Volume 125, Issue 10 e2020JA028307
Research Article

Ionospheric Response at Conjugate Locations During the 7–8 September 2017 Geomagnetic Storm Over the Europe‐African Longitude Sector

John Bosco Habarulema

Corresponding Author

South African National Space Agency, Hermanus, South Africa

Department of Physics and Electronics, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa

Correspondence to:

J. B. Habarulema,

jhabarulema@sansa.org.za

Search for more papers by this author
Zama T. Katamzi‐Joseph

South African National Space Agency, Hermanus, South Africa

Department of Physics and Electronics, Rhodes University, Makhanda, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Dalia Burešová

Institute of Atmospheric Physics CAS, Prague, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
Rendani Nndanganeni

South African National Space Agency, Hermanus, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Tshimangadzo Matamba

South African National Space Agency, Hermanus, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Mpho Tshisaphungo

South African National Space Agency, Hermanus, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Stephan Buchert

Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Kosch

South African National Space Agency, Hermanus, South Africa

Physics Department, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Stefan Lotz

South African National Space Agency, Hermanus, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Pierre Cilliers

South African National Space Agency, Hermanus, South Africa

Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
Ayman Mahrous

Institute of Basic and Applied Science, Egypt‐Japan University of Science and Technology, Alexandria, Egypt

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 September 2020
Citations: 2

Abstract

This paper focuses on unique aspects of the ionospheric response at conjugate locations over Europe and South Africa during the 7–8 September 2017 geomagnetic storm including the role of the bottomside and topside ionosphere and plasmasphere in influencing electron density changes. Analysis of total electron content (TEC) on 7 September 2017 shows that for a pair of geomagnetically conjugate locations, positive storm effect was observed reaching about 65% when benchmarked on the monthly median TEC variability in the Northern Hemisphere, while the Southern Hemisphere remained within the quiet time variability threshold of ±40%. Over the investigated locations, the Southern Hemisphere midlatitudes showed positive TEC deviations that were in most cases twice the comparative response level in the Northern Hemisphere on the 8 September 2017. During the storm main phase on 8 September 2017, we have obtained an interesting result of ionosonde maximum electron density of the F2 layer and TEC derived from Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations showing different ionospheric responses over the same midlatitude location in the Northern Hemisphere. In situ electron density measurements from SWARM satellite aided by bottomside ionosonde‐derived TEC up to the maximum height of the F2 layer (hmF2) revealed that the bottomside and topside ionosphere as well as plasmasphere electron content contributions to overall GNSS‐derived TEC were different in both hemispheres especially for 8 September 2017 during the storm main phase. The differences in hemispheric response at conjugate locations and on a regional scale have been explained in terms of seasonal influence on the background electron density coupled with the presence of large‐scale traveling ionospheric disturbances and low‐latitude‐associated processes. The major highlight of this study is the simultaneous confirmation of most of the previously observed features and their underlying physical mechanisms during geomagnetic storms through a multi–data set examination of hemispheric differences.

Data Availability Statement

The GNSS observations are provided by the University Navstar Consortium, UNAVCO (https://www.unavco.org/data/gps‐gnss/gps‐gnss.html and ftp://data‐out.unavco.org) and South African National Geospatial Information (http://www.trignet.co.za/ and ftp://ftp.trignet.co.za). Global Ionospheric Map products in IONEX format are available at https://iono.jpl.nasa.gov/gim.html and ftp://cddis.gsfc.nasa.gov/pub/gps/products/ionex/, and the JPL's maps were used. OMNI data are available online (https://omniweb.gsfc.nasa.gov). AE and SYM‐H data are also accessible from the World Data Center for Geomagnetism, Kyoto (http://wdc.kugi.kyoto‐u.ac.jp).