Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2017, 18 (1): 92-112 | DOI: 10.13060/25706578.2017.18.1.351

Excellence and Gender Equality Policies in Neoliberal Universities

Birgit Riegraf, Lena Weber

The historical nexus of academia and gender has been characterised by exclusivity. The classical idea of innovative science was shaped by male scientists and reflected their ways of living and was mainly reproduced via gatekeeping and homosocial co-optation processes. Recently, academia has begun a transition towards a new model of academic organisation and governance represented by the vision of the 'neoliberal university'. In this transition the historical nexus between academic 'excellence' and masculine culture is being called into question by new economic mechanisms and instruments of academic governance that are declared to be 'gender neutral' and 'transparent'. In fact, some studies show that management by performance disadvantages female academics by favouring male patronage, but with the instruments of the new governance gender equality can also be introduced as a core principle of excellence criteria, as happened in the case of the German excellence initiative. On the basis of two case studies of German universities, our contribution shows how the nexus between 'excellence' competition and masculine culture is eroding, partly due to new 'quasi'-market mechanisms being combined with gender equality policies. Our findings shed light on new gendered work patterns and inequalities of contemporary academia. Academia is opening up to 'excellent' high-performance women, while other women are still disadvantaged.

Keywords: gender policies, excellence, academia, new public management, neoliberal university

Published: March 1, 2017Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Riegraf, Birgit and Lena Weber. 2017. "Excellence and Gender Equality Policies in Neoliberal Universities." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 18(1):92-112.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Acker, J. 1990. 'Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies. A Theory of Gendered Organizations.' Gender & Society, Vol. 4, No. 2: 139-158. Go to original source...
    2. Acker, J. 1992. 'Gendering Organizational Theory.' Pp. 107-128 in Mills, A. J., Tancred, P. (eds.). Gendering Organizational Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
    3. Acker, J. 2012. 'Joan Acker's Review of the Contributing Papers.' Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, Vol. 31, No. 3: 208-213. Go to original source...
    4. Aulenbacher, B., Riegraf, B. 2010. 'The New Entrepreneurship in Science and Changing Gender Arrangements. Approaches and Perspectives.' Pp. 61-73 in Riegraf, B., Aulenbacher, B., Kirsch-Auwärter, E., Müller, U. (eds.). Gender Change in Academia. Re-mapping the Fields of Work, Knowledge, and Politics from a Gender Perspective. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Go to original source...
    5. Aulenbacher, B., Riegraf, B. 2012. 'Economical shift und demokratische Öffnung - Uneindeutige Verhältnisse in der unternehmerischen und geschlechtergerechten Universität.' Die Hochschule, Vol. 21, No. 2: 291-303.
    6. Aulenbacher, B., Binner, K., Riegraf, B., Weber, L. 2012. 'Wissenschaft in der Entrepreneurial University - feminisiert und abgewertet?' WSI Mitteilungen, Vol. 65, No. 6: 405-411. Go to original source...
    7. Aulenbacher, B., Binner, K., Riegraf, B., Weber, L. 2015. 'Wandel der Wissenschaft und Geschlechterarrangements. Organisations- und Steuerungspolitiken in Deutschland, Österreich, Großbritannien und Schweden.' Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, Vol. 37, No. 3: 22-39.
    8. Berkovitch, N., Bradley, K. 1999. 'The Globalization of Women's Status. Consensus/ Dissensus in the World Polity.' Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 42, No. 3: 481-498. Go to original source...
    9. Binner, K., Kubicek, B., Weber, L. 2010. 'Geschlechterarrangements in den Entrepreneurial Universities. Ein Blick auf Disziplinen, Arbeits- und weitere Lebensverhältnisse.' Feministische Studien, Vol. 28, No. 1: 71-84. Go to original source...
    10. Binner, K., Kubicek, B., Rozwandowicz, A., Weber, L. (eds.). 2013. Die unternehmerische Hochschule aus der Perspektive der Geschlechterforschung: Zwischen Aufbruch und Beharrung. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
    11. Boer, H. de, Enders, J., Schimank, U. 2008. 'Comparing Higher Education Governance Systems in Four European Countries.' Pp. 35-54 in Soguel, N. C., Jaccard, P. (eds.). Governance and Performance of Education Systems. Dordrecht: Springer.
    12. Brink, M. van den, Benschop, Y. 2012. 'Gender Practices in the Construction of Academic Excellence: Sheep with Five Legs.' Organization, Vol. 19, No. 4: 507-524. Go to original source...
    13. Brink, M. van den, Benschop, Y. 2014. 'Gender in Academic Networking: The Role of Gatekeepers in Professorial Recruitment.' Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 51, No. 3: 460-492. Go to original source...
    14. Bröckling, U. 2009. 'Von den Exzellenzen zur Exzellenz. Genealogie eines Schlüsselbegriffs.' Forschung & Lehre, Vol. 16, No. 6: 422-424.
    15. Brouns, M. 2000. 'The Gendered Nature of Assessment Procedures in Scientific Research Funding: The Dutch Case.' Higher Education in Europe, Vol. 25, No. 2: 193-201. Go to original source...
    16. Brouns, M. 2007. 'The Making of Excellence - Gender Bias in Academia.' Pp. 23-42 in Wissenschaftsrat (eds.). Exzellenz in Wissenschaft und Forschung - neue Wege in der Gleichstellungspolitik. Köln: Wissenschaftsrat.
    17. Burton, C. R. 1998. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities. Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Oxford: Pergamon.
    18. European Commission. 2016. She Figures 2015. Gender in Research and Innovation. Statistics and Indicators. Brussels: Directorate General for Research and Innovation.
    19. Ferlie, E., Andresani, G. 2009. 'United Kingdom from Bureau Professionalism to New Public Management?' Pp. 177-195 in Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., Ferlie E. (eds.). University Governance. Western European Comparative Perspectives. Dordrecht, London: Springer. Go to original source...
    20. GWK. 2016. Chancengleichheit in Wissenschaft und Forschung. 20. Fortschreibung des Datenmaterials (2014/2015) zu Frauen in Hochschulen und außerhochschulischen Forschungseinrichtungen. Bonn: Gemeinsame Wissenschaftskonferenz (GWK) (Materialien der GWK, 50).
    21. Husu, L. 2004. 'Gate-Keeping, Gender Equality and Scientific Excellence.' Pp. 69-76 in European Commission (eds.). Gender and Excellence in the Making. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
    22. Leathwood, C. 2012. 'Higher Education Research Policy in the UK. Class Discourses and E/ Quality Impacts.' Unpublished manuscript.
    23. Mayring, P. 2010. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim: Beltz.
    24. Metz-Göckel, S., Selent, P., Schürmann, R. 2010. 'Integration und Selektion. Dem Dropout von Wissenschaftlerinnen auf der Spur.' Beiträge zur Hochschulforschung, Vol. 32, No. 1: 8-35.
    25. Meuser, M., Nagel, U. 2009. 'The Expert Interview and Changes in Knowledge Production.' Pp. 17-42 in Bogner, A., Littig, B., Menz, W. (eds.). Interviewing Experts. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
    26. Merton, R. K. (eds.). 1973. The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    27. Merton, R. K. 1988. 'The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property.' Isis, Vol. 79, No. 4: 606-623. Go to original source...
    28. Münch, R. 2009. 'Die Inszenierung wissenschaftlicher Exzellenz. Wie der politisch gesteuerte Wettbewerb um Forschungsressourcen die Wissenschaft den Darstellungszwängen der öffentlichen Kommunikation unterwirft.' Pp. 485-497 in Willems, H. (eds.). Theatralisierung der Gesellschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Go to original source...
    29. Noble, D. F. 1992. A World without Women. The Christian Clerical Culture of Western Science. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
    30. Rees, T. 2011. 'The Gendered Construction of Scientific Excellence.' Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol. 36, No. 2: 133-145. Go to original source...
    31. Riegraf, B. 2017. 'Zwischen Exzellenz und Prekarität. Über den Wettbewerb und die bedingte Öffnung der Universitäten für Wissenschaftlerinnen.' Forthcoming in Laufenberg, M., Erlemann, M., Lucht, P., Norkus, M., Petschick, G. (eds.). Prekäre Gleichstellung. Geschlechtergerechtigkeit, soziale Ungleichheit und unsichere Arbeitsverhältnisse in der Wissenschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Go to original source...
    32. Riegraf, B., Aulenbacher, B., Kirsch-Auwärter, E., Müller, U. (eds.). 2010. GenderChange in Academia. Re-mapping the Fields of Work, Knowledge, and Politics from a Gender Perspective. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
    33. Riegraf, B., Weber, L. 2013. 'Exzellenz und Geschlecht in der unternehmerischen Hochschule.' Pp. 67-85 in Binner, K., Kubicek, B., Rozwandowicz, A., Weber, L. (eds.). Die unternehmerische Hochschule aus der Perspektive der Geschlechterforschung: Zwischen Aufbruch und Beharrung. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
    34. Rossiter, M. W. 1993. 'The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science.' Social Studies of Science, Vol. 23, No. 2: 325-341. Go to original source...
    35. Samjeske, K. 2012. 'Gender Bias in der Forschungsförderung - Forschungsüberblick.' Femina Politica. Zeitschrift für feministische Politik-Wissenschaft, Vol. 21, No. 1: 158-162.
    36. Schiebinger, L. 1993. Nature's Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science: Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
    37. Schubert, T. 2009. 'Empirical Observations on New Public Management to Increase Efficiency in Public Research - Boon or Bane?' Research Policy, Vol. 38, No. 2: 1225-1234. Go to original source...
    38. Slaughter, S., Leslie, L. L. 1997. Academic Capitalism. Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    39. Slaughter, L., Rhoades, G. 2009. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy. Markets, State, and Higher Education. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
    40. Strid, S., Husu, L. (eds.). 2013. Gender Paradoxes in Changing Academic and Scientific Organisation(s). Conference Proceedings from GEXcel Themes 11-12. GEXcel Work in Progress Report. Linköping University: LiU-Tryck (XVIII).
    41. Weber, L. 2017. Die unternehmerische Universität. Chancen und Risiken für Gleichstellungspolitiken in Deutschland, Großbritannien und Schweden. Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
    42. Weber, L., Binner, K., Kubicek, B. 2012. 'Hard Times in Academe: The Devaluation of the Academic Profession and Gender Arrangements.' Pp. 139-144 in Chandler, J., Barry, J., Berg, E. (eds.). Dilemmas for Human Services. Papers from the 15th International Research Conference 2011. London: University of East London Press.
    43. Wetterer, A. 2002. Arbeitsteilung und Geschlechterkonstruktion. 'Gender at work ' in theoretischer und historischer Perspektive. Konstanz: UVK-Verlag.
    44. Wolff, S. 2009. 'Dokumenten- und Aktenanalyse.' Pp. 502-514 in Flick, U., Kardorff, E. von, Steinke, I. (eds.). Qualitative Forschung: Ein Handbuch. Hamburg: Reinbek.
    45. Zimmermann, K. 2000. Spiele mit der Macht in der Wissenschaft. Passfähigkeit und Geschlecht als Kriterien für Berufungen. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
    46. Zippel, K., Ferree, M. M., Zimmermann, K. 2016. 'Gender Equality in German Universities: Vernacularising the Battle for the Best Brains.' Gender and Education, Vol. 28, No. 7: 867-885. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content