Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review 2014, 50(1): 83-106 | DOI: 10.13060/00380288.2014.50.1.31

Prison as a Place of Ambiguous Power Relations: The Perspectives of Czech Prison Guards

Lukáš Dirga, Jaroslava Hasmanová Marhánková
Fakulta filozofická, Západočeská univerzita v Plzni

The analysis of various forms of punishment has traditionally been a prominent subject of sociological study. However, most research on the prison system and its impact on individuals has focused on various aspects of inmates' lives. This article focuses on other important subjects in the prison system, ones whose perspective has been largely ignored - prison guards. The first part of this article introduces prison as a medium through which to analyse modern mechanisms of power and the changing conceptualisation of risks. The second part of the article examines the subjective views of prison guards. The authors conducted 17 in-depth interviews with prison guards working in Czech C-type prisons in order to understand how the prison guards themselves conceptualise their role in the prison system and how they construct the meaning of prison and punishment. The aim of the article is to analyse how the position of various participants in the prison system is negotiated and how the ideas of 'control' and 'power' are established. The authors find that prison guards experience a sense of blurred boundaries between those who are guarded and those who guard. They see themselves as having no control over the prison environment and highlight the control the prisoners have over them through institutional regulations.

Keywords: power, prison, prison guards, punishment, total institution

Published: February 1, 2014Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dirga, L., & Hasmanová Marhánková, J. (2014). Prison as a Place of Ambiguous Power Relations: The Perspectives of Czech Prison Guards. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, 50(1), 83-106. doi: 10.13060/00380288.2014.50.1.31.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alford, F. 2000. "What Would It Matter if Everything Foucault Said about Prison Were Wrong? Discipline and Punish after Twenty Years." Theory and Society 29 (1): 125-146, http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007014831641. Go to original source...
    2. Arnold, H., A. Liebling, S. Tait. 2007. "Prison Officers and Prison Culture." Pp. 471-496 in Y. Jewkes (ed.). Handbook on Prison. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.
    3. Ashford, B. E., G. E. Kreiner. 1999. "'How Can You Do It?': Dirty Work and the Challenge of Constructing a Positive Identity." The Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 413-434, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259134. Go to original source...
    4. Carlen, P., A. Worrall. 2004. Analysing Women's Imprisonment. Portland: Willan Publishing.
    5. Clemmer, D. 1958. The Prison Community. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson.
    6. Cressey, D. R. 1961. The Prison: Studies in Institutional Organization and Change. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson.
    7. ČSÚ. 2012. Česká republika v číslech 2012 [online]. Praha: Český statistický úřad [cit. 7. 1. 2013]. Dostupné z: http://www.czso.cz/csu/2012edicniplan.nsf/p/1409-12.
    8. Drake, D. H. 2012. Prisons, Punishment and the Pursuit of Security. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137004833. Go to original source...
    9. Ezzy, D. 2002. Qualitative Analysis. London: Routledge.
    10. Foucault, M. 2000. Dohlížet a trestat. Kniha o zrodu vězení. Praha: Nakladatelství Dauphin.
    11. Garland, D. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
    12. Goffman, E. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patiens and Other Inmates. New York: Doubleday Anchor.
    13. Hendl, J. 2005. Kvalitativní výzkum. Praha: Portál.
    14. Jacobs, J. B., H. G. Retsky. 1975. "Prison Guard." Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 4 (1): 8-29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124167500400102. Go to original source...
    15. Jones, R. S., T. J. Schmid. 2000. Doing Time: Prison Experience and Identity Among First-Time Inmates. Stamford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    16. Karabec, Z. 2001. "K problematice trestání a trestů." Sociologický časopis 37 (1): 73-87.
    17. Liebling, A. 2007. "Why Prison Staff Culture Matters." Pp. 105-122 in J. M. Byrne, F. S. Taxman, D. C. Hummer (ed.). The Culture of Prison Violence. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    18. Liebling, A., D. Price, G. Schefer. 2011. The Prison Officer. New York: Willan Publishing. Go to original source...
    19. Lombardo, L. X. 1981. Guards Imprisoned - Correctional Officers at Work. New York: Elsevier Science Ltd.
    20. Nedbálková, K. 2006. Spoutaná Rozkoš: (re)produkce genderu a sexuality v ženské věznici. Praha: Sociologické nakladatelství (SLON).
    21. Petersilia, J. 2003. When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    22. Schmid, T. J., R. S. Jones. 1991. "Suspended Identity: Identity Transformation in the Maximum Security Prison." Symbolic Interaction 14 (4): 415-432, http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.1991.14.4.415. Go to original source...
    23. Silberman, M. 1995. A World of Violence: Corrections in America. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
    24. Sykes, G. M. 1966. Society of Captives: A Study of Maximu Security Prison. New York: Random House.
    25. Vězeňská služba ČR. 2005. Koncepce rozvoje českého vězeňství do roku 2015. Praha: Vězeňská služba ČR, Generální ředitelství.
    26. Vězeňská služba ČR. 2006. Evropská vězeňská pravidla. Doporučení Rec (2006) 2 Výboru ministrů členským státům Rady Evropy k Evropským vězeňským pravidlům. Příloha časopisu České vězeňství č. 1/2006 [online]. [cit. 14. 5. 2013]. Dostupné z: http://vscr.cz/client_data/1/user_files/19/file/PDF/Publikace/Evropsk%C3%A1%20v%C4%9Bze%C5%88sk%C3%A1%20pravidla.pdf.
    27. Vězeňská služba ČR. 2012a. Statistická ročenka Vězeňské služby České republiky 2012 [online]. [cit. 15. 5. 2013]. Dostupné z: http://vscr.cz/client_data/1/user_files/19/file/spr%C3%A1vn%C3%AD/statistiky/Statistick%C3%A9%20ro%C4%8Denky/Ro%C4%8Denka%202012.pdf.
    28. Vězeňská služba ČR. 2012b. "Zacházení s vězněnými osobami." Vězeňská služba České republiky [online]. [cit. 12. 11. 2012]. Dostupné z: http://www.vscr.cz/generalnireditelstvi-19/o-nas/zakladni-informace-4/zachazeni-s-veznenymi-osobami-6125.
    29. Wacquant, L. 2000. "The New 'Peculiar Institution': On the Prison as Surrogate Ghetto." Theoretical Criminology 4 (3): 377-389, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1362480600004003007. Go to original source...
    30. Wacquant, L. 2002. "The Curious Eclipse of Prison Ethnography in the Age of Mass Incarceration." Ethnography 3 (4): 371-397, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1466138102003004012. Go to original source...
    31. Wacquant, L. 2009a. Punishing the Poor. The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. London: Duke University Press. Go to original source...
    32. Wacquant, L. 2009b. Prisons of Poverty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    33. Wacquant, L. 2010. "Crafting the Neoliberal State: Workfare, Prisonfare and Social Insecurity." Sociological Forum 25 (2): 197-220, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1573-7861.2010.01173.x. Go to original source...
    34. Welch, M. 2005. Ironies of Imprisonment. London: Sage Publications.
    35. Zimbardo, P. 2005. Moc a zlo: sociálně psychologický pohled na svět. Praha: Moraviapress.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content