Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 2020, 21 (2): 59-84 | DOI: 10.13060/gav.2020.011

The Gender Pay Gap in the Platform Economy: Comparing the Importance of Market and Organisational Dynamics on Two German Crowdworking Platforms

Anja-Kristin Abendroth
Bielefeld University

The rise of the platform economy has brought about crowdwork as a new form of flexible work where individuals solve specific problems or provide specific services or products in exchange for payment via online platforms. Survey data for crowdworkers in Germany collected by the 'Digital Future' collaborative research unit are used to compare gender inequalities in hourly pay among crowdworkers sampled from a marketplace platform and a micro-task platform. The results reveal that fathers earn higher hourly pay than mothers and childless women and men, but only on the marketplace platform. These differences can partly be explained by fathers being better positioned in the overall labour market and fathers' investment patterns in crowdwork, with longer seniority on the platform and quick task performance, which results in higher hourly pay. Investments in crowdwork and overall labour market positioning are only of modest importance on the micro-task platform. This points to different organisational settings and inequality regimes on the two platforms under study.

Klíčová slova: platform labour, platform economy, crowdwork, algorithmic control, gender inequalities, gender pay gap, flexibility

Přijato: 9. listopad 2020; Zveřejněno online: 13. leden 2021; Zveřejněno: 12. leden 2021Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Abendroth, Anja-Kristin. 2020. "The Gender Pay Gap in the Platform Economy: Comparing the Importance of Market and Organisational Dynamics on Two German Crowdworking Platforms." Gender a výzkum / Gender and Research 21(2):59-84.
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Acker, J. 1990. Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations. Gender & Society 4 (2): 139-158, https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. Adams, A. 2020. The Gender Wage Gap on an Online Labour Market: The Cost of Interruptions.
    3. CEPR Discussion Paper DP14294: 1-34, https://ssrn.com/abstract=3518636.
    4. Adams, A., J. Berg. 2017. When Home Affects Pay. An Analysis of the Gender Pay Gap Among Crowdworkers. SSRN Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048711. Retrieved 3/3/2020 (https://plu.mx/ssrn/a/?ssrn_id=3048711). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. Barzilay, A., A. Ben-David. 2017. Platform Inequality: Gender in the Gig-Economy. Seton Hall Law Review 47 (2): 393-431, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2995906. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    6. Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., D. Howcroft. 2014. Amazon Mechanical Turk and the Commodification of Labour. New Technology, Work and Employment 29 (3): 213-223, https://doi.org/10.1111/ntwe.12038. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    7. Bonin, H., U. Rinne. 2017. Omnibusbefragung zur Verbesserung der Datenlage neuer Beschäftigungsformen. Bonn: IZA Institute of Labour Economics. Retrieved 3/3/2020 (https://www.iza.org/de/publications/r/188/report- no-80-omnibusbefragung-zur-verbesserung-der-datenlage-neuer-beschaftigungsformen).
    8. Budig, M. J. 2006a. Gender, Self-Employment, and Earnings. Gender & Society 20 (6): 725-753, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206293232. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    9. Budig, M. J. 2006b. Intersections on the Road to Self-Employment: Gender, Family and Occupational Class. Social Forces 84 (4): 2223-2239, https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2006.0082. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    10. Chung, H., T. van der Lippe. 2018. Flexible Working, Work-Life Balance, and Gender Equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research 4 (2): 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. Cook, C., R. Diamond, J. Hall, J. A. List, P. Oyer. 2018. The Gender Earnings Gap in the Gig Economy: Evidence from over a Million Rideshare Drivers. NBER Working Paper 24732, https://web.stanford.edu/~diamondr/UberPayGap.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    12. Dechant, A., H.-P. Blossfeld. 2015. Changes in the Division of Labor Within Highly Educated German Couples When the First Child Is Born. Zeitschrift für Familienforschung 27 (3): 121-144, https://doi.org/10.3224/zff.v27i3.21279. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. Durward, D., I. Blohm, J. M. Leimeister. 2016. Rags to Riches - How Signaling Behavior Causes a Power Shift in Crowdsourcing Markets. SSRN Journal, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3159165. Retrieved 3/3/2020 (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3159165). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. England, P. 2010. The Gender Revolution: Uneven and Stalled. Gender and Society 24 (2): 149-166, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210361475. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    15. England, P. 1992. Comparable Worth. Theories and Evidence. New York: De Gruyter.
