Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2020, 21 (1): 130-153 | DOI: 10.13060/gav.2020.007

The Male Childlessness the Perspective of Hegemonic Masculinity

Hana Maříková
Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i.

In contemporary (not only) Czech society, the share of childless persons is increasing. Research in the field of social sciences focuses mainly on explanation of female childlessness than male one. This text tries to at least partially fill the gap in research when focusing on male childlessness from the perspective of masculinity, resp. hegemonic masculinity. Thematic analysis of repeated problem-oriented interviews with 12 heterosexual men (of different age and education) focuses on explanation of the life experience of these men with childlessness, respectively their perception of childlessness in relation to the conditions and circumstances of their lives according to the construction of their masculinity along the main axes, i.e. "values and norms", "perception and meaning of close relationships", "meaning of work and leisure activities", "experiencing the individual's life situation". The combination of these basic axes leads to the re-production or disruption of hegemonic masculinity characteristics. The analysis has shown that even in the case of childlessness, men more often construct their masculinity in terms of its hegemonic mode than crossing it. However, the construction of hegemonic masculinity also occurs through "unspoken", "concealed", i.e. what is not directly articulated in interviews, so attention should also be paid to this issue in research on masculinities.

Keywords: childlessness, men, hegemonic masculinity, qualitative research, Czech Republic

Published: August 27, 2020Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Maříková, Hana. 2020. "The Male Childlessness the Perspective of Hegemonic Masculinity." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 21(1):130-153.
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Agrillo, C., Nelini, C. 2008. "Childfree by Choice: A Review." Journal of Cultural Geography, Vol. 25, No. 3: 347-363, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08873630802476292. Go to original source...
    2. Bauman, Z. 1995. Úvahy o postmoderní době. Praha: SLON.
    3. Bauman, Z. 2003. Liquid Love. Cambridge: Polity.
    4. Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
    5. Beck, U., Beck-Gernsheim, E. 1995. The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    6. Beck, U., Beck-Gernsheim, E. 2002. Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage.
    7. Bertaux, D., Kohli, M. 1984. "The Life Story Approach: A Continental View." Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 10: 215-237. Go to original source...
    8. Connell. 2005. Masculinities. (2nd edition). Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    9. Deutsch, F. M. 2007. "Undoing gender." Gender & Society, Vol. 21, No. 1: 106-127. Go to original source...
    10. Dudgeon, M. R., Inhorn, M. C. 2003. "Gender, Masculinity and Reproduction: Anthropological Perspectives." International Journal of Men's Health, Vol. 2, No. 1: 31-56. Go to original source...
    11. Elder, G. H., O'Rand, A. M. 2009. "Adult Lives in a Changing Society." Pp. 430-455 in Heinz, W. R., Huinink, J., Weymann, A. (eds.). The Life Course Reader. Individuals and Societies Across Time. Frankfurt, New York: Campus Verlag.
    12. Fialová, L. 2005. "K některým rysům demografického vývoje v České republice v závěru 20. století." Gender, rovné příležitosti, výzkum, roč. 6, č. 1: 10-14.
    13. Giddens, A. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity.
    14. Gillespie, R. 2003. "Childfree and Feminine: Understanding the Gender Identity of Voluntary Childless Women." Gender & Society, Vol. 17, No. 1: 122-136, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243202238982. Go to original source...
    15. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., Namey, E. E. 2012. Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436. Go to original source...
    16. Hadley, R., Hanley, T. 2011. "Involuntarily Childless Men and the Desire for Fatherhood." Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 1: 56-68, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2010.544294. Go to original source...
    17. Hašková, H. 2009. Fenomén bezdětnosti. Praha: SLON.
    18. Hašková, H., Vohlídalová, M. 2014. "Singles." Pp. 103-130 in Hašková H. (ed.). Vlastní cestou? Životní dráhy v pozdně moderní společnosti. Praha: SLON, Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i.
    19. Hašková, H. (ed.), Vohlídalová, M., Maříková, H., Dudová, R., Uhde, Z., Křížková, A., Formánková, L. 2014. Vlastní cestou? Životní dráhy v pozdně moderní společnosti. Praha: SLON / Sociologický ústav AV ČR, v. v. i.
    20. Hašková, H., Zamykalová, L. 2006. "Mít děti - co je to za normu? Čí je to norma?" Biograf, roč. 13, č. 40-41. Dostupné z: http://www.biograf.org/clanek.php?clanek=v4001.
    21. Hey, V. 2005. "The Contrasting Social Logics of Sociality and Survival: Cultures of Classed Belonging in Late Modernity." Sociology, Vol. 39, No. 5: 855-87, https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038505058369. Go to original source...
    22. Hochschild, A. 1989. The Second Shift : Working Parents and the Revolution at Home. New York: Viking.
    23. Hrušáková, M., Králíčková, Z. 2001. České rodinné právo. 2. vydání. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.
    24. Hunter, S. H., Riggs, D. W., Augoustinos, M. 2017. "Hegemonic Masculinity vs. A Caring Masculinity: Implications for Understanding Primary Caregiving Fathers." Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Vol. 11, No. 3: 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12307. Go to original source...
    25. Chaloupková, J. (ed.). 2010. Proměny rodinných a profesních startů. Praha: Sociologický ústav AV ČR.
    26. Christensen, A. D., Jensen, S. O. 2014. "Combining Hegemonic Masculinity and Intersectionality." NORMA, Vol. 9, No. 1: 60-75, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/18902138.2014.892289. Go to original source...
    27. Chromková, M., Rabušic, L. 2013. "Male Fertility in the Czech Republic - First Empirical Evidence." Demografie: Revue pro výzkum populačního vývoje, roč. 55, č. 4: 275-290.Inglehart, R. 1977. The Silent Revolution. Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    28. Jamieson, L., 1999. "Intimacy Transformed? A Critical Look at the Pure Relationship." Sociology, Vol. 33, No. 3: 477-494. Go to original source...
    29. Kaa, D. J. van de. 1987. "Europe's Second Demographic Transition." Population Bulletin, Vol. 42, No. 1: 3-55.
    30. Katrňák, T., Fučík, P. 2009. "Preference výbĕru partnera: Liší se rozvedení a svobodní ve sňatkových a partnerských preferencích?" Sociológia, roč. 41, č. 5: 437-456.
    31. Kiernan, K. 2001. "The Rise of Cohabitation and Childbearing Outside Marriage in Western Europe." International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, Vol. 15, No. 1: 1-21, https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/15.1.1. Go to original source...
    32. Kyzlinková, R., Šťastná, A. 2018. "Fatherhood in a Changing Society: Shifts in Male Fertility Patterns." Sociological Research Online, Vol. 23, No. 2: 328-353, https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418754565. Go to original source...
    33. Lampman, C., Dowling-Guyer, S. 1995. "Attitudes toward Voluntary and Involuntary Childlessness." Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 1-2: 213-222. Go to original source...
    34. Letherby G. 2002. "Childless and Bereft?: Stereotypes and Realities in Relation to 'Voluntary' and 'Involuntary' Childlessness and Womanhood." Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 72, No. 1: 7-20, https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-682X.00003. Go to original source...
    35. Merz, E. M., Liefbroer, A. C. 2012. "The Attitude toward Voluntary Childlessness in Europe: Cultural and Institutional Explanations." Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 74, No. 3: 587-600, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.00972.x. Go to original source...
    36. Miettinen, A., Rotkirch, A., Szalma, I., Donno, A., Tanturri, M. L. 2015. "Increasing Childlessness in Europe: Time Trends and Country Differences." Families and Societies Working Paper Series (33).
    37. Možný, I., Pakosta, P., Přidalová, M. 2008. Declining Fertility in Europe, and, What Parenthood Means to the Czechs. Brno: Masaryk University, Georgetown.
    38. Nock, S. L. 1998. Marriage in Men´s Life. New York: Oxford University Press.
    39. Pakosta, P. 2009. "Proč chceme děti: hodnota dítěte a preferovaný počet dětí v České republice." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, roč. 45, č. 5: 899-934. Go to original source...
    40. Park, K. 2002. "Stigma Management among the Voluntarily Childless." Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 45, No. 1: 21-45. Go to original source...
    41. Park, K. 2005. "Choosing Childlessness: Weber's Typology of Action and Motives of the Voluntarily Childless." Sociological Inquiry, Vol. 75, No. 3: 372-402, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2005.00127.x. Go to original source...
    42. Philipov, D., Spéder, Z., Billari, F. 2005. Now or Later? Fertility Intentions in Bulgaria and Hungary and the Impact of Anomie and Social Capital. Working Papers. Vienna: Vienna Institute of Demography.
    43. Rabušic, L. 2001. Kde ty všechny děti jsou?: porodnost v sociologické perspektivě. Praha: SLON.
    44. Rabušic, L. 2004. "Will Tomorrow´s Czechs Have the Fewest Children in Europe?" Pp. 41-60 in Mareš, P. (ed.). Society, Reproduction and Contemporary Challenges. Brno: Barrister and Principal.
    45. Skeggs, B. 2003. Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.
    46. Slepičková, L. 2009. "Neplodnost jeho a neplodnost její: Genderové aspekty asistované reprodukce." Sociologický časopis/Czech Sociological Review, roč. 45, č. 1: 177-203.
    47. Slepičková, L. 2014. Diagnóza neplodnost: sociologický pohled na zkušenost nedobrovolné bezdětnosti. Praha: SLON.
    48. Sobotka, T. 2004. Postponement of Childbearing and Low Fertility in Europe. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
    49. Szalma, I., Takács, J. 2015. "Who Remains Childless? Unrealized Fertility Plans in Hungary." Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review, Vol. 51, No. 6: 1047-1076, https://doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2015.51.6.228. Go to original source...
    50. Šmídová, I. 2002. "Muži v České republice podle jiných mužů." Sociální studia, roč. 7, č. 7: 89-117.
    51. Wagner, M., Mulder, C. H., Weiß, B., Krapf, S. 2019. "The Transition from Living Apart Together to a Coresidential Partnership." Advances in Life Course Research, Vol. 39: 77-86, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.12.002. Go to original source...
    52. West, C., Zimmerman, D. H. 2008. "Dělat gender." Sociální studia, roč. 5, č. 1: 99-120. Go to original source...
    53. Williams, J. 1999. Unbending Gender: Market Work and Family in the Twenty-first Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
    54. Witzel, A. 2000. "The Problem Centered Interview." Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol. 1, No. 1.
    55. Xie, Y., Raymo, J. M., Goyette, K., Thornton, A. 2003. "Economic Potential and Entry into Marriage and Cohabitation." Demography, Vol. 40, No. 2: 351-367. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content