Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2012, 13 (1): 42-51

On the prehistory of Czech collective homes

Hubert Guzik

Collective homes and housing collectivization are phenomena that are usually considered to be ideologically close to Marxism and anarchism. In the 19th century, however, socialization of domestic work was part of various ideological streams, from social democrats to the business establishment. At the beginning of the 20th century, various forms of collective housing garnered the attention of the Czech intellectual elite. Information about collective housing came either directly from the United States of America or from Germany and Scandinavia. Czech sociologists regarded it as a contribution to social solidarity; feminists, on the contrary, as an instrument for the reinforcement of the family. The concept of homes with central kitchens came to Bohemia not only as part of a political and economic discourse but also in utopian novels and as part of architectural debates. Czech architecture and literature were, however, reserved about collective housing. The first larger reflection on central kitchens did not appear in Czech architecture until the beginning of the 1920s, on the margins of debates about the garden city. Among feminists, in contrast, we can see an uninterrupted interest in the socialization of domestic work during the entire first four decades of the 20th century. And it was feminists who managed to give the theoretical deliberations a real, albeit very constrained architectural form.

Published: March 1, 2012Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Guzik, Hubert. 2012. "On the prehistory of Czech collective homes." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 13(1):42-51.
Download citation

References

  1. Bahenská, M., Hečková, L., Musilová, D. (eds.). 2010. Ženy na stráž! České feministické myšlení 19. a 20. století. Praha: Masarykův ústav a Archiv Akademie věd České republiky, v. v. i.
  2. Baker, P. 1984. "The Domestication of Politics. Women and American Political Society 1780-1920." American Historical Review,Vol. 89: 620-647. Go to original source...
  3. Baydar, G. 2005 "Figures of wo/man in contemporary architectural discourse." Pp. 30-46 in Heynen, H., Baydar, G. (eds.). Negotiating Domesticity: Spatial Productions of Gender in Modern Architecture. London, New York: Routledge.
  4. Dörhöfer, K. 2004. Pionierinnen in der Architektur. Eine Baugeschichte der Moderne. Tübingen, Berlin: Ernst Wasmuth Verlag.
  5. Fraserová, N., Honneth, A. 2004. Přerozdělování nebo uznání? Praha: Filosofia.
  6. Guzik, H. 2005. "Pachmanová Martina: Neznámá území českého moderního umění. Pod lupou genderu (rec.)." Umění, roč. 53, č. 5: 527-530.
  7. Guzik, H. 2006. "Diogenova rodina. Kolektivizace bydlení v Čechách 1905-1948." Umění, roč. 54, č. 2: 162-176.
  8. Guzik, H. K. 2009. Architektura a feminismus v Československu 1. poloviny 20. století (Disertační práce). Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze.
  9. Hayden, D. 1979. Seven American Utopias. The Architecture of Communitarian Socialism, 1790-1975. Cambridge (Ma.), London: The MIT Press.
  10. Hayden, D. 1981. The Grand Domestic Revolution. Cambridge (Ma.), London: The MIT Press.
  11. Hemingway, A. 1996. "Marxism and Art History after the Fall of Communism." Art Journal,Vol. 55,summer: 20-27.
  12. Janák, D. 2008. Hodnoty a hodnocení v sociologii Inocence Arnošta Bláhy. Studie z dějin klasické české sociologie (Disertační práce). Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
  13. Jedlicki, J. 2000. Świat zwyrodniały. Lęki i wyroki krytyków nowczesności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sic!.
  14. Levitas, R. 1998. "Utopian Fictions and Political Theories. Domestic Labour in the Work of Edward Bellamy, Charlotte Perkins Gilman and William Morris." Pp 81-99 in Gough, V., Rudd, J., (eds.). A Very Different Story. Studies on the Fiction of Charlotte Perkins Gilman. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Go to original source...
  15. Musil, J. 2005. "Jak se formovala sociologie bydlení." Sociologický časopis, roč. 41, č. 2: 207-225.
  16. Pachmanová, M. 2000. "Collective Desires. Czech Avant-Garde Architecture and the Production of Degendered Space." Umění, roč. 48, č. 4: 265-276.
  17. Pachmanová, M. 2004. Neznámá území českého moderního umění. Pod lupou genderu. Praha: Argo.
  18. Szczerski, A. 2002. Wzorce tożsamości. Recepcja sztuki brytyjskiej w Europie Środkowej około roku 1900. Kraków: Uniwersitas.
  19. Švácha, R. 1994. "Teige jako inspirátor moderní architektury - Teige jako stavebník." Pp. 8095 in Srp, K. (ed.). Karel Teige. 1900-1951. Praha: Galerie hlavního města Prahy.
  20. Švácha, R. 1995. "Funkcionalistická tvorba architekta Václava Hilského." Umění, roč. 43, č. 1-2: 134-148.
  21. Uhrová, E. 2005. "Národní fronta žen a Rada československých žen - dva proudy ženského hnutí v českých zemích a jejich zájem o sociální a právní postavení žen." Pp. 88-112 in Kárník, Z., Kopeček, M. (eds.). Bolševismus, komunismus a radikální socialismus v Československu IV. Praha: Ústav pro soudobé dějiny AV ČR, Dokořán.
  22. Weisman, L. K. 1992. Discrimination by Design. A Feminist Critique of Man-Made Environment. Urbana, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.