Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2020, 56(4): 491-521 | DOI: 10.13060/csr.2020.016

Legitimising Educational Reforms: Strategic Documents and Competing Knowledge Regimes

Jitka Wirthová
Fakulta sociálních věd, Univerzita Karlova, Praha

The article focuses on knowledge regimes within the normative discourse of the reform of Czech educational curricula. Engaging with the relational ontology of 'third-wave sociology of education', the article presents a qualitative analysis of strategic documents that sheds light on the divergent systems of reasons for particular educational changes. The research traced legitimising (justifying and criticising) strategies in authorised documents (governmental organisations) and non-authorised (NGOs and transnational organisations) in the 2010-2017 period. These findings point to the existence of several significantly divergent knowledge 'micro-regimes' that produce various contradictions and tensions on the level of regimes, documents, and the meaning of 'competent' actors. The research tracked the different relationships between managerial, expert, revisionist, revising, and adaptation regimes. It demonstrated that contemporary Czech attempts to reach a consensus over the goals of education across society are paralysed by a number of contradictory legitimisations rather than one hegemonic discourse.

Keywords: legitimisation, knowledge regimes, educational reform, strategic documents, contradictions

Received: June 18, 2020; Accepted: June 18, 2020; Published: October 1, 2020Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Wirthová, J. (2020). Legitimising Educational Reforms: Strategic Documents and Competing Knowledge Regimes. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 56(4), 491-521. doi: 10.13060/csr.2020.016.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aasen, P., T. Prøitz, N. Sandberg. 2014. "Knowledge Regimes and Contradictions in Education Reforms." Educational Policy 28 (5): 718-738, https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904813475710. Go to original source...
    2. Abbott, A. 2005. Ecologies and Fields [online]. Chicago. Dostupné z: http://home.uchicago.edu/aabbott/Papers/BOURD.pdf.
    3. Abbott, A. 2016. Processual Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226336763.001.0001. Go to original source...
    4. Anagnostopoulos, D., B. Lingard, S. Sellar. 2016. "Argumentation in Educational Policy Disputes: Competing Visions of Quality and Equity." Theory Into Practice 55 (4): 342-351, https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2016.1208071. Go to original source...
    5. Anderson, G., L. Donchik. 2016. "Privatizing Schooling and Policy Making: The American Legislative Exchange Council and New Political and Discursive Strategies of Educational Governance." Educational Policy 30 (2): 322-364, https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904814528794. Go to original source...
    6. Apple, M. W. 2005. "Doing Things the 'Right' Way: Legitimating Educational Inequalities in Conservative Times." Educational Review 57 (3): 271-293, https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910500149002. Go to original source...
    7. Ball, S. 2008. "New Philanthropy, New Networks and New Governance in Education." Political Studies 56 (4): 747-765, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00722.x. Go to original source...
    8. Ball, S. 2015. "Policy Actors/policy Subjects." Journal of Education Policy 30 (4): 467-467, https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1038454. Go to original source...
    9. Béland, D., M. Howlett. 2016. "How Solutions Chase Problems: Instrument Constituencies in the Policy Process." Governance 29 (3): 393-409, https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12179. Go to original source...
    10. Cooren, F. 2004. "Textual Agency: How Texts Do Things in Organizational Settings." Organization 11 (3): 373-393, https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041998. Go to original source...
    11. Cooren, F. 2018. "Materializing Communication: Making the Case for a Relational Ontology." Journal of Communication 68 (2): 278-288, https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx014. Go to original source...
    12. Čeplak, M. 2012. "The Individualisation of Responsibility and School Achievement." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 48 (6): 1093-1114.
    13. Decuypere, M., M. Simons. 2016. "Relational Thinking in Education: Topology, Sociomaterial Studies, and Figures." Pedagogy, Culture and Society 24 (3): 371-386, https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1166150. Go to original source...
    14. Dépelteau, F. (ed.). 2018. The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66005-9. Go to original source...