    16. Eurofound. 2015. New Forms of Employment. Luxembourg: European Union, https://doi.org/10.2806/937385. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. Folkerts, F., V. Schreck, S. Riazy, K. Simbeck. 2019. Analyzing Sentiments of German Job References. Pp. 1-6 in IEEE International Conference on Humanized Computing and Communication (HCC), Laguna Hills, CA. Retrieved 3/3/2020 (https://iug.htw-berlin.de/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/AnalyzingSentimentsOfGermanJobReferences_copyright.pdf).
    18. Galperin, H. 'This Gig is Not for Women': Gender Stereotyping in Online Hiring. 2019. SSRN Journal, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3501207. Retrieved 3/3/2020 (https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3501207). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    19. Giard N, P. Hemsen, M. Hesse et al. 2019. Technical Report, Interdisziplinäre Befragung von Crowdworkern.Bielefeld: Forschungsschwerpunkt Digitale Zukunft. Retrieved 3/3/2020 (https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2936990/2936992/TechnicalReport_Crowdworkerbefragung_FS_DigitaleZukunft.pdf).
    20. Gomez-Herrera, E., M. Bertin, F. Mueller-Langer. 2017. Trade, Competition and Welfare in Global Online Labour Markets. A 'Gig Economy' Case Study. Digital Economy Working Paper, JRC Technical Reports 5. Seville, Spain: European Commission. Retrieved 3/3/2020 (https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/trade-competition-and-welfare-global-online-labour-markets-gig-economy-case-study). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. Howcroft, D., B. Bergvall-Kåreborn. 2019. A Typology of Crowdwork Platforms. Work, Employment and Society 33 (1): 21-38, https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018760136. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    22. Huws, U., S. Joyce. 2016. Crowd Working Survey. The Size of Germany´s 'Gig Economy' Revealed for the First Time. University of Hertfordshire: UNI Europa Global Union; Foundation for European Progressive Studies (FEPS). Retrieved 3/3/2020 (https://www.feps-europe.eu/resources/publications/447:size-of-germany-s-gig-economy-revealed-for-the-first-time.html.)
    23. International Labor Office (ILO). 2018. Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in the Online World. Geneva: ILO. Retrieved 3/3/20 (https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---dcomm/---publ/documents/publication/wcms_645337.pdf).
    24. Kuhn, K. M., A. Maleki. 2017. Micro-entrepreneurs, Dependent Contractors, and Instaserfs. Understanding Online Labor Platform Workforces. Academy of Management Perspectives 31 (3): 183-200, https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2015.0111. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    25. Kelly, E. L., S. K. Ammons, K. Chermack, P. Moen. 2010. Gendered Challenge, Gendered Response. Confronting the Ideal Worker Norm in a White-Collar Organization. Gender & Society 24: 281-303, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243210372073. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    26. Kenney, M., J. Zysman. 2019. Work and Value Creation in the Platform Economy. Pp. 13-41 in Kovalainen, A., S. Vallas (eds). Work and Labor in the Digital Age. Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. Kirchner, S. 2019. Arbeiten in der Plattformökonomie: Grundlagen und Grenzen von 'Cloudwork' und 'Gigwork'. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie (71) 1: 3-25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-019-00587-w. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    28. Lechmann, D. S. J., C. Schnabel. 2012. Why Is There a Gender Earnings Gap in Self-employment? A Decomposition Analysis with German Data. Journal of European Labor Studies 1 (6): 1-25, https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9012-1-6. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    29. Leimeister, M., D. Durward, S. Zogaj. 2016. Crowdworker in Deutschland. Eine empirische Studie zum Arbeitsumfeld auf externen Crowdsourcing-Plattformen. HBS Working Paper Series 323. Düsseldorf: Hans Böckler Stiftung. Retrieved 3/3/2020 (https://hdl.handle.net/10419/146407).
    30. Litman, L., J. Robinson, Z. Rosen, C. Rosenzweig, J. Waxman, L. M. Bates. 2020. The Persistence of Pay Inequality: The Gender Pay Gap in an Anonymous Online Labor Market, PLoS ONE 15 (2): e0229383, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    31. Lott, Y., H. Chung. 2016. Gender Discrepancies in the Outcomes of Schedule Control on Overtime Hours and Income in Germany. European Sociological Review 32 (6): 752-765, https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcw032. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    32. Lott, Y., A.-K. Abendroth. 2020. The Non-Use of Telework in an Ideal Worker Culture: Why Women Perceive More Cultural Barriers. Community, Work & Family 54 (1): 1-19, https://http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2020.1817726. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    33. Misra, J., M. Murray-Close. 2014. The Gender Wage Gap in the United States and Cross Nationally. Sociology Compass 8 (11): 1281-1295, https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12213. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    34. Pesole, A., C. Urzí Brancati, E. Fernández-Macías, F. Biagi, I. González Vázquez. (eds.). 2018. Platform Workers in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/742789. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    35. Phelps, E. S. 1972. The Statistical Theory of Racism and Sexism. The American Economic Review 62 (4): 659-661.
    36. Pongratz, H., S. Bormann. 2017. Online-Arbeit auf Internet-Plattformen. Empirische Befunde zum 'Crowdworking'. Deutschland. Arbeits- und Industriesoziologische Studien 10 (2): 158-181.
    37. Ridgeway, C. L., S. J. Correll. 2004. Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations. Gender & Society 18 (4): 510-531, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265269. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    38. Ridgeway, C. L. 2001. Gender, Status, and Leadership. Social Issues 57 (4): 637-655, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00233. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    39. Risman, B. J. 2004. Gender as a Social Structure: Theory Wrestling with Activism. Gender & Society 18 (4): 429-450, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265349. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    40. Schor, J. B., W. Attwood-Charles, M. Cansoy, I. Ladegaard, R. Wengronowitz. 2020. Dependence and Precarity in the Platform Economy. Theory and Society 49: 833-861, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09408-y. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    41. Serfling, O. 2018. Crowdworking Monitor Nr. 1. Für das Verbundprojekt "Crowdworking
    42. Monitor. Hochschule Rhein-Waal: BMAS. Retrieved 3/3/2020 (https://www.bmas.de/DE/Presse/Meldungen/2018/ausmass-von-plattformarbeit-in-deutschland-hoeher-als-erwartet.html).
    43. Stier, H., H. Lewin-Epstein. 2003. Time to Work: A Comparative Analysis of Preferences for Working Hours. Work and Occupations 30 (3): 302-326, https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888403253897. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    44. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., D. Avent-Holt. 2019. Relational Inequalities: An Organizational Approach. Cambridge, UK: Oxford University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    45. Treas, J., S. Drobnič. 2010. Dividing the Domestic: Women, Men and Household Work in Cross-National Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    46. Vallas, S., J. B. Schor. 2020. What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy. Annual Review of Sociology 46: 273-294, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    47. Wood, A. J., M. Graham, V. Lehdonvirta, I. Hjorth. 2019. Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work, Employment and Society 33: 56-75, https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017018785616. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    48. Williams, C. L., C. Muller, K. Kilanski. 2012. Gendered Organizations in the New Economy. Gender & Society 26: 549-573, 10.1177/0891243212445466. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    49. Williams, J. C., M. Blair-Loy, J. L. Berdahl. 2013. Cultural Schemas, Social Class, and the Flexibility Stigma. Journal of Social Issues 69 (2): 209-234, https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12012. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    50. BY-NC Anja-Kristin Abendroth, 2020.BY-NC Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, 2020.
    51. Anja-Kristin Abendroth is a junior professor for technical and social change at Bielefeld University and part of the interdisciplinary research programme 'Digital Future'. Her research interests include gender inequalities, work-life balance, flexible working, the digital future of work, and organisational inequality regimes. Contact e-mail: anja.abendroth@uni-bielefeld.de.

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah