Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Slepičková, Lenka. 2015. "Until What Age Can a Woman Be Fertilized? A Debate on the Legislative Regulation of Assisted Reproduction in the Czech Parliament." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 16(2):60-72.
Download citation

References

  1. Banh, D., Havemann, D. L., Phelps, J. Y. 2010. "Reproduction Beyond Menopause: How Old is Too Old for Assisted Reproductive Technology?" Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Vol. 27, No. 7: 365-370. Go to original source...
  2. Beckman, L. J., Harvey, S. M. 2005. "Current Reproductive Technologies: Increased Access and Choice?" The Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 61, No. 1: 1-20. Go to original source...
  3. Bell, A. V. 2014. "Diagnostic Diversity: The Role of Social Class in Diagnostic Experiences of Infertility." Sociology of Health & Illness, Vol. 36, No. 4: 516-530. Go to original source...
  4. Blyth, E., Farrand, A. 2005. "Reproductive Tourism a Price Worth Paying for Reproductive Autonomy?" Critical Social Policy, Vol. 25, No. 1: 91-114. Go to original source...
  5. Bourdieu, P. 2000. Nadvláda mužů. Praha: Karolinum.
  6. Bryld, M. 2001. " The Infertility Clinic and the Birth of the Lesbian the Political Debate on Assisted Reproduction in Denmark." European Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 8, No. 3: 299-312. Go to original source...
  7. Colen, S. 1995. "Like a Mother to Them': Stratified Reproduction and West Indian Childcare Workers and Employers in New York." Pp. 78-102 in Ginsberg, F. D., Rapp, R. (eds.). Conceiving the New World Order: The Global Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  8. Česká biskupská konference 2008. Stanovisko České biskupské konference k návrhu věcného záměru zákona o specifických zdravotních službách. 2. dubna 2008.
  9. Česká televize 2008. "Události." 3. 4. 2008. deLacey, S. 1998. "Assisted Reproduction: Who Qualifies?" Collegian, Vol. 5, No. 4: 28-36. Go to original source...
  10. Denik.cz. 2007. "Pro umělé oplodnění musí svobodné ženy podvádět." [online]. [cit. 31. 1. 2015]. Dostupné z:
  11. De Wert, G. 1998. "The Menopause. Playground for Reproductive Technology? Some Ethical Reflections." Pp. 221-237 in Haris, J., Holm, S. (eds). The Future of Human Reproduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Fenton, R. A. 2006. "Catholic Doctrine Versus Women's Rights: The New Italian Law on Assisted Reproduction." Medical Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 1: 73-107. Go to original source...
  13. Fischer, F., Sommerville, A. 1998. "To Everything There is a Season? Are There Medical Grounds for Refusing Infertility Treatment to Older Women?" Pp. 203-220 in Haris, J., Holm, S. (eds). The Future of Human Reproduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  14. Foucault M. 1999. Dějiny sexuality I. Vůle k vědění. Praha: Hermann & synové.
  15. Gal, S., Kligman, G. (eds.). 2000. Reproducing Gender: Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life after Socialism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  16. Gannon, L. 1994. "Sexuality and Menopause." Pp. 100-124 in Choi, P. Y. L., Nicolson, P. (eds.). Female Sexuality: Psychology, Biology and Social Context. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
  17. Hašková, H., Zamykalová, L. 2006. "Mít děti - co je to za normu? Čí je to norma?" Biograf, roč. 40-41: 130.
  18. Idnes.cz. 2008. "Lidovecký návrh: Potrat jen s podpisem otce." [online]. [cit. 31. 1. 2015]. Dostupné z:
  19. Informační centrum vlády 2015. "Odborně o reformě." [online]. [cit. 31. 1. 2015]. Dostupné z:
  20. Lidovky.cz. 2008. "Julínkův zákon nepustíme." Rozhovor s Jiřím Čunkem 8. 11. 2008. [online]. [cit. 31. 1. 2015]. Dostupné z:
  21. Lidovky.cz. 2008. "Lidovci vytáhli proti Julínkovi." [online]. [cit. 31. 1. 2015]. Dostupné z:
  22. Lie, M. 2002. "Science as Father? Sex an Gender in the Age of Reproductive Technologies." European Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 9, No. 4: 381-399. Go to original source...
