Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2018, 54(6): 831-836

Private Actors in Politics and Policy-Making: Case Studies into the Patterns of Proximity

Jana Vargovčíková

Published: December 1, 2018Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vargovčíková, J. (2018). Private Actors in Politics and Policy-Making: Case Studies into the Patterns of Proximity. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review54(6), 831-836.
Download citation

References

  1. Bexell, M. and U. Mörth (eds). 2010. Democracy and Public-Private Partnerships in Global Governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  2. Chevallier, J. 2004. L'État post-moderne. 2nd ed. Droit et société. Paris: LGDJ.
  3. Ciepley, D. 2013. 'Beyond Public and Private: Toward a Political Theory of the Corporation.' American Political Science Review 107 (1): 139-158, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000536. Go to original source...
  4. Coni-Zimmer, M., K. D. Wolf and P. Collin. 2017. 'Editorial to the Issue on Legitimization of Private and Public Regulation: Past and Present.' Politics and Governance 5 (1): 1-5, https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i1.915. Go to original source...
  5. Courty, G. and H. Michel. 2012. 'Groupes d'intérêt et lobbyistes dans l'espace politique européen : des permanents de l'Eurocratie.' Pp. 213-240 in Le Champ de l'Eurocratie. Une Sociologie Politique Du Personnel de l'UE, edited by D. Georgakakis. Paris: Economica.
  6. Crouch, C. 2004. Post-Democracy. Malden, MA: Polity.
  7. Cutler, A. C., V. Haufler and T. Porter. 1999. Private Authority and International Affairs. SUNY Press.
  8. Donahue, J. D. and R. J. Zeckhauser. 2006. 'Public-Private Collaboration.' Pp. 496-525 in The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, edited by M. Moran, M. Rein and R. E. Goodin. New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Freeman, J. 1997. 'Collaborative Governance in the Administrative State.' UCLA Law Review 45 (1): 1.
  10. Georgakakis, D. and J. Rowell. 2013. The Field of Eurocracy: Mapping EU Actors and Professionals. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  11. Green, J. F. 2013. Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Go to original source...
  12. Haas, P. M. 2001. 'Policy Knowledge: Epistemic Communities.' Pp. 11578-11586 in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd. Go to original source...
  13. Hall, R. B. and T. J. Biersteker (eds). 2002. The Emergence of Private Authority in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  14. Héritier, A. 2002. 'New Modes of Governance in Europe: Policy Making without Legislating?' In Reihe Politikwissenschaft. Vol. 81. Vienna: Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien. Go to original source...
  15. Lascoumes, P. and P. Le Galès. 2007. 'Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments-From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation.' Governance 20 (1): 1-21, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00342.x. Go to original source...
  16. Laurens, S. 2018. Lobbyists and Bureaucrats in Brussels : Capitalism's Brokers. Translated by Trista Selous. Abingdon, Oxon, New York: Routledge. Go to original source...
  17. Majone, G. 1994. 'The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe.' West European Politics 17 (3): 77-101, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031. Go to original source...
  18. Peters, A., L Koechlin, T. Förster and G. F. Zinkernagel (eds). 2009. Non-State Actors as Standard Setters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  19. Rhodes, R. A. W. 1994. 'The Hollowing Out of the State: The Changing Nature of the Public Service in Britain.' The Political Quarterly 65 (2): 138-151, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.1994.tb00441.x. Go to original source...
  20. Rhodes, R. A. W. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability. Buckingham and Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
  21. Rhodes, R. A. W. and D. Marsh. 1992. 'New Directions in the Study of Policy Networks.' European Journal of Political Research 21 (1-2): 181-205, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00294.x. Go to original source...
  22. Robert, C. 2013. 'Expert Groups in the Field of Eurocracy.' Pp. 137-165 in The Field of Eurocracy Mapping EU Actors and Professionals, edited by D. Georgakakis and J. Rowell. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Go to original source...
  23. Sánchez Salgado, R. 2014. Europeanizing Civil Society: How the EU Shapes Civil Society Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. Saurugger, S. 2002. 'L'expertise, un mode de participation des groupes d'intérêt au processus décisionnel communautaire.' Revue Française de Science Politique 52 (4): 375-401, https://doi.org/10.3406/rfsp.2002.403725. Go to original source...
  25. Saurugger, S. 2008. 'Interest Groups and Democracy in the European Union.' West European Politics 31 (6): 1274-1291, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380802374288. Go to original source...
  26. Stone, D. 2013. Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. [S.l.]: Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Strange, S. 1996. The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the World Economy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  28. Tilly, C. 1985. 'War Making and State Making as Organized Crime.' Pp. 169-187 in Bringing the State Back In, edited by P. Evans, D. Rueschmeyer and T. Skocpol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  29. Vries, J. de. 1976. The Economy of Europe in an Age of Crisis, 1600-1750. Cambridge University Press.
  30. Weintraub, J., Kumar, K. 1997. Public and Private in Thought and Practice, Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  31. Weintraub, J. 1997. 'The Theory and Politics of the Public/Private Distinction.' Pp. 1-41 in Public and Private in Thought and Practice, Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy, edited by J. Weintraub and K. Kumar. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.