Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2012, 13 (1): 12-23

The Impasse of the institution of hired domestic care

Zuzana Uhde

The article focuses on analyzing the institution of hired domestic care in the context of global connections of social relations and changing social forms of care. In the first part, the author introduces the social context in which the market model of care and transnational care practices partake in forming the process of distorted emancipation. In the second part, she focuses on feminist contentions about the meaning and possibilities of transformation of the institution of hired domestic care. In the third part, a systematic analysis of this institution is presented, examining forms of relationships between the domestic worker and the employer with a reference to institutional conditions and employers' attitudes. With respect to the dimensions of personal/impersonal relationships and the degree of formalization of the relationship between the domestic worker and the employer, the author differentiates four major forms of relationships: paternalistic/maternalistic relationship, instrumental relationship, the relationship of contractual professionalization, and the relationship of personalism. These forms of relationships are connected with four possible attitudes towards domestic workers: subordination, fictive reification, valuation of achievement, and respect. On the basis of her analysis the author identifies drawbacks of the professionalization of hired domestic work and care as a solution to gender and social injustice emerging from this institution. At the end, the author outlines a public model of care as a starting point for a future exploration.

Published: March 1, 2012Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Uhde, Zuzana. 2012. "The Impasse of the institution of hired domestic care." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 13(1):12-23.
Download citation

References

  1. Ally, S. 2009. From Servants to Workers. South African Domestic Workers and the Democratic State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  2. Anderson, B. 2000. Doing the Dirty Work. The Global Politics of Domestic Labor. London & New York: Zed Books.
  3. Anderson, E. 1993. Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  4. Beck, U. 2000. The Brave New World of Work. New York: Polity Press.
  5. Boltanski, L., Chiapello, E. 2007. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London, New York: Verso.
  6. Búriková, Z., Miller, D. 2010. Au Pair. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  7. Cohen, G. A. 2006. Iluze liberální spravedlnosti. Praha: Filosofia.
  8. Constable, N. 2002. "FilipinaWorkers in Hong Kong Homes: Household Rules and Relations." Pp. 115-141 in Ehrenreich, B., Hochschild, A. R. (eds.). Global Woman. Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: A Metropolitan/OWL Book.
  9. Cox, R. 2006. The Servant Problem. Domestic Employment in a Global Economy. London, New York: I. B. Tauris. Go to original source...
  10. Ehrenreich, B. 2002. "Maid to Order." Pp. 85-103 in Ehrenreich, B., Hochschild, A. R. (eds.). Global Woman. Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: A Metropolitan/OWL Book.
  11. Ehrenreich, B., Hochschild, A. R. (eds.). 2002. Global Woman. Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. New York: A Metropolitan/OWL Book.
  12. Eisenstein, H. 2010. Feminism Seduced: How Global Elites Use Women's Labor and Ideas to Exploit the World. Boulder, London: Paradigm Publishers.
  13. England, P. 2011. "Genderová revoluce. Nerovnoměrná a zastavená."Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 12, č. 1: 54-62.
  14. Fraser, N. 1985. "What's Critical About Critical Theory: The Case of Habermas and Gender." New German Critique, č. 35: 97-131. Go to original source...
  15. Fraser, N. 2009. "Feminismus, kapitalismus a lest dějin." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 10, č. 2: 1-9.
  16. Fraserová, N., Honneth, A. 2004. Přerozdělování nebo uznání? Praha: Filosofia.
  17. Glenn, E. N. 2010. Forced to Care. Coercion and Caregiving in America. London, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  18. Hess, S. 2000/2001. "Au-pairstvo: migračná stratégia mladých žien zo Slovenska." Aspekt, č.2/2000-1/2001: 265-271.
  19. Hochschild, A. R. 1989. The Second Shift. New York: Avon Books.
  20. Hochschild, A. R. 2003. The Commercialization of Intimate Life. Notes from Home and Work. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
  21. Hochschild, A. R. 2008. "Láska a zlato. Globální řetězce péče." Pp. 107-128 in Hrubec, M. a kol. Sociální kritika v éře globalizace. Odstraňování sociálně-ekonomických nerovností a konfliktů. Praha: Filosofia.
  22. Hondagneu-Sotelo, P. 2001. Doméstica. Immigrant Workers Cleaning and Caring in the Shadows of Affluence. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
  23. Honneth, A. (ed.). 2007. Zbavovat se svéprávnosti. Paradoxy současného kapitalismu. Praha: Filosofia.
  24. Honneth, A. 2008. Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press. Go to original source...
  25. ILO. 2011. Convention Concerning Decent Work for Domestic Workers. [online]. [cit. 28. 6. 2011]. Dostupné z: <http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_157836.pdf>.
  26. Jaggar, A. M. 2010. "'Zachraňte Aminu': Globální spravedlnosti pro ženy a interkulturní dialog." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 11, č. 1: 3-16.
  27. Kofman, E., Phiacklea, A., Raghuram, P., Sales, R. 2000. Gender and International Migration in Europe. Employment, Welfare and Politics. London: Routledge.
  28. Krištofová, L. 2011. "Au-pair ako inštitucionálny problém." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 12, č. 1: 82-87.
  29. LeFeuvre, N. a kol. 2012. "Remaking Economic Citizenship in Multicultural Europe. In Halsaa, B., Roseneil, S., Sümer, S. (eds.). Remaking Citizenship in Multicultural Europe. Women's Movements, Gender and Diversity.Houndmills, New York: Palgrave Macmillan, v tisku.
  30. Lukács, G. 1975. History and Class Consciousness. Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  31. Lutz, H. 2008. "When Home Becomes a Workplace: Domestic Work as as Ordinary Job in Germany?" Pp. 43-60 in Lutz, H. (ed.). Migration and Domestic Work. A European Perspective on a Global Theme. Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.
  32. Lutz, H. 2011. The New Maids: Transnational Women and the Care Economy. London: ZED Books.
  33. Meagher, G. 2002. "Is It Wrong To Pay For Housework?" Hypatia, Vol. 17, No. 2: 52-66. Go to original source...
  34. Parreñas, R. S. 2001. Servants of Globalization. Women, Migration, and Domestic Work. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  35. Ray, R., Qayum, S. 2003. "Grappling with modernity. India's respectable classes and the culture of domestic servitude." Ethnograpghy, Vol. 4., No. 4.: 520-555.
  36. Ray, R., Qayum, S. 2009. Cultures of Servitude. Modernity, Domesticity, and Class in India. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Go to original source...
  37. Rollins, J. 1985. Between Women: Domestics and Their Employers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  38. Sassen, S. 2000. Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
  39. Standing, G. 1999. "Global Feminization Through Flexible Labor: A Theme Revisited."World Development, Vol. 27, No. 3: 583-602. Go to original source...
  40. Tronto, J. C. 2010. "Creating Caring Institutions: Politics, Plurality, and Purpose." Ethics and Social Welfare, Vol. 4, No. 2: 158-171. Go to original source...
  41. Tronto, J. C. 2012. "Problém "chůvy" ve feminismu." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 13, č. 1: 3-11.
  42. Uhde, Z. 2012. "Autoritářství trhu: kritická diagnóza deformované emancipace žen." Filosofický časopis, roč. 60, č. 1: 55-76.
  43. Ungerson, C. 1997. "Social Politics and the Commodification of Care." Social Politics, Vol. 4, No. 3: 362-381. Go to original source...
  44. Voswinkel, S. 2007. "Obdiv bez ocenění? Paradoxy uznání dvojnásobně subjektivizované práce." Pp. 79-113 in Honneth, A. (ed.). Zbavovat se svéprávnosti. Paradoxy současného kapitalismu. Praha: Filosofia.
  45. Widding Isaksen, L. (ed.). 2010. Global Care Work. Gender and Migration in Nordic Societies. Lund: Nordic Academic Press.
  46. Williams, F. 2011. "Towards a Transnational Analysis of the Political Economy of Care." Pp. 21-38 in Mahon, R., Robinson, F. (eds.). Feminist Ethics and Social Policy Towards a New Global Political Economy of Care. Vancouver: UBC Press.
  47. Yeates, N. 2004. "Global Care Chains. Critical Reflections and Lines of Enquiry." International Feminist Journal of Politics, Vol 6, No. 3: 369-391. Go to original source...
  48. Yeates, N. 2009. Globalizing Care Economies and Migrant Workers. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  49. Young, I. M. 2007. "Recognition of Love's Labor. Considering Axel Honneth's Feminism." Pp. 189-212 in t van den Brink, B., Owen, D. (eds.). Recognition and power. Axel Honneth and the Tradition of Critical Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.