  23. Lorber, J. 1989. "Choice, Gift or Patriarchal Bargain: Women's Consent to in Vitro Fertilization in Male Infertility." Hypatia, Vol. 4, No. 3: 23-36. Go to original source...
  24. Malson, H., Swann, C. 2003. "Re-producing ' Woman's' Body: Reflections on the (Dis) Place (ments) of 'Reproduction' for (Post) Modern Women." Journal of Gender Studies, Vol. 12, No. 3: 191-201. Go to original source...
  25. Mayer, T. (ed.). 2000. Gender Ironies of Nationalism: Sexing the Nation. London: Routledge.
  26. Marjanovič, T. 2007. "Jen zůstaň na ocet, dítě ti zařídí Julínek." [online]. [cit. 31. 1. 2015]. Dostupné z:
  27. Marksová-Tominová, M. 2007. "Umělé oplodnění osamělých žen? No konečně!" Aktuálně.cz. [online]. [cit. 31. 1. 2015]. Dostupné z:
  28. Ministerstvo zdravotnictví. 2008. "Ministr pokračuje v přípravě reformy, o zákonech povede otevřenou diskusi." Tisková zpráva z tiskové konference ministra zdravotnictví 19. června 2008. [online]. Ministerstvo zdravotnictví. [cit. 31. 1. 2015]. Dostupné z:
  29. Novinky, ČTK, Právo 2008. "Julínek asi vyhoví lidovcům a zdravotnické zákony upraví." [online]. Novinky.cz. [cit. 31. 1. 2015]. Dostupné z:
  30. Paulson, R. J., Sauer, M. V. 1994. "Pregnancies in Post-menopausal Women Oocyte Donation to Women of Advanced Reproductive Age: 'How Old is Too Old?" Human Reproduction, Vol. 9, No. 4: 571-572. Go to original source...
  31. Radkowska-Walkowicz, M. 2014. "Frozen Children and Despairing Embryos in the 'New' Post-communist State: Debate on IVF in the Context of Poland's Transition." European Journal of Women's Studies, 1350506814542881. Go to original source...
  32. Russo, N. F., Denious, J. E. 2005. "Controlling Birth: Science, Politics, and Public Policy." Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 61, No. 1: 181-191. Go to original source...
  33. Sandelowski, M., Holditch-Davis, D., Harris, B. G. 1990. "Living the Life: Explanations of Infertility." Sociology of Health & Illness, Vol. 12, No. 2: 195-215. Go to original source...
  34. Smajdor, A. 2011. "The Ethics of IVF over 40." Maturitas, Vol. 69, No. 1: 37-40. Go to original source...
  35. Stanworth, M. 1987. Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  36. Stehlíková, D. 2011. "Která žena smí být matkou?" [online]. Aktuálně.cz. [cit. 31. 1. 2015]. Dostupné z:
  37. Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky 2013. Asistovaná reprodukce 2012. Praha: ÚZIS.
  38. Uzel, R. 2010. "Svobodné ženy a lesbičky nemají v Česku na umělé oplodnění nárok". [online]. Novinky.cz. [cit. 31. 1. 2015]. Dostupné z:
  39. Whiteford, L. M., Gonzalez, L. 1995. "Stigma: the Hidden Burden of Infertility." Social Science and Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 1: 27-36. Go to original source...
  40. Whittaker, A., Speier, A. 2010. ", Cycling Overseas': Care, Commodification, and Stratification in Cross-border Reproductive Travel." Medical Anthropology, Vol. 29, No. 4: 363-383. Go to original source...
  41. Zamykalová, L. 2006. "Mediální reflexe bezdětnosti v české společnosti mezi lety 1994-2004." Pp. 95-144 in Hašková, H. (ed.). Fenomén bezdětnosti v sociologické a demografické perspektivě. Sociologické studie / Sociological Studies 06:4. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
  42. Zamykalová, L. 2003. "Kdo smí participovat na asistované reprodukci? Ustavování hranic neplodnosti." Biograf, roč. 31: 26-50.
  43. Zoláková, Z. 2011. "Asistovaná reprodukcia v slovenskom právnom poriadku." Časopis zdravotnického práva a bioetiky, roč. 1, č. 2: 39-54.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.