(Hegel proti Spinozovi ... a proti Hegelovi. Hegelova pozdní kritika substanční filosofie a jeho vlastní přechod od „substance“ k „subjektu“)

Obsah knihy

Kapitola analyzuje Hegelovu recepci Spinozy a ukazuje, jak Hegel včlenil subjektivitu do metafyziky na způsob Spinozy v závěru svého jenského období. Kapitola je součástí autorova dlouhodobého publikačního projektu o vývoji Hegelovy dialektické metody.

In: Karásek, J., Kollert, L. a Matějčková, T. (vyd.), Übergänge in der klassischen deutschen Philosophie. Leiden: Wilhelm Fink, 2019, s. 169–192.

(Kultivace člověka a kultivace ducha u Hegela. Výklad s ohledem na humanismus [Humboldt, Herder])

Obsah knihy

Kapitola analyzuje Hegelův pojem Bildung (kultivace) a ukazuje jeho odlišnosti od známých a populárních pojmů Bildung u Humboldta a Herdera. Kapitola navazuje na dlouhodobý zájem autora o všechny otázky spjaté s pojmem Bildung a s teorií moderní univerzity.

In: Bomski, F. a Stolzenberg, J. (eds.), Genealogien der Natur und des Geistes: Diskurse, Kontexte und Transformationen um 1800. Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag, 2018, s. 257–272.

(Benjamin Constant a ideje republikanismu)

Obsah čísla

Stať byla publikována v monotematickém čísle o republikanismu. Oproti standardní interpretaci Constantovy politické teorie jako čistě liberální, autorka tvrdí, že interpretace Constantova chápání politiky musí vzít do úvahy jeho názory, jak je vyjádřil ve spise De la religion. Autorka zastává názor, že Constant rozvinul své pojetí občanského republikanismu tím, že zdůraznil morálku (založenou na našich vášních) a občanskou angažovanost jako hlavní prostředky ochrany lidské svobody.

(Má mu to člověk věřit? K Fichtově polemice se Schulzeho skepticismem v recenzi Aenesidema)

Obsah čísla

Účelem této kapitoly bylo zkoumat vliv skepticismu na Fichta. Byla publikována v monotematickém čísle Fichte-Studien (Brill/Rodopi).

In: D’Alfonso, V., and De Pascale, C., and Fuchs, E., a Ivaldo, M. (eds.), Fichte und seine Zeit: Kontext, Konfrontationen, Rezeptionen. Leiden: Brill, 2016, s. 39–51.

Obsah knihy

Interpretace Wittgensteinovy první a jediné knihy, Tractatus logico-philosophicus představuje Wittgensteina převážně jako Schopenhaueriána poučeného jazykovou analýzou. To ho přivedlo k rozlišení mezi tím, co může být řečeno slovy a tím, co může být ukázáno použitím slova.

(Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, The Phenomenology of Spirit)

Table of Contents

This work, which was conceived by Hegel as an introduction to his philosophical system and, at the same time, as its justification, grew into a unique presentation of the system itself. It influenced European intellectual history and philosophical learning in various subject-areas. The translation draws on the academic edition of 1980, taking from it notes, which are complemented by the classical notes of Georg Lasson, as well as by the translators’ own notes. The translation has developed out of an originally-projected critical revision of Jan Patočka’s 1960 translation.

This publication received an award for best translation of a scientific book from the Academia publishing house in 2020.

(The Face of the Other: On the thinking of Emmnanuel Levinas)

Table of Contents

Levinas develops his fundamental philosophical considerations from the concrete encounter with the other, who in his radical otherness places an ethical demand on the ego. This claim is particularly evident in the face and gaze of the other. Thus the “face of the other” belongs to the central figures of thought of Levinas’ philosophy. This anthology unfolds the core motif of the “face” in different directions (e. g. in conversation with philosophical tradition) and at the same time shows its effect in various fields: in art or in the “political”.

(Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Considerations on the Government of Poland and on Its Projected Reformation)

Table of Contents

Considerations on the Government of Poland is the last political work by J.-J. Rousseau, it was published for the first time only after his death. Rousseau wrote the Considerations in a response to the request of the members of the revolted Polish nobility to propose a reform of the Polish Constitution. In this work Rousseau discusses the possibility of the survival of the Polish nation face to the disappearance of the Polish state. In this regard, Rousseau anticipates the national movements and demonstrates the originality of his political thought. The numerous references to the Social Contract contained in the Considerations prove the unity of his political theory as well as the strength and ardour of his convictions even in his last years. The book contains the notes of the author and the translator as well as the index, bibliography and a short survey of political the situation in the 18th century Poland. This is the first Czech translation of this work.

In: Ch. Krijnen (ed.), Concepts of Normativity: Kant or Hegel?

Both Kant and Hegel are convinced that the state is essential for human coexistence and cannot be replaced by another institution. Their justification of the state and their understanding of it does, however, differ. Kant is a theorist of natural rights and social contract, while Hegel is known as a critic of both of these theories and a theorist of an ethical state. Chotas explains what these two claims actually mean and in what respects do they contradict each other. He considers also their consequences for the notion of the state within a broader context of philosophy of these two thinkers.

(Benjamin Constant, Principles of politics)

Table of Contents

The translated book is the key political work of the Swiss-French political writer and politician Benjamin Constant (1767–1830). Constant considers here the impact of the French revolution on political thought. The present publication is the translation of the manuscript version of the book (1806) that Constant could not publish at the time due to political reasons. This version of the book confirms him as a key representative of classical Liberalism.