    15. Enroth, H. 2014. "Governance: The Art of Governing after Governmentality." European Journal of Social Theory 17 (1): 60-76, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431013491818. Go to original source...
    16. Freeman, R., J. Maybin. 2011. "Documents, Practices and Policy." Evidence and Policy 7 (2): 155-170, https://doi.org/10.1332/174426411X579207. Go to original source...
    17. Gorur, R. 2015. "Producing Calculable Worlds: Education at a Glance." Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 36 (4): 578-595, https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2015.974942. Go to original source...
    18. Greger, D., K. Černý. 2007. "Společnost vědění a kurikulum budoucnosti." Orbis Scholae 2 (1): 21-39, https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2018.147. Go to original source...
    19. Herzog, B. 2016. "Discourse Analysis as Immanent Critique: Possibilities and Limits of Normative Critique in Empirical Discourse Studies." Discourse & Society 27 (3): 278-292, https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630897. Go to original source...
    20. Horáková, N. (ed.). 2018. Sociologické výzvy ve středoevropském kontextu: 8. česko-slovenské sociologické dny v Ostavě 15. 11. 2017. Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita.
    21. Izqiuerdo, H. M., A. Mínguez. 2003. "Sociological Theory of Education in the Dialectical Perspective." Pp. 21-41 in C. Torres, A. Antikainen (eds.). Handbook on Sociology of Education: An International Assessment of New Research and Theory. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
    22. Janík, T. 2015. "Škola na kruhovém objezdu aneb když se to vezme kolem a kolem…" Pedagogická orientace 25 (5): 727-732.
    23. Kaščák, O., B. Pupala. 2012a. "Deti medzi emancipáciou a sociálnou využiteľnosťou: Nová sociológia detstva a 'našepkaná emancipácia'." Sociální studia 9 (2): 13-29, https://doi.org/10.5817/SOC2012-2-13. Go to original source...
    24. Kaščák, O., B. Pupala. 2012b. Škola zlatých golierov: Vzdelávanie v ére neoliberalizmu. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).Keller, J., L. Tvrdý. 2008. Vzdělanostní společnost? Chrám, výtah a pojišťovna. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    25. Knutsson, B., J. Lindberg. 2017. "Studying 'the Political' in International Aid to Education: Methodological Considerations." Comparative Education Review 61 (4): 701-725, https://doi.org/10.1086/693924. Go to original source...
    26. Lawn, M., B. Lingard. 2002. "Constructing a European Policy Space in Educational Governance: The Role of Transnational Policy Actors." European Educational Research Journal 1 (2): 290-307, https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2002.1.2.6. Go to original source...
    27. Levinson, B. A. U., M. Sutton, T. Winstead. 2009. "Education Policy as a Practice of Power Theoretical Tools, Ethnographic Methods, Democratic Options." Educational Policy 23 (6): 767-795, https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904808320676. Go to original source...
    28. Lindberg, J., B. Knutsson. 2019. "On the Absent Ground of Transnational Partnerships in Education: A Post-Foundational Intervention." Globalisation, Societies and Education 17 (4): 432-444, https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1583090. Go to original source...
    29. Lyotard, J.-F. 1998. Rozepře. Praha: Filosofia.
    30. Macgilchrist, F. 2016. "Fissures in the Discourse-Scape: Critique, Rationality and Validity in Post-Foundational Approaches to CDS." Discourse & Society 27 (3): 262-277, https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516630902. Go to original source...
    31. Menashy, F. 2016. "Understanding the Roles of Non-State Actors in Global Governance: Evidence from the Global Partnership for Education." Journal of Education Policy 31 (1): 98-118, https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1093176. Go to original source...
    32. Meyer, H.-D., L. W. Boyd. 2001. Education Between State, Markets, and Civil Society. Comparative Perspectives. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410602114. Go to original source...
    33. Patriotta, G., J. Gond, F. Schultz. 2011. "Maintaining Legitimacy: Controversies, Orders of Worth, and Public Justifications." Journal of Management Studies 48 (8): 1804-1836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00990.x. Go to original source...
    34. Peters, M. 2007. "Kinds of Thinking, Styles of Reasoning." Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (4): 350-363, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00344.x. Go to original source...
    35. Popkewitz, T. 2000. "The Denial of Change in Educational Change: Systems of Ideas in the Construction of National Policy and Evaluation." Educational Researcher 29 (1): 17-29, https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029001017. Go to original source...
    36. Popkewitz, T., J. Diaz, C. Kirchgasler. 2017. A Political Sociology of Educational Knowledge: Studies of Exclusions and Difference. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315528533. Go to original source...
    37. Prior, L. 2003. Using Documents in Social Research. London: SAGE, https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020222. Go to original source...
    38. Prior, L. 2008. "Repositioning Documents in Social Research." Sociology 42 (5): 821-836, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094564. Go to original source...
    39. Saldana, J. 2009. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: SAGE.
    40. Skarpenes, O. 2014. "Education and the Demand for Emancipation." Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 58 (6): 713-733, https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2013.840677. Go to original source...
    41. Smith, D. 2001. "Texts and the Ontology of Organizations and Institutions." Studies in Cultures, Organizations & Societies 7 (2): 159-198, https://doi.org/10.1080/10245280108523557. Go to original source...
    42. Strouhal, M. 2012. "K problematice antinomičnosti pedagogických diskurzů." E-pedagogium 2012 (3): 123-133, https://doi.org/10.5507/epd.2012.041. Go to original source...
    43. Strouhal, M., S. Štech. 2016. Vzdělávání a dnešek. Praha: Karolinum.
    44. Štech, S. 2013. "Když je kurikulární reforma evidence-less." Pedagogická orientace 23 (5): 615-633, https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2013-5-615. Go to original source...
    45. Taylor, S. 2004. "Researching Educational Policy and Change in 'New Times': Using Critical Discourse Analysis." Journal of Education Policy 19 (4): 433-451, https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093042000227483. Go to original source...
    46. Tupý, J. 2018. Tvorba kurikulárních dokumentů v České republice: Historicko-analytický pohled na přípravu kurikulárních dokumentů pro základní vzdělávání v letech 1989-2017. Brno: Masarykova univerzita, https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-8998-2018. Go to original source...
    47. Tveit, S., C. Lundahl. 2018. "New Modes of Policy Legitimation in Education: (Mis)using Comparative Data to Effectuate Assessment Reform." European Educational Research Journal 17 (5): 631-655, https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117728846. Go to original source...
    48. Verger, A., C. Fontdevila, L. Parcerisa. 2019. "Reforming Governance through Policy Instruments: How and to What Extent Standards, Tests and Accountability in Education Spread Worldwide." Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 40 (2): 248-270, https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2019.1569882. Go to original source...
    49. Wirthová, J. 2019. "Třetí vlna sociologie vzdělávání: Kritický přístup pro globalizovaný i partikularizovaný svět." Sociální studia 16 (1): 165-184.
    50. Young, M. 2008. Bringing Knowledge Back in: From Social Constructivism to Social Realism in the Sociology of Education. Oxon: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203073667. Go to original source...
    51. Zhao, W. 2017. "Untangling the Reasoning of China's National Teacher Training Curriculum: Confucian Thesis, Modern Epistemology, and Difference." Pp. 193-207 in T. Popkewitz, J. Diaz, C. Kirchgasler (eds.). A Political Sociology of Educational Knowledge: Studies in Exclusion and Difference. New York: Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315528533-13. Go to original source...
    52. Analyzované dokumentyMŠMT. 2014. Strategie vzdělávací politiky České republiky do roku 2020 [online]. 52 str. Praha: Ministerstvo školství, mládeže a tělovýchovy. Dostupné z: http://www.vzdelavani2020.cz/images_obsah/dokumenty/strategie-2020_web.pdf.
    53. NÚV. 2017. "Proč revidovat kurikulární dokumenty?" Zpravodaj Oborové skupiny [online] číslo 14/léto 2017. 4 str. Praha: Národní ústav pro vzdělávání. Dostupné z: http://www.nuv.cz/file/806_1_1/.
    54. OECD. 2016. Education at a Glance 2016: OECD Indicators [online]. 508 str. Paris: OECD. Dostupné z: https://doi.org/10.187/eag-2016-en. Go to original source...
    55. OSN. 2015. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development [online]. A/RES/70/1. 35 str. Dostupné z: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.
    56. SKAV. 2010. Kdy a jak měnit kurikulum [online]. 30 str. Praha: Stálá konference asociací ve vzdělávání. Dostupné z: https://www.eduin.cz/wp-content/uloziste/311/Obsah_a_cile_vzdelavani/SKAV_kdy_a_jak_menit_kurikulum.pdf.
    57. VPV-EDUin. 2017. Problémy českého vzdělávání a návrhy jejich řešení [online]. 7 str. Praha: EDUin, o. p. s., - Vzdělání je i naše věc. Dostupné z: https://www.eduin.cz/ wp-content/uploads/2017/08/EDUIN_TEXT_VOLBY_2017-1.pdf.